Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,404 members, 7,815,880 topics. Date: Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 08:13 PM

Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo - Politics (7) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo (14191 Views)

Festus Keyamo Tweet On Fuel Scarcity During GEJ's Administration / The Death Of Prince Abubakar Audu And The Legal Implications By Festus Keyamo / Jonathan Lacks Capacity To Secure Nigeria, Fight Corruption - Festus Keyamo (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by 3kay945(m): 4:10pm On Jul 05, 2012
special people are created in this part of the world,..... the Damn Nigeria system is so disgusting. no one born in this country should miss heaven. its going to be hell+square!
well, the riches case is different though.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by mapet: 4:18pm On Jul 05, 2012
Bros you lost me here and there is no big question. Did you not read Keyamo's analysis

1. If you're being pressured to give a bribe and you report to the authorities as Otedola did, then what is your issue?
2. Did Lawan that claimed Otedola pressured him report to any authority (Police, SSS, or at the floor of the Senate) before the saga blew up.....
3. I'm beginning to suspect some of you lots. The moment you've decided sacrifice integrity and try to game the truth, you argue so blindly.......
Redstone:


Now who do we believe BIG Question for all of us.

Logically, the idea behind bribe scandals is always that the offender offers bribe in order to get cleared of a crime, If this is correct, between Farcrook and Otedollar, whose company is being investigated in the fuel subsidy saga

The one who is being investigated obviously will be the one to initiate bribe offering. Farcrook is weak minded and gullible to have fallen for this trap.

Now, Otedolla is telling Nigerians that he was pressured offer the bribe. He now wants to play the injured party.

this is jus a diversionary game, Nigerians, shine your eyes oooooooo.

Both Farcrook and Zenon boss have lots of question to answer.

The money has to be retrieved, let's all see how this unfolds.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by mapet: 4:21pm On Jul 05, 2012
1. That will be the most useless evidence.
2. How would you have been able to relate it with the Oil investigation
3. Farook cloud claim it was money for other means which will be admissible in court.

No matter how you guys try to turn logic on its head, it leads you all to the same direction....... my disappointment is only at perceptions we could infer about the personality of all you lots

Redstone:



If sss actually had a video of him the first time he collected the bribe money, that is enough evidence to take him in. Now where is the bribe money?

1 Like

Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by mapet: 4:28pm On Jul 05, 2012
I hate to say this, but your arguement is flawed

1. Kenyamo is first a Citizen, before and among other things. He has the freedom to voluntare is opinion
2. Is the matter in court yet? has the judge directed that nothing be said so as not to affect the case?
3. Farouk can claim prejudice, because he has a case against the nigerian state and not Kenyamo
4. I agree with you on the bolded part below
ideylaff: Keyamo is meant to be a lawyer and he's already passing judgement on a case that is yet to go to court

All Farouk will do to get off the hook is claim prejudice.. simple....

[b]All of them are the same.. Distraction agents... everybody don 4get 3 trillion abi na 2 trillion wey we dey find in the 1st place


Only yesterday the same set of accussed marketers were awarded bigger contracts again, Same old story... yeye dey smell big time[/b]
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by mapet: 4:32pm On Jul 05, 2012
Demdem:
The Force Headquarters stated that the audio recording, which was relayed on Monday by the private TV station, was not enough evidence to prosecute Lawan.

Deputy Force Public Relations Officer, Frank Mba, who spoke on the relay of the audio recording in Abuja on Tuesday, asked for the full video component of the recording which should start from the beginning of its recording.


On why it is taking the police too long to conclude investigation, Mba stressed that with the evidence so far obtained, it would amount to a waste of time and public resources to rush to court.

He said, “You just don’t rush to court for the fun of charging people to court. That is why courts are congested and that is why we don’t make progress. It does not make sense. It is unproductive; it is a waste of public resource.”

http://www.punchng.com/news/no-evidence-yet-to-prosecute-lawan-police/

@ Demdem, I think you are not getting the full picture.
1. The Police are well within their rights with the statements above
2. ..and to some of you lots, that is why it was important not to have arrested Farouk at the spot
3. For me some of you guys need to understan how power games are played sometimes.... May be Farouk is not the only suspect or prime target in this case. With some of the bait dangling, leads could open up for additional targeted crooks
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by mapet: 4:34pm On Jul 05, 2012
When I read your piece, I struggled within me to understand why it is complex for some people to reason and type simultaneously, since blood flows in a single direction to satisfy both objectives. At best do one before the other. Demonstration of crass dumbness and share arrogance gives you in so quickly with your puerile rants..
Toktee: Imagine a lawyer talking,he is even comending the effort of otedola and the sss,the lawyer went ahead to use america nd other european countries,that do resign their position in a case like this,my problem with the whole analysis is,if mr otedola is innocent,why must he perticipate in the whole saga instead of waiting for the house to complete the investigation,who call who first, and why must lawan invite security agencies,who among them can be trusted,otedola invited the sss to do what,what prevented them frm arresting lawan immediately he take posession of the exhibit,can u tell me how otedola is innocent in all these with good reasons? And the question of resignation,hw many corrupt govt official nd politician resign their position in nigeria,i therefore conclude that mr otedola do nt gve kobo to mr lawan,if he give where is the money,on the side of sss they fail in there duties as they were been commanded by mr otedola,what a shame,the giver nd the taker,are both guilty of the offence period...no ranting
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Skills10: 5:18pm On Jul 05, 2012
Nigerians and the way they reason. Everyone keeps making assumptions.
What is the evidence that the money was marked? Its Otedola's words. What about the Audio tape. Don't we know a thing or two about Voice forensics. Even that Audio could have been done afterwards and voices simulated. Anything is possible. Otedola might have had the meeting, given him his own money and then goes to SSS to play ball. The thing is, all these talks are just diversionary. Let them take it to court and charge Farouk. What is our police doing? This country self. The middle class is suffering and smiling and trying to express their grammatical skills on NL while some are @ Abuja looting like there will be no tomorrow.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 6:15pm On Jul 05, 2012
edicolove:
The man says put the cameras on me. I wanna sing a hit! The guy is asking for the opportunity to release a chart bursting single man! From where I stand, I don't see him hiding. He is rearing to go.

This goes down as a classic.
grin grin grin
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 6:23pm On Jul 05, 2012
Demdem:

i disagree. otedollar wants farook to go to jail and the institution who may facilitate this is being undermined by the complainant. If its the same audio we all heard that the police has then i agree with the police that its bullshit. why do u have to give them partial evidence in form of an uncompleted audio? why havent u even given them the Video? why is SSS not cooperating with the police? there is absolutely no way otedollar will give them something and the police will tamper with it in farouk's favour. remember that the source itself is Otedollar. besides Otedollar isnt an ordinary citizen that can just be locked up and claimed to be the culprit, u know that isnt possible.


Hope you know that most of our security outfits are corrupt. Remember that Ibori escaped from our authorities here. Remember what led to the removal of the I.G and the Boko Haram suspect. Remember there is a report saying that the police escorted FARCROOK to his house to shower and rest after he was detained.

Now tell me this are the people you want Otedola to dine with. He would be stopped in seconds. As I said before. He is playing his cards right. You don't go showing your cards when you could bluff your opponents to bring in more loot before you make your call. Also the right step is Journalists first who are amebos and are always looking for gist to yarn. When it is out it can't be taken back and secondly security agents you trust. Any other thing is a mistake.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 6:42pm On Jul 05, 2012
Stkingsley: I want to ask, why are Nigerians like dis? and why are Nairalanders like dis? Dis report from Keyamo, is it an original article typed in here by a member? or did he type it down on Nairaland personally for us to argue or comment? Am asking this, because i have noticed anybody looking for a car to buy, a loan to get or even a girlfriend posts it here, and even those looking for work or business posts it here too. Am saying this because, i noticed in the dailies of Monday, Chief Mike Ozekhome, has been contracted by Facrook to defend him, and he has actually started his work. This article from Keyamo smears of somebody who needs a job from Ote$. In any case, i think he shd be bold enough to approach the man and tell him so. Why am i saying this? Even a blind man can see that to Keyamo Facrook is guilty, guilty n guilty, while Otedola (is a Saint) who has worked according to d dictates of good citizenry, undermining dat d law frowns at both d giver n taker of bribes. To Keyamo, Otedola ddnt give a bribe, bt merely played along wit d SSS who marked d dollar. Whether Facrook feels a doctored evidence is being released or not, d 1st conversation showed Otedola was in an aircraft, and i am asking my fellow Nairalanders, WAS OTEDOLA TAKING THE WHOLE $620,000 TO CHINA? or wherever he was travelling to then? because, ACCORDING TO THAT CONVERSATION, Facrook was called up by Otedola to come for d money. What if Facrook ddnot send TJ, will he have travelled wt d money? At d other point, he said HE CANNOT KEEP SUCH MONEY AT HOME, but he can take it to airport aboard an aircraft.

Guys, we are all Nigerians. If SSS were privy of this matter as is being claimed, am sure, trust Nigerian Police, they will swing into action in search of those MARKED dollar bills. We all have established that both FACROOK N OTEDOLA ARE THIEVES here, let no job/brief-seeking lawyer become d judge at d same time. Please, we are watching.... I have noticed in NAIRALAND, that the person who reports a case first, is always d innocent man. Pls, dis shd not be so. Until d full trial starts, we cannot say for sure how dis thing happened.

For those castigating d National Assemblies (closed trial) and citing the subsidy era in January, am sure we also remember there were a lot of closed door meetings between House of Reps and the Labour Congress. Pls, lets keep straight mind on this issue, knowing that d two pple have defaulted and we shall all learn of d outcome sooner or later, but d no. 1 priority is DONT ALLOW THIS TO BURY THE FUEL SUBSIDY PROBE REPORT, which is d main intention of this whole saga

Please which report? The report that is totally doctored, the report that a company that imports AGO was indicted for collecting FX to import PMS. A committee that coherently agreed to remove a name of ZENON PETROLEUM after they believed another Maga has paid.

The true Culprits of whatever led to the loss of FX are not on that report. A lot of corrupt people have paid and are flexing and you guys want the subsidy report.

We should be crying for the truth of what went down in CBN. We should not blame Otedola of Burying their Scam report but commend him for exposing how corrupt the so called Thieves and crooks are. How can CROOKS recover stolen Wealth. I laugh in AYE.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 6:53pm On Jul 05, 2012
Demdem:



The Force Headquarters stated that the audio recording, which was relayed on Monday by the private TV station, was not enough evidence to prosecute Lawan.

Deputy Force Public Relations Officer, Frank Mba, who spoke on the relay of the audio recording in Abuja on Tuesday, asked for the full video component of the recording which should start from the beginning of its recording.


On why it is taking the police too long to conclude investigation, Mba stressed that with the evidence so far obtained, it would amount to a waste of time and public resources to rush to court.

He said, “You just don’t rush to court for the fun of charging people to court. That is why courts are congested and that is why we don’t make progress. It does not make sense. It is unproductive; it is a waste of public resource.”


http://www.punchng.com/news/no-evidence-yet-to-prosecute-lawan-police/

You saying Otedola should work with the police. How can a policeman look into the eyes of a Journalist and make a statement that no enough evidence to prosecute. When the person has admitted that he took the money and has no evidence to back up that it was for a sting operation. The tapes will prove that FARCROOK took the money but FARCROOK admitted he took the money. The place where evidences is needed lies on FARCROOK defense to prove that the money was for a sting Operation.

How could FARCROOK admit he took the money for a Sting operation and his cohorts have denied him and the police are still asking for tapes. All CROOKS.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by kingblosky: 11:14pm On Jul 05, 2012
FAROUK LAWAN is a born liar . And he claims to be a good muslim. Lie Lie, him na lie , all na lie..
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Monjerk: 11:16pm On Jul 05, 2012
The mistake most people are making here is that we allow things that might have happened in the past to determine our conclusion on this case. Farouk must have one time been a good or bad person, so also Otedola must have been doing his business in a bad /good way in the past. My take on this is, Farouk is a thief, how? he collected bribe to remove Otedola name from the list, so he should be arrested and he should be dealth with severely. On the other hand, Otedola himself is innocent , but his company still need to be re- investigated concerning this fuel subsidy thing, Why? If the company was indicted on the subsidy mess up and He (otedola) bribe his way out which he later use as evidence does not make the company innocent. His company need to be screen again to realy prove it innocent as claim by him. But farouk need to be kick out of the national assembly immediately or amadioha will begin to strike all those member one after the other, ...... just hold on lemme go inside to make some incatation i will be back soon...

1 Like

Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by brownlord: 12:04am On Jul 06, 2012
Monjerk: The mistake most people are making here is that we allow things that might have happened in the past to determine our conclusion on this case. Farouk must have one time been a good or bad person, so also Otedola must have been doing his business in a bad /good way in the past. My take on this is, Farouk is a thief, how? he collected bribe to remove Otedola name from the list, so he should be arrested and he should be dealth with severely. On the other hand, Otedola himself is innocent , but his company still need to be re- investigated concerning this fuel subsidy thing, Why? If the company was indicted on the subsidy mess up and He (otedola) bribe his way out which he later use as evidence does not make the company innocent. His company need to be screen again to realy prove it innocent as claim by him. But farouk need to be kick out of the national assembly immediately or amadioha will begin to strike all those member one after the other, ...... just hold on lemme go inside to make some incatation i will be back soon...


gbam...you said it better than keyomo self, facrock case is not something we should be discussing, because right from the very first day, farock was already guilty and should not only be removed from National assembly, but needs to be beheaded, as for Otes, is true in this case he is innocent by not playing along and wanting to expose farcroock, but before the saga, his company needs to be investigated because he cant be free which is the reason his name was included in the first place, also when president Obj, said all the national assembly members where thiefs, this was exactly what he was refering to, they already have evidence about the bribe collected by the commite, but just waiting to further confirm the story by exposing them, my verdict...farock case no need to be judge because hes guilty, let dig deep into Otes company to find out if he is involve in the mess.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by brownlord: 12:08am On Jul 06, 2012
I remember when growing up, my mother use to say, anything an Hausa tells you is nothing but the truth, but after knowing facrock, na only good morning be the truth for their mouth, if them tell me good afternoon i go check my time, kai facroock, u need to be stone to death

1 Like

Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by 3rdparty: 3:57am On Jul 06, 2012
Nobody should be swayed by whatever is happening so long as it's Nigeria. Nobody ever goes to jail. Can anyone on here point to one person that has been sent to jail for the stock market scam? KPMG, was the fraudulent accounting firm hired to inflate profit earnings of banks to show false profits, can you point to any staff of KPMG in jail? Has any one been sent to jail over the fuel subsidy scam? Pension scam? etc. All these are just scripts for the next Nollywood movie. One the media stops carrying the news, the whole drama dies down.

1 Like

Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 9:19am On Jul 06, 2012
thegoodjoehunt:

Hope you know that most of our security outfits are corrupt. Remember that Ibori escaped from our authorities here. Remember what led to the removal of the I.G and the Boko Haram suspect. Remember there is a report saying that the police escorted FARCROOK to his house to shower and rest after he was detained.

Now tell me this are the people you want Otedola to dine with. He would be stopped in seconds. As I said before. He is playing his cards right. You don't go showing your cards when you could bluff your opponents to bring in more loot before you make your call. Also the right step is Journalists first who are amebos and are always looking for gist to yarn. When it is out it can't be taken back and secondly security agents you trust. Any other thing is a mistake.

yes very many of the security outfits are corrupt and this includes the SSS also. its just that the SSS is relatively better. Otedollar that has the support of the presidency and the ears of the retardeen cant be shortchanged by the police controlled by the presidency. Escorting Farook back home has nothing to do with tampering with the evidences given by otedollar. Its a different ball game entirely. I dont think otedollar is doing it right, infact i think by the way he is going (uncooperative attitude of him and SSS), Nothing will eventually come out and hereby no-case.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 9:27am On Jul 06, 2012
thegoodjoehunt:

Please which report? The report that is totally doctored, the report that a company that imports AGO was indicted for collecting FX to import PMS. A committee that coherently agreed to remove a name of ZENON PETROLEUM after they believed another Maga has paid.

The true Culprits of whatever led to the loss of FX are not on that report. A lot of corrupt people have paid and are flexing and you guys want the subsidy report.

We should be crying for the truth of what went down in CBN. We should not blame Otedola of Burying their Scam report but commend him for exposing how corrupt the so called Thieves and crooks are. How can CROOKS recover stolen Wealth. I laugh in AYE.

is this part of the report doctored?

2. We found out that the subsidy regime, as operated between the period under review (2009 and 2011), were fraught with endemic corruption and entrenched inefficiency. Much of the amount claimed to have been paid as subsidy was actually not for consumed PMS. Government officials made nonsense of the PSF Guidelines due mainly to sleaze and, in some other cases, incompetence. It is therefore apparent that the insistence by top Government officials that the subsidy figures was for products consumed was a clear attempt to mislead the Nigerian people.

what about this?


3. Thus, contrary to the earlier official figure of subsidy payment of N1.3 Trillion, the Accountant-General of the Federation put forward a figure of N1.6 Trillion, the CBN N1.7 Trillion, while the Committee established subsidy payment of N2,587.087 Trillion as at 31st December, 2011, amounting to more than 900% over the appropriated sum of N245 Billion. This figure of N2, 587.087Trillion is based on the CBN figure of N844.944b paid to NNPC, in addition to another figure of N847.942b reflected as withdrawals by NNPC from the excess crude naira account, as well as the sum of N894.201b paid as subsidy to the Marketers. The figure of N847.942b quoted above strongly suggests that NNPC might have been withdrawing from two sources especially when the double withdrawals were also reflected both in 2009 and in 2010.
However, it should be noted that as at the time the public hearing was concluded, there were outstanding claims by NNPC and the Marketers in excess of N270billion as subsidy payments for 2011.
Whereas the mandate of the Committee was necessitated by the removal of subsidy, the Committee found out that subsidy payment on kerosene formed an Integra part of the total sum.

and this

4. On its part, NNPC was found not to be accountable to any body or authority. The Corporation, in 2011, processed payment of N310.4 Billion as 2009 – 2011 arrears of subsidy on Kerosene, contrary to a Presidential Directive which removed subsidy on Kerosene in 2009. The Corporation also processed for itself, direct deduction of subsidy payment from amounts it received from other operations such as joint venture before paying the balance to the Federation Account, thereby depleting the shares of States and Local Governments from the distributable pool. Worse still, the direct deduction in 2011 alone, which amounted to N847.942 Billion, was effected without any provision in the Appropriation Act.

and this

13. With regards to the 445,000 bpd allocation to NNPC , the Committee believes that with the current refining capacity of 53% and the SWAP/Offshore processing arrangement of the balance of 47%, it is sufficient to provide the nation with the following products:
a. 40 Million Litres Per Day (MLPD) of PMS,
b. 10 MLPD of Kerosene (HHK)
c. 8.97 MLPD of Diesel (AGO) ,
d. 0.62 MLPD of LPG and
e. 2.31 MLPD of FO
It is only AGO whose average daily consumption of 12 million Litres per day will not be achieved in full. Since AGO has been deregulated, other marketers can make up for the 3.03 MLPD AGO shortfalls. The implication of this finding is that if NNPC properly manages the allocation of 445 bpd efficiently, the availability of the products can be achieved by the NNPC alone. This contrasts the situation where in 2009-2011 NNPC got the daily allocation of 445,000bpd and the nation still had to import through Marketers.
Curiously, although NNPC confirmed that it makes some savings of about =N= 11.00 per litre refining locally than import, it could not be established that the Corporation reflects this cost differential in its claims to subsidy.

I can go on and on and on. You simly dont throw away the baby and the waste water. The house is right in still sticking to his report and its a valid document no matter what detractors will like to say. Like i said earlier, it still remain:

Demdem: the only issue i have against the house report is the various lists of indicted people and organization. Efforts should be made in making sure these parts of the report is thoroughly looked into again and make sure that org arent indicted wrongfully, besides that the report still dey Kampe and the house is right by sticking to their report. Security agents are expected to implement so they should do further investigation. How can someone in his right senses say Farookgate influenced these exclusives from the report
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 9:38am On Jul 06, 2012
thegoodjoehunt:

You saying Otedola should work with the police. How can a policeman look into the eyes of a Journalist and make a statement that no enough evidence to prosecute. When the person has admitted that he took the money and has no evidence to back up that it was for a sting operation. The tapes will prove that FARCROOK took the money but FARCROOK admitted he took the money. The place where evidences is needed lies on FARCROOK defense to prove that the money was for a sting Operation.

How could FARCROOK admit he took the money for a Sting operation and his cohorts have denied him and the police are still asking for tapes. All CROOKS.

[b]Whatever u say wont change the facts as at today (yesterday or so). The police isnt an independent body but its being supervised by the same Presidency that supports Otedollar. Despite their corrupt tendencies, i still believe them because i simply dont have any other choice for now.

Another alternative is that the SSS should take charge of prosecution but they are probably not doing that because they also know its a waste of time going to court with these so called evidences.

The Police says the evidences so far are insufficient and that is it. Tell Otedollar to cooperate the more with them by releasing the full audio transcripts and the video which will assist the Police. Tell SSS also to be cooperative with the Police. Give them what they want afterall otedollar has nothing to loose if trully and indeed he is saying the truth. the Police is forthcoming with what they want, why is Otedollar drawing back? In the absence of that, farook aint going to jail boy and in the sight of the law, he is as innocent as anything therby giving Farook the right to sue otedollar for defamation.
Deal with that.[/b]
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 9:43am On Jul 06, 2012
3rdparty: Nobody should be swayed by whatever is happening so long as it's Nigeria. Nobody ever goes to jail. Can anyone on here point to one person that has been sent to jail for the stock market scam? KPMG, was the fraudulent accounting firm hired to inflate profit earnings of banks to show false profits, can you point to any staff of KPMG in jail? Has any one been sent to jail over the fuel subsidy scam? Pension scam? etc. All these are just scripts for the next Nollywood movie. One the media stops carrying the news, the whole drama dies down.

This is impunity, the hallmark of the killer party (PDP)
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 10:54am On Jul 06, 2012
Demdem:




Simple we need a report from a more credible source, Otedola should proceed in a way that seems right to him because if not for him many of the Crooks would have walked free. The police and their agencies have done nothing to help our situation. So they have lost their trust.

Finally don't you think we need the real truth. Most of what is in that report can't be trusted. What we know is lot of FX is gone and we need to know what happened to them. We can't depend on CROOKS to tackle the greatest financial crime in the history of this country. The police can go and rest till Otedola finishes exposing the crooks. Then they can prosecute all they like. Or can't they investigate again? Must Otedola do their work?

Haven't you ever wandered what happens that all the major financial crooks that walk free? That is because they are controlled by forces. If Otedola defending his integrity will get these Crooks exposed, so be it. So far we got some exposure because Otedola, thanks to him for that. Now we need more credible individuals without stains or skeletons in the Closets to stand up and lets find out what really went down.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 11:04am On Jul 06, 2012
Demdem:

Whatever u say wont change the facts as at today (yesterday or so). The police isnt an independent body but its being supervised by the same Presidency that supports Otedollar. Despite their corrupt tendencies, i still believe them because i simply dont have any other choice for now.

Another alternative is that the SSS should take charge of prosecution but they are probably not doing that because they also know its a waste of time going to court with these so called evidences.


By the way you believe them despite their corrupt tendencies? Huh? So why are we against FARCROOK? Despite his corrupt tendencies, we should believe him and his report. I now get your point.

The SSS and Otedola not rushing to prosecute FARCROOK, led him to make a mess of himself on the floor removing ZENON PETROLEUM form the list, denying collecting bribe, getting his people to deny him etc. So you still believe they should rush for prosecution even if more loopholes will be exposed.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:28am On Jul 06, 2012
thegoodjoehunt:

By the way you believe them despite their corrupt tendencies?

yes, and i gave my reason. kindly read through again. Your so-called SSS is also corrupt but u vouch for them, dont u?

Huh? So why are we against FARCROOK? Despite his corrupt tendencies, we should believe him and his report. I now get your point.

Nop, u havent. besides the house cant implement its own report, its left for the executives to do so.

the only issue i have against the house report is the various lists of indicted people and organization. Efforts should be made in making sure these parts of the report is thoroughly looked into again and make sure that org arent indicted wrongfully, besides that the report still dey Kampe and the house is right by sticking to their report. Security agents are expected to implement so they should do further investigation. How can someone in his right senses say Farookgate influenced these exclusives from the report

The SSS and Otedola not rushing to prosecute FARCROOK, led him to make a mess of himself on the floor removing ZENON PETROLEUM form the list, denying collecting bribe, getting his people to deny him etc. So you still believe they should rush for prosecution even if more loopholes will be exposed.

Justice delayed is justice denied. So called string operation is over, everything is now in the public domain. We have instances where criminals are charged to court while investigation is ongoing. This havent been done for farook. The excuse of not rushing to prosecute is bullshit. this issue has been on for months.
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Autolord: 1:43pm On Jul 06, 2012
[size=16pt]Breaking News:[/size]Hon Farouk Lawan Confesses Existence Of Evil Twin
Please read

https://www.nairaland.com/982991/hon-farouk-lawan-confesses-existence
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Limaoscar: 2:34pm On Jul 06, 2012
For once I'm fully with Keyamo on this.

Farouk is in the mess of His life.

My Dad used to remind us with a cane in hand..after we have tried all the lies in this world to make him not "sammer" us....He will calmly say "when you are in a hole, you don't dig in".
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Limaoscar: 2:51pm On Jul 06, 2012
Breaking News:Hon Farouk Lawan Confesses Existence Of Evil Twin
Please read

https://www.nairaland.com/982991/hon-farouk-lawan-confesses-existence

Sounds like some Evan Vs Evan(s) Enwerem Circuslipsrsealed
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by jammer777: 5:41pm On Jul 06, 2012
Demdem:

take a look at his previous post to me and u will see that he threw the first punch. i have been consciously civil on this thread. I cant make peeps read my contributions, its a choice.

I was expecting u attack moi too, but u just seem to me good man afterall,ignore future punches and remain good. Lovely weekend bro, u could join share a bowl of palmie wiv unlimited portions of bush meat... grin cheesy
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 5:47pm On Jul 06, 2012
^^^

Bro, i can humbly say that am a nice guy
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by thegoodjoehunt(m): 5:57pm On Jul 06, 2012
Demdem:



yes, and i gave my reason. kindly read through again. Your so-called SSS is also corrupt but u vouch for them, dont u?


I never vouched for them, I said if Otedola trust the security operatives he is working with, we must not be bent on him working with the police. The police already showed signs of compromise handling FARCROOK. If when he is detained, they could grant him access to leave the Cell, then how can we trust them in something bigger.


Justice delayed is justice denied. So called string operation is over, everything is now in the public domain. We have instances where criminals are charged to court while investigation is ongoing. This havent been done for farook. The excuse of not rushing to prosecute is bullshit. this issue has been on for months.


This is a delicate case and Otedola is handling it the way he seems fit. If the police actually care they should investigate and find out what went down. Not all cases do you have victims handing out evidences. Without Otedola the police are totally lost. FARCROOK confessed to taking the money. Now they should do their job. By the way JUSTICE DELAYED IS NOT JUSTICE DENIED. I wonder where you dug that from. There are cases that have lasted over 10 years and the final verdict upholds justice. Was that a case of justice denied?
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 6:15pm On Jul 06, 2012
thegoodjoehunt:

[b]

I never vouched for them, I said if Otedola trust the security operatives he is working with, we must not be bent on him working with the police. The police already showed signs of compromise handling FARCROOK. If when he is detained, they could grant him access to leave the Cell, then how can we trust them in something bigger.

Then let SSS prosecute Farook. If they cant, they simply shut up.


This is a delicate case and Otedola is handling it the way he seems fit. If the police actually care they should investigate and find out what went down. Not all cases do you have victims handing out evidences. Without Otedola the police are totally lost. FARCROOK confessed to taking the money. Now they should do their job. By the way JUSTICE DELAYED IS NOT JUSTICE DENIED. I wonder where you dug that from. There are cases that have lasted over 10 years and the final verdict upholds justice. Was that a case of justice denied?

This is no longer Otedollar case, he should hand over whatever he has and let the prosecution begin. His handling to me is shoddy and suggest that he himself have a lot to hide. case closed
Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by logica(m): 8:47pm On Jul 06, 2012
brownlord: I remember when growing up, my mother use to say, anything an Hausa tells you is nothing but the truth
You dey mind that MYTH? The backward ones (just like you will find even in Yoruba villages) are quite honest, but it's not just the Hausas. Most backward people are more honest than the urban types.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply)

Air Force Refunds N19.44bn To Stabilisation Account / "You Will Benefit From Restructuring" - Atiku Tells North / "You Are Too Slow" - Hakeem Baba-Ahmed To Buhari

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 125
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.