CgRay:
This can make the lady to stayed glued to the husband forever because the lady might just be a side chick to the man having another person she intended to marry. Now that everything is out the main guy will back out, then she will be left with no option than to stick to her husband. Mumu wife

Toh. She's not a mumu, but she should confront her husband. And if she wants the girl gone, she should do so without destroying the girl so much that no man outside will be available for her. The destruction of the girls own choices will make that girl go back to her husband.

Theopneustos:
A pained housewife has taken it into her hands to print posters of her husband sidechick to publicly embarass her and she went further to place them at strategic areas of public view.
What do you think about this?
Do you think it's the best approach?
Could she have done more or less?

The wife is very stupid for doing this. Did the side chick put a gun on her husbands head? She should take her time to treat the man well instead of this rubbish Non non non nonsense

immortalcrown:
The stupid wife can be sued for this.

Instead of facing your stupid husband, you are attacking the girl. Your husband will still find another babe if you chase this one away. Face the problem and not its shadow. Prevention is better than cure.

When he is poor, "He cheats on me".

When he is rich, "She is trying to steal my man".

First question is which of the wives..no evidence...how can you prove who posted it. Do you know how many married men this one dey sleep with

henrycloud:
funny thing she may not know which of the sugar daddies to leave coz they are plenty

She knows!
Agarachas always know everything about the men they're going out with. Including their wives.

Mad-am go soon lose everything to Hell-en

7arrows:


The wife is very stupid for doing this. Did the side chick put a gun on her husbands head? She should take her time to treat the man well instead of this rubbish Non non non nonsense

Nobody ever takes the side of the wife. Including females!
Whether she does this or that, she gets blamed!

Well, the wife has every right to decide how she wants to fight her battles.
She has the right to decide who and who she wants to warn/deal with.

Something had to take....Ma'am, I like this your local joor......
Y'all cheaters here and there, this is jus the beginning......
K
Make una dey right long English advising madam on how to rein in her dog

immortalcrown:
The stupid wife can be sued for this.

Instead of facing your stupid husband, you are attacking the girl. Your husband will still find another babe if you chase this one away. Face the problem and not its shadow. Prevention is better than cure.

When he is poor, "He cheats on me".

When he is rich, "She is trying to steal my man".

So the fact that a man wants another wife just as Adam, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Solomon, Job, Moses, e t.c. makes him a stupid ma, you need psychiatric evaluation

pappilo:


How? Please.

There is no criminal matter here at all. You can try to claim for a civil infraction but I cant think of what the lady on the poster will try to claim for.

If it can be proven that the lady on the poster had an affair with a man the person wio put up the poster is legally married to, then the claim will fail.

Calling a woman who is having an affair with your husband a homebreaker and telling her to leave your husband alone on a poster is no different to saying it to her it a public place with a crowd gathered.

Your last paragraph is an example of defamation. Please take your time to understand the word defamation.

Criminal defamation can be proven in the case, if the offended party, in this case the girlfriend, has enough evidence.

Do you know that any person who publishes any defamatory matter, is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable to imprisonment for one year; and any person who publishes any defamatory matter knowing it to be false, is liable to imprisonment for two years.

I am not a lawyer, but it is stated in section 375 of the criminal code act. Take your time to read it.

If the offended is able to prove intended harm and actual harm, then the offender is in trouble.

I just opened to be sure the side chick is not my fiancee.....

idahme:
■ Equality woman, I hope u support the wife to bring 50 percent of family expenses? If no then your line of arguments is null and void. Equality without equality in financial responsibility is zero equality.

The way some of una dey reason ehn... it dey always astound!

When did this become a debate of equality? Do men who are married to women who bring 50% never cheat? Do men married to women who are breadwinners never cheat? What is this abeg!

The thing is this lady won't even know whose wife is behind this except she's dating only one married man.

ElevationD:


Your last paragraph is an example of defamation. Please take your time to understand the word defamation.

Criminal defamation can be proven in the case, if the offended party, in this case the girlfriend, has enough evidence.

Do you know that any person who publishes any defamatory matter, is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable to imprisonment for one year; and any person who publishes any defamatory matter knowing it to be false, is liable to imprisonment for two years.

I am not a lawyer, but it is stated in section 375 of the criminal code act. Take your time to read it.

If the offended is able to prove intended harm and actual harm, then the offender is in trouble.

Go back and read my post. If it can be proven on balance of probabilities that the lady on the poster did indeed have an affair with the lawful husband of the lady who put up the poster, then the claim will fail.

She was called a home breaker and told to leave the aggrieved party's husband alone. If the lady has been having an affair or even just a fling with the husband, then that statement wont be seen as false to the reasonable man on the street.

If you are having an affair with someone's husband and you are called a homebreaker you have no leg to stand on to claim defamation of character.

For a defamation case to succeed, the claim made will have to be false.

This one is worst than Cyberstalking na. Police no go charge the poster to court.

She can be sued for defamation of character

Mumu woman...

U should have posted ur husband's image alongside, or probably put ur husband's name there and his phone number so that that olosho go know who u talking about...

U know how many people's husbands she's dating?

How she go take know the one to leave?

Wrong move...

pappilo:


Go back and read my post. If it can be proven on balance of probabilities that the lady on the poster did indeed have an affair with the lawful husband of the lady who put up the poster, then the claim will fail.

She was called a home breaker and told to leave the aggrieved party's husband alone. If the lady has been having an affair or even just a fling with the husband, then that statement wont be seen as false to the reasonable man on the street.

If you are having an affair with someone's husband and you are called a homebreaker you have no leg to stand on to claim defamation of character.

For a defamation case to succeed, the claim made will have to be false.

“ For a defamation case to succeed, the claim made will have to be false”. That’s why is it called defamation.

I commented about the criminal aspect of it, to show that it is possible.

Thanks.

Madam is not wise at all! This won't stop her husband from his randy ways.

The woman needs to also check her self. Some women are the reason some men cheat. Not every man who cheats really want to.

ElevationD:



“ For a defamation case to succeed, the claim made will have to be false”. That’s why is it called defamation.

I commented about the criminal aspect of it, to show that it is possible.

Thanks.

Learn and stop being ignorant. Defamation does not occur if what is said or communicated is true.

A reasonable person (a legal test) will agree that a woman who has a relationship with a married man against the wishes of the married man's wife is a homebreaker.

Case dismissed.

All this is hypothetical anyway. Where side chic wan see money conduct proceedings? But you lot should stop shouting "she can sue". She has no case if she is/was having a relationship with the husband of the aggrieved woman who put up the poster.

Wallade:



That is also a notable point, in other words, the sidechick has to admit to a relationship with her husband for the sidechick to establish her case against the man's wife.

Yes . That's the point

Mariangeles:


Nobody ever takes the side of the wife. Including females!
Whether she does this or that, she gets blamed!

Well, the wife has every right to decide how she wants to fight her battles.
She has the right to decide who and who she wants to warn/deal with.

Are you friends to the wife? Or have you done something similar in the past?

pappilo:


Learn and stop being ignorant. Defamation does not occur if what is said or communicated is true.

A reasonable person (a legal test) will agree that a woman who has a relationship with a married man against the wishes of the married man's wife is a homebreaker.

Case dismissed.

All this is hypothetical anyway. Where side chic wan see money conduct proceedings? But you lot should stop shouting "she can sue". She has no case if she is/was having a relationship with the husband of the aggrieved woman who put up the poster.

“… a woman who has a relationship with a married man against the wishes…”.

You wrote the above? Did you read it before posting?
Abeg go one side oga.

Theopneustos:
A pained housewife has taken it into her hands to print posters of her husband sidechick to publicly embarass her and she went further to place them at strategic areas of public view.
What do you think about this?
Do you think it's the best approach?
Could she have done more or less?

Most times, the source of most of our problems can be seen every time we face the mirror.
Marriage is highly overrated.