tinsel:

https://www.thecable.ng/icymi-inec-not-bound-to-electronically-transmit-results-says-supreme-court-in-osun-guber-case/amp

INEC IS NOT BOUND TO ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT RESULTS

As a smart Nigeria this is the end result of Obi and Atiku's case in Tribunal..😃😃😃😃😃

tinsel:

https://www.thecable.ng/icymi-inec-not-bound-to-electronically-transmit-results-says-supreme-court-in-osun-guber-case/amp

In the event of a conflict between the record of accredited voters in the BVAS and the ticked names of the registered voters due to human errors in the ticking of the names in the register of voters, the BVAS record shall be used,”
In this case of presidential election; the above ruling shall govern.

denko:
The New Electoral law was signed after Osun Election does that answer your curiosity

It was signed in February,osun and ekiti were June and July.obi is gone

TheDarkHorse:

.., with this from the supreme court.., Ọtilọ

Jagaban don become President be that because na this related Osun talk be the koko for the President-Select issue wey been dey Tribunal..

GOD Have Mercy.. 😰😓
It's Another 8 years of horror in Nigeria..

tell Obi and kwankwanso to go back to PDP with their supporters of they want to defeat APC 2027 then pick tambuwai as president candidate...

Walamide:
A win for pdp in Osun but the same yardstick will be used to decide the presidential election.. I see a big loss at tribunal for LP/PDP.

The funny thing is that PDP chieftains and even Obidients are quick to commend the judgement hailing the judges and describing it as landmark. However, when this same template is used to determine their petition against them at the PEPT, then watch their reactions. Fair they say is foul and foul is fair.
Are you guys aware that the lead council who secured the judgement in favour of Sen. Ademola Adeleke against Gov. Oyetola in the person of Mr. Onyechi Ikpeazu is also one of the lead councils in Peter Obi’s petition? I’m trying to imagine what would be his arguments at the PEPT as regards to the issue of electronic transmission. You see lawyers are chameleons .

Ofunaofu:
These are beer parlour analysis, we are yet to get the CTC of the judgement


Are you aware of what is called emerging new facts

INEC is bound by the Electoral law and it's election guidelines to transmit results electronically. The INEC chairman made that point clear severally at different foras that the results of the 2023 general election, i.e polling units results will be transmitted electronically to the IREV real time on the election day

It doesn't matter what the INEC chairman said. His word is not law. The only law duly gazetted is the Electoral Act 2023 and the so called automatic transmission of the results is not required. If you can find where its absence negates the results please it here and let's have a proper argument.

However, the appellants failed to prove their case of over-voting.

INEC IS NOT BOUND TO ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT RESULTS

Notably, the apex court emphasised that there is no law that requires presiding officers to transmit by BVAS the number of accredited voters or accreditation of the polls to the database or backend server of INEC as claimed by the appellants.

With this Atiku and Obi dey play. They cant win their case against tinubu at all

Ofunaofu:
These are beer parlour analysis, we are yet to get the CTC of the judgement


Are you aware of what is called emerging new facts

INEC is bound by the Electoral law and it's election guidelines to transmit results electronically. The INEC chairman made that point clear severally at different foras that the results of the 2023 general election, i.e polling units results will be transmitted electronically to the IREV real time on the election day

Are you guyz BOT or coconut heads ?? after reading through all that was said you are still reminiscing the same old shit ... at the last hearing Peter Obi counsel quickly pushed for an adjournment, is that not a tip

Someone gave a report of Judiciary proceedings if you think its a lie at least give us the Truth you have lets compare,

Obedient are worst than Zombies, their mental state is a very hopeless one

BreconHills:


It doesn't matter what the INEC chairman said. His word is not law. The only law duly gazetted is the Electoral Act 2023 and the so called automatic transmission of the results is not required. If you can find where its absence negates the results please it here and let's have a proper argument.

Then Tinubu should stop parading himself as president elect because it was the same INEC chairman that said it

Tinubu got to wait until the court declare him winner

ginggerxy:
How do you hold credible election when the facilities provided to conduct credible election is not been put to use? Why was money wasted purchase those devices if the manual process were so credible? See some of you are becoming more stupid by day because illegality seems to favour you. Stupidity and illegality must never be allowed to stand as that will create endless cycle of illegality . Sane society is not built on illegality. Criminals like you will always will condemn an Internet fraudster but support political criminals because it serves your immediate purpose.

bvas worked that's why pple like ortom Ayade ikpeazu Lost Senate elections... That's LP won Abuja lagos... Anyone thinking LP can win president ahead of APC PDP is obviously deluded and myopic... APC PDP remains the only parties with structure and outreach to win president.. the rest are regional Parties

Ofunaofu:


Yes, the 2022 Electoral law and it's guidelines

Osun election was conducted by same law

maestroferddi:
You are not making sense...

There is no way the Supreme Court will undermine an authenticated result...

If your argument is that the uploaded results were not real, then it could be understood...

But saying that INEC could allocate results suo motu does not hold water.

The opposition only need to prove that INEC results as used for declaring the winner were FALSE...

The Supreme Court cannot dismissive overwhelming evidence and then accept a manipulated result from INEC just because they are the electoral umpires...

There are a large body of instances where the Supreme Court threw INEC results out of the window...

Firstly,where is the overwhelming evidence?
Secondly cite instances

maestroferddi:
Let's see how Mahmoud would confute several video evidences of him stating empathically that he would transmit results electronically...

We are waiting to see how the tribunal and the defence will undermine this fundamental evidence...

The moment the intention to deceive and subvert has been proved beyond reasonable doubt, no judge will rule otherwise...

someone can say he/she will bring heaven to earth but if he/she doesn't do it and there's no law to back what he/she said plus there are no consequence to it, then you can't do anything. Where there are no laws, there are no offense.

chidiokay:



Are you guyz BOT or coconut heads ?? after reading through all that was said you are still reminiscing the same old shit ... at the last hearing Peter Obi counsel quickly pushed for an adjournment, is that not a tip

Someone gave a report of Judiciary proceedings if you think its a lie at least give us the Truth you have lets compare,

Obedient are worst than Zombies, their mental state is a very hopeless one

Imagine

So you don't even know the reason for the adjournment
You are a zombie

MadamExcellency:


Why did you jump the following emphasis by the Apex Court as stated below?

The BVAS, INEC voter register or form EC8A showing the number of votes cast at each polling unit are the only admissible evidence that can be used to ascertain over-voting.

The Labour Party and PDP petitions are centered on BVAS not IREV.

Secondly, BVAS exposes Over voting while IREV exposes votes manipulation and reassignment and APC didn't contest vote reassignment as in the case with LabourParty petition

I swear to God you're very intelligent and sensitive.

This is just what it is, but these brainless APC morons are trying to white wash Supreme Court judgement in Osun and turn it upside down to their own emotional advantages.

These fools know Tinubu is gone, they're just trynna cajole the public into thinking Tinubu has a strong defence, Lmao.

Ofunaofu:
These are beer parlour analysis, we are yet to get the CTC of the judgement


Are you aware of what is called emerging new facts

INEC is bound by the Electoral law and it's election guidelines to transmit results electronically. The INEC chairman made that point clear severally at different foras that the results of the 2023 general election, i.e polling units results will be transmitted electronically to the IREV real time on the election day

INEC Chairman announcing that doesn't making it a law.

tinsel:
From the above, we can see that Obi and Atiku have no case in the tribunal. What they are doing is a mere waste of time and probably to continue giving their supporters hope especially the noisy Obidients.

You posted, same you analyzed.

Nonsense, u just posted from a biased standpoint.

seunmsg:




The court also noted that the information at the backend saver might not be accurate because the BVAS may fail to transmit records for several reasons including poor internet connection, loss of battery power, failure of INEC official to properly press the submit button etc. SJC Emmanuel Agim.

With the above, the non transmission of results immediately from the polling units to IREV is dead and buried. Case already resolved in favour of Tinubu even before the commencement of trial 🤣🤣🤣

That was in reference to voter accreditation data not results.
You guys are mixing things up.
Simple English comprehension

You were part of the people that ask him questions and he responded.

Hope your thinking capacitor has been restored.

maestroferddi:
AFTER the election, are you reading what you are typing?

Do you change the offside rule after using mago mago to score an illegal goal?

Try and do some thinking na...

HNICEARTH:
Notably, the apex court emphasised that there is no law that requires presiding officers to transmit by BVAS the number of accredited voters or accreditation of the polls to the database or backend server of INEC as claimed by the appellants.

“Therefore, the case of the appellants that the presiding officers were bound to instantly or on-the-spot transmit the number of accredited voters in the BVAS to the backend server or database of INEC has no support,” Emmanuel Agim who read the lead judgment said.



Keep twisting realities and spreading propaganda and deceit.
The supreme court never talked about transmitting of results but rather transmitting of accredited voters. They are 2 different issues.
INEC are bound by the law (electoral act) to transmit results from PU in real time

Yes transmit results but not in realtime and not necessarily electronic

OGHENAOGIE:
bvas worked that's why pple like ortom Ayade ikpeazu Lost Senate elections... That's LP won Abuja lagos... Anyone thinking LP can win president ahead of APC PDP is obviously deluded and myopic... APC PDP remains the only parties with structure and outreach to win president.. the rest are regional Parties

You're really ignorant of the whole process of the presidential and NASS election. The NASS election results were uploaded in real time but the presidential results were not uploaded in real and INEC came to say they were technical glitch as if the election were not done same time. But here is you in my mention displaying your ignorance of the whole process. The results of the presidential election were not uploaded in real time. They were rigged at the LGA collation centers. We saw the results the video of the mutilated results. You saw them too.

DMerciful:
Ofcourse INEC is not bound to electronically transmit result however it is bound to snap the form EC8A and send as a picture to the IREV. Two different things

Yes which they have done

tinsel:
From the above, we can see that Obi and Atiku have no case in the tribunal. What they are doing is a mere waste of time and probably to continue giving their supporters hope especially the noisy Obidients.

Why did we spend billions of Naira on electronic transmission systems for INEC?
The type of Nigeria remaining in the yesteryears shall be the country for your lot when progressive groups leave this unprogressing Nigeria before long.

tinsel:

https://www.thecable.ng/icymi-inec-not-bound-to-electronically-transmit-results-says-supreme-court-in-osun-guber-case/amp

so BVAS na Scam

even Nigeria as a country na Scam

onuman:

Why did we spend billions of Naira on electronic transmission systems for INEC?
The type of Nigeria remaining in the yesteryears shall be the country for your lot when progressive groups leave this unprogressing Nigeria before long.

my brother ask them

Ofunaofu:
These are beer parlour analysis, we are yet to get the CTC of the judgement


Are you aware of what is called emerging new facts

INEC is bound by the Electoral law and it's election guidelines to transmit results electronically. The INEC chairman made that point clear severally at different foras that the results of the 2023 general election, i.e polling units results will be transmitted electronically to the IREV real time on the election day

SC is talking you're saying INEC chairman made it clear many times.
Who is INEC chairman ?

overall90:


You are calling him mumu when you are infact the mumu.
From the write up, can you point out where the court said results does not have to be transmitted electronically.

what supreme court is saying is that the original is better than the duplicate. EC8A is the original while whatever is in IREV is a duplicate. More emphasis is on EC8A than BVAS because it is the original where other results or duplicates are gotten from. Therefore, electronic transmission is rubbish so long as you can provide EC8A. Bookmark this post

tinsel:
From the above, we can see that Obi and Atiku have no case in the tribunal. What they are doing is a mere waste of time and probably to continue giving their supporters hope especially the noisy Obidients.

I think it will be good to see the CTC of the judgment before making such a conclusion as you have done. The reason is that the supreme court ruled in the past that INEC regulations can be considered laws governing the conduct of any election so long as they are not in conflict with the electoral act or the Constitution. And the electronic transmission of results was mandated by the INEC regulation for the 2023 general election.

By the way, it will be naive to think the opposition does not have enough EC8A original duplicates to prove their case in court.

tinsel:
From the above, we can see that Obi and Atiku have no case in the tribunal. What they are doing is a mere waste of time and probably to continue giving their supporters hope especially the noisy Obidients.

Unfortunately for you and your postulations, the Supreme Court can overrule itself and can change its position on a particular issue. The Electoral Act said INEC can choose any method to transmit the results and once it picks a particular method, it is bound by it. In this instance, INEC indeed in a press statement picked a particular method.
Again, legally speaking, no two cases are the same.

Ofunaofu:
These are beer parlour analysis, we are yet to get the CTC of the judgement


Are you aware of what is called emerging new facts

INEC is bound by the Electoral law and it's election guidelines to transmit results electronically. The INEC chairman made that point clear severally at different foras that the results of the 2023 general election, i.e polling units results will be transmitted electronically to the IREV real time on the election day

Supreme Court Judgement na bear pallor gist ? Ok continue .those with blind mind can not see even if their eyes is bigger than their head .