Nonexisting1:
Please write a clear explanation to back your choice.

No 2 will never raise leaders. They'll stay dependent on their leader all their lives. Unfortunately this the kind of leadership we have in the Church today. Members to Daddy GOs.

No will raise independent leaders in a short while. Here intuition and wisdom is what the leader behind puts ahead of his followers.

#2 na buhari!

toprealman:

Meaning that 2 is not,and considering your point on pic 2, that refers to that as a leader. Your logic rules out 1 as a leader.
Truth table, logic…etc!!!!

I didn't rule out pic 1 as not a good leader. Remember that leadership is inclusive in what motherhood is all about.

The case before us require situational approach in talking them base on SWOT analysis.
Case 1
The chicks are vulnerable to hawk attack, hence the mother hen approach is apt.
Case 2
The ducks are relatively matured and survivability index high.

The pictures are fakes and far from reality. In fact, the reverse is the case for the two animals involved.

Keep on leading without taking stock of the status of your followers until they're fallen victims of kidnappings, fraud, robbery, and all other evils a leader shouldn't be alive to see happening to his so called followers if truly he care for them. You can go ahead and choose number 1.

Nonexisting1:
Please write a clear explanation to back your choice.

both depending on the circumstances.

In a sane situation, organization or country, no. 1, but in a typical Nigerian state, no 2.

Woodshot:
It was a Sunday morning In the trenches, way way back in early 2000s mother after parboiling and washing Sunday rice handed me the basin of hot water to throw away. Without the least complaints I headed out but never came back the same way.

I saw the family of number one with their indefatigable mother reclining in a nearby shrubbery. The chicks were in my childhood a little bit dirty plus the weather outside was cold.

Innocently, to help relieve and make their living great I splashed and because I expected it Usain bolted.

The ever strong willed and hardened mother hen was my fuccking guest...

My Usain bolting speed was snail when she pursued, swiftly gained and like a war plane perched on my young head and ahead she went to administer deadly excruciating pain from her knife sharp like peak.

Mother hen is a dear mama in 2pac's voice to her chick.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 am sure in your next life, you wouldn't try it.

Malroux:
I didn't rule out pic 1 as not a good leader. Remember that leadership is inclusive in what motherhood is all about.

We are in 2023. A full thesis can be written on this subject. Keep your mind open….leadership should be fluid not set on stone.

Nonexisting1:
Nlfpmod, help us get more opinions.

Can this one reduce the price of fuel or gari in mkt?


Efulefus

You lead from the FRONT NOT back! That's why it's called a LEADER!

FalseProphet1:
As a prophet I'll say none, because none of them can see visions and prophesy to their offspring.

This I have seen.

My people perish for lack of knowledge

Exceed15:
Whatever is coming will hit her First. So she lead to safeguard the children. No 2.

What if it came from behind (back)

Both of them are perfect examples of a good leader. How?
As a leader, you are supposed to lead your followers by being at the forefront to teach them how to and how not to do things or fail by experience. Train them to be responsible and once you have done all expected from you as a leader then the next step is to stay behind and begin to guide them as they have been following your footsteps for a while. They are now mature enough to take responsibility so, if there's any mistake from them you can easily correct them.
A mentor is one who starts at being in position 1 and then moves to position 2 after the mentee would have undergone trainings and found capable enough to take charge. Therefore, he leads from the front initially and guides from the back at the end.

Both are right , it dipends from which countrys view u are seeing it, no 1 is Nigerian style of leadership in which they will be behind doing absolutely nothing for u , u are almost leading and directing your self, coming to work late almost everything they do is hidden in mystery so that they can be syphoning money and taking bribes from the back with out any one knowing.
No 2 is American or advance country style in which as d head of service , u are mandated to live by example, u lead from d front , come to work before everyone , get your salary when others have gotten, leave office when others have left.

You are right, Number 1 is what we have in Nigeria, the followers sacrifices for the leaders to enjoy and give urchins crumbs to defend them

RingRoadMafia:


It's number 2.

You don't put your people in front to shoulder every burden, you lead the way and show them where is best to pass after bearing the brunt. Remember, the question is about leadership, not conflict.

Unfortunately, number 1 is what we have in Nigeria.

Both of them have different leadership skills first one is very active in leadership skills while the other one have calming leadership skills with different ideaology

Nonexisting1:
Please write a clear explanation to back your choice.

The duck.

Only because it is less often eaten, compared to the chicken.

Nonexisting1:
Please write a clear explanation to back your choice.

It depends on where the supposed danger is coming from.

The question of whether a "Chicken Mother" or a "Duck Mother" makes a better leader isn't something that can be definitively answered because it depends on the context and the qualities of the individual leader, rather than their species. Leadership effectiveness is determined by various factors, including communication skills, decision-making abilities, adaptability, empathy, and the specific needs of the group being led.

Chickens and ducks are different species, each with its own characteristics. Chickens tend to be more territorial and hierarchical in their social structure, whereas ducks are often more communal and adaptable. However, these are general traits and do not necessarily dictate leadership capabilities.

In the animal kingdom, leadership often depends on the specific group dynamics and the survival strategies of the species. Chickens may have effective leaders within their flocks, and ducks may have leaders in their formations when migrating.

In human contexts, leadership is even more complex. A good leader can come from any background or possess any set of qualities. Effective leadership requires a combination of skills such as communication, problem-solving, emotional intelligence, and the ability to inspire and motivate others.

Ultimately, whether a "Chicken Mother" or a "Duck Mother" is a better leader is subjective and context-dependent. What matters most is the leadership qualities and abilities of the individual, regardless of their species or metaphorical label.

There are different leadership acumen...for me...this case is not dice in cast...

Both of them are good leaders however their leadership acumen is different.....

1. Train his followers put them in the field and watch how they have been able to catch up with the leadership. President He has taught them over the years...and also...he is behind them to correct and shield them whenever they miss the principle he has taught them. over the years

2. This kind of leader train his followers and also take the lead in front..this is to reinforce what he has taught them so that in addition to what they have learned from him they will keep following in's footstep and this is often what happens in the war front...no.junior soldier take any different step except he or she is ordered to do so.....

The shepherd stays in front to give command,followed by his next ranking officer.
BUT THE MYSTERIOUS IS THAT:
WHEN THE SHEPHERD IS STROKE THE SHEEP WILL SCATTER

Nonexisting1:
Please write a clear explanation to back your choice.

The leader(which means show d way) is obviously the second
The first is a protector/bodyguard not a leader

No.1 is the better leader, because both of them are good,
Watching both of them in reality you will understand better, No.1 is always there for her chick, both rain, sun, cares, not only given them food, but most times given up her own food for them, even predators,
No.2 is good but No.1 is better.

When it is human leadership, you alternate between the two. Sometimes you are ahead pointing the way, some other times, you are behind watching over and guiding.

The duck chicks are always in the front while the chicken chicks stay behind their mother. So the pictures are not in order

RingRoadMafia:


It's number 2.

You don't put your people in front to shoulder every burden, you lead the way and show them where is best to pass after bearing the brunt. Remember, the question is about leadership, not conflict.

Unfortunately, number 1 is what we have in Nigeria.

We don't have either in Nigeria bro. We only have a bunch of self-serving kleptomaniacs in leadership positions.

GeneralPula:
2..

If she’s not a good leader, her kids for no grow reach that level..

😊

Samantha124:
What's the use of leading naive and defenceless people only for them to be killed when the enemy comes from the back?

Even in action movies, the heroes would usually tell the defenceless people to run while they stay behind to fight the enemy... It's only when they suspect or see the enemy coming from the front that they'll then lead and ask the people to stay back.

You voted APC. I can testify to that in court, because you don’t know what a leader means, you are used to people like Tinubu who put people in front while they sit and watch.

Samantha124:
What's the use of leading naive and defenceless people only for them to be killed when the enemy comes from the back?

Even in action movies, the heroes would usually tell the defenceless people to run while they stay behind to fight the enemy... It's only when they suspect or see the enemy coming from the front that they'll then lead and ask the people to stay back.

There is difference been a BOSS and A LEADER.

know the difference. Leaders are rare, LEE OF SINGAPORE, DENG OF CHINA, king of dubai, MANDELA, they were at the forefront.

No 1 is a good leader,because you need to guide your team properly in other to be successful.Your coordination of their activities would let you correct their mistakes and coach,train and mentor them to achieve common goal.
Is not everytime your team would need to watch you,but with better training they will catch up in time.