BrownSugq:

Lol

You know you are lying

danijesus:
Obi is coming

tinsel:

This lady was a labour party candidate in the last election and even took INEC to court. Do you think these two things did not destroy her evidence alone?

chokekachy:


https://ait.live/breaking-labour-party-witness-insists-no-glitches-on-inec-site-on-presidential-election-day-says-her-report-was-down-loaded-online/

chokekachy:


https://ait.live/breaking-labour-party-witness-insists-no-glitches-on-inec-site-on-presidential-election-day-says-her-report-was-down-loaded-online/

MT:
The witness was:
1. A member of the Labour Party
2. She represented herself and not AWS.
3. She took ownership of AWS data
4. She claimed to be subpoenaed directly instead of through AWS.

She was a tainted witness. Her testimony would never count.

favor914:
Quite obvious that you cannot read, & comprehend.

MT:
The witness was:
1. A member of the Labour Party
2. She represented herself and not AWS.
3. She took ownership of AWS data
4. She claimed to be subpoenaed directly instead of through AWS.

She was a tainted witness. Her testimony would never count.

id4sho:
A town hall meeting

Richb44:
It's now obvious most obedient are illiterates for not even understanding this post omo I'm anyone who still dey argue with this people na mumu

sangresan:
Besides, all this is academic exercise.

As declared by the Supreme Court, the results sheets from polling units are the only means of proving that the election was rigged. The electronic platform was just created for backup. If you like, subpoena the CEO of Amazon Web Services.

Cleo18:
The Amazon acclaimed expert turned out to be an Obidient, a registered LP member.

From what I read, I'm not sure she's an employee of Amazon.

Her responses weren't professional.

Glitches can occur at different stages of the SDLC.

SDLC has a standard procedure which consists generally of 6 phases. She claimed different companies have their own SDLC phases. That's false.

Again, as an IT expert and a Cybersecurity officer at that, she's supposed to know the CIA triad. From her responses, she said she's testifying on her own, using Amazon data but without the authorization of Amazon. Who does that?

Also, she doesn't even have access to INEC server facility like she made Obidients believe.

When asked if she's aware that the results when transferred via BVAS to the IREV would appear in image format such as .jpg, .jpeg, etc, she said she had no idea.

Help me ask her in what format scanned documents appear. Do they appear in .doc format or .xlxs format?

This lady proved me wrong.
I thought I would be listening to/reading from an expert but she spoke like an amateur.

There are lot of faulty points from her defence. Here's the link to the full hearing.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0vN5SLDp2wVkNSPFCTJNKSYpPfnKEnKChszmAFyykcjybc9N1nwjfA2AgFv5dJ1mZl&id=100001949281099&mibextid=Nif5oz

drlateef:




Coming to where. That lady may put herself in big trouble if she ever have anything to do with Amazon. You don’t represent yourself while claiming to give information from the company. She claims these were public information, how can glitches in apps which is given to a client be an information for public consumption? Definitely she has not been given access to administrator interface where only the company and the client have access to. Such information is definitely password protected and encrypted for data protection and business information protection purposes. By the time administrators from INEC give evidence, she could be liable for misleading the court. Giving an absolute answer when she knows by her specialisation that there would definitively be privacy and protection of their client’s information which she may not have access to, could lead her into trouble with the law as a witness. This is tantamount to giving false witness.

drlateef:




Coming to where. That lady may put herself in big trouble if she ever have anything to do with Amazon. You don’t represent yourself while claiming to give information from the company. She claims these were public information, how can glitches in apps which is given to a client be an information for public consumption? Definitely she has not been given access to administrator interface where only the company and the client have access to. Such information is definitely password protected and encrypted for data protection and business information protection purposes. By the time administrators from INEC give evidence, she could be liable for misleading the court. Giving an absolute answer when she knows by her specialisation that there would definitively be privacy and protection of their client’s information which she may not have access to, could lead her into trouble with the law as a witness. This is tantamount to giving false witness.

successmatters:
This is a big bone in the throat of INEC

Hope15:

Good one there.

She is actually dull. She was rambling about availability - region, server, bla bla bla. Cloud service is definitely not just about infrastructure as a service (IaaS), INEC might have gone with the Platform as a service model, and even have different apps for HOR/Senate and the President elections. In that case what she was reporting would be just about the infrastructure alone, she would never know about the status of the secure apps on PaaS. The performance stats on those apps would only be between the service provider (AWS, in this case) and the client (INEC, or its rep).

Orathird:







Thank God for Twitter o. You all claim to know more than the lawyers and the judges but in the real sense, you all come to Nairaland to constitute a nuisance.

The APC/INEC lawyer wanted to know how she got the report she presented to them. She was smart to let them know that she did not hack any website to get her report. Her report is available and accessible online. That is to say, anyone can get it.




That's to tell you the LP candidate was not illiterate. She's a top-tech girl that wants a represent her people at the green chamber.


Dino was also a witness in the PDP case.

successmatters:
This is a big bone in the throat of INEC

vastolord4:
This will show the world if the executive, legislative and judiciary in nigeria are swimming in the pool of corruption together! The whole world is watching.. with the evidences so far, there's no way this case should be void of justice

Orathird:







Thank God for Twitter o. You all claim to know more than the lawyers and the judges but in the real sense, you all come to Nairaland to constitute a nuisance.

The APC/INEC lawyer wanted to know how she got the report she presented to them. She was smart to let them know that she did not hack any website to get her report. Her report is available and accessible online. That is to say, anyone can get it.




That's to tell you the LP candidate was not illiterate. She's a top-tech girl that wants a represent her people at the green chamber.


Dino was also a witness in the PDP case.

elipheleh:
INEC will be exposed at last. Stealing and corruption must stop at this time or never.

If an illegitimate government is allowed to stay, it encourages evil in the land.

For all our information, Amazon does not issue any staff ID card based on the name Amazon or AWS. All identification cards are tagged Employee Resource Center.

So Madam Ogar is right and I pray with all these, the principalities and dark powers holding this nation captive will be exposed and swept about of our polity once and for all.

successmatters:
This is a big bone in the throat of INEC

IamNat:
So this so called "expert" wasn't only a Nigerian, she's also a labour party member? This is quite funny and interesting at the same time.

They made it seem as if her report was from Amazon themselves not knowing she only downloaded them online.


Obi is coming in did....

SmartyPants:
So the expert witness is a lp member who has sued INEC before. That's a dent to her credibility.

Funflipper:


They are just too ignorant to know that.

Abfinest007:
I don't believe this story .nairaland reporters can report the opposite at times .The reason I read my news from multiple sources. All can't be lying

WorldRichest:



That's why they live very old, that is why the government just extended their retirement age to 70. You will always see very old judges. It is because they are entertained every day by court jesters in robes.

GeneralPula:

Lol..

So you people actually thought one amazon expert was coming from USA? Nah Made in Aba Amazon IT then carry come court 😃

Judges are really trying cus if I be judge, I go just deh laugh ni