ogunijebu18:

Do they not act like slaves tho?

Do your Yoruba pastors not act like false prophets

senatordave1:


Even if it is consistent,his analysis is incomplete as it was done with secondary evidence that was collected, analyzed, processed and stored by INEC

Fixed!
Did anyone contest this?

senatordave1:


The burden is on you to prove it not me

Here you go again, you are caught red handed on this one,the cobwebs entangled you already

Here is your claim, it's left to you to prove it not me, I've told you already with evidence that INEC did not, so be a man enough to prove your assumption

senatordave1:


The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

senatordave1:


Even if it is consistent,his analysis is incomplete as it was done with secondary evidence

You cannot run away from your shadows

senatordave1:


The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

Where and when dis INEC say this

Fashionista01:

Cry me a river.

you want make we reason mk i control you...i no dey joke with ibo babe though 😜

engineerboat:



You cannot run away from your shadows




Where and when dis INEC say this

Prove that inec didn't use electronic

engineerboat:



Here you go again, you are caught red handed on this one,the cobwebs entangled you already

Here is your claim, it's left to you to prove it not me, I've told you already with evidence that INEC did not, so be a man enough to prove your assumption

You didn't prove any thing.you must bring your proofs unit by unit

senatordave1:


Prove that inec didn't use electronic

You have consistently affirmed that INEC used electronic technology.
You have also consistently said that the Prof relied only on these electronic information on IREV for his work.

You have also said the work of the Prof is inconsistent or incomplete because he did not incorporate the paper copies.

Do you agree with him that the incomplete data for IREV, cannot be used to determine who won the elections?

senatordave1:


You didn't prove any thing.you must bring your proofs unit by unit

You want a unit by unit proof to match them with blurred documents on IREV?
I was thinking you were only a liar, I didn’t know you had other underlaying issues.

sonnie10:

You want a unit by unit proof to match them with blurred documents on IREV?
I was thinking you were only a liar, I didn’t know you had other underlaying issues.

That is the standard of proof required by law.see udom vs umanasuora 2015

senatordave1:


That is the standard of proof required by law.see udom vs umanasuora 2015

Before or after the electoral act?
Can you tell us why they did not request for the IREV data in that judgment ?

sogodihno:


It is not a theory it is reality, the only alternative is to win south and north central overwhelmingly, which Peter obi didn't

And who told you that he didn't win any of these?

00FFT00:


Have you bothered to read Clause 48 of the INEC Regulation?. I know you don't read, so let me paraphrase for your benefit.

“The clause states that the result that is electronically transmitted will be employed for the purpose of collation and announcement of result. Therefore, in a situation of incorrectness or suspicion of manipulation, the electronically transmitted result supersedes other forms of result appearing before the collation officer.”

Do you see where your tons of lies and showboating fall flat on its face?.

The guy know what he is doing. He just want to damping obidients zeal and nothing more. No amount of corrections you throw at him, he won't take it but instead still making more unfound argument not in law or outright lie to justify his assertion.

My kind of gee...

Trust22:


LOL... I FOR JUST CALL YOU MUMU BUT LET ME BE POLITE

sonnie10:

Before or after the electoral act?
Can you tell us why they did not request for the IREV data in that judgment ?

The 2022 electoral act didn't affect terms of evidences.the osun judgment killed irev

senatordave1:


The 2022 electoral act didn't affect terms of evidences.the osun judgment killed irev

Does the Court make laws? Is the electoral act not a law?
Is IREV not part of the electoral act?
Is the court selective on what law to enforce?

senatordave1:


You didn't prove any thing.you must bring your proofs unit by unit

You're the one alleging here

senatordave1:


The commission says it chose manual.again,you cannot prove that inec did not transfer electronically

So be man enough to accept your goof

senatordave1:


The 2022 electoral act didn't affect terms of evidences.the osun judgment killed irev

Please can you quote that part of the judgement for us. You just like lying with reckless abandon. I have told you that it was the same lawyers that cracked the case still holding forth for Obi and LP and you cannot know more than them when it comes to election matters. Stop disturbing yourself and lying around.

IfnobeGod20:

The guy know what he is doing. He just want to damping obidients zeal and nothing more. No amount of corrections you throw at him, he won't take it but instead still making more unfound argument not in law or outright lie to justify his assertion.

I agree with my learned brother Kekere-Ekun, JSC, that the failure to follow the Manual and Guidelines which were made in exercise of the powers conferred by the Electoral Act, cannot in itself render the election void. And this should not be understood to mean that the innovation of the Card Reader is in conflict with the relevant Sections of the Electoral Act.



Permit me, again, Your noble Lordships, to state, with emphasis that the Card Reader was introduced by INEC with good intentions. However, a distinction must always be drawn between the effect of a law made by the legislature (National Assembly: i.e. the Electoral Act: the Constitution, etc) and a rule of procedure (by whatever name called) by any other authority with a view to facilitating the smooth running or operation of a given institution. Breach of the former can be severer and fatal than breach in case of the latter. In this appeal, Section 138(2) decisively settles the



The above is from justice tanko Muhammed of the supreme court in wike vs dakuku

IfnobeGod20:

Please can you quote that part of the judgement for us. You just like lying with reckless abandon. I have told you that it was the same lawyers that cracked the case still holding forth for Obi and LP and you cannot know more than them when it comes to election matters. Stop disturbing yourself and lying around.

let me make it clear that the provisions of the Electoral Act are superior to any letter or directive of the Independent National Electoral Commission. That superiority is clearly stated in Section 138(2) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) as follows:-

"An act or omission which may be contrary to an instruction or direction or directive of the Commission or of an officer appointed for the purpose of the election but which is not contrary to the provisions of this Act shall not of itself be a ground for questioning the election."



Thus, when the Independent National Electoral Commission directed that only card reader machine shall be used for accreditation and when it failed, its staff resorted to manual accreditation, that infraction did not for any reason amount to a ground for questioning the election of the appellant.


From justice nwali nguta

engineerboat:



You're the one alleging here



So be man enough to accept your goof

Lp and pdp are the one alleging non transmission

sonnie10:
Does the Court make laws? Is the electoral act not a law?
Is IREV not part of the electoral act?
Is the court selective on what law to enforce?

Irev is not

senatordave1:


Prove that inec didn't use electronic

The proof happening in court is a joke to u abi

senatordave1:


Good.the one inec holds is the most important...
Assuming there's a rerun in 1800) units,that's about 10 mil voters.maximum average turnout is 30#% that is 3 mil.but scattered polls usually experience lower or abysmal turnout but let's leave it at 3 mil.higgest obi can get is 2mil which cannot change anything.in reality,less than 2 mil will come out

Yet INEC chairman is running away from being served the subpoena?

senatordave1:


Did Hillary not accuse trump of rigging,did trump not cry of rigging? Which Nigerian election was ever 100% ? Indomie generation

This one will not be same as usual.

aswani:


Subpoena means: Ordering a person to attend a court.

Obi's lawyers are about to run out of time.

Each of the subpoena witness submitted statement of witness on Oath. SWO .

Why are you claiming or acting like you did not hear where the lawyers were refering to their statements and paragraphs in their statements?

Was the drama yesterday between your lawyers, LP lawyers and Prof not because Prof wanted to make correction to change a typographical error of Rivers state to Benue state.

IamV:


The Court now adjourns till Monday June 19, 2023 at 2pm for the continuation of hearing.


--------------------

Thank you everyone who kept this thread going and my beautiful silent observers, you're all appreciated.

For now,take care and have a lovely weekend ahead,see you all on Monday ,2:00pm.

#Onelove.

Thank you.

senatordave1:


Irev is not

Why was it brought during the presidential elections?
Why was Yakubu caught on camera saying that he will use it?
Why did they upload some documents on it ?
Why did INEC produce and issued those documents as CTC of the presidential results?
Is that why INEC have objected to those evidence?

Fashionista01:

Thank you.

You're welcome.
Sweet dreams & do have a lovely weekend ahead.

senatordave1:


Lp and pdp are the one alleging non transmission

While You are the one claiming that they Said that They will only use manual.

So for me not say that You're spreading false information, redeem yourself now

stocktaker:
There are some things going on in Court IamV is withholding here he only type what he want you to know

It seems you are preview to those things happening that isn't depicted here, why don't you add them or create another thread to give a complete overview of happenings?