₦airaland Forum

ABUZOLA CAN BE DEFEATED BUT QUR’AN NEVER DEFEATED
You all misconceived the concept of the Qur’an and Abuzola was unable to convince. Now the basic principle is that Qur’an verses that has to do with scientific fact their meaning could not be obtained from earlier Islamic scholars sources. Dr. Maurice Buccaile has this to say: “For many centuries, humankind was unable to study certain data contained in the verses of the Qur’an because they did not possess sufficient scientific means. It is only today that numerous verses of the Qur’an dealing with natural phenomena have become comprehensible”. To me, though I am not Arabic expert, I think there should be a difference between ‘Tahaha’ and ‘Dahaha’. But many Islamic translator have the both word equated in meaning due to lack of scientific expertise in their time. But today with the help of science the meaninig of ‘Dahaha’ has become a crystal clear. In Qur’an 91:6 Allah the Almighty says: “By the earth and its (wide) expanse”. And in 79:30: according Al-maududi the translation is “And the earth moreover, hath He extended (to a wide expanse)”. You can see here maududi equated the meaning of two different word. May God reward him abundantly for his Ijtihad. But, in reality the Qur’an does not mean that; Qur’an cannot say wrong but the translators can say it due to one limitation or the other. That is why analysts are saying the most difficult text to translate is the Qur’an. Today the most acceptable interpretation of this verse with the coming of science is that of Rashad Khalifa despite of his apostasy. Rashad further mentioned that: “the Arabic word “dahhaahaa” is derived from “Dahhyah” which means ‘Egg’. Now the meaning shall be “And the earth thereafter (He made) it sphere” Allah is the best knower. In all case Qur’an does not mean the earth is flat. Qur’an is the only divine book accepted by scientists. Dr. Maurice Buccaile emphasized that: “There is no human work in existence that contains statements as far beyond the level of knowledge of its time as the Qur’ an. Scientific opinions comparable to those in the Qur’an are the result of modern knowledge………… the Qur’an is undoubtedly a revelation from God”. With this piece I assisted Abuzola to fulfill his task of defeating our opponents!!!! Thanks Abuzola, a great deal.

IF you speak the truth about 9/11 attack they will label it as "conspiracy theory" : but the irony is that they are the American traitors that wored out the conspiracy act of setting up that horrific event to justify thier eventual invasion of middle east land as they have already strated. don't forget that the most powerful evidence indicting bn lade as provied by unwise ex-president bush is "whether he did it or not we know he is guilty. david duke and some fair-minded french analyts had showed us the intricate conspiracy devsed by the american jews and politicians to in setting up the attack with the aim to blackmail the Muslims and justify the invasion of their lands.

I trust Guillaume Dasquie, the co-author of “Bn Laden: The Forbidden Truth” when he said in an interview: “9-11 was not just a mad act, it was a political act meant to create a good ground for a big war in all Central Asia. I trust david duke when he said: "Bush says we must strike down terrorists wherever they are in the whole world, but he has shared tea and crumpets with Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, one of the world’s leading most brutal and bloodthirsty terrorists. Sharon committed a number of crimes against humanity, among them the massacre of 2,000 men, women and children in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon. Mr. Bush did not strike Mr. Sharon, instead he toasted him."

focused123:
Muhammad claimed that his Quran was above human invention. He challenged anyone, including "jinn" to produce something like the Quran.

Well, we see that Satan was able to do so, and with incredible ease. The question to follow should be:

Obviously, the "Quran" is not that special since even Satan was able to bring forth similar material to that of Allah's without Muhammad realizing the difference.

[God will lead us to the right path (Amen )

The fact that the satanic verses were unveiled as un-Qur’anic is a crystal sign that nothing as the original Qur’an can be produced by any creature. Currently nothing like satanic verses is there in the Qur’an. Islam still challenges the world to bring a copy book similar to Qur’an. Or tell me a single of book in this world that has a close standard with the Qur’an. Those who invented this lie is not their purpose to produce sth similar to Qur’an but to inject sth in the Qur’an due to Allah’s promise to protect the Qur’an from omission of admission their plot was exposed. You appeal to God to guide you to the right path: I am telling you the right path is Islam because nowhere in other distorted religious books where such prayer “GUIDE US TO THE RIGHT PATH” is mentioned except in the true final testament (The QUR’AN). Everything in this world (natural and artificial) speaks of the truth of the Qur’an: the humans, the universe, the seas, the mountains, the computers and other true religious books (like Tourah and Injil – currently distorted bible). The most authentic criteria to test the truth of things in modern world is empirical science; and it generally acceptable that the Qur’an is now a recourse for scientific truth.

Hence christians and anti-Islam should stop tarnishing Islam with any source alleging the creation of satanic verses since truth is now clear - these sources are lies. If they are sincere to us they will help us to stop people from upholding this lie against Islam. Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death in Iranian court by Khomeini for his obvious blasphemy to the our great prophet (pbuh). This is the wise conviction. satanic verses is naked lie.

I have read all of your replies which could not stand for a single line of my argument. My article is beyond your retort; please read it in full about 20 pages(http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=14887. While some of your replies are illogical and irrational claims others are sheer utterances emanate from sentimentalism. Some always try to equate Islam with Christianity as they are saying religion has no place in religion. This claim seems to be true in Christianity; but in Islam something must be different! When it comes to Government, Economy, state and politics Christianity must have failed. The main reason why Christianity fell in Europe is because it opposed and condemned the quest of science – some strongly commanded in Islam. Thus the scientific revolution triumphed with defeat of the church. It was this historical experience that makes some enemies of Islam to think Islam is like Christianity. You claimed Islam to have risen from dark ages. A sheer lie! European science is the product Islamic science that had flourished during golden age. You claimed Islam is about political domination. I see it today who are the conquerors attacking the Land of the people in pretext of encountering terrorism when the irony is that they are real terrorists. I can see it today who are dominating the peoples’ nation by stationing their military base all over the world. You claimed that Qur’an is an evil book. I can see it today which among the religious book was unique tribute by modern scientists like Dr. Maurice Bucaile. It is the only book that covers some unique knowledge that was not yet discover by the modern scholars of different field of science (Maurice Bucaile proclaimed). You claimed Islam is based on dictatorship. Had it been as you claimed it would have not consumed much millions of people voluntarily. Today Islam is the most admired religion by the world. The end of democracy is on the brink; the beginning of Islamocracy is bound to assume power. The history of rise and fall of nations and civilization is true; DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM must perish as did socialism and communism. I will not say much to reply all your critics for MUHSIN has done some for me. The truth is that between the mind and the heart there is a barrier suppressing one from reaching the truth. Only those who are successful can break this barrier and reach for the truth. Malcolm X has succeeded, ditto for Michael (I am not certain). ISLAM IS THE COMPLETE AND COMPREHENSIVE WAY OF SOCIO-POLITICAL LIFE. WEST AND EAST BELONG TO ALLAH – the final promise is that what you always fear must come to be; that the WORLD will be literally Islamized and Islamocratized. CAN’T YOU SEE THAT MUSLIMS ARE NOW MORE ACTIVE IN EUROPE AND US THAN EVER BEFORE. HURRAYYYYYY!!!!! I WIN THE DEBATE. PLEASE I DO NOT INTEND TO CAUSE YOU LOSE YOUR CONTROL.

I am suprised but the dos of God are beyond that. Had it been happened on the Muslims we would have heard the Western media critisizing Muslims with all their prejudice, and without any excuse.

THE ALL-ENCOMPASSING REPLY
I have  read all your replies: while some of your views are the product of  mental defeatism as impacted upon your thoughts others are sheer illogical and irrational thread based on mere sentimentalism. Some try to equate Islam with Christianity as the say religion has no place in governance. In reference to Christianity this claim seems to be true; but to Islam something must be different. Those who support secularism and believe in it upon leaving their Judaic or Christian faith are those who suffered or influenced by historical experience of Christian Europe before scientific revolution. The reason why Christian failed in Europe at moment of scientific renaissances is because it opposed quest of Science – something strongly emphasized in Islam. ISLAM IS A COMPLETE WAY AND COMPREHENSIVE IDEOLOGY OF SOCIO-POLITICAL LIFE. Between the mind and the heart there is a barrier suppressing one from knowing the truth; only those who have succeeded in breaking this barrier can reach the truth. I will not say more on replies MUHSIN HAS DONE IT FOR ME ALL!!! THE SENSE OF ISLAMOCRACY STARTED TO BE FELT IN SOME PART OF THE WORLD. The history of rise and fall of nations and civilization is true. THE END OF DEMOCRACY, AND CAPITALIM IS ON THE BRINK.

THE ALL-ENCOMPASSING REPLY
I have all read your replies: while some of your views are the product of mental defeatism as impacted upon your thoughts others are sheer illogical and irrational thread based on mere sentimentalism. Some try to equate Islam with Christianity as the say religion has no place in governance. In reference to Christianity this claim seems to be true; but to Islam something must be different. Those who support secularism and believe in it upon leaving their Judaic or Christian faith are those who suffered or influenced by historical experience of Christian Europe before scientific revolution. The reason why Christian failed in Europe at moment of scientific renaissances is because it opposed quest of Science – something strongly emphasized in Islam. ISLAM IS A COMPLETE WAY AND COMPREHENSIVE IDEOLOGY OF SOCIO-POLITICAL LIFE. Between the mind and the heart there is a barrier suppressing one from knowing the truth; only those who have succeeded in breaking this barrier can reach the truth. I will not say more on replies MUHSIN HAS DONE IT FOR ME ALL!!! THE SENSE OF ISLAMOCRACY STARTED TO BE FELT IN SOME PART OF THE WORLD. The history of rise and fall of nations and civilization is true. THE END OF DEMOCRACY, AND CAPITALIM IS ON THE BRINK.

Ikomi speak frankly, or you're afraid! tell me your philosophy; we are on intellectual table of debate. Right!!

otele:
islam=violence.
even non violent muslims are being killed these days in the middle east. the non violent muslims are like moderate republicans in america . . . . an endangered specie.

the world is in trouble b/c pakistan has nuclear weapons. note that pakistan is the first officially muslim country on the planet. these jihadists will one day lay hands on that weapon and destroy mankind.

Ridiclous! hither to, no a single Muslim nation have used WMD on humankind; but the Craziest nation - America had once used it in Hroshima and Nagasaki. The fact is terrorism was caused due to American injustices and tyranny on earth motivated by the super-terrorist Jewish illegitimate state. All the wars and international conflicts in the world are caused by American imposition of cultural imperialization upon the world; and America is controlled and guided by the Jews. In 20th century alone America had caused the death of 100,000,000 people in different part of the world- exceeding the casualties of WW I & II combined. Therefore, America must be blamed of killing each and every single soul; they are the source of all evils and terrors. This is the very reason why thier masters, the Jews have proclaimed in thier protocols that "IT IS FROM US THAT ALL-ENFORCING TERROR PROCEED"

davidylan:
Abu . . . can you kindly mention 1 (ONE) nation where islamocracy has been of benefit? I just finished reading about the latest suicide bombing in Pakistan . . . i'll take democracy any day. Thanks.

You must be a confused idiot . . . the western world does not need to "depserately" claim that democracy is the best system of government . . . the examples are too numerous to mention. It is no coincidence that 99% of the world's most powerful (militarily and economically) nations are democracies! Please show us examples of islamocracy!

Wonder why idiots like you dont just pack your belongings to Saudi Arabia and enjoy your islamic system of government and leave the infidels like us alone.

First the war issue in pakistan was caused by the US when it hypnotiyed the government to attack taliban whom were previously given official legitimacy to rule over an exceptional territory (Waziristan and others). America told govt. that this an encouragement of terrorism and pakistani govt. must annihilate the talibans. First to attack first to blame. And pakistan is not Islamocracy and it is subservient to the US.

Secondly, I will not insult you as u did it on me. Democracy does not matter for economic development. Think of China! Islamocracy is not yet practiced in the world and therefore no example is needed. I am just inviting Muslim nations to initiate this system of government. Perhaps I may call Iran a new baby born Islamocracy; it is in its childhood. Due to its Islamocratic nature it goes beyond the development of the rest Muslim countries including Saudi Arabia itself.

Thirdly, I am not yet convinced whether Saudia is a pure Islamic (Islamocratic) state due to its blind subservience to the America even when it is against Islam and the muslims. I am inviting Saudia to accept Islamocracy.

Finally, I do not call for any infidel nation to accept Islamocracy. I am much concerned with my Muslim ummah. Muslim are intervening the infidel states; but the infidel state like America always interfere with affairs of our states. The West should park their democracy and leave us alone with our Islamocracy.

THE BATTLE: ISLAMOCRACY VS DEMOCRACY

Globally speaking, Democracy today means American hegemony upon other nations. The American power still exerts pressure upon the world nations especially the Muslim ones that to must accept Democracy willy-nilly. And by imposing democracy on other nations, American has been enforcing their cultures, civilization, and evilization upon other world communities. From the brief introduction we have just presented one can realize that democracy tries to incorporate some basic essential and inherent messages of Islam such as good governance, Justice to people, ensure of people’s right and freedom. However, it views these aspects from atomistic view of point and in a reductionist manner when it separates them from spiritual faith and belief in God as such it fails to establish them truly on the earth. All such kind of democratic aspects are just secondary in human life which could not be established truly unless the primary aspect is established. And this primary aspect is the question of faith and belief in God whose laws and orders must be the basis of human constitutional way of life. In fact this is the first right to be established prior to human right. The fact that Western democracy deliberately or ignorantly fails to address the question of spirituality as a primary focus in human life makes all its ideas to become fallacious, deceptive, and reductionist. But, Islam as a most perfect and most comprehensive political way of life, a fully-detailed and all-encompassing principle upon which all the nations can found their system of social, economic, and political life. Islam does address both the spiritual and material aspect of human life; thus creating balance between the soul and the body, and between this world and the hereafter. , Islamocracy means an independent system of Shari’ah government that governs the social, political and economic life of the people. Islamocracy is the government of peace for the people whose values, norms, honours, nobility, rights and freedom must be granted and protected to ensure the development of their peculiar socio-political and spiritual well-being. Islamocracy is a government of God formed by the people to serve the interest and right of the people as bounded by Shari’ah. Islamocracy negates the split of the religion and the state politics; both are one and the same. In fact, the religion (Islam) is the mover of the state politics under Islamocracy. We now preserve the right to speak about ‘Political Islam’. By Political Islam we mean that Islam is not only a religion of mosque but also a political ideology that interprets and addresses the problems, goals, and developmental needs of the state and society; it organizes and orders the state political affairs and administrations. Thus, there must be a conspicuous disparity between the concept of religion in democracy and the concept of religion in Islamocracy. Hence, the difference between democracy and Islamocracy becomes succinctly conceivable. While democracy asserts sovereignty of man Islamocracy strongly asserts sovereignty of God – the creator of man – and that man has a temporal power and will as prescribed for him by Allah. Islamocracy challenges the world that if the people are unable to take control of their lives and deaths, then they most recognize the sovereignty of God in all aspects of life. It also argues that if the laws of God (Shari’ah) are to be suspended from human life then there would be no any human to impose his man-made laws on other men since man is not the creator of man. This fact renders man ineligible to be the master, legislator and law-giver of himself. And therefore, he could not be the legislator and law-giver of other men. As democracy tries to detach human beings from God by assigning sovereignty to man Islamocracy comes to re-attach man to God by explaining to him (man) that sovereignty belongs to God alone and that he (man) is entrusted with temporal power to govern through a systematic machinery of leadership popularly called the Government. And this government can be positive or negative. Positive government is that aims at establishing laws and orders based on belief in God. In other word, it is a government that recognizes the sovereignty of God in the state politics. Whereas, the negative government is that which establishes its laws and orders based on unbelief and secularism. Such negative government tends to usurp the power of God by claiming sovereignty in the hands of man or the state. Thus, Islamocracy explains to man, as a representative of God, his duties and responsibilities on this earth as enunciated in Islam and Shari’ah. It comes to liberate men from the servitude of other men to the servitude of God alone – the creator of men. Liberty, right, freedom of speech are all placed in their appropriate positions under Islamocracy and were given their original meanings. Man can enjoy liberty, right, and freedom only when it is in accordance to the laws of God or the Islamocratic state. In Islamocratic state each and every Muslim and non-Muslim citizen is subjected to the laws as prescribed in his peculiar religion, Therefore, Islamocracy as an intelligent and a comprehensive system of government speaks of right of God, and right of man both of spiritual and secular life. To establish the right of God in the state is the first and foremost duty of Islamocratic government, then followed by human, and then animal right. These three articles of rights were never mentioned in democracy. This is a major drastic drawback of Democracy which the Western world desperately claims to be the best system of government. Lo! Such Western people are professional liars, deceivers, and prevaricators.

Follow this link to read the exciting article in full (Therefore, Islamocracy as an intelligent and a comprehensive system of government speaks of right of God, and right of man both of spiritual and secular life. To establish the right of God in the state is the first and foremost duty of Islamocratic government, then followed by human, and then animal right. These three articles of rights were never mentioned in democracy. This is a major drastic drawback of Democracy which the Western world desperately claims to be the best system of government. Lo! Such Western people are professional liars, deceivers, and prevaricators.
Therefore, Islamocracy as an intelligent and a comprehensive system of government speaks of right of God, and right of man both of spiritual and secular life. To establish the right of God in the state is the first and foremost duty of Islamocratic government, then followed by human, and then animal right. These three articles of rights were never mentioned in democracy. This is a major drastic drawback of Democracy which the Western world desperately claims to be the best system of government. Lo! Such Western people are professional liars, deceivers, and prevaricators.
Follow this link to read the exciting article in full (http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=14887.)


Submitted by Salimullah

If this story was bring to tarnish Islam as the greatrock percieved then it makes no sence to judge Islam according to a crime made by individual Muslim believer. The fact is that Alfa acted agaisnt ISLAM. Therefore no one can blame Islam but Alfa must be blamed. Islam is the most powerful and comprehensive religion.

Only those with insightful mind can know the dos of God. Virgins come from where we came - they are created in the same way we were. And women will live with their first husband or loved one as they were in this first world; additionally, such husband will enjoy the provision of divine virgins who are living in the paradise. In fact these virgins are there waiting for us (true believers) in the paradise. Whoever seems to reject thier existence he has no share in them.

THE DESTRUCTION OF ATHEISM AND NATURALISTS
)CRITICAL OBSERVATION ON THE CONCEPT OF GOD AND NATURE - Focus on Atheistic & Scientific Belief)
By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com
blogwebsite: www.salimullah1..com
Written on Sunday, 1st /08/2009

GOD: According to Islam and other relevant religion, they believe that God is the ultimate creator, sustainer, master and controller of this very infinite universe and the mankind as well. He is ever-existing before the creation and will remain after it. He can neither be seen nor be felt by any means; however, he is very nearer to us. All the natural phenomena and the activities of mankind evolve through his power and will. God controls natural elements, events and occurrences. He could withhold rain, cause drought or diseases. He provides the universal sustenance for the entire mankind. He gives life or death to whomever he wills. He causes all the natural events, disasters, and phenomena. It is therefore, God has an absolute and predominant power over the universe. And even the human actions (good & bad) were created and predetermined by God. While good actions are ordered and permitted to be strictly observed, bad ones are strongly prohibited and disallowed to be acted upon. And that is the purpose of the creation of Paradise for righteous doers, and Hellfire for evil doers. Islam in particular, believed that God created multitude humble servants who promptly carry out his executions and commands. These humble servants are known as the “Angels” and they are differently functioning.
Rightly indeed, this is the good belief of concept about God, rather than atheism – the idea of believing in nature. Many scientists are atheists – those who believe only in the concept of nature rather than God. Naturalism is another view in philosophy that believe that all things happen in this hold and life are based on natural causes and laws, and not on spiritual or supernatural ones. Both of them deny the existence of a super-natural being call God. It was on this concept that the Western scientists built their theories of scientific natural laws and causalities. In their scientific laws, they state that whatever cannot be seen either by naked eyes or microscope, and cannot be felt by stark hand or through the skin, such thing do not exist at all. But, they believed in nature and it too, cannot be seen or felt by any means. Their belief in nature has neither any dogmatic basis nor scientific corroboration. It is just a mere speculation and assumption. And as usual, anything assumed is likely to be false knowledge.

Since we have gone through a pure belief let us go directly inside the question of ‘Nature’ from its distinct phase of science and atheism. And ultimately we may come to desperately compare and contrast in order to arrive at a pure, perfect and true belief.

NATURE AS A SCIENTIFIC BELIEF
When the religious believers especially Muslims believe in the oneness of God being the ultimate essence of creation; they believe in His sovereignty over the universe and the mankind and his unique control over them, some scientists, naturalists, and atheists held entirely different belief. For instance, Naturalism in philosophy is an idea which surmises that all things happen in the world are based on natural causes and laws, and not on spiritual or super-natural one. They mean that God does not exist at all. Atheism also, is another western idea which says no God. Most of the western scientists are largely atheists or naturalists.

Scientifically, nature is the way that all things happen in the physical world when they cannot be controlled by human act. This definition is indeed an absolute true; because only God (ALLAH) can control natural events and happenings. Naturalist scientists believe that nature causes rain through evaporation, plant growth through germination, reproduction through intercourse and fertilization, and many several others of natural occurrences are happening according to the laws of nature. But remember in their law they mention that anything invisible, insensitive or cannot be known through one of the human senses does not exist at all. And now they are telling us that they believe in the fact that nature controls the universe and mankind through its natural laws and causalities. And at the same time nature too, is invisible and cannot be felt or known by any empirically scientific process. Presumably, let us assume that natural laws of causalities control the universe. So then who is directing and administering such natural laws? There must be a super-natural being and that must be ALLAH – the Most High. As they say, what empirical science cannot establish its reality does not exist at all. Thus, they destroy the existence of ALLAH describing it as an illusionary belief. Going by this way, we may ask: which among the scientific empirical researches establish the absolute descriptive image and concept of nature? None at all. Until this time, no any empirical scientific study that tells us about the depiction of ‘Nature’: is it a living or non-living? What colour and what size of it? Where is it residing? Have they ever see or feel it empirically? They are only imagining about it. Just ask them a general question: what are the characteristics of nature? They could never answer you only to fumble about. The fact that ALLAH cannot be empirically studied, known, or described, the same thing apply when it comes to the issue of nature. So, then who is God and who is nature. I think it is one thing with different name. Hence, whenever naturalist scientists mention nature they must either directly or indirectly refer to God (ALLAH). The irrational antagonism towards religion hinders them from upholding the truth. My beloved brothers in true faith, wherever you meet such corrupt scientists and atheists let them answer the above heavy fundamental questions.

GOD AND NATURE: COMPARE AND CONTRAST
ALLAH is the only real and absolute God, and nature is true. From one angle of perspective, we can say that nature is a God’s creation just as the world and other creatures. Going by this understanding, we may assume that Nature is a creation of God and it entails the mean or tool through which His power (Qudrah) and will (Iradah) are exerted upon the activities of the universe and mankind in general. An example of this view is that: it is natural that man must fall hunger and naturally must take in nourishment. And it is natural that plant needs water to grow and naturally the sky must produce rain at certain season. That is to say all things happening through the natural laws as designated and directed by ALLAH. In another view, we may assume that ALLAH is the real God and nature is His power and will (Qudrah/Iradah) as he impacts it upon the creatures including the universe. Verse quotes. Thus, according to this view, nature is an attribute of God. The fact that nature is the way in which things happen in the world when it is beyond human intervention does not mean the absence of controller or administrator. Indeed there is and that is ALLAH – the Most High.

Comparatively, the modern world has developed the technology of automation in various machines and computers. Compare it with the definition of nature, for instance to say: automation is the way in which technological products carry out activities in the absence of human control. Is that means the lack of controller at all? No and never, indeed there is an absolute controller who is also the inventor of such machine and the designer of its automation process, and it is the honorable man. In fact, it is the man (the creator of the machine) that equips it with the ability of automation; that the machine must follow the natural technological laws as designed by its inventor – the man. And at the same time, if the inventor is so wish, he can disqualify it from such ability of automation. Desperately, we may assume that the same thing apply to the activities of God in the universe despite of its far cry from that; because the activities of God, when he wills one, makes no difference between the divine will and the happening effect of the event or occurrence. According to Qur’an: “truly, nowise the nature of God but when He intend to do things simply say it to ‘Be’ and ‘it is’. (Qur’an, Ch. 36 v82). Also, in another passage: “When he decreeth a matter he saith to it ‘Be’ and ‘it is’. (Qur’an, Ch. 2 V118).

Indeed, the above quoted verses illustrate the automatic happenings in the natural world as it is ordered and directed by ALLAH. The fact that between the God’s will and His impacted power upon things to happen is however, makes no difference of time or distance. In fact, all the happening in the natural world have been decreed and fated from eternity.

Finally, remember that the power and will of God, known as nature by scientists, are virtually exerted upon everything: living and non-living, human and non-human, natural and artificial. So, then what is wrong to bother yourself with those atheists. They are indeed ignorant of true knowledge. Hence, to think that nature is the ultimate bases of creation and the final governor of world natural happenings in the absence of ALLAH is a typical Kufr (infidelity) and a prevarication from truth of not only religion but also the scientific and logical bases of knowledge. With this short observation also, the Darwin’s heretical and illogical theory that all the creations come to be as a result of eternal natural selection must have become defeated.

Had it been the story is right Al-shabab must have gone out of Shari'ah principles and they should be stopped in the name of Islam, and even for moral reason this boob inspection is definitely illegal. But i dont think the story is true for I am always aware of American-western propaganda to deface Islam all over the world. mull it over again!!!

This is a good knowledge only for those who have intelligence. Keep on your objective dialugue Muhsin and never shrink!

CRITICAL OBSERVATION:
THE CONCEPT OF GOD AND NATURE
(Focus on Atheistic & Scientific Belief)
By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com
blogwebsite: www.salimullah1..com
Written on Sunday, 1st /08/2009

GOD: According to Islam and other relevant religion, they believe that God is the ultimate creator, sustainer, master and controller of this very infinite universe and the mankind as well. He is ever-existing before the creation and will remain after it. He can neither be seen nor be felt by any means; however, he is very nearer to us. All the natural phenomena and the activities of mankind evolve through his power and will. God controls natural elements, events and occurrences. He could withhold rain, cause drought or diseases. He provides the universal sustenance for the entire mankind. He gives life or death to whomever he wills. He causes all the natural events, disasters, and phenomena. It is therefore, God has an absolute and predominant power over the universe. And even the human actions (good & bad) were created and predetermined by God. While good actions are ordered and permitted to be strictly observed, bad ones are strongly prohibited and disallowed to be acted upon. And that is the purpose of the creation of Paradise for righteous doers, and Hellfire for evil doers. Islam in particular, believed that God created multitude humble servants who promptly carry out his executions and commands. These humble servants are known as the “Angels” and they are differently functioning.
Rightly indeed, this is the good belief of concept about God, rather than atheism – the idea of believing in nature. Many scientists are atheists – those who believe only in the concept of nature rather than God. Naturalism is another view in philosophy that believe that all things happen in this hold and life are based on natural causes and laws, and not on spiritual or supernatural ones. Both of them deny the existence of a super-natural being call God. It was on this concept that the Western scientists built their theories of scientific natural laws and causalities. In their scientific laws, they state that whatever cannot be seen either by naked eyes or microscope, and cannot be felt by stark hand or through the skin, such thing do not exist at all. But, they believed in nature and it too, cannot be seen or felt by any means. Their belief in nature has neither any dogmatic basis nor scientific corroboration. It is just a mere speculation and assumption. And as usual, anything assumed is likely to be false knowledge.

Since we have gone through a pure belief let us go directly inside the question of ‘Nature’ from its distinct phase of science and atheism. And ultimately we may come to desperately compare and contrast in order to arrive at a pure, perfect and true belief.

NATURE AS A SCIENTIFIC BELIEF
When the religious believers especially Muslims believe in the oneness of God being the ultimate essence of creation; they believe in His sovereignty over the universe and the mankind and his unique control over them, some scientists, naturalists, and atheists held entirely different belief. For instance, Naturalism in philosophy is an idea which surmises that all things happen in the world are based on natural causes and laws, and not on spiritual or super-natural one. They mean that God does not exist at all. Atheism also, is another western idea which says no God. Most of the western scientists are largely atheists or naturalists.

Scientifically, nature is the way that all things happen in the physical world when they cannot be controlled by human act. This definition is indeed an absolute true; because only God (ALLAH) can control natural events and happenings. Naturalist scientists believe that nature causes rain through evaporation, plant growth through germination, reproduction through intercourse and fertilization, and many several others of natural occurrences are happening according to the laws of nature. But remember in their law they mention that anything invisible, insensitive or cannot be known through one of the human senses does not exist at all. And now they are telling us that they believe in the fact that nature controls the universe and mankind through its natural laws and causalities. And at the same time nature too, is invisible and cannot be felt or known by any empirically scientific process. Presumably, let us assume that natural laws of causalities control the universe. So then who is directing and administering such natural laws? There must be a super-natural being and that must be ALLAH – the Most High. As they say, what empirical science cannot establish its reality does not exist at all. Thus, they destroy the existence of ALLAH describing it as an illusionary belief. Going by this way, we may ask: which among the scientific empirical researches establish the absolute descriptive image and concept of nature? None at all. Until this time, no any empirical scientific study that tells us about the depiction of ‘Nature’: is it a living or non-living? What colour and what size of it? Where is it residing? Have they ever see or feel it empirically? They are only imagining about it. Just ask them a general question: what are the characteristics of nature? They could never answer you only to fumble about. The fact that ALLAH cannot be empirically studied, known, or described, the same thing apply when it comes to the issue of nature. So, then who is God and who is nature. I think it is one thing with different name. Hence, whenever naturalist scientists mention nature they must either directly or indirectly refer to God (ALLAH). The irrational antagonism towards religion hinders them from upholding the truth. My beloved brothers in true faith, wherever you meet such corrupt scientists and atheists let them answer the above heavy fundamental questions.

GOD AND NATURE: COMPARE AND CONTRAST
ALLAH is the only real and absolute God, and nature is true. From one angle of perspective, we can say that nature is a God’s creation just as the world and other creatures. Going by this understanding, we may assume that Nature is a creation of God and it entails the mean or tool through which His power (Qudrah) and will (Iradah) are exerted upon the activities of the universe and mankind in general. An example of this view is that: it is natural that man must fall hunger and naturally must take in nourishment. And it is natural that plant needs water to grow and naturally the sky must produce rain at certain season. That is to say all things happening through the natural laws as designated and directed by ALLAH. In another view, we may assume that ALLAH is the real God and nature is His power and will (Qudrah/Iradah) as he impacts it upon the creatures including the universe. Verse quotes. Thus, according to this view, nature is an attribute of God. The fact that nature is the way in which things happen in the world when it is beyond human intervention does not mean the absence of controller or administrator. Indeed there is and that is ALLAH – the Most High.

Comparatively, the modern world has developed the technology of automation in various machines and computers. Compare it with the definition of nature, for instance to say: automation is the way in which technological products carry out activities in the absence of human control. Is that means the lack of controller at all? No and never, indeed there is an absolute controller who is also the inventor of such machine and the designer of its automation process, and it is the honorable man. In fact, it is the man (the creator of the machine) that equips it with the ability of automation; that the machine must follow the natural technological laws as designed by its inventor – the man. And at the same time, if the inventor is so wish, he can disqualify it from such ability of automation. Desperately, we may assume that the same thing apply to the activities of God in the universe despite of its far cry from that; because the activities of God, when he wills one, makes no difference between the divine will and the happening effect of the event or occurrence. According to Qur’an: “truly, nowise the nature of God but when He intend to do things simply say it to ‘Be’ and ‘it is’. (Qur’an, Ch. 36 v82). Also, in another passage: “When he decreeth a matter he saith to it ‘Be’ and ‘it is’. (Qur’an, Ch. 2 V118).

Indeed, the above quoted verses illustrate the automatic happenings in the natural world as it is ordered and directed by ALLAH. The fact that between the God’s will and His impacted power upon things to happen is however, makes no difference of time or distance. In fact, all the happening in the natural world have been decreed and fated from eternity.

Finally, remember that the power and will of God, known as nature by scientists, are virtually exerted upon everything: living and non-living, human and non-human, natural and artificial. So, then what is wrong to bother yourself with those atheists. They are indeed ignorant of true knowledge. Hence, to think that nature is the ultimate bases of creation and the final governor of world natural happenings in the absence of ALLAH is a typical Kufr (infidelity) and a prevarication from truth of not only religion but also the scientific and logical bases of knowledge. With this short observation also, the Darwin’s heretical and illogical theory that all the creations come to be as a result of eternal natural selection must have become defeated.

Gidado1565:
My first question to the atheist will be: "What is the definition of God?" For a person to say there is no God, he should know what is the meaning of God. If I hold a book and say that ‘this is a pen’, for the opposite person to say, ‘it is not a pen’, he should know what is the definition of a pen, even if he does not know nor is able to recognise or identify the object I am holding in my hand. For him to say this is not a pen, he should at least know what a pen means. Similarly for an atheist to say ‘there is no God’, he should at least know the concept of God. His concept of God would be derived from the surroundings in which he lives. The god that a large number of people worship has got human qualities - therefore he does not believe in such a god. Similarly a Muslim too does not and should not believe in such false gods.

If a non-Muslim believes that Islam is a merciless religion with something to do with terrorism; a religion which does not give rights to women; a religion which contradicts science; in his limited sense that non-Muslim is correct to reject such Islam. The problem is he has a wrong picture of Islam. Even I reject such a false picture of Islam, but at the same time, it becomes my duty as a Muslim to present the correct picture of Islam to that non-Muslim i.e. Islam is a merciful religion, it gives equal rights to the women, it is not incompatible with logic, reason and science; if I present the correct facts about Islam, that non-Muslim may Inshallah accept Islam.

Similarly the atheist rejects the false gods and the duty of every Muslim is to present the correct concept of God which he shall Insha Allah not refuse.
The methods of proving the existence of God with usage of the material provided in the ‘Concept of God in Islam’ to an atheist may satisfy some but not all.

Many atheists demand a scientific proof for the existence of God. I agree that today is the age of science and technology. Let us use scientific knowledge to kill two birds with one stone, i.e. to prove the existence of God and simultaneously prove that the Qur’an is a revelation of God.

If a new object or a machine, which no one in the world has ever seen or heard of before, is shown to an atheist or any person and then a question is asked, " Who is the first person who will be able to provide details of the mechanism of this unknown object? After little bit of thinking, he will reply, ‘the creator of that object.’ Some may say ‘the producer’ while others may say ‘the manufacturer.’ What ever answer the person gives, keep it in your mind, the answer will always be either the creator, the producer, the manufacturer or some what of the same meaning, i.e. the person who has made it or created it. Don’t grapple with words, whatever answer he gives, the meaning will be same, therefore accept it.
http://www.islam101.com/tauheed/provingGodExists.htm

Thank you Gidodo for your logical and intelligent retort to atheims and in sha Allah I will deal with them in my next special post.

Tudór:
Err because iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. . . We can't allow terrorists nuclear weapons, can we?

Tudor what of America itself that has been sponsoring Israeli terrorism in the Middle East for the last almost 60 years? both America and Israel are the most terrorist states in the world and all have obtained this evil weapon. But what the UN do in supressing Israel from obtaining this weapon. Tudor, are you really objective?

Nasrullah of course, He established the powerful Hizbullah challenging Israeli and Amarican Hegemony in the Mid-East. Hizbullah defeated Israeli Armies Twice in 2000 and 2006. with the presence of Hizbullah in Middle East even American state of department believe that a new order of Islam is finding its way to thrive in that bloc. A person that smashed down the American faces must be the great in the world.

WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
It is because they are not Europeans…. Nor Americans: it is because they are Muslims and their state is ruled by Islamic government in form of Islamocracy (Shari’ah Ruling System). Any act of change that will lead a Muslim country to political, scientific and technological development the West (particularly the US) perceives it as a threat to their ‘Evilization’ that presently dominated the world social order. Why Iran most not afford nuclear technology when other nations have already afforded it?. UN security council members institutionalized that only their countries can afford nuclear weapon. This means that only America, China, France, England and Russia can afford nuclear bomb. But, other nations have the right to have nuclear technology only for peaceful purpose (e.g. energy power supply such as electricity), and not to produce a nuclear bomb. But today, despite of this law, over dozen of nations have afforded nuclear weapons: Israel, India, Germany, North Korea and Canada were among them. Most of these nations have afforded it illegally and were allowed to go unscathed and officially uninvestigated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). For Israel and others alike, is illegal to obtain nuclear bomb as afar as nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty developed by IAEA is concerned, based on Article 6 of its charter. There must be a hypocrisy and injustice in the rule that only those nations (like the UN Security Council members) that have nuclear bomb could afford and retain it; while others have no right to even develop it. Disarmament policy must have been a double-faced strategy adopted by the UN Security Council. In 1970, Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was put into effect. The principal law of NPT as reads in Encarta 2009, is thus: “Under the terms of the NPT, countries without nuclear weapons agreed not to develop them, and states possessing nuclear weapons agreed to work toward disarmament. The IAEA inspects the nuclear power and research facilities of participating non-nuclear weapons states to ensure that enriched uranium and plutonium byproducts are not being diverted to nuclear weapons production”. If the rule of disarmament was founded on justice and equity it will effect the law that not only the non-nuclear nations could not obtain it but also the nuclear ones must have destroy their own nuclear bombs. Going by this unjust disarmament policy, the remote impact will mean that Muslim countries would not be allowed to obtain it. If they are objective why is that Israel allowed to afford this nuclear bomb which is against the rules of NPT but Iran is being denied its right to afford its technology only for peaceful purpose. It is Israel that bombards the UN Security Council to must suppress Iran from its Uranium enrichment. Those nations that suppress others from obtaining nuclear bombs have already stored thousands of it in their weapons stockpile. Ironically enough, America which had been the only nation that used nuclear bomb in Hiroshima – Japan (on August 6, 1945) – is now the head of disarmament policy. What a ridiculous! All what I have been trying to educate our people is why only Iran is facing harsh pressure by the UN and the world superpowers headed by America and controlled by the Jewish state of Israel? Let us examine this fact from just and fair analysis.
Israel not wants to see that a Muslim nation in the Middle East has afforded a sophisticated military technology because it perceives that as a threat to its way of terrorism against the Palestinians in particular and the Middle East in general. This is the reason why it has destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor base in 1981 and Syrian nuclear installations in 2007. Israel is not an IAEA and who give it the right to attack the nuclear activities installation of other nations like Iraq and Syria. This is a patent act of terrorism but the UN never put forward any official inquiries on Israeli terrorist state because the world superpowers and UN Security Council are the slaves of the Jews. It should be noted that Israel is among the nations whom were banned from obtaining nuclear weapons; but it has been producing thousands of such bombs illegally. However, no official investigation and sanction has put forward by the IAEA and the UN Security Council being them serving the Jewish interest. When India, Israel and other non-nuclear nations are developing nuclear technology they had never faced pressures of investigation by the IAEA or sanctions by the UN Security Council. But, Iran is now facing harsh pressure and incoming sanctions from UN Security Council motivated by Israel – the most illegal stockpile of WMD including nuclear bomb. Iran’s nuclear sites were thoroughly inspected by IAEA officials and were all confirmed for peaceful purpose and fulfilled the rules required for the legal nuclear activities. Iran has scores significant points in its ‘diplomatic debate’ with the world power in this case. It was able to present a new proposed bill on nuclear disarmament to IAEA and was approved well. According to IRIB as written by Ebrahimi: “the IAEA approved a resolution to ban attacks on nuclear installations as a necessity”. Thus, the Israeli ongoing plan to attack Iranian nuclear installation was eschewed. The approved bill also suggested that: the usurper state of Israel to stop its nuclear proliferation and abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and as the first step bring their arsenals and nuclear installations under IAEA supervision. However, notwithstanding the international will, the representative of the Zionist regime at the agency announced unashamedly that it will not cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog as per the ratified resolution”.
The controversy is not whether Iran is having nuclear bomb (the world knows that Iran hasn’t it at all) but whether it is having a programme that could use to make this bomb in the next 5-10 years. In all cases the IAEA’s report about Iranian nuclear activities is ‘peaceful and right’. But UN Security Council (presumably with the exception of China & Russia) appeared to rule out IAEA’s report and preparing to invade Iran. But, recently alternative decision suggests harsher economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programmes in preference to military invasion (New York Times September 28, 2009). The truth is that IAEA is no longer respectful in the eyes of the UN Security Council as are ready to ignore its decision about Iran. Ali Asghar, Iran’s envoy to IAEA has told press TV that: “IAEA Chief Mohammad al-Baradei says in paragraph 26, Iran has cooperated with the agency, improving the safeguard measures at the Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz”. Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Dr. Saeed Jalili declares in retorting to West’s opposition saying: “Why do they express concern towards Iran's legal nuclear activities while they do not raise a smallest question on the nuclear arsenal of the Zionist entity? Who has given nuclear weapons to Israel?” Whether military invasion or economic sanction is to be set against Iran we should know the real motivator behind this evil is Israel. As documented in Telegraph UK Newspaper dated Sept 27, 2009, Benjamin Netanyahu spoke, via telephone, to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, emphasizing that: “Action must be taken in all areas to increase pressure on Iran and impose crippling sanctions on it," he said, according to the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz ‘If not now, then when?”. Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman made a call upon the UN that “the mad regime of Tehran” must be overthrown (Ibid). Chief of staff of the Israeli army, Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi has stated that Ahmadinejad had "to know that he can end his days like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi" (ibid). Follow the link to read in full (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6237299/Israel-urges-West-to-stand-firm-against-Iran.html).
When Iran has publicly declared its peaceful nuclear activities and allowed IAEA for inspection, and signed treaty of nuclear non-proliferation and fulfilled the rules of Article 6 of IAEA charter, Israel has been allowed to do all this unchecked at its nuclear weapons factory at Dimona in the Negev, and without signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Despite of all these violation and non-cooperation by Israel it is Iran that is going to be punish or even attack in spite of its cooperation with international laws and IAEA’s rules and regulations. In fact, according to IAEA’s report, Iran has been much more cooperative and obedient to all IAEA’s laws governing nuclear activities for peaceful usage. But, Obama has made a big lie when he says: “Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow”. According to IAEA’s investigation on Iran’s nuclear sites, Obama’s statement is a sheer and patent lie; it is Israel, India and North Korea, who are having hundreds or thousands of nuclear bombs, that break the rules that all nations must follow but the UN Security Council could not attack or even punish these belligerent nations because they are among the parties of non-Muslim nations whom they consider as single unbelievers community opposing the community of Muslim believers. But, Iran as a pure Muslim and Islamic nation that has been very cooperative with the rules of nuclear activities and never attempt to afford WMD in violation to IAEA’s rule was considered defiant and mad nation worthy of destruction under Israeli motives. It is now clear that any policy of disarmament or Nuclear non- proliferation is aimed to disarm only Muslim countries. The case of Pakistan (only Muslim state having nuclear bomb) is different; this possibility has come to it at an inevitable stage unable to suppress even by the world powers.

Why only Iran? It has no any kind of nuclear bomb. But why not Israel? It has many more stockpiles of nuclear bombs. The double standard is self-evident in Western International laws and policies. It is just as what David Duke mentioned: “America does not really oppose biological and chemical weapons or their use, all the Federal Government really cares about is which side uses them”. Why America is going to attack Iran for the same thing that other dozen of nations do. Suppose that Iran obtained nuclear bomb, then it is not that same Iran to be destroyed first but Israel.
Finally, let us stand up for Iran; its development is ours and will pave the way for further resurrection of Islamic political power and social order. When it comes to this issue religious sectarianism must have been irrelevant. We are all Muslims from the base. Let us reawaken our Sunni Muslim countries to follow the foot of Iran on political bases so as to escape from American imperialism and Western political hegemony as did Iran achieved. I can see that the moon of modern Islamic civilization glistering from Tehran horizon to South East Asia. Stand up with me for Iran once again for they are representing the general Ummah against the Western Kuffar. MAY GOD RESTORE OUR PAST GLORY AND PRESTIGE.

Submitted by Salimullah

WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
It is because they are not Europeans…. Nor Americans: it is because they are Muslims and their state is ruled by Islamic government in form of Islamocracy (Shari’ah Ruling System). Any act of change that will lead a Muslim country to political, scientific and technological development the West (particularly the US) perceives it as a threat to their ‘Evilization’ that presently dominated the world social order. Why Iran most not afford nuclear technology when other nations have already afforded it?. UN security council members institutionalized that only their countries can afford nuclear weapon. This means that only America, China, France, England and Russia can afford nuclear bomb. But, other nations have the right to have nuclear technology only for peaceful purpose (e.g. energy power supply such as electricity), and not to produce a nuclear bomb. But today, despite of this law, over dozen of nations have afforded nuclear weapons: Israel, India, Germany, North Korea and Canada were among them. Most of these nations have afforded it illegally and were allowed to go unscathed and officially uninvestigated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). For Israel and others alike, is illegal to obtain nuclear bomb as afar as nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty developed by IAEA is concerned, based on Article 6 of its charter. There must be a hypocrisy and injustice in the rule that only those nations (like the UN Security Council members) that have nuclear bomb could afford and retain it; while others have no right to even develop it. Disarmament policy must have been a double-faced strategy adopted by the UN Security Council. In 1970, Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was put into effect. The principal law of NPT as reads in Encarta 2009, is thus: “Under the terms of the NPT, countries without nuclear weapons agreed not to develop them, and states possessing nuclear weapons agreed to work toward disarmament. The IAEA inspects the nuclear power and research facilities of participating non-nuclear weapons states to ensure that enriched uranium and plutonium byproducts are not being diverted to nuclear weapons production”. If the rule of disarmament was founded on justice and equity it will effect the law that not only the non-nuclear nations could not obtain it but also the nuclear ones must have destroy their own nuclear bombs. Going by this unjust disarmament policy, the remote impact will mean that Muslim countries would not be allowed to obtain it. If they are objective why is that Israel allowed to afford this nuclear bomb which is against the rules of NPT but Iran is being denied its right to afford its technology only for peaceful purpose. It is Israel that bombards the UN Security Council to must suppress Iran from its Uranium enrichment. Those nations that suppress others from obtaining nuclear bombs have already stored thousands of it in their weapons stockpile. Ironically enough, America which had been the only nation that used nuclear bomb in Hiroshima – Japan (on August 6, 1945) – is now the head of disarmament policy. What a ridiculous! All what I have been trying to educate our people is why only Iran is facing harsh pressure by the UN and the world superpowers headed by America and controlled by the Jewish state of Israel? Let us examine this fact from just and fair analysis.
Israel not wants to see that a Muslim nation in the Middle East has afforded a sophisticated military technology because it perceives that as a threat to its way of terrorism against the Palestinians in particular and the Middle East in general. This is the reason why it has destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor base in 1981 and Syrian nuclear installations in 2007. Israel is not an IAEA and who give it the right to attack the nuclear activities installation of other nations like Iraq and Syria. This is a patent act of terrorism but the UN never put forward any official inquiries on Israeli terrorist state because the world superpowers and UN Security Council are the slaves of the Jews. It should be noted that Israel is among the nations whom were banned from obtaining nuclear weapons; but it has been producing thousands of such bombs illegally. However, no official investigation and sanction has put forward by the IAEA and the UN Security Council being them serving the Jewish interest. When India, Israel and other non-nuclear nations are developing nuclear technology they had never faced pressures of investigation by the IAEA or sanctions by the UN Security Council. But, Iran is now facing harsh pressure and incoming sanctions from UN Security Council motivated by Israel – the most illegal stockpile of WMD including nuclear bomb. Iran’s nuclear sites were thoroughly inspected by IAEA officials and were all confirmed for peaceful purpose and fulfilled the rules required for the legal nuclear activities. Iran has scores significant points in its ‘diplomatic debate’ with the world power in this case. It was able to present a new proposed bill on nuclear disarmament to IAEA and was approved well. According to IRIB as written by Ebrahimi: “the IAEA approved a resolution to ban attacks on nuclear installations as a necessity”. Thus, the Israeli ongoing plan to attack Iranian nuclear installation was eschewed. The approved bill also suggested that: the usurper state of Israel to stop its nuclear proliferation and abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and as the first step bring their arsenals and nuclear installations under IAEA supervision. However, notwithstanding the international will, the representative of the Zionist regime at the agency announced unashamedly that it will not cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog as per the ratified resolution”.
The controversy is not whether Iran is having nuclear bomb (the world knows that Iran hasn’t it at all) but whether it is having a programme that could use to make this bomb in the next 5-10 years. In all cases the IAEA’s report about Iranian nuclear activities is ‘peaceful and right’. But UN Security Council (presumably with the exception of China & Russia) appeared to rule out IAEA’s report and preparing to invade Iran. But, recently alternative decision suggests harsher economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programmes in preference to military invasion (New York Times September 28, 2009). The truth is that IAEA is no longer respectful in the eyes of the UN Security Council as are ready to ignore its decision about Iran. Ali Asghar, Iran’s envoy to IAEA has told press TV that: “IAEA Chief Mohammad al-Baradei says in paragraph 26, Iran has cooperated with the agency, improving the safeguard measures at the Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz”. Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Dr. Saeed Jalili declares in retorting to West’s opposition saying: “Why do they express concern towards Iran's legal nuclear activities while they do not raise a smallest question on the nuclear arsenal of the Zionist entity? Who has given nuclear weapons to Israel?” Whether military invasion or economic sanction is to be set against Iran we should know the real motivator behind this evil is Israel. As documented in Telegraph UK Newspaper dated Sept 27, 2009, Benjamin Netanyahu spoke, via telephone, to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, emphasizing that: “Action must be taken in all areas to increase pressure on Iran and impose crippling sanctions on it," he said, according to the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz ‘If not now, then when?”. Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman made a call upon the UN that “the mad regime of Tehran” must be overthrown (Ibid). Chief of staff of the Israeli army, Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi has stated that Ahmadinejad had "to know that he can end his days like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi" (ibid). Follow the link to read in full (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6237299/Israel-urges-West-to-stand-firm-against-Iran.html).
When Iran has publicly declared its peaceful nuclear activities and allowed IAEA for inspection, and signed treaty of nuclear non-proliferation and fulfilled the rules of Article 6 of IAEA charter, Israel has been allowed to do all this unchecked at its nuclear weapons factory at Dimona in the Negev, and without signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Despite of all these violation and non-cooperation by Israel it is Iran that is going to be punish or even attack in spite of its cooperation with international laws and IAEA’s rules and regulations. In fact, according to IAEA’s report, Iran has been much more cooperative and obedient to all IAEA’s laws governing nuclear activities for peaceful usage. But, Obama has made a big lie when he says: “Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow”. According to IAEA’s investigation on Iran’s nuclear sites, Obama’s statement is a sheer and patent lie; it is Israel, India and North Korea, who are having hundreds or thousands of nuclear bombs, that break the rules that all nations must follow but the UN Security Council could not attack or even punish these belligerent nations because they are among the parties of non-Muslim nations whom they consider as single unbelievers community opposing the community of Muslim believers. But, Iran as a pure Muslim and Islamic nation that has been very cooperative with the rules of nuclear activities and never attempt to afford WMD in violation to IAEA’s rule was considered defiant and mad nation worthy of destruction under Israeli motives. It is now clear that any policy of disarmament or Nuclear non- proliferation is aimed to disarm only Muslim countries. The case of Pakistan (only Muslim state having nuclear bomb) is different; this possibility has come to it at an inevitable stage unable to suppress even by the world powers.

Why only Iran? It has no any kind of nuclear bomb. But why not Israel? It has many more stockpiles of nuclear bombs. The double standard is self-evident in Western International laws and policies. It is just as what David Duke mentioned: “America does not really oppose biological and chemical weapons or their use, all the Federal Government really cares about is which side uses them”. Why America is going to attack Iran for the same thing that other dozen of nations do. Suppose that Iran obtained nuclear bomb, then it is not that same Iran to be destroyed first but Israel.
Finally, let us stand up for Iran; its development is ours and will pave the way for further resurrection of Islamic political power and social order. When it comes to this issue religious sectarianism must have been irrelevant. We are all Muslims from the base. Let us reawaken our Sunni Muslim countries to follow the foot of Iran on political bases so as to escape from American imperialism and Western political hegemony as did Iran achieved. I can see that the moon of modern Islamic civilization glistering from Tehran horizon to South East Asia. Stand up with me for Iran once again for they are representing the general Ummah against the Western Kuffar. MAY GOD RESTORE OUR PAST GLORY AND PRESTIGE.

Submitted by Salimullah

WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
It is because they are not Europeans…. Nor Americans: it is because they are Muslims and their state is ruled by Islamic government in form of Islamocracy (Shari’ah Ruling System). Any act of change that will lead a Muslim country to political, scientific and technological development the West (particularly the US) perceives it as a threat to their ‘Evilization’ that presently dominated the world social order. Why Iran most not afford nuclear technology when other nations have already afforded it?. UN security council members institutionalized that only their countries can afford nuclear weapon. This means that only America, China, France, England and Russia can afford nuclear bomb. But, other nations have the right to have nuclear technology only for peaceful purpose (e.g. energy power supply such as electricity), and not to produce a nuclear bomb. But today, despite of this law, over dozen of nations have afforded nuclear weapons: Israel, India, Germany, North Korea and Canada were among them. Most of these nations have afforded it illegally and were allowed to go unscathed and officially uninvestigated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). For Israel and others alike, is illegal to obtain nuclear bomb as afar as nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty developed by IAEA is concerned, based on Article 6 of its charter. There must be a hypocrisy and injustice in the rule that only those nations (like the UN Security Council members) that have nuclear bomb could afford and retain it; while others have no right to even develop it. Disarmament policy must have been a double-faced strategy adopted by the UN Security Council. In 1970, Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was put into effect. The principal law of NPT as reads in Encarta 2009, is thus: “Under the terms of the NPT, countries without nuclear weapons agreed not to develop them, and states possessing nuclear weapons agreed to work toward disarmament. The IAEA inspects the nuclear power and research facilities of participating non-nuclear weapons states to ensure that enriched uranium and plutonium byproducts are not being diverted to nuclear weapons production”. If the rule of disarmament was founded on justice and equity it will effect the law that not only the non-nuclear nations could not obtain it but also the nuclear ones must have destroy their own nuclear bombs. Going by this unjust disarmament policy, the remote impact will mean that Muslim countries would not be allowed to obtain it. If they are objective why is that Israel allowed to afford this nuclear bomb which is against the rules of NPT but Iran is being denied its right to afford its technology only for peaceful purpose. It is Israel that bombards the UN Security Council to must suppress Iran from its Uranium enrichment. Those nations that suppress others from obtaining nuclear bombs have already stored thousands of it in their weapons stockpile. Ironically enough, America which had been the only nation that used nuclear bomb in Hiroshima – Japan (on August 6, 1945) – is now the head of disarmament policy. What a ridiculous! All what I have been trying to educate our people is why only Iran is facing harsh pressure by the UN and the world superpowers headed by America and controlled by the Jewish state of Israel? Let us examine this fact from just and fair analysis.
Israel not wants to see that a Muslim nation in the Middle East has afforded a sophisticated military technology because it perceives that as a threat to its way of terrorism against the Palestinians in particular and the Middle East in general. This is the reason why it has destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor base in 1981 and Syrian nuclear installations in 2007. Israel is not an IAEA and who give it the right to attack the nuclear activities installation of other nations like Iraq and Syria. This is a patent act of terrorism but the UN never put forward any official inquiries on Israeli terrorist state because the world superpowers and UN Security Council are the slaves of the Jews. It should be noted that Israel is among the nations whom were banned from obtaining nuclear weapons; but it has been producing thousands of such bombs illegally. However, no official investigation and sanction has put forward by the IAEA and the UN Security Council being them serving the Jewish interest. When India, Israel and other non-nuclear nations are developing nuclear technology they had never faced pressures of investigation by the IAEA or sanctions by the UN Security Council. But, Iran is now facing harsh pressure and incoming sanctions from UN Security Council motivated by Israel – the most illegal stockpile of WMD including nuclear bomb. Iran’s nuclear sites were thoroughly inspected by IAEA officials and were all confirmed for peaceful purpose and fulfilled the rules required for the legal nuclear activities. Iran has scores significant points in its ‘diplomatic debate’ with the world power in this case. It was able to present a new proposed bill on nuclear disarmament to IAEA and was approved well. According to IRIB as written by Ebrahimi: “the IAEA approved a resolution to ban attacks on nuclear installations as a necessity”. Thus, the Israeli ongoing plan to attack Iranian nuclear installation was eschewed. The approved bill also suggested that: the usurper state of Israel to stop its nuclear proliferation and abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and as the first step bring their arsenals and nuclear installations under IAEA supervision. However, notwithstanding the international will, the representative of the Zionist regime at the agency announced unashamedly that it will not cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog as per the ratified resolution”.
The controversy is not whether Iran is having nuclear bomb (the world knows that Iran hasn’t it at all) but whether it is having a programme that could use to make this bomb in the next 5-10 years. In all cases the IAEA’s report about Iranian nuclear activities is ‘peaceful and right’. But UN Security Council (presumably with the exception of China & Russia) appeared to rule out IAEA’s report and preparing to invade Iran. But, recently alternative decision suggests harsher economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programmes in preference to military invasion (New York Times September 28, 2009). The truth is that IAEA is no longer respectful in the eyes of the UN Security Council as are ready to ignore its decision about Iran. Ali Asghar, Iran’s envoy to IAEA has told press TV that: “IAEA Chief Mohammad al-Baradei says in paragraph 26, Iran has cooperated with the agency, improving the safeguard measures at the Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz”. Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Dr. Saeed Jalili declares in retorting to West’s opposition saying: “Why do they express concern towards Iran's legal nuclear activities while they do not raise a smallest question on the nuclear arsenal of the Zionist entity? Who has given nuclear weapons to Israel?” Whether military invasion or economic sanction is to be set against Iran we should know the real motivator behind this evil is Israel. As documented in Telegraph UK Newspaper dated Sept 27, 2009, Benjamin Netanyahu spoke, via telephone, to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, emphasizing that: “Action must be taken in all areas to increase pressure on Iran and impose crippling sanctions on it," he said, according to the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz ‘If not now, then when?”. Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman made a call upon the UN that “the mad regime of Tehran” must be overthrown (Ibid). Chief of staff of the Israeli army, Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi has stated that Ahmadinejad had "to know that he can end his days like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi" (ibid). Follow the link to read in full (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6237299/Israel-urges-West-to-stand-firm-against-Iran.html).
When Iran has publicly declared its peaceful nuclear activities and allowed IAEA for inspection, and signed treaty of nuclear non-proliferation and fulfilled the rules of Article 6 of IAEA charter, Israel has been allowed to do all this unchecked at its nuclear weapons factory at Dimona in the Negev, and without signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Despite of all these violation and non-cooperation by Israel it is Iran that is going to be punish or even attack in spite of its cooperation with international laws and IAEA’s rules and regulations. In fact, according to IAEA’s report, Iran has been much more cooperative and obedient to all IAEA’s laws governing nuclear activities for peaceful usage. But, Obama has made a big lie when he says: “Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow”. According to IAEA’s investigation on Iran’s nuclear sites, Obama’s statement is a sheer and patent lie; it is Israel, India and North Korea, who are having hundreds or thousands of nuclear bombs, that break the rules that all nations must follow but the UN Security Council could not attack or even punish these belligerent nations because they are among the parties of non-Muslim nations whom they consider as single unbelievers community opposing the community of Muslim believers. But, Iran as a pure Muslim and Islamic nation that has been very cooperative with the rules of nuclear activities and never attempt to afford WMD in violation to IAEA’s rule was considered defiant and mad nation worthy of destruction under Israeli motives. It is now clear that any policy of disarmament or Nuclear non- proliferation is aimed to disarm only Muslim countries. The case of Pakistan (only Muslim state having nuclear bomb) is different; this possibility has come to it at an inevitable stage unable to suppress even by the world powers.

Why only Iran? It has no any kind of nuclear bomb. But why not Israel? It has many more stockpiles of nuclear bombs. The double standard is self-evident in Western International laws and policies. It is just as what David Duke mentioned: “America does not really oppose biological and chemical weapons or their use, all the Federal Government really cares about is which side uses them”. Why America is going to attack Iran for the same thing that other dozen of nations do. Suppose that Iran obtained nuclear bomb, then it is not that same Iran to be destroyed first but Israel.
Finally, let us stand up for Iran; its development is ours and will pave the way for further resurrection of Islamic political power and social order. When it comes to this issue religious sectarianism must have been irrelevant. We are all Muslims from the base. Let us reawaken our Sunni Muslim countries to follow the foot of Iran on political bases so as to escape from American imperialism and Western political hegemony as did Iran achieved. I can see that the moon of modern Islamic civilization glistering from Tehran horizon to South East Asia. Stand up with me for Iran once again for they are representing the general Ummah against the Western Kuffar. MAY GOD RESTORE OUR PAST GLORY AND PRESTIGE.

Submitted by Salimullah