₦airaland Forum

OkekeChristian: [color=#f00]
If you can't read, please stop writing... This is a "social" network! If you have "low self esteem" problem, solve it elsewhere; stop attacking people with arguments that are devoid of premeditation.[/color]

Are u sick?

OkekeChristian: [color=#f00]Suddenly, Adamawa has turned to Borno State overnight.

Perhaps still, they're the only university in the north.[/color]

Guy u are soooooooo ignorant oooo. The only university in d north? Guy u get problem wallahi.

tintingz: force marriage is still a practice in Africa, it has to do with culture and not Islamic.

I agree wit u bt many muslims or islamic countries has make it look like force marriage is islam which is nt islamically. Jus look at d issue of honour killing, its disgusting.

AbdulSleek: Who is talking about having se.x up and down?


You have shown that your mind is dirty.


Women can embrace their sexuality without being pros.titutes. Embracing se.xuality does not mean having se.x constantly.

wat does it mean then? Not havin sex constantly bt periodically abi?

AbdulSleek: Who is talking about having se.x up and down?


You have shown that your mind is dirty.


Women can embrace their sexuality without being pros.titutes. Embracing se.xuality does not mean having se.x constantly.

wat does it mean then? Not havin sex constantly bt periodically abi?

19 year old Russian woman Alyona Ipatova who left her five-month-old
baby to starve to death while she went out
partying for two weeks has been sentenced
to a minimum of 10 years' hard labour.
Alyona, dubbed 'Monster mum' by Russian
media admitted in court to leaving her
baby alone in her apartment in Russia and
went partying for two whole weeks with
friends.
Prosecutors said when the teen got back,
she found her infant daughter dead.

Alyona pictured below in another pic said
in court during sentencing
"I really regret what I did. I did not
want that to happen. I realise what I
have done," she told the sentencing
hearing.
Her lawyer claimed she had asked the
child's father to help look after their
daughter.
"Yes, she left the child at times.
Although she left her, sometimes she
came back in the morning or the
father was at home, so he could still
look after the girl," he claimed.
Her lawyer wanted the court to change the
charge from 'murder of a minor with
cruelty' to 'causing death by negligence' but
the judge rejected the plea and sentenced
her to 10 years hard labour.

source : http://www.lindaikeji..com.es/2014/09/sick-mum-left-baby-to-starve-to-death.html?m=1

UncannyGenius: Why can't this silly northerner called Zainab mind her business? Mikel is an adult who decides how he will live his life and face the consequences. This is why I hate Nigerian girls. Stupid people who can't mind their business because some correct guy don't give a damned about them.

And to illiterate you, any gal who bear Zainab is from the north. Na wa ooooo.

AbdulSleek: Freedom for women to show their faces without fear

Freedom for women to drive to wherever they want in country

Freedom for women to work/walk without a male guardian

Freedom of women to marry their choice, not just a family approved muslim

Freedom of women to embrace their sexuality and not be judged by their virginity

Freedom for women to embrace their sexuality abi?
So to u having sex up and down is freedom? na wa oooo
Hey the word freedom is subjective, wat is call freedom in a country maynt be freedom in another country. We shld nt try to impose our way of life to other ppl. Ppl are different.

Lailerh: Yeah I agree with you on this quite alright but these women were not molested nor were they forced into marriage. They were just not allowed to drive cars. I just think it's not right for Saudi to be listed here

I somehow agree that its nt right for Saudi to be listed here, bt on force marriage, Saudi are nt innocent of that. Some gals are married out too early for dem to even consent to d marriage while some older ones are force to marry someone they don't love. Let be sincere we have that force marriage ish in many islamic countries. Its reducing sha.

focus7: And all of them are islamic countries. Islam is such an evil religion that shouldn't have happen to humanity just like ebola and cancer.

And u see hw bigotry and hatred has blinded ur heart, brain and eyes. So to u dullard, Guatemala, DR Congo, Nepal and some others are islamic countries?
U need to go and take ur medicine.

Lailerh: God bless you that's exactly what I was thinking too

Bt Saudi shld nt have ban women frm driving car completely. Some wish dey could drive themselves bt d government will nt agree. That is discrimination that has no origin frm religion, its jus their male chauvinist character. Always tryin to demote female folks to the background.

hensben: make canadian citizen come write WAEC na, u think say waec and jamb easy

what they wrote over there is harder than both waec and Jamb. Can our Nigeria sec students write SAT or TOEFL amd pass wot high marks?
And remember over there nothing like exam malpractices.

Congolese players dancing skelewu after scoring the second goal

calabar ppl no dey watch football? The stadium is somehow empty.

I had an interesting experience the other
day. After spending a good deal of the
morning in an interesting and
intellectually stimulating discussion with a
very bright and pleasant Irishman about
the right of the State of Israel to exist, I
spent the afternoon in a heated and
acrimonious debate with a very irate and
extremist Israeli who believed that ''blacks
were slaves of islam'', that ''Arabs are
animals'' and that ''muslims were evil''.
In the morning I was defending the Jews
and the State of Israel with all the logic,
passion, debating skills, historical
knowledge, powers of persuasion and
sincerity that I could muster and in the
afternoon I found myself vigorously
confronting the excesses, religious bigotry,
racism and sheer arrogance of a
misguided Jew and the malevolent mindset
and disposition that virtually all extremist
and right-wing Israelis suffer from.
What a day it was. I experienced as much
hate and as much violence in temperament
and language from that Jew as I have ever
done from the most extreme and militant
Islamic fundamentalist and jihadist.
Naturally he got far more than he
bargained for from me and he left the
discussion a very sober man indeed because
I was compelled to tell him the bitter truth
about his own people, his own faith and his
own intellectual and emotional disposition.
Yet all in all the entire discussion troubled
me. This is especially after I was labelled
as being ''anti-Semitic'' by many American
and European Jews and Christians on
twitter simply for speaking the truth.
I have also been labelled as being ''anti-
Muslim'' by many of my Muslim friends
and detractors simply because of my
relentless and unyielding opposition to
Islamist terror and Muslim
fundamentalism over the years.
Having been involved in public discourse
and debates for over 20 years now I loose
no sleep about what others think about me
but what I always find troubling is the fact
that some people find it very difficult to
cope with the bitter truth when confronted
with their own shortcomings, fallacies and
errors.
Worse still once you point those bitter
truths out to them they go on the
defensive, lash out at you, seek to
demonise you and label you as public
enemy number one. I am used to getting
that from the Muslim extremists in our
midst but I was surprised to get it from the
Jews, whom I have always defended, as
well.
And frankly the extraordinary brand of
arrogance and high level of historical
revisionism, double-speak, stubborness and
selective memory of the right-wing
orthodox Jewish extremists is worse than
any that I have ever come across in my
life because, more often than not, they
speak from the position of being the
helpless victim and they feel justified in
all that they say and do.
Their rhetoric is powerful, compelling and
convincing and the rationale for all that
they do and say is laced with emotion. This
is pretty potent stuff and these are very
serious people with an extremly dangerous
mindset. They are indeed the very same
people that murdered the moderate
Israeli Prime Minister and great
peacemaker, Mr. Yizhak Rabin, simply
because he had the decency and presence
of mind to sign the American-sponsored
Oslo Accords with Yasser Arafat's
Palestinian Liberation Organisation in
1995.
I kept asking myself one question: how on
earth do the Arabs cope when faced with
such insolence, intolerance and racism
from the Jewish far right? Many of us love
Israel and consider ourselves to be friends
of Israel but, like I told my Jewish
orthodox antagonist, real friends are
compelled to tell the truth, even if that
truth is bitter and unpleasant.
Only fake friends will endorse every act of
Israel even when that act is wrong,
counter-productive, ill-conceived,
irrational and unreasonable. Only fake
friends will support the display and
expression of every inappropiate,
disproportionate and indefensible Israeli
action and utterance.
If you are not prepared to tell the State
of Israel or the Jews the truth when and
where they have gone wrong then you
cannot call yourself a lover of Israel or a
believer in the Jewish cause.
I sought to teach my right wing Jewish
orthodox friend a few lessons in that
debate and those lessons are as follows.
Not all Muslims are bad, not all Christians
are good and not all Jews are civilised.
Again not all Arabs are demons, not all
Jews are angels and not all Christians are
as holy as the Pope.
Racial bigotry and religious intolerance is
the worse form of ignorance that exists. It
is a cancer and it is evil. That is why I am
a secularist and I believe that religion
must be kept out of the affairs of state
and politics.
Whether you are black, white, brown, red
or yellow or whether you are a Muslim,
Christian, Arab, Jew, Persian or anything
else, if you are a racist or a religious bigot
I despise you and I have nothing but
contempt for you.
I harbor the same degree of disdain and
contempt for a Muslim fundamentalist
and Islamist terrorist as I do for a
christian terrorist, a Jewish terrorist and a
Hindu terrorist. Terror is terror. It has no
race or creed. It is evil and it is
unacceptable.
Those that believe that such atrocities are
only committed by Muslims have not read
their history very well. They forget that it
was a christian by the name of Adolf
Hitler, with the full backing and
endorsement of the Pope of his day, who
gassed 6 million Jews, Slavs and Gypsies
and who caused the death of 50 million
people during the Second World war.
They forget that it was a christian by the
name of Kaiser Wilhelm 11 of Germany
who started the First World War which led
to the death of 20 million people.
They forget that it was a christian militia
backed by the Jewish State of Israel and
the Israeli Defence Force that killed
thousands of innocent Palestinian and
Arab women and children in the refugee
camps of Sabra and Shatilla.
They forget that it was the Hindu
nationalists that slaughtered hundreds of
thousands of Muslims in post colonial India
which led to the breaking up of that
nation into three separate countries.
They forget that it was the white christian
Boers of South Africa that institutionalis
ed apartheid and that justified it with
verses from the bible.They forget that it
was the Jewish state of Israel that
espoused and still espouses the deeply
racist concept of Zionism.
They forget that it was the Christian Hutus
of Rwanda that slaughtered 800,000 of
their own Christian Tutsi brothers and
sisters in 28 days of madness, fratricide
and genocide with knives, cudgels and
machetes. They forget that it was Christian
America that killed 150,000 innocent
civilians in 3 days when they bombed
Baghdad in an illegal war.
They forget that it was Christian America
that wiped out the Red Indians and that
herded the few that they didn't slaughter
into concentration camps that they called
reservations. They forget that it was
Christian western Europe that
dehumanised and enslaved the black man
and that carved up and colonised the
African continent. They forget that it was
Christian Great Britain that tormented
and plagued pre-independence China and
that turned the Chinese into helpless
victims of a drug called opium.
They forget that it is Christian America
that has killed thousands of innocent
muslim women and children in secret
drone attacks in Pakistan and
Afghanistan in the last few years. They
forget that it was the Christian IRA that
killed thousands of innocent British
civilians over a period of 100 years and
during the time of the ''troubles''.
They forget that it was Christian King
Leopold 11 of Belgium that personally
ordered the slaughter of no less than 10
million Congolese and that actually owned
the entire nation of the Congo and
regarded it as part of his personal estate.
They forget that it was Jewish Israel that
killed 2000 innocent civilians, including
450 infants and young children, during
the just-concluded bombing of Gaza. I
have always believed that Israel has the
right to defend herself and I have always
supported them in their noble cause.
This is because I believe passionately that
the re-establishment of the State of
Israel in 1948 was prophetic and because I
believe that she has the right to exist.
However that does not mean that I ought
to endorse, commend or support the
slaughter of 450 innocent Palestinian
children.
They forget that it is Christian Ukraine
that is shelling, bombing and killing
thousands of their own people in the
eastern part of their country today simply
because those people are trying to exercise
their right of self-determination and are
fighting for their freedom and liberty.
They forget that it was the Christian Serbs
that were indulging in ethnic cleansing
and slaughtering the Muslim Kosovars and
Bosnians and the christian Croats in
eastern Europe approximately 20 years
ago. They forget that it was the Christian
crusaders that massacred every single
muslim man, woman and child when they
took the City of Jerusalem in the Middle
Ages.
They forget that it was a Muslim by the
name of Salahudeen who, 100 years later
when he re-took Jerusalem back from the
Christians, refused to retaliate and
instead gave every christian safe passage
to leave the city and ordered that not one
of them should be harmed.
Those that argue that all Muslims are
butchers, animals and terrorists have
forgotten the compassion of Salahudeen
and those that argue that all Christians
are beasts and sadistic killers have
forgotten the compassion of King Richard
the Lionheart of England, a God-fearing
and profoundly good man who led the
later crusades, who liberated Jerusalem
from the Muslims and who was a respected
friend and worthy adversary of the great
Salahudeen.
From this it is clear that kindness,
restraint, mercy, compassion,
righteousness and humanity has no
religious or ethnic boundries or identity.
Unfortunately neither does the affliction
of wickedness or the perpetuation and
willful administration of horror and
misfortune.
Terror is unacceptable whether it comes
from a Christian, a Jew or a Muslim and
whether it is being administered by the
state or by a religious or private militia.
Human beings of every race and creed can
be beasts and more often than not they
use religion to justify their beastly
activities and ways and to achieve their
sinister political objectives.
I condemn Islamist terror (particularly
the type of horrific and unprecedented
terror inflicted by groups like Al Qaeda,
the Taliban, ISIS, Islamic Jihad, Al Shabab
and Boko Haram) but I refuse to condemn
Islam as a religion because not all Muslims
are terrorists and not all terrorists are
Muslims.
If I were to condemn all Muslims for the
barbaric actions of a few of them then I
would have to condemn all Christians and
Jews for the barbaric acts, committed
throughout world history, by the adherents
of both of these faiths as well.
Not one of the three major religious faiths
is evil because each of the three accept the
concept and propogate the notion of one
all-powerful and all-knowing God that
rules in the affairs of men and that is the
creator of all that exists. It is mankind
that corrupts and abuses the practice and
interpretation of these three great faiths
and that, more often than not, uses them
to justify the most barbaric and the most
evil acts that one can possibly imagine. If
we really want a better world this has to
stop.
I shall pray for my right wing, orthodox
Jewish antagonist because, as with all
extremists, he has been blinded by hate,
fear and venom. I shall also continue to
pray for and bless the State of Israel
because I have a very soft spot for the
Jews and because my bible compels me to
do so.
Yet whether the Jews continue to see me as
a friend or not is neither here nor there
and neither does it bother me one way or
the other. This is because the Lord sees my
heart and, as a servant of truth, I am
compelled by the laws of the God to
continue to speak the truth no matter how
painful it is and no matter whose ox is
gored. Shalom Al Israel.

For Jules Pomerance, walking around
without a stitch on in front of her son
Jordan is the most natural thing in the
world.
The mother-of-three happily potters round
the house in the nude, doesn’t wrap a towel
around herself when she leaves the
bathroom after a shower and she and
husband Nigel often enjoy a naked snuggle
in bed with Jordan and his sisters.
But Jordan isn’t a baby or a toddler — he’s
13.

Many will find his mother’s actions
unsettling and say it’s time she started
covering up in front of him. Some experts
even believe she risks causing long-term
psychological damage to her son.
Jules, from Hertfordshire, is adamant she’s
doing nothing wrong. ‘I see no reason to
stop as Jordan gets older,’ the 44-year-old
insists.
‘Nudity has nothing whatever to do with sex
as far as I’m concerned, and as our son
has already reached puberty it’s not going
to make any difference now. If anything, I
think that “normalising” nudity is the best
way of countering the over-sexualisation of
our children.

‘Of course, if Jordan asked me to put some
clothes on I would respect that. But so far
he has always felt comfortable with it.
‘As a family we are frequently naked
around the house, especially in the
mornings when the children get into bed for
a cuddle with my husband and me.’
So is Jules right? Are we nothing more than
a country of prudes where even though it’s
easy for boys to access graphic pornography
— displaying unnaturally hairless and
artificially enhanced young women’s bodies
— in seconds on mobile phones and laptops,
it’s frowned upon for them to see their own
mothers’ naked bodies?
Is it unhealthy for boys to see their mothers
undressed once they have reached puberty
or, indeed, at any age? Is there a right
time to cover up in front of your son?
Jules, who runs her own face and body
painting business and is married to Nigel, a
45-year-old jeweller, cannot remember
her own parents ever being naked in front
of her — the closest she got was one
holiday, when she says: ‘I remember
walking into our hotel room when my father
was getting dressed and him moving behind
an armchair so I wouldn’t see him without
his trousers on.’
She has never had any inhibitions about
showing her body. Given her own upbringing,
she has no idea where her relaxed attitude
towards nudity comes from, but says she
hopes her daughters Daisy, ten, and Lily,
seven, will share her confidence.
‘I’m not a supermodel — I have a scar on
my tummy from having a Caesarean with
Jordan and like most mums I’ve got my fair
share of stretch marks.
‘But I am happy with my own body and
always have been. Nudity is very normal to
me.
‘One reason I’m keen for my daughters to
see me naked was because, last year, Lily
started to comment that her thighs looked
fat. I was horrified and wanted to show her
that people come in all shapes and sizes
and that no one looks like they do in
fashion magazines, not even the models
themselves.’
Jules also hopes that seeing her naked will
help her teenage son to have a more
realistic view of women’s bodies when he’s
older. She says: ‘The women Jordan sees in
magazines are airbrushed versions of the
female form. I hope seeing the real thing
will help.’
But is it possible that her behaviour might
ultimately be harmful?
Scientists who have explored the subject
suggest the age you start covering up may
be key. One U.S. study found exposure to
parental unclothedness for those aged six or
under had benefits when it came to their
capacity for affection and intimacy as
adults.
But another found that boys who saw their
parents in the nude from the ages of six to
11 were more likely to have permissive
attitudes towards sexuality and more sexual
partners.
Sexual and relationship psychotherapist
Margaret Ramage believes that given the
special bond between mothers and their
sons there are risks for boys who see their
mothers naked after they are about eight.
‘Although there is nothing intrinsically
“wrong” in nudity between family members,
it can have effects we cannot predict,’ she
says.
‘Neuroscientists have found there is a sexual
template in the brain that begins to develop
around seven or eight in a boy, and it might
be inhibited by the sight of his mother’s
naked body, which could possibly affect him
in later life.
‘The brain has its own ways of dealing with
such things, often not under our own
control. As a therapist I have seen adult
men who slept in their mothers’ beds in
their teenage years and who later
complained of a complete lack of sexual
desire. Although it’s not conclusive evidence
it is enough to alert one to the possible
dangers.’
She adds: ‘If nudity were a totally non-
sexual matter we wouldn’t be thinking about
this. But in our culture, nudity is very much
a sexual matter, with mystery, excitement
and arousal all linked to it. Generally, it is
important that children are not exposed to
adult sexuality in any form.’

Jordan says he supports his mother’s
attitude to nudity, and doesn’t feel it’s
anything unnatural.
‘I honestly don’t feel at all embarrassed
about seeing my mum naked. It’s not as if
she just suddenly started doing it. It is just
normal in our house,’ he says, adding that
he wouldn’t feel comfortable seeing a
friend’s mother naked.
But that’s unlikely, as Jordan admits: ‘Most
of my friends’ families are not like mine.
‘If mates come over unexpectedly I
wouldn’t just take them up to my room
without calling out, “Is everyone decent?”
first. But I think it’s good to be relaxed
about nudity in the family and will probably
do the same with my children when I grow
up.’

Sex therapist Sarah Fletcher says there are
benefits for children who see their parents
naked.
‘I think up until adolescence it is helpful
for children to see their parents in the
nude as it models a positive attitude
towards their bodies,’ she says.
‘It helps prevent them growing up believing
their own bodies are in some sense
shameful. But in puberty I think there
need to be more boundaries and respect for
what they might feel is awkward or
embarrassing.’
Parenting coach Judy Reith says teenage
boys usually indicate when it’s time to start
covering up. ‘They suddenly begin shutting
doors, finding it embarrassing if their mum
is wandering around naked,’ she says.
‘Adolescence is a time of huge emotional
and mental turmoil. It is tough enough for
today’s teens outside of home, so I would
encourage mothers to be sensitive to their
teenager’s reaction to unclothedness. It’s a
normal part of growing up.’
Mother-of-three Karen King, 44, considers
herself open-minded, but stopped letting
her sons see her naked when they were
seven or eight.
Karen, a director of her own estate agency,
who lives near Leatherhead, Surrey, with
husband Ray, 57, a communications
consultant, says: ‘I’ve always believed it’s
important to treat nudity in a way that
removes any stigma and ensures my
children feel confident in their bodies. The
trick is to know when a line has to be drawn
in respect of their bodies and your own.’
Karen is mum to James, 20, who’s studying
chemistry at Oxford University, Sarah, 18,
who has just secured a place at Oxford
Brookes to study psychology, and Daniel, 14.
She adds: ‘Until they were seven or eight,
my body, naked or otherwise, had been a
source of essential comfort for my sons.
After all, it had nurtured all three
children through pregnancy and then
breastfeeding.
‘I’ve aIways slept naked and I treasured
those skin-on-skin cuddles with them when
they were very small — medical experts say
it encourages a close bond and feelings of
security between parent and child. I’d pad
around the bedroom naked in front of
them, or share baths with them. They were
totally at ease running about with no
clothes on.’

But she says by the time James and Daniel
each got to around seven or eight their
hormones were starting to kick in and if a
woman appeared on the TV screen in a
bikini they were ‘all eyes’.
She adds: ‘With the internet, film and TV,
it’s very easy for boys to find images of
women naked or scantily clad so, sadly,
they seem to be more sexually aware at a
younger age now.
‘So when James was about eight I decided
that I needed to cover up.

‘Suddenly, I felt there needed to be a
demarcation between my body as their
mummy and the bodies of other women as
objects of desire.
‘There was a growing awareness that my
sons knew too much about the female body
as a sexual form and that I was their
mother and needed to be in a different
category.
‘I wanted to maintain a respectful
perception of me as their mother.
‘So although I still sleep naked and walk
round with nothing on in front of Ray, now
I always grab a bathrobe before leaving the
bedroom and shut the door before getting
changed.
‘An added factor in covering up was the
need for my sons to understand that they
must respect their sister’s need for privacy
about her body and all its changes as she
got older, too.’
She adds: ‘Around seven and eight was also
the age Daniel and James started to feel
more awkward about me seeing them naked,
too.
‘If Daniel catches sight of me in my bra
and knickers he’s mortified and says: “Oh,
Mum, cover up!”
‘While I respect other mothers who continue
to be open with their unclothedness in front of
their sons, I think they are removing the
thrill and anticipation of discovery that is
part of the relationships their sons will
eventually have with their future partners
or wives.’
Sexual and relationship therapist Margaret
Ramage agrees and thinks mothers of sons
should be aware of the possible
consequences of their actions. She says:
‘Once a boy reaches puberty it is much
harder to know what the long-term effects
of seeing his mother naked might be.’

source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2736090/The-mother-s-proud-parade-naked-13-year-old-son.html?ito=social-facebook

DailyNews: Arab guys should get busy and stop depending on mineral resources. It is their less-busy lifestyle that makes them waste time on a barbaric religion!

They should stop sponsoring terrorists to sustain their barbaric religion!

They should contribute to global peace and harmony and quit their barbaric religious extremism! Can you enjoy the freedom you enjoy in Europe or American in any Arab nation? And you guys are here hailing their nonsense lifestyle.

I visit Dubai for a reason, if not I will never!

My dislike goes to all Arab nations sponsoring global terrorism to expand and sustain their barbaric religion that they have used to brainwash and destroy my nation and Africa.

If not for their barbaric religion and influence in Africa, Africa would have been a peaceful, lovely place unlike what their followers have turned it into.

And for those screaming: Dubai is heaven, Dubai is that! Let me inform you that Dubai is an artificial city and not healthy for human habitation. Time will tell. Give Dubai some more decades and you will see what will become of their artificial edifices.

Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, etc are the sponsors of most islamic terrorists terrorising the whole world today.

Their European counterparts are busy thinking of how to develop the world and make it a better place for all to live, Arab nations are busy clinging on their barbaric religious beliefs.

But whatever they do, they can't run away from natural nemesis. You can't be sponsoring terrorists to destroy other peoples' homes while you live in peace and expect to live in peace forever, not possible.

Karma will catch up with them. The kind terror that will befall Arab nations in future will be so horrible! All these their tall buildings will be levelled to dust. They will be rendered homeless. Their evil royals will be forced to go on exile.

Whenever I hear Boko Haram, ISIS, Alqadae, Al Shabab, Taliban, etc I dislike Arab nations the more. They hate peace.

They value their barbaric religious belief to human life. Cavemen living like wild animals!! Time will tell.

Bla bla bla bla bla. Guy u are a big time disappointment. When did UAE sponsored terrorism? And u are even abusing their religion, that showed that u are a big tym bigot. America that u hailed much are d biggest sponsored of terrorism. Jus clean ur heart of bigotry and hatred so that u can see well and move forward cos u are currently blind now

Dis dailynews or wat did u call urself is just an extreme hater that has allow bias emotion and unjustifiable hatred to becloud his senses. Guy sorry for u oooooo. Haters are liable to die young. safe urself.

yorke1: I don't need to read further. So far, countries that practice Islam have the weirdest of Laws!

C dis hypocrite. Religious bigot and intolerant

abbakacici: wow so this is the weirdest law : In Saudi Arabia, it is illegal for any woman to drive a car. Right now, it’s illegal for them to vote too and this In Saudi Arabia, there is no minimum age for marriage. have you read all the 67 laws so you just saw saudi arabia

u dey mind d hypocrite. He is a bigot

tommiblack: Asisat, na which language for naija be that

Asisat na islamic name. Its d female version of Abdulazeez. Its yoruba female muslim that usually bear that name.

suwailad: i'm freaking serious. leave these women oh, the things they do for power, you will never believe it!

hmmmm so to get power and more power and money, dey do sleep around and commit adultery?

suwailad: One thing you got to know about these first ladies is that they are HIGH CLASS PROSTITUTES and most are members of cults that demand they are sexually violated by other well to do members periodically! This is not a drill.

u serious?
how u take know all this?

izsmike: yeah, what is bodies

number of people they have slept with

Adeniran Adebayo, (pictured below) a
primary school teacher has been arrested
and arranged in court by the Lagos state
police command for raping a primary 4 pupil
inside the toilet of their private primary
school located on Olateju Ilesanmi Street,
Baruwa, Ipaja area of Lagos, Punch
reports.
Testifying before a Lagos State Chief
Magistrate Court in Ebutte Metta yesterday
August 13th, the Investigating Police
officer from the state Criminal
Investigation Department Yaba said he
interrogated the little girl three times in
which she affirmed that her teacher, Mr
Adeniran, who is married with two children,
had lured her to the school toilet and forced
himself into her and then threatened to flog
her if she screamed. Continue...
The police officer investigating the case
said;
"I interviewed the victim after the
matter was brought to the SCID. She
said on the fateful day, she was in
school after the closing hours and was
waiting for her younger brother, who
attended the same school, so they
could go back home together. While
waiting, she decided to get busy with
her assignments. She said it was while
she was doing the assignment that the
teacher came and said she should
follow him. He then took her to a toilet
within the school premises and
threatened to cane her if she
screamed, unzipped himself, undressed
the pupil and made love to her. The girl
said she was crying while this was on.
It was a female teacher, who was
passing by that heard her cry. The
female teacher came closer to have a
better look and immediately the
suspect saw her, he quickly zipped up.
The pupil said the female teacher told
him that being a teacher, he should
never have taken advantage of the
girl.”
The accused, Mr Adeniran, while narrating
what happened to the Chief Magistrate,
denied the claims, saying he never raped the
girl
"I am the health teacher of the school.
I married five years ago, and have two
sons. There are six male teachers in
the school. On that day, I didn’t call
the girl. I only stood at the gate and
asked her and her brother to go home.
That was all. I was surprised that
after four days, they came to my
office and arrested me. The toilet in
question has never even been used by
anybody.” he said
The Chief Magistrate, O.O. Olatunji, was
however not satisfied by his own account,
stating that children between the ages of
6-11 never tell lies
"Kids hardly lie, especially when they
are between the ages of six to 11. And
that’s why I find it hard to believe the
account of the defendant. People like
you should not be in the society. If like
you said there were six male teachers
in your school, why did she decide to
pick only you? It’s such a big shame,”
the Chief magistrate said
The police prosecutor advised the court to
remand the accused in prison but he was
granted bail in the sum of N300,000 with
two sureties in like sum. The judge ordered
Adeniran should be remanded in Prison until
the bail conditions have been fulfilled. The
case was adjourned till October 15th.

source: http://www.lindaikeji..com.es/2014/08/primary-school-teacher-rapes-10year-old.html?m=1

HopeAtHand: What is it with Northerners and Sudan..Is that place another kind of Mecca for them.

IMO, i feel Nigeria and Nigerians are more distinguished than the Sudanese in all facets of life.

I guess the Medical students needed a school where they are taught in Arabic.

FYI haters, they are taught in english. Kwankwaso spread many students around the world for scholarship. England, USA, Russia, Malaysia, Turkey, India, Ukraine, Egypt, Sudan and many private universities in d southern Nigeria.
Most haters dont want to see any good thing happenin in d north. And FYI Kwankwaso is one of d best gov in Nigeria of today both in terms of infrastructures and human development. Ask d non indigenes in Kano, dey will gist u. Its just d most of d media don't like sayin much abt d good development in d north except to spread bad news abt d north so as to sell more.
Kudos to Kwankwaso.

Which one will u rather go for?