BabaO2:
Na only him go do all the playing for every match?

Mogajunior:


The price of Football players inflated dramatically in recent times. Most times these players don't even perform to expectation. But all the same, he is a good addition to the team.

Chelsea's game against Liverpool today was impressive. I see Pochettino bringing back the good old days.

ada9ja:
So erotic

Mogajunior:


The price of Football players inflated dramatically in recent times. Most times these players don't even perform to expectation. But all the same, he is a good addition to the team.

Chelsea's game against Liverpool today was impressive. I see Pochettino bringing back the good old days.

Chudyned26:
This is the longest HERE WE GO I have ever seen 🤗

kingsways:
Who is he?

Where from?

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think about 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

kinzation:
Just another Ecuadorian Mctominay

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think about 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

Monday60655:


If Kante is to be sold in this present era, he will cost more and more than he was sold then. Check your analysis very well. In reality, footballers value has drastically changed entirely.

kinzation:
Just another Ecuadorian Mctominay

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

Mogajunior:


The price of Football players inflated dramatically in recent times. Most times these players don't even perform to expectation. But all the same, he is a good addition to the team.

Chelsea's game against Liverpool today was impressive. I see Pochettino bringing back the good old days.

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

Broveens42:


Which one is kudus. Bro this is epl, not Ajax, you will run and get choked
The only thing Chelsea needs now is a supporting forward or winger like oliseh or people in the likes of mahrez, bernado, who can do takeons and is decisive in front of the 18. Sterling is not really cutting it.
Enzo , who was a bit careful going forward as CM had 17 passes in the final third, with 2 chances created. So it's obvious Chelsea needs a ruthless winger.

Broveens42:


Which one is kudus. Bro this is epl, not Ajax, you will run and get choked
Lavia switches off at times and gets carried away.
The only thing Chelsea needs now is a supporting forward or winger like oliseh or people in the likes of mahrez, bernado, who can do takeons and is decisive in front of the 18. Sterling is not really cutting it.
Enzo , who was a bit careful going forward as CM had 17 passes in the final third, with 2 chances created. So it's obvious Chelsea needs a ruthless winger.