OLAADEGBU:

Well said.  Only if folks had read their Bibles they would have come to the knowledge of truth as you have stated above.  What evolutionists are still struggling with is their misunderstanding of what the Bible means by the word 'kind'.  The Bible classified the animals into kinds and not as species as we know them today.  We have the 'cat kind' and the 'dog kind' and from these we have what we see today.

That is a good point that is lost on these evolutionists and their sympathisers.

Good job and well said.  I wish most Christians on this site could see this instead of compromising with evolutionists.

Yehowah:

The dinosaurs were in Noah's Ark and some became carnivorous AFTER THE FLOOD. God's original intent was for human and animals to eat plants but, after the flood, things changed.

How Could all the Animals Get On Board Noah's Ark?

Yehowah:

The dinosaurs were in Noah's Ark and some became carnivorous AFTER THE FLOOD. God's original intent was for human and animals to eat plants but, after the flood, things changed.

debosky:

Did the bible tell you the 'kinds' were cat kind and dog kind or is this your invention?

debosky:

So reading the bible would tell you the rivets contained titanium and aluminium too?

debosky:

Stop exposing your abject ignorance - you don't need rapid burial by water for fossilization. Volcanic eruptions and could lead to fossilization. I don't know why you will call a blatant lie a 'good point' simply because it supports your views. 

So much for standing for the truth.

debosky:

No one is arguing that he had to take big animals into the ark - that has never been the point of debate on this thread in the first place. The issue is fabrication of ridiculous claims just to support your views such as claiming water is required for fossilization. 

debosky:

How do you know that dinosaurs were in Noah's Ark? Just how do you know this? Do you know when exactly they became extinct that you can say definitively that they were on the Ark?

debosky:

Did the bible tell you dinosaurs were in the Ark?

debosky:

@ Ola

Cartoons are amusing but don't really address the issue at hand - yes Noah didn't need to carry an infinite number of animals, but no one actually knows how many animals he needed to carry, or do you?

Horus:

Genesis 7:21
"And all flesh died . . ."

. . . According to that, Noah couldn't have been on the earth during the flood or else he would have been counted amongst the dead. Where was this "ark?" It couldn't have been on the earth. Either this is another contradiction in the bible, or the "ark" was actually hovering above the water and not resting upon the earth or the water that was on the earth. This is difficult for you to see because you were taught and programmed that this "ark" was some type of boat; and it's written in every version of the Bible, in movies, in novels, etc., that Noah built a big boat. However, if you go to the Hebrew language and look at the word they translated as "ark," you will see it is the word "tebah" meaning vessel or craft. Thus, you will see that the "ark" being a boat, was only implied. Therefore, someone threw in the English word "ship," which if questioned, could be a boat or craft, and is one of the reasons why the English language is a language of confusion.

Noah's Ark Poll

chrisj2000:

Noah ark is the same as Jonah in the womb of a fish, a married woman was a virgin, a perfect god created imperfect human. Bulshit pack of lies.

Martian:

I remember when this Olladegbu person used to say that there were no fossil records. Now, because AIG say fossils exist, he is now yapping about fossil records while ignoring the amount of time needed for fossilization. In his warped world, lies are justified as long as they promote his medieval philosophy.

Martian:

If AIG changes their tune tomorrow and say evolution is probably true, the rube would be on here writing how humans evolved only 6000 years ago and how some nonsensical verse in their book all the proof they need.

gotizsata:

@debosky - I am must admit that I am pleasantly surprised that a Christian would find the idea of drowning animals, humans, especially babies quite repulsive like everyone else. You must be the only Christian who has a problem with this.

I have removed the pictures.

Noah's ark is not my opinion however, it is an opinion held by Christians like you. It is of course ridiculous painful and very cruel to non-christians. People who have experienced relatives, friends etc drowning are especially affected.

There must have been thousands of bodies like these floating around after Noah's flood and millions upon millions of bloated corpses of animals. It is a very disturbing story.

kelz88:

You referred to Genesis 1:29–30 however, I very much doubt that cos according to what was discovered some dinosaurs fed on meat while some on plants. How come things changed for some, and not others, going by "God's original intent".


Also, according to GEN 3:14 " the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life". (They don't eat dust though. Maybe he meant while they were down there, but that's beside the point). This was pre-the flood as well.


Maybe dinosaurs were part of some of the land animals that didn't make it on the ark, and died in the flood?

The bible is so

Did Dinosaurs Survive The Flood?

OLAADEGBU:

Two Dinosaurs did get on board and those who could not make it died in the Flood.

debosky:

Can you provide proof of this statement or is this something you have made up?

OLAADEGBU:



[19] And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female. [20] Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive (Genesis 6:19-20).

You can see that it was only land-dwelling, air-breathing animals that God brought into the ark. Two of each kind (7 of some) and you must note that it was not species or variety that was included in the ark. All animals we see today, including the extinct dinosaurs had their ancestors on board.

debosky:

I agree with the passage, but not your interpretation. The bible says 'every living thing of all flesh'. We don't know if the dinosaurs had become extinct before the flood or whether they became extinct after the flood, so there is no way to definitively and conclusively say that dinosaurs were on the ark.

debosky:

Unless you have a biblical reference stating specifically that dinosaurs were on the ark (and were not extinct before the flood), you cannot conclusively say that Dinosaurs were on the ark.

debosky:

All you can say really, is that IF they weren't extinct before the flood, then a 'representative' of their 'kind' would have been on the ark. If I propose, like you did earlier, that reptiles and dinosaurs are the same 'kind', then you don't even need to have dinosaurs on the ark, merely a member of their kind like a snake for example, or a crocodile.

Behold now Behemoth

OLAADEGBU:

Why would they become extinct before the Flood?  The evidence that they existed after the Flood is in the book of Job we have the description of a dinosaur.

"Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. LO now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: . . . His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. He is the chief of the ways of God" (Job 40:15–19).

If they were not represented on the Ark how come Job knew about them?

Why would you like to propose that reptiles and not dinosaurs were on the Ark?  Evolutionists claim that they evolved from some reptile, where then is the fossil evidence to back it up?  Job described them well after the Flood.