A001's Posts
Nairaland Forum › A001's Profile › A001's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 (of 184 pages)
Maximilan:For me, it's CR7, closely followed by Messi, notwithstanding the recent award the latter won. |
Maximilan:Who's now the first best ever? Messi? Lols. |
otemanuduno:OtemAtum, what does critical meditation mean, and as a person or in your own (Otemic) philosophy, how do you do critical meditation on an issue? Also, how do you do deep meditation? |
donjazet:Okay |
Nothing spectacular about Jorginho's game. He was just lucky to be a part of the winning squads for both his club and country. He's an annoying player to watch. |
Pr0ton:I'm not an atheist. But I agree with an atheist on many issues concerning religion and life generally. |
Pr0ton:Yes, which means I don't believe in any god, and those entities must have also come from a (unknown) Source like all things in existence. I don't do beliefs, but knowledge. Pr0ton:God, if it exists, is unknown or unknowable. Pr0ton:I don't see or refer to them as gods. I thought I made that clear in my posts. |
Pr0ton:Yes, that's true. Pr0ton:Yes, it's true that not all gods have human references. But all the gods worshipped in religions have human-like traits, including Yahweh and Allah. They're all deified humans judging from the their traits in the religious texts. Can you give me examples of a monotheistic religion? If you want to say Christianity, don't forget the religion was established on the concept of trinity in Catholicism. Also, Muslims like to paint Allah as a monotheistic god but by the time you study the history of the other religions predating Islam and see how different gods formed a trinity and are worshipped together as a God-head (one God), then it becomes clear the same practice is in Islam. In many parts of Qur'an, We is used to refer to God. That is a God-head you're looking at or a group of gods existing or worshipped as a single God. But most Muslims and Christians didn't take the time to study the history of older religions predating Christianity and Islam to see that almost all the concepts in the two Abrahamic religions were stolen from paganism. Pr0ton:I clearly said the entities religious people call gods are advanced beings. I don't use the word god personally to refer to them. If these advanced beings are existing in other parts of the Universe, I don't see them as gods or God. Pr0ton:No, in any Abrahamic religion, the entity worshipped as God is called the creator of the universe. That's how the concept is in the religions, not my own making. Pr0ton:I never told you that if the Universe has a maker, it has to be a god or God. That's your own conclusion. Pr0ton:You don't know the god worshipped in any Abrahamic religion is taken as the creator of the universe or the source/maker of all things? You obviously haven't taken the time to study the Bible and Qur'an then. You clearly don't understand what I said below, especially the highlighted because this comment of yours isn't related to my statement: "The word god or God is man-made, but that doesn't mean all those entities worshipped in religions never existed on this planet at some time in the past and that doesn't also mean the Universe doesn't have an Origin or Source, which you might call God or refer to in another way." I never said anything about the Source or Origin being God or a conscious being. Take your time to read posts before reacting to them. Pr0ton:If you understand the post you quoted, you won't be asking me this. On this subject of gods' existence or non-existence, I regard all the entities called gods in religions as the early beings or the first settlers on this planet who created early humans in their image, taught them languages, and civilized them. That's my own stance. And there are many pieces of evidence in various parts of the world and in religious texts and their histories in support of this position. |
Blakjewelry:Nigeria is a good example of the fact a religious society isn't necessarily a moral one. The average Nigerian, who is religious, is corrupt and uses his/her favorite parts of the Bible and Qur'an to justify cheating other people, defrauding others. (Just like the whites that brought Christianity into this country justified slavery and racism with some parts of the Bible.) Morality is natural and immorality is a learned or acquired trait. The innocent babies we see all around us demonstrate this fact always, until they grow up and are taught how to lie, cheat others by their religious and corrupt parents or guardians or relatives. Every human is born an atheist or agnostic. If you're a kind person, you don't need a god or a book to tell you to be nice to your fellow man. Hence, you don't need religion to live a moral life and be kind to others. What you need is good philosophy and ethics. Funnningly, religious people even copy the vindictive, wicked nature of Allah or Jehovah who they worship. This is one reason why Nigerians, with all their religiosity (hypocrisy), are some of the most wicked people in the world. Looking at Sharia laws in Islam or the (bloody) history of Catholicism, you realize that religion doesn't make you a moral, kind person but can make you an extremely wicked person. |
HellVictorinho3:You clearly don't understand most of the things I said up there. But that's fine. |
Pr0ton:The atheistic position looks naive to me as many atheists just think religious people merely manufactured names of the gods and goddesses they worship as God. But only naive people would think that way because all these gods and goddesses are early beings that had existed on this planet. For instance, if you study the history of our native religions in this part of the world, then you'll realize the fact all these gods and goddesses were deified humans. So, only someone that's ignorant or naive about how the world works will say that gods and goddesses like Orunmila, Amadioha, Ala, Osun, Sango, etc. are objects of fiction that didn't exist or won't know that it's these early beings or past beings that rule the today's world. The same thing applies to every other religion. All these gods and goddesses are simply past beings or the ancestors of their people (worshippers). The word god or God is man-made, but that doesn't mean all those entities worshipped in religions never existed on this planet at some time in the past and that doesn't also mean the Universe doesn't have an Origin or Source, which you might call God or refer to in another way. The entities called gods and goddesses are just advanced beings, and since we're yet to explore 1% of the Universe and have never set foot on any other planet in our solar system or beyond it, it's possible there are races of advanced beings out there in the Universe, which could be monitoring us. Otem claims all these gods and goddesses are advanced beings who had lived and created all sorts of life on this planet billions of years ago and are now in other parts of the Universe and regularly monitor this planet with some technologies (built to look like stars in the sky but are really surveillance gadgets) and UFOs. Given the vastness of this universe, there's a high chance that entities will be living in various parts of the Universe that our telescopes may not be sophisticated enough to detect yet. For these reasons, I maintain that there's a possibility advanced beings that religious people call gods and goddesses do exist in other parts of the Universe. The areas of Physics studying the origin and evolution of the Universe, UAPs, extraterrestrial life are Astrophysics, Cosmology, and ET/planetary science. And with time, advances made in those areas will reveal the truth. It's more reasonable to me to approach the subject with agnosticism and open-mindedness rather than pitching my tent with either of the two extremes. |
HellVictorinho3:Okay |
HellVictorinho3:If you apply the wave-particle paradox to the brain, it can have a wave-aspect (the soul or psyche) that we can't see and flesh-aspect (particle) that we can see. Understanding this inner self or inner being (also called ka) scientifically will help us know how thoughts originate in the brain, how dreams are made and can be stored, how memories can be digitized, and so on. The wave-particle duality of matter has been demonstrated in various experiments, microscopically and macroscopically (though with a material containing a few thousands of atoms, not with a human being, at least yet). The concept applies to matter generally. |
HellVictorinho3:I don't know. I've mentioned some here; if you're interested, you may check them. But if you're not in the university yet, don't read the books. It's better to focus on gaining admission first. |
HellVictorinho3:You can see it as simply the brain, the psyche, or the soul. |
HellVictorinho3:Lols. You don't understand these things because you've not read some books of philosophy and physics. It's all about one's interest and age. When you're older, some of them will be clearer. There are some books that don't make sense at a certain age. |
HellVictorinho3:Spirit means different things to different people, and to me, it means inner self or inner being. Nothing superstitious or supernatural. Scientifically, it's defined in my previous comment. |
1Sharon:This is an excerpt from the link about Berbers' origin in Africa: "Berber, self-name Amazigh, plural Imazighen, any of the descendants of the pre-Arab inhabitants of North Africa." Pre-Arab people in that region were blacks not Caucasians (Arabs), as all humans originated from black ancestors in Africa. This is not even so detailed. I can find books of their history later written by African authors, not Arabized writers/Muslims that claim the fictitious Adam from the Arab world is the first man on Earth. |
HellVictorinho3:We're two different individuals with different philosophies in life. HellVictorinho3:Your knowledge of EM waves in Physics is shallow. If not, you won't be misinterpreting the clear statements I made. |
HellVictorinho3:Read about the wave-particle paradox on Google and apply it to a human. The concept is applicable to matter generally. |
1Sharon:Berbers aren't Caucasian in ancient times, but they're in modern times due to invasion and slave trades in some past centuries. Berbers are indigenous North African people who were traditionally black, but are now Caucasian in contemporary times. |
1Sharon:Christianity and Islam just copied many concepts from African traditional religions and bastardized them like musicwriter says. Spirit, as depicted in the Bible and Qur'an, is just superstitious nonsense. To get a deeper understanding of reality, it's crucial for one to learn from the sources those so-called holy books plagiarized. That's why books like Otem's, the Kyballion, and the Emerald tablets are crucial, at least for research scientists. Spirit is just a kind of wave and is one of two ways something manifests to us in reality with the other form being particle (the concept of wave-particle duality of matter in Physics comes to mind here). Whether matter appears to us as a spirit (wave) or as a particle (flesh), both are a single thing manifesting in a dualistic manner, and it's our (limited) perception or the interpretation of the brain that causes the confusion (illusion). You can see spirit as a kind of light. Some scientists have been able to condense light to exist in solid form with the speed of the particles attenuated in a special medium. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_light If light is not existing in such a condensed state, then these particles will be moving at the speed of light and will appear invisible or non-existent to us. Hence, people commonly say a spirit doesn't exist because scientists can't detect the wave yet and interact with it. But our perception of reality is very limited and highly filtered. The universe is mental as what we see as reality is just a picture our brain builds for us or an interpretation the brain gives us, not what really exists. In the future, physicists will be able to detect and measure spirit/consciousness (wave). For interstellar travels, superluminal (faster-than-light) travels, and teleportation to be achievable in the future, it's crucial for scientists to detect and trap spirit or consciousness, which is just a unique kind of wave. |
1Sharon:Blacks are the first people on this planet, including North Africa. That's a fact, not a claim. Africa is the cradle of humankind. |
1Sharon:Some things aren't visible to us but influence our reality. If God exists as the source/origin of all things, I think astrophysicists and cosmologists will discover it in the future since those experts study the origin and evolution of the Universe. If something exists, there must be evidence for its existence. If no evidence is offered, then there's no basis to accept it exists. |
Pr0ton:How does saying God might or might not exist mean holding onto God as being the only alternative? Agnosticism is just a position between the two extremes — atheism and theism. It's very arrogant of a human that's extremely ignorant about his own planet to assert God doesn't exist as a matter of fact, when he's yet to explore 1% of the Universe, 10% of the world's oceans, and is completely ignorant of most of the things existing or happening even in his immediate environs. Holding such a position makes you the same as a religionist. But an agnostic considers that God or gods might exist, is open-minded, and looks to science to solve the riddle with time. Atheists are dogmatic IMO, just like religious people, though it's still much better to be an atheist than a religionist. But agnostics are open-minded and prefer to approach these things with a curious, inquisitive approach like a baby. For an agnostic, it's scientific discoveries and data that determine the truth, not the parochial wishes of an atheist or the ill-informed, superstitious notions of a religionist. |
1Sharon:Lols, you obviously know very little about the history of Egypt to be asking these questions. Apparently, you've never taken the time to research the history of the country and the people. Anyone with basic knowledge of Egypt's history knows the Arabs currently calling themselves Egyptians aren't the original ancient Egyptians. The Arabian presence in the country only began a few centuries ago. Before the Greeks and Arabs invaded the country, the ancient Egyptians were blacks. The body of evidence in support of that assertion is great, ranging from the tons of paintings of their gods and goddesses, to the discovered mummies, arts, to fashion, and even genetic evidence. To learn the truth of the matter, get good books of ancient African history written by black writers, not the fake, distorted histories (pure lies) the European and Arab conquerors taught to most Africans. There are some of such books posted on Nairaland, including Otem's. Even all the countries in North Africa were not originally Arabs (not only Egypt), but blacks (mainly Berbers or Berberians/Barbarians). |
Pr0ton:I don't understand you. Which assumptions do agnostics live by? Do you see assumption as possibility or vice versa because that's the impression you gave with this comment? Where are the assumptions in my post you quoted? The agnostic doesn't say a god exists or doesn't exist. He/she simply asserts there's no evidence for God's existence or non-existence due to the limitations of our understanding of the Universe using science as a tool and owing to the limitations of our senses. The agnostic is open-minded and seeks evidence for or against either of the two positions, not just one possibility because if he supports either of the two sides, then that's not agnosticism. Based on our current level of scientific knowledge of the Universe, we may never be able to know as a matter of fact that God exists or doesn't exist at least while on Earth. |
Pr0ton:That's the atheistic position which I don't subscribe to. We know very little about the Universe to say it as a matter of fact that God exists or doesn't exist. Given the facts that the Earth is just one of the trillions (or even unlimited number) of planets (worlds) in existence, that the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old when the Age of Scientific Enlightenment is less than 600 years (a millennium), and that information about most of the things existing in our environs is filtered by our senses (i.e. we don't see and may not be able to see what actually exists in reality), it's possible God exists. Our sciences, for all its glory and breakthroughs, are still elementary in many ways and nascent in many key areas of life. Thus, it's not reasonable to conclude a god or God doesn't exist. When one understands the limits of our senses and organs — especially the brain, eye, and ear — one realizes life is much deeper and complex than science paints it. Reality is different from existence as something can be existing but isn't real to us as limited beings. For these reasons, the agnostic position is the most reasonable IMO as it makes one open-minded about things. |
Pr0ton:That's why there are agnostics like me. When scientists present concrete evidence for God's existence, agnosticism will die a natural death. Given the fact that we know very little about the Universe, one can't conclude that God exists or doesn't exist. Hence, I find the agnostic position convenient. |
Pr0ton:Okay. Do you have any scientific evidence for God's existence? A yes or no would do. |
Crystyano:Okay |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 (of 184 pages)

