truespeak:


I do not have time for endless arguments.

As you already know that since the kings come from the people, the law is for all.

So you can keep turning it as you like, it does not change that fact especially as I have already seen that turn turn na your way.

Westerhoffe:


Why did GOD then direct the statement to KINGS and not to the people?

GOD did not say, "NONE of you must multiply horses/wives to yourself…" but GOD said, The king must not…

If GOD is against marrying two wives, why did GOD say this to a man who has two wives:

Deuteronomy 21 (KJV)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
¹⁵ IF A MAN HAVE TWO WIVES, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated:
¹⁶ Then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn:
¹⁷ But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his.

Westerhoffe:



You still argue it. GOD directed the word to KINGS, and not to the PEOPLE.
What's difficult for you to understand here?
GOD could have said YOU ALL, but He said, THE KING.

truespeak:


Repeat mode has been engaged!

truespeak:


Repeat mode in session!

advocatejare:

The verse was clear that the instructions was to the king and that many wives was what God forbade for the king, two, three is not many, so a king is permitted to have two or three or any number deemed fit as “not many”

Stop adding to God’s word and stop twisting it. Have a nice day

truespeak:


I do not have time for endless arguments.

As you already know that since the kings come from the people, the law is for all.

So you can keep turning it as you like, it does not change that fact especially as I have already seen that turn turn na your way.

Westerhoffe:




I am providing BIBLE REFERENCE to back up my claims.

Where is yours?

Twisting and bending the Bible to rhyme with your thoughts will never work with me.

Show me where GOD said POLYGAMY is a sin.

Veecruz:


You lie some more and now you have reached the status of Satan the Liar, for Deuteronomy 17:17 is in the bible, Extra 10:1-3 is in a bible and thou shalt not commit Adultery is in the bible.

And neither were you able to show how a second woman can enter to be a wife without breaking The Law and committing Adultery as proven by this case Re: Marrying A Second Wife Good Or Bad I Need Ur Opinion by Blunttruth: 5:27pm On Aug 05, 2022
Trustedapparel:
I am a married man with 2kids but their is one big lady that I met she loves me very much ....since I Bleep that lady I can't get my eyes of her ....I have been thinking about her since after the marathon sex we hard last month... honestly I want to make her my second wife ...

From the beginning of this debate to the end you have been exposing yourself that you are a liar and shamelessly lying left and right, even lying against the meaning of Adultery until you finally took the correction, thereof, a person full of vile affections and lust full thoughts clearly proving God has given you over to a reprobate mind filled with all unrighteousness, fornications and a covenant breaker.

And since you are not able to make any further argument you just have to repeat and repeat yourself like a scratched CD in proof that

"There is no valid argument against the Truth"!. So bye.

Westerhoffe:

I provided several Bible passages to back up my claims, you and Veecruz had none that rhymes. Then what is your argument that lacks Bible support?[/color][/b]

Veecruz:


You are the one adding to the bible and technically blaspheming God by calling Him unholy. Which is why it is people like you who gave atheists a reason to blaspheme God.

I respectfully you and all of you saying this
["from where would the king come from? Is it from the sky or amongst the people of Israel?

And thank God you said tto get a better understanding you we should start from verse 14, "When you come to the land that the LORD your God is giving you, and you possess it.." who is the "you" there? Is it a King or the people?

And in line with this Law did God ever choose a king having wives?

You refused to answer because you know that the Answer has destroyed all your beliefs.

And in addition to the questions above did you see anywhere, where God Said 2 or 3 is not many wives?

Whereas, The Law is on an unmarried person being permitted to marry his fellow unmarried opposite sex.

No WHERE DOES GOD SAY A MARRIED MAN/WOMAN CAN MARRY ANOTHER UNMARRIED/MARRIED MAN! ABSOLUTELY NO WHERE.

So stop relying on people who broke The Law. Follow those who kept The Law and God even called them "PERFECT".

And stop making The Holy God, Unholy and a person Who condones Adultery if you can sneak it by Him by marrying the person you commit the adultery and fornication.

This is what you yourself told Jw when they bring up their mad lies and sins that make God look unholy!

truespeak:


No mind dem o jare. Dey defend the indefensible like say e go save dem.

Veecruz:


And all were proven wrong which is why you are now desperately repeating yourself.

truespeak:


Repeat mode still ongoing. I'm out!

Veecruz:


Dem no know God.

And it is crazy that the people who claim Christians and one wife are not here. Obviously, they secretly nurse the ambition of committing adultery and then marrying the the person they commit it, thinking that they have deceived God! Hmm, people go burn.

Westerhoffe:



You'd keep making mistakes because it's clear you don't understand the Bible!
You can never make GOD look unholy, because GOD is holy.
How many men in the Bible were called perfect?

Westerhoffe:



You proved the Bible wrong with the Bible or with your personal words?

I said I'll expose your ignorance, you think I'm joking. Now you've been making mistakes in your lies now.

truespeak:


Abeg, leave that guy. im brain don freeze for repeat mode.

Veecruz:


None of which you could counter which is why you are repeating and repeating yourself as you try to find how you can reargue.

But, there is NO ROAD! Now you are waiting for what you think is a mistake, exactly like devil lying in wait.

No Road! Devil, Absolutely No Road!

truespeak:


Abeg, leave that guy. im brain don freeze for repeat mode.

Veecruz:


It is known that God is Holy but it is also known that people like you blaspheme and profane His Holiness

Veecruz:


That's what "There is no valid argument against the Truth" means.

Veecruz:


That's what "There is no valid argument against the Truth" means.

So, because he can not bear the shame that his beliefs were wrong the evil is now waiting hoping that I'll make a mistake he can use to turn his shame and disgrace around.

Even those who saw your errors and ignorance called your attention to it, but you think you're still right, but only in your own eyes.

Go read through those who answered you.

You are just trying to apply damage control since your errors were exposed!

Waiting for you to make a mistake?
Really?
You've made so many mistakes that I've been calling your attention to!

Your mistakes are glaring!
*You said you countered the Bible with the Bible.
*You said you can profane the HOLINESS of GOD.
*You said marriage is adultery.

What more? Let me go check…

Veecruz:


That's what "There is no valid argument against the Truth" means.

So, because he can not bear the shame that his beliefs were wrong the evil is now waiting hoping that I'll make a mistake he can use to turn his shame and disgrace around.

truespeak:


I have come to the conclusion that he is mad. No sane person argues in this manner.

They said the same thing too about our LORD JESUS CHRIST. since they could not understand His sayings.

“And many of them said, He hath a devil, and is mad; why hear ye him?”
— John 10:20 (KJV)

Does the above verse ring a bell to you Veecruz and truespeak?

The word of GOD has been catching you since the beginning of your comments.
Come and say more.

Call me Devil, mad; call me more… it does not stick to me.

Westerhoffe:

Are the whole people kings?[/c
I've answered you but you rebuffed because the truth is not what you wanted to hear but your confused interpretation.

NOW YOU HAVE IMPLIEDLY CONFESSED THAT DEUTERONOMY 17:14-17 IS ABOUT THE WHOLE PEOPLE!

And it is clear that any 1 or 2 of the "whole people" could be Kings.

So YOU STILL NO ROAD

Veecruz:


NOW YOU HAVE IMPLIEDLY CONFESSED THAT DEUTERONOMY 17:14-17 IS ABOUT THE WHOLE PEOPLE!

And it is clear that any 1 or 2 of the "whole people" could be Kings.

So YOU STILL NO ROAD.

Now I see where your problem is… it is the spirit of deception and trickery, and difficulty understanding English.

Now you've lost words and resorted to twisting my comments too.

I asked, Are the whole people kings?
You said I have called them kings.
Your English teachers should refund all your fees from Primary School to the level you attained. They failed you.

truespeak:


I have come to the conclusion that he is mad. No sane person argues in this manner.

Veecruz:


I disagree sha ooo. He is evil and very evil and a Liar, but he is sane.

Veecruz:


I disagree sha ooo. He is evil and very evil and a Liar, but he is sane.

truespeak:

I have come to the conclusion that he is mad. No sane person argues in this manner.

Veecruz:

I disagree sha ooo. He is evil and very evil and a Liar, but he is sane.

truespeak:


Hmm!

Are you shocked they called our LORD JESUS CHRIST the same you both had been calling me?

No… it just proves whose sides you both are on.

Westerhoffe:


I am evil for insisting on the truth of the Bible?

Lies can never unite without parting asunder!