senatordave1:


Inec can interpret it to mean anything they like

With this your reply, I pity your generation.

senatordave1:


You fall back to the copies of the agents and police.by the way,no one is alleging manipulation at collation point.

The cases is simple. INEC announced results that do not exist anywhere, both on IREV and on paper copies at every level of collation points to favor APC.
To cover up their lies they uploaded blurred images.
I have said it before, cover-ups are more demanding than the actual deeds.
Just like you tried to cover up your lies today on the Profs testimony by quoting an irrelevant portion of the proceeding when asked to provide evidence of your false claims.

senatordave1:


The electoral act supercedes the guidelines

EA Section 60(5)
(5) The presiding offcer shall transfer the result including the total number of accredited voters and the result of the ballot in a manner as prescribed by the Commission.

Do you understand the bolded

Egoat:

Omo.. The bolded tho.
These people dey read extensively before dey face judges?

😂 😂 E shock you?

senatordave1:


Inec can interpret it to mean anything they like

INEC cannot interpret it to mean anything because they made several sensitisation video's which they keey circulating daily on their youthbe and twitter page on voting and collation process

engineerboat:



EA Section 60(5)
(5) The presiding offcer shall transfer the result including the total number of accredited voters and the result of the ballot in a manner as prescribed by the Commission.

Do you understand the bolded

The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

sonnie10:

The cases is simple. INEC announced results that do not exist anywhere, both on IREV and on paper copies at every level of collation points to favor APC.
To cover up their lies they uploaded blurred images.
I have said it before, cover-ups are more demanding than the actual deeds.
Just like you tried to cover up your lies today on the Profs testimony by quoting an irrelevant portion of the proceeding when asked to provide evidence of your false claims.

The sensible thing to do is to cross check other copies and see who is lying

Atm99:


With this your reply, I pity your generation.

And yours kid

engineerboat:



INEC cannot interpret it to mean anything because they made several sensitisation video's which they keey circulating daily on their youthbe and twitter page on voting and collation process

Prove before the court non transmission

senatordave1:


The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

That is a big lie, at no time did they say otherwise.

I put it to you to shiw where this was done before the election


Evidences aboud where they outlined the process.

So I put it out to you to show where and whenthis was done before the election

senatordave1:


The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

INEC not transmit electronically as stipulated in the guidelines.

engineerboat:


INEC not transmit electronically as stipulated in the guidelines.

Prove before court

engineerboat:


That is a big lie, at no time did they say otherwise.

I put it to you to shiw where this was done before the election


Evidences aboud where they outlined the process.

So I put it out to you to show where and whenthis was done before the election

You will prove it unit by unit in court

Go to court ,now we're in the court you can't appear in the court,it's a shame for him to appear in the court,shame on Eye Neck, shame on their staff and lead counsel, if not these liar called lawyer are shameless how could you advocate for a corrupt institution like Eye Neck.

senatordave1:


The sensible thing to do is to cross check other copies and see who is lying

The result INEC announced in favor of APC does not exist anywhere. It’s was made up .
Just like you made up stories about the Profs testimony.
Till now, you are still struggling to find evidence to support your claims

Kukutenla:

Stealing is taking for yourself something that you do not own or have rights over. E.g. claiming Benue and Rivers as part of states won by APC when LP clearly won there

How do I know if what I take belongs to someone else, is there an arbiter of property?

Is there an arbiter of electoral votes? If the arbiter says Tinubu owns victory in Benue and Rivers, then how could it be said that he stole?

senatordave1:


Which of overrwhelming evidence apart from irev copies on which won't hold water? I asked you to show figures of the obi leading tinubu,you can't boy

Is it not same irev you're using to claim victory for Tinubu?
Or is it only acceptable only for Tinubu and no one else?
If apc can steal two states in broad daylight, what more can't they do in the remaining states?

senatordave1:


You will prove it unit by unit in court

I'm still waiting for your Acclaimed press on manual transmission and jettison of IREV

senatordave1:


Obi rigged in anambra in 2010.all oresidens from 1960 rigged.by the way, why hasn't obi shown us how he won

Where's the evidence that all presidents rigged? Including buhari? Or Nnamdi Azikiwe in an election conducted by the British?
Having failed on the international stage you're running back home to defend your thievery?
Wow

senatordave1:


You will prove it unit by unit in court

Garfield1 I'm waiting for your press where inec said they had jettison IREV

BabaRamota1980:


How do I know if what I take belongs to someone else, is there an arbiter of property?

Is there an arbiter of electoral votes? If the arbiter says Tinubu owns victory in Benue and Rivers, then how could it be said that he stole?

You'll know because you should know what belongs to you and what doesn't.

If the arbiter's result screen shows otherwise from what it announced, given that the arbiter is under Tinubu's party's govt, is that not a clear case of stealing? Anybody can declare anything, it's the facts to back it up that confirms the authenticity of the declaration or otherwise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avKb3eUC6Kk

engineerboat:


Garfield1 I'm waiting for your press where inec said they had jettison IREV

He has no proof of that. He is a pathological liar ..

senatordave1:


A court already said inec can transmit as they like

I think engaging you is a waste of time.

BabaRamota1980:


How do I know if what I take belongs to someone else, is there an arbiter of property?

Is there an arbiter of electoral votes? If the arbiter says Tinubu owns victory in Benue and Rivers, then how could it be said that he stole?

Oga even a toddler knows what belongs to him and what doesn't. This your question is silly with all due respect. You're making it seem like it was inec that made a mistake while it was APC that rigged then got INEC to stamp the rigging by declaring the rigged results.

The arbiter should rely on results as transmitted from polling units and not from thin air. That's what the rule says. Anything outside of that is fraudulent

engineerboat:



I'm still waiting for your Acclaimed press on manual transmission and jettison of IREV

The burden is on you to prove it not me

Kukutenla:

Is it not same irev you're using to claim victory for Tinubu?
Or is it only acceptable only for Tinubu and no one else?
If apc can steal two states in broad daylight, what more can't they do in the remaining states?

Prove it in the others

You are to be laughed at. Do you know how Obi got his mandate back? Let me explain a bit to you. Ngige and Ubas were fighting. They agreed in the end to remove Ngige at all costs. They presented results against Ngige. That could not have done but for the influence of UBAs connection with Obj. Do you know how many mandates Tinubu retrieved from courts? Go and be lest s
arcastic

h

They want to humiliate mahmood and the election defrauder, they are even surprised that the LP is this prepared. Go to court, go to court, you want to play with someone that reclaimed his governorship mandate, not once or twice but three times, Obi is mean and knows his onions, I foresee the break up of Nigeria if the judges try anything funny, the evidences are too glaring to toy with[/quote]

Frank688915:
See dem mumu ipob, so na like this una go dey continue 😂

Cry me a river.

senatordave1:


Prove it in the others

Did I hear you say prove?
Have you proven that the testimony by the prof about IREV being a collation system was inconsistent as you have campaigned severally on here today?

sonnie10:

Did I hear you say prove?
Have you proven that the testimony by the prof about IREV being a collation system was inconsistent as you have campaigned severally on here today?

Even if it is consistent,his analysis is incomplete as it was done with secondary evidence

senatordave1:


The burden is on you to prove it not me

You're the one that alleged

Here is your own word

senatordave1:


The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

So i put to you that INEC did,but here you are saying otherwise so unless you want me to tell you that you're not a man of your word, prove otherwise or you accept that you goof on this one