₦airaland Forum

By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com
blogwebsite: www.salimullah1..com
Written on Sunday, 1st /08/2009

GOD: According to Islam and other relevant religion, they believe that God is the ultimate creator, sustainer, master and controller of this very infinite universe and the mankind as well. He is ever-existing before the creation and will remain after it. He can neither be seen nor be felt by any means; however, he is very nearer to us. All the natural phenomena and the activities of mankind evolve through his power and will. God controls natural elements, events and occurrences. He could withhold rain, cause drought or diseases. He provides the universal sustenance for the entire mankind. He gives life or death to whomever he wills. He causes all the natural events, disasters, and phenomena. It is therefore, God has an absolute and predominant power over the universe. And even the human actions (good & bad) were created and predetermined by God. While good actions are ordered and permitted to be strictly observed, bad ones are strongly prohibited and disallowed to be acted upon. And that is the purpose of the creation of Paradise for righteous doers, and Hellfire for evil doers. Islam in particular, believed that God created multitude humble servants who promptly carry out his executions and commands. These humble servants are known as the “Angels” and they are differently functioning.
Rightly indeed, this is the good belief of concept about God, rather than atheism – the idea of believing in nature. Many scientists are atheists – those who believe only in the concept of nature rather than God.

Naturalism is another view in philosophy that believes that all things happen in this world and life are based on natural causes and laws, and not on spiritual or supernatural ones. Both of them deny the existence of a super-natural being call God. It was on this concept that the Western scientists built their theories of scientific natural laws and causalities. In their scientific laws, they state that whatever cannot be seen either by naked eyes or microscope, and cannot be felt by stark hand or through the skin, such thing do not exist at all. But, they believed in nature and it too, cannot be seen or felt by any means. Their belief in nature has neither any dogmatic basis nor scientific corroboration. It is just a mere speculation and assumption. And as usual, anything assumed is likely to be false knowledge.

Since we have gone through a pure belief let us go directly inside the question of ‘Nature’ from its distinct phase of science and atheism. And ultimately we may come to desperately compare and contrast in order to arrive at a pure, perfect and true belief.

NATURE AS A SCIENTIFIC BELIEF
When the religious believers especially Muslims believe in the oneness of God being the ultimate essence of creation; they believe in His sovereignty over the universe and the mankind and his unique control over them, some scientists, naturalists, and atheists held entirely different belief. For instance, Naturalism in philosophy is an idea which surmises that all things happen in the world are based on natural causes and laws, and not on spiritual or super-natural one. They mean that God does not exist at all. Atheism also, is another western idea which says no God. Most of the western scientists are largely atheists or naturalists.

Scientifically, nature is the way that all things happen in the physical world when they cannot be controlled by human act. This definition is indeed an absolute true; because only God (ALLAH) can control natural events and happenings. Naturalist scientists believe that nature causes rain through evaporation, plant growth through germination, reproduction through intercourse and fertilization, and many several others of natural occurrences are happening according to the laws of nature. But remember in their law they mention that anything invisible, insensitive or cannot be known through one of the human senses does not exist at all. And now they are telling us that they believe in the fact that nature controls the universe and mankind through its natural laws and causalities. And at the same time nature too, is invisible and cannot be felt or known by any empirically scientific process.

Presumably, let us assume that natural laws of causalities control the universe. So then who is directing and administering such natural laws? There must be a super-natural being and that must be ALLAH – the Most High. As they say, what empirical science cannot establish its reality does not exist at all. Thus, they destroy the existence of ALLAH describing it as an illusionary belief. Going by this way, we may ask: which among the scientific empirical researches establish the absolute descriptive image and concept of nature? None at all.
Until this time, no any empirical scientific study that tells us about the depiction of ‘Nature’: is it a living or non-living? What colour and what size of it? Where is it residing? Have they ever see or feel it empirically? They are only imagining about it. Just ask them a general question: what are the characteristics of nature? They could never answer you only to fumble about. The fact that ALLAH cannot be empirically studied, known, or described, the same thing apply when it comes to the issue of nature. So, then who is God and who is nature. I think it is one thing with different name. Hence, whenever naturalist scientists mention nature they must either directly or indirectly refer to God (ALLAH). The irrational antagonism towards religion hinders them from upholding the truth. My beloved brothers in true faith, wherever you meet such corrupt scientists and atheists let them answer the above heavy fundamental questions.

GOD AND NATURE: COMPARE AND CONTRAST
ALLAH is the only real and absolute God, and nature is true. From one angle of perspective, we can say that ‘nature’ is a powerful creation of God or can be one of God’s super functions just as it runs the natural world. Going by this understanding, we may assume that Nature is a creation of God and it entails the mean or tool through which His power (Qudrah) and will (Iradah) are exerted upon the functions of the universe and mankind in general. An example of this view is that: it is natural that man must fall into hunger and naturally must take in nourishment. And it is natural that plant needs water to grow and naturally the sky must produce rain at certain season. That is to say all things happening through the natural laws as designated and directed by ALLAH. In another view, we may assume that ALLAH is the real God and nature is His power and will (Qudrah/Iradah) as He impacts it upon the creatures including the universe. Verse quotes. Thus, according to this view, nature is an attribute of God. The fact that nature is the way in which things happen in this world when it is beyond human intervention does not mean the absence of controller or administrator. Indeed there is and that is ALLAH – the Most High.

Comparatively, the modern world has developed the technology of automation in various machines and computers. Compare it with the definition of nature, for instance to say: automation is the way in which technological products carry out activities in the absence of human control. Is that means the lack of controller at all? No and never, indeed there is an absolute controller who is also the inventor of such machine and the designer of its automation process, and it is the honorable man. In fact, it is the man (the creator of the machine) that equips it with the ability of automation; that the machine must follow the natural technological laws as designed by its inventor – the man. And at the same time, if the inventor is so wish, he can disqualify it from such ability of automation. Desperately, we may assume that the same thing apply to the activities of God in the universe despite of its far cry from that; because the activities of God, when he wills one, makes no difference between the divine will and the happening effect of the event or occurrence. According to Qur’an: “truly, nowise the nature of God but when He intend to do things simply say it to ‘Be’ and ‘it is’. (Qur’an, Ch. 36 v82). Also, in another passage: “When he decreeth a matter he saith to it ‘Be’ and ‘it is’. (Qur’an, Ch. 2 V118).

Additionally, in other passage:
Indeed, the above quoted verses illustrate the automatic happenings in the natural world as it is ordered and directed by ALLAH. The fact that between the God’s will and His impacted power upon things to happen is however, makes no difference of time or distance. In fact, all the happening in the natural world have been decreed and fated from eternity.

Finally, remember that the power and will of God, known as nature by scientists, are virtually exerted upon everything: living and non-living, human and non-human, natural and artificial. So, then what is wrong to bother yourself with those atheists. They are indeed ignorant of true knowledge. Hence, to think that nature is the ultimate bases of creation and the final governor of the world natural happenings in the absence of ALLAH is a typical Kufr (infidelity) and a prevarication from the truth of not only religion but also the scientific and logical bases of knowledge. With this short observation also, the Darwin’s heretical and illogical theory that all the creations come to be as a result of eternal natural selection must have become defeated. I will deal with Darwin’s Theory of Evolution next InshaaAllah.
‘’Allahumma Ahliki Kafrata Wal Mushrikeen Wa Najjena Min Shuririhim’’ (Oh God destroy the infidelities and polytheists and save us from their evils). Amen.

Sir Salimullah
(This article was first written on Sunday 1st August, 2009)

I had once did this test around 2013 I think when I applied for a job in Union bank. we were invited to Abuja where Dragnet centre is located. the centre is very beautiful and attractive. everything inside is white in colour including the computers that were connected to a one single giant computer. In fact I have never seen a sophisticated modern ICT centre like dragnet. coming to your question Simulation test is a type of programmed computerized objective test where questions are appearing on the screed and disappear in few seconds (30seconds maximum) whether your answer it or not it will disappear as soon as as it allocated second elapse. The test itself is divided into 3: Numeric, Logic and ENGLISH I think so if dont forget.

They are not Muslims at all

By Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah) -
15/04/2017
salimanology13@gmail.com
May God bless the emir and forgive his shortcomings. “He is him of his own word….he fears not the pen of the critics in the face of the truth he professes…. He is a vibrant ‘Mutafanni’ intellectual, a Banker, an administrator, a leader and a scholar indeed. Bilingual Speaker and writer, versatile in knowledge, an authority in Shari’ah, economy and finance. The one who knows how to influence, motivate and create action point among those under him and whosoever follows him. He was the defender and saviour of Shariah in the 1999 debate who had challenged and defeated the enemies throughout the media”.

This is how I described this man in my article titled: “My Best man of The Year 2016”.
Some had described him as controversial, secularist, capitalist and even enemy of the North, all for he dared to express the truth from the bottom of his heart. We are not always following the prophetic model in our manners when we disagree with one another. Some have taking it their daily hobbies criticizing other’s opinion, too often not intending to bring better alternative to it but to express themselves as professional writers and critics who can criticize and destroy others view when and how they so wish. They turn any new opinion into a threat to unity, society and its development. They suspend Islamic manners on Adab al-Ikhtilaf (Etiquette of Differing) and indulge in their sel-acclaimed behavior and make the discussion atmosphere to become saturated with backbiting, slander, rumours, accusations, lying, and character assassination.

To this group of people I tell them: They should realize that the Emir Sunusi’s ‘Expression’ is not necessarily the ‘Impression they get from him. There do exist a gap between what he mean and what this group of Character Assassinators understand. Ours is to reduce this gap to a minimum; the smaller it is the more successful the Emir is delivering his message. Although few of his critics have managed to be fair to him, like Hamisu Hadejia who also described him as a Philosopher King, some have gone far to make the Emir the victim of character assassination, so much so that they claimed the Emir to have had changed his name from Sunusi Lamido Sunusi to Muhammad Sunusi II for him to start life afresh, as if he has an untold bad record of service, character and or morality.

It is natural to be stereotyped as controversial. Try to be expressive in your truth even if you are alone. This has been a unique character of the emir. You can find only few people of his calibre. He is very assertive in his opinion to the core. None of his opinions fall shorter than yours.
They accused him of being too noisy in media. This is how the Islamic leader should be. Being expressive (speech and writing) is among the 25 qualities of good leader. This man has been an intellectual writer and speaker; therefore you cannot expect him to drop his pen and tie his tongue just because he is now an Emir. In fact, he is in the right position to do it even much. No blame!

They accused him of planning to burry polygamy. This is not a law passed single handedly by the emir; it was just a proposal and he observed Islamic protocol of Shura (mutual consultation) before forwarding this proposal. No blame on him!.
The emir was right when he responded to Gov. Yari as thus: “Don’t give these kind of explanations. “That is not an Islamically correct statement to make.”“(If) you don’t have vaccines, you don’t have vaccines; Go and get vaccines.”
He was also right when he said that“The North East and the North West of Nigeria are amongst the poorest parts of the WORLD. Not just Nigeria. If Borno and Yobe were countries, they’d be poorer than Niger and Chad.

He was even more right when he said that “The Federal Government of Nigeria is spending 66 percent of its revenues on interests on debts, which means only 34 percent of revenues is available for capital and recurrent expenditures….. “That model cannot work. If you look at the 2017 budget of the Federal Government, I sometimes wonder what Nigerian economists are doing?
May Allah bless the Emir and forgive his shortcomings once again. Go on Emir with your thoughts and ideas. The tirades of character assassinators will not deter you.

Console yourself with what Allah consoles his messenger (s.a.w): “It is by God’s grace that you deal gently with them. Had you been harsh and hard-hearted, they would surely have broken away from you. Therefore, pardon them and pray for them to be forgiven and consult with them in the conduct of public affairs. When you have resolved about a course of action, put your trust in God. God loves those who put their trust in Him. (Al-imran v.159).

ON THE NEED OF MUSLIM WITHDRAWAL FROM UNITED NATION
Yesterday I read one treatise by Shakir Butt from Canada who writes thus: It is time to abolish the UN; it has not solved a single problem facing the world…... It is time to withdraw Muslim membership in the useless UN
According to him:“The UN is no more than a tool in the hands of the oppressors led by the US. It has not solved a single problem in the world, key among which is Palestine, especially as it was illegally handed over to the Zionists by the UN. The Holy Land belongs to God, not the Zionists. The UN has simply rubber-stamped the dirty game played by Britain and America. The same applies to the UN’s failure on Kashmir where nearly 100,000 people have been murdered by Indian colonization troops. Thousands of Kashmiri women have been raped and tens of thousands of youth have simply disappeared. It is time to withdraw Muslim membership in the useless UN”.
This is clear-cut fact known to every sensible man. Something needs to be done, a fact I, they, he, she, they and we know even better. But who will do it? When and how, always remain unanswered questions. Many Muslim intellectuals, writers and revivalists have for long been vociferously calling for this need. However none could have strategized the theoretical scheme to attain this goal.
But to me, I have already drafted the proposal on this very issue for future Islamic workers in my long awaiting-to-be-published book: “THE MESSAGE TO THE CONTEMPORARY MUSLIM WORLD”. While suggesting for the creation of WORLD ISLAMIC SHURA ORGANIZATION (WISO) I wrote: “The final objective of this organization is to eradicate or at least minimize the tension of the differences among the assorted sect of Muslims; and to organize a Treaty of the Muslim States withdrawal from United Nations which I may probably call “Treaty of Repentance”-to expose themselves to Allah as sinners before who now come to seek his forgiveness. I am aware that in the course of Muslims withdrawal from UN there would be an excessive and hot debate or compromise between West and Muslims. In such situation WISO will undertake the responsibility of all sittings, meetings and compromise that may occur. Therefore, there is need for WISO to afford some classical competent group of versatile scholars, lawyers, social scientists, jurists, judges and historians who can face and tackle any Western political and intellectual challenges.
WISO then at last, will proclaim the Muslim states withdrawal from UN on, but not limited to the following bases and reasons:
i- UN does not represent the needs of the Muslim and therefore, betraying the Muslims confidence;
ii- It hinders them from executing their own Islamic laws and policies in their states;
iii- It does not protect their rights, lives, lands and properties;
iv- It undermines the honour and respect of the Muslims;
v- It’s secular rules, laws and policies are completely incompatible to Islam; and
vi- Finally, it is against Islam by favouring the Western states against the Muslim ones.
Before I theorize this view of mine I dwelt so much in the eternal message of Allah (Qur’an). In my discreet ponder in the Qur’an I came to realize some certain mistakes made by the Muslims or their leaders (as the case may be). I have found that some basic commands in the Qur’an which aim to retain Islamic and Muslim power in this world are not fulfilled yet. One of these commands is that Allah has enjoined Muslims to have an independent systems and laws of social relation, peace-keeping and conflict resolution but the Muslims until now fail to do so.
May Allah help us restore our past glory. Ameen
END. Salimullah
Wasalam.

THE DIRTY RULER, EGYPTIANS’ DEMAND
AND THE U.S RESPONSE
By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com
blogwebsite: www.salimullah1..com

What would be the western response had Mubarak been an Islamic leader amidst public agitation to step down? Suppose this most legitimate protest against the government is happening in IRAN; what do you think about the possible response from the U.S (the Big Satan), Israel (the evil-hatchers), Britain and France (the unbelieving-hypocrites)? They will instantly intervene even with military to help the people of Egypt to topple the government. Don’t ever forget that the America’s motive is democracy; and are even attacking the Islamic state for non-observance of democracy. Now, here are people protesting against age-old (83 years) dictator to step down. It is an astonishing irony the U.S is supporting the dictator and overlooks the majority citizens’ demand. The Obama’s administration has only urged Mubarak to ‘enact reform’. This response is against the Egyptian’s aspirations who are demanding the horrendous ruler to step down.

It is one week-plus of the nation’s instability and all previous attempts to arrest the revolutionary situation by Mubarrack has failed, including the military deployment. It was even reported that Mubarrack has given military order of shooting the civilian protesters wherever met. Why should they be shot for staging the most legitimate and peaceful protest? Surprisingly, even the military are in support of the protest; they too need the change and participate in the protest from behind the scene.

The military never dare to carryout the ‘shoot’ order given to them by Mubarrack. Mubarrack’s family have already left the state for refuge. In his attempt to appease the Egyptians, Mubarrack dissolved his cabinet and appointed new ones. It is too late for him and the measure taken is less than enough to quench the Egyptians’ thirst. Mubarrack has no option but to step down despite of Western support for him. Even though the President Mubarrack has promised economic and political reforms, protesters remain defiant, fearless and formidable in their right determination and say they will not give up until Mubarak steps down.

Meanwhile, the imminent revolution in Egypt presages a disastrous future against Israel; as such it is doing all its best from behind the scene to suppress its success. It should be recalled that Peace treaty existed for over 30yrs today between Israel and Egypt, enabling the Israel to continue its persecution, aggression and invasion of Palestinians’ lands, all with tacit approval of Mubarrack’s administration. Israel will never like a revolution in Egypt, which could endanger the peace treaty that was signed between the tow parties in 1979. The U.S too is concerned about Israel’s security should this revolution succeed.

Netanyahu, an Israeli prime minister envisages that Egypt uprising could lead to an Islamic revolution which has occurred in Iran in 1979. “In a time of chaos, an organized Islamic group can take over the state. It happened in Iran and it also happened in other places, Netanyahu quote saying at a press conference with visiting German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday. On last Saturday (29/01/011) three Israeli planes landed in Cairo’s Mina’s International Airport to deliver crowd dispersal weapons for Mubarrack to use them against the mass popular protesters.

It could be concluded that Western stance towards Egypt uprisings is a clear-cut irony. It therefore exposes their double standard in their relation to Muslim world. In reality, the U.S is not after entrenching democracy in the Muslim world; it is after someone that can serve their will and protect their interest in the Middle East irrespective of a kind of government he runs: a monarchy, dictatorship or military it doesn’t matter. Ironically, they are after toppling any Muslim democracy government that remains defiant to their need and interest in the Middle East.

Their attitudes can be divided into two as regards their policy in Middle East and other Muslim countries:

1) The U.S and their alliance welcome any Muslim dictatorial ruler who will serve their interest even if it is against Islam and Muslims; and they need him on power in his state for uncountable years as long as he remains ‘a dog’ (blindly obedient) to them. For instance, Saudi Kings and others (e.g. Mubarrack’ regime) are dictators but the U.S needs them to remain on power because they are serving their wills. But, they dislike Qaddhafi, another Libyan dictator because he rarely serves their wills and always seek to topple him from power. A double-standard established!

2) They never want a popular Muslim democrat leader who will not serve their interest. They will never like him despite of his democracy-style leadership. Their enmity is worse when this democrat leader professes Islamic principle of leadership. Iran’s leader, who is a democratic one, is a typical example in this case.

Finally, it is time for Muslim world to better understand the true stance and attitude of U.S and their alliance towards Muslim countries.

THE DIRTY RULER, EGYTIANS’ DEMAND
AND U.S RESPONSE
By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com
blogwebsite: www.salimullah1..com


What would be the western response had Mubarak been an Islamic leader amidst public agitation to step down? Suppose this most legitimate protest against the government is happening in IRAN; what do you think about the possible response from the U.S (the Big Satan), Israel (the evil-hatchers), Britain and France (the unbelieving-hypocrites)? They will instantly intervene even with military to help the people of Egypt to topple the government. Don’t ever forget that the America’s motive is democracy; and are even attacking the Islamic state for non-observance of democracy. Now, here are people protesting against age-old (83 years) dictator to step down. It is an astonishing irony the U.S is supporting the dictator and overlooks the majority citizens’ demand. The Obama’s administration has only urged Mubarak to ‘enact reform’. This response is against the Egyptian’s aspirations who are demanding the horrendous ruler to step down.

It is one week-plus of the nation’s instability and all previous attempts to arrest the revolutionary situation by Mubarrack has failed, including the military deployment. It was even reported that Mubarrack has given military order of shooting the civilian protesters wherever met. Why should they be shot for staging the most legitimate and peaceful protest? Surprisingly, even the military are in support of the protest; they too need the change and participate in the protest from behind the scene.

The military never dare to carryout the ‘shoot’ order given to them by Mubarrack. Mubarrack’s family have already left the state for refuge. In his attempt to appease the Egyptians, Mubarrack dissolved his cabinet and appointed new ones. It is too late for him and the measure taken is less than enough to quench the Egyptians’ thirst. Mubarrack has no option but to step down despite of Western support for him. Even though the President Mubarrack has promised economic and political reforms, protesters remain defiant, fearless and formidable in their right determination and say they will not give up until Mubarak steps down.

Meanwhile, the imminent revolution in Egypt presages a disastrous future against Israel; as such it is doing all its best from behind the scene to suppress its success. It should be recalled that Peace treaty existed for over 30yrs today between Israel and Egypt, enabling the Israel to continue its persecution, aggression and invasion of Palestinians’ lands, all with tacit approval of Mubarrack’s administration. Israel will never like a revolution in Egypt, which could endanger the peace treaty that was signed between the tow parties in 1979. The U.S too is concerned about Israel’s security should this revolution succeed.

Netanyahu, an Israeli prime minister envisages that Egypt uprising could lead to an Islamic revolution which has occurred in Iran in 1979. “In a time of chaos, an organized Islamic group can take over the state. It happened in Iran and it also happened in other places, Netanyahu quote saying at a press conference with visiting German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday. On last Saturday (29/01/011) three Israeli planes landed in Cairo’s Mina’s International Airport to deliver crowd dispersal weapons for Mubarrack to use them against the mass popular protesters.

It could be concluded that Western stance towards Egypt uprisings is a clear-cut irony. It therefore exposes their double standard in their relation to Muslim world. In reality, the U.S is not after entrenching democracy in the Muslim world; it is after someone that can serve their will and protect their interest in the Middle East irrespective of a kind of government he runs: a monarchy, dictatorship or military it doesn’t matter. Ironically, they are after toppling any Muslim democracy government that remains defiant to their need and interest in the Middle East.

Their attitudes can be divided into two as regards their policy in Middle East and other Muslim countries:

1) The U.S and their alliance welcome any Muslim dictatorial ruler who will serve their interest even if it is against Islam and Muslims; and they need him on power in his state for uncountable years as long as he remains ‘a dog’ (blindly obedient) to them. For instance, Saudi Kings and others (e.g. Mubarrack’ regime) are dictators but the U.S needs them to remain on power because they are serving their wills. But, they dislike Qaddhafi, another Libyan dictator because he rarely serves their wills and always seek to topple him from power. A double-standard established!

2) They never want a popular Muslim democrat leader who will not serve their interest. They will never like him despite of his democracy-style leadership. Their enmity is worse when this democrat leader professes Islamic principle of leadership. Iran’s leader, who is a democratic one, is a typical example in this case.

Finally, it is time for Muslim world to better understand the true stance and attitude of U.S and their alliance towards Muslim countries.

THE BREAK OF THE NATION
By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com

Hints For Notice
The only tie that keeps the political unity of diverse people of Nigeria is PDP’s zoning policy, and now it was recently put to an end. This means a total disintegration of Nigerian geo-political unity. The zoning policy is neither in the interest of Southerners nor in the interest of the Northerners, but that of the PDP’s elders both from the North and South to keep their personal ambitions alive. Yet, it means a lot to both of them. The more intelligent one side is the more he knows how to exploit the opportunity. It seems to me Obasanjo is the winner coz he knows better how to exploit the opportunity. Since the beginning of democracy era in Nigeria, the Southerners ruled more than the Northerners. Even when the Northerners’ turn came, they were deprived by the Southerners not by the use of force but by smart and strategic political brilliance and prudence put forward by Obasanjo.

What Went Wrong?
The zoning policy had been facilitated by PDP in consonance with both the Southern and Northern elders of the party, both driven by vested-interest. The Southern elders cautiously work both for their personal benefit and for that of their people in their distinct geo-political zone; while Northern elders worked only for their personal benefit. However their personal target has fallen. The policy shows the Northerners’ generosity to grant the minority their rights in leadership as opposed to democratic notion of ‘Majority Rules’ despite of the hidden agenda by the Northern facilitators. How I wish that the hidden agenda was meant for the interest of Northern patriotisms. Alas! It is for their personal interest. Through this policy agreed upon by the PDP elders, the democracy began to usher in Nigeria, given the Southerners the first turn, beginning in 1999. The reading error by Northern elders of PDP in the phase of the zoning policy is that they confined all their hidden agenda on how to achieved their personal future ambition; while the Southerners widen their hidden agenda on how to secure the future well-being of their people in general and make them the potentially perpetual Nigerian Leaders in the future. Obasanjo’s failed third tenure aspiration and assigning the age-old Yar’adua to take over are typical examples of Southerners attempt to deprive the Northerners of their right to rule Nigeria in sooner or later future. This is a point not clearly understood by until now.

Obasanjo, who was lucky to be the first beneficiary of zoning policy, had tried to betray the agreement by earnestly seeking for third term tenure, but only God forbids. On realizing this, he resorted to alternate political strategy and assigned the age-old ‘sick person’ of the North, whose last breath had been presaged to exceed not his office tenure, to take over the presidency, meaning the presidency would must have automatically return to the Southerners, and indeed did it so and it exactly happened. Don’t take what Obasanjo did just for granted; it is a deliberate scheme and all-purposeful agenda.

On the demise of the Northerner (may Allah bless him), the Southerner acting as VP automatically took over. His main mission is to continue from whence Obasanjo had stopped – to dismantle the zoning policy and monopolize the leadership and power, leaving the Northerners dying for their lust and hunger of power. Painful as it might be to admit, our representative elders in PDP have been deceived from behind the scene, and yet they must be blamed for any falling future that may likely to affect the Northerners.

The Possible Implication
Now G. Jonathan put to an end the only tie for Nigerians’ political unity. The impending implication would divide the Nigerian politics and democracy not only on geo-political basis but also on religio-political one. It is clear to all now that politics and election started to be preached in mosques and churches. Hence, the Christians are urged to vote for Christian candidate from the South and Muslims are urged to vote Muslim candidate from the north. Despite of the religious outlook now appeared in the politics one cannot describe it wholly as either religious or tribalistic; but it is a combination of both – one half masked in tribalism and the other half masked in religionism. Nigeria will inevitably come to stall as a single multi-ethno-religious political entity; hence the beginning of bitter political and religious conflict – a prelude to an imminent Civil War. This will, in the near future, evolve to geopolitical disintegration of our beloved ‘Motherland’ Nigeria. If the emerging demarcation between Northerners and Southerners or Muslims and Christians persists in our politics, without any prior consensus on basic rights and limitations of each, the result will be disastrous. It is not my wish to admit, but a matter of necessity.

The Possible Way-out
I therefore, opine that only military take-over will prevent any imminent political disaster that may likely to affect this nation. As the politics and election now being divided on the basis of religionism, tribalism, regionalism – both the South (Christians) and the North (Muslims) determine to fight back in case of losing the chance – what would be the end? Disastrous! I guessed. The military should now intervene and save the union of this nation. Let them imprison and encage mysterious situation created by this irrational, thoughtless, un-intelligent, unscrupulous and unpatriotic democrats whose ideas and thought can be best described as “Thought of the Thoughtless”. Let the military officers takeover the government; only to return it to the democrats when all thing are set aright in the state.

AH! The Pictures I can see are they really true or are just taken from a Hollywood? Don't forget Hussain really knew and witnessed that his Father, Sayyid Aliyu was brutally assassinated and yet, he did not innovate the custom of injuring and maiming his body. If Hussain were to come back today to and observe howthese people are injuring and cutting thier bodies just to mourn his assassination at Karbala he would fight them if they refused to abstain.

After you have accepted that Qur'an had exonerated Sayyidat A'isha from baseless accusation of the Kuffar, you have also to accept the priority accorded to her by the Qur'an and the prophet as well among his entire wife. Is she not the very noble wife of the prophet that He order us to obtain half of our religion from her? The love, respect, honour and humility showed to her by the prophet is great sign of her being far away from doing anything that may contradict the wish of the prophet even after his life. The reality of the matter is that Shi'a always seek to distort reality and mess up things. Alas, look for your own salvation instead of tracing to seek for others' err whom had already been salvaged and emancipated by Allah. If you like read: "The Prophet is closer to the believers than their own selves and his wives are as their mothers, " (33:6)____ ", O women of the household of Rasool, Allah only intends to remove uncleanliness from you and to purify you completely, " (33:33). But I know due to your irrational prejudice, you always try to exclude Sayyidat A'ishat from the praise and honour given to the Prophet's wives by Allah himself, albeit no any clear-cut evidence that excludes her. Let you knwo this: "“the criterion of truth is that it works even if nobody is prepared to acknowledge it”.

"i found this forum and i was disgusted to read the rude posts made against islam and our beloeved Prophet (sa) in the other religion forum.i therefore joined to defend islam and the Prophet (sa) against the rude talk and baseless lies".

(Shi'a Islam)


I wonder how would someone claim to defend the honour of the beloved Prophet (S.A.W) and at the same abusing, blaspheming, defaming and disparaging the beloved wife of the same prophet whose honour he is claiming to defend. will it not suffice Shi'a Muslims the saying of Allah in Q24:11 to acquit Sayyidat A'ishat from your baseless lies and defamation.

DENAJAD’S VISIT: ISRAEL IS DRIVEN BY PHOBIA


DENAJAD’S VISIT: ISRAEL IS DRIVEN BY PHOBIA

The west (US) and Israel began to turn into ‘sentimentally rational’. Since when Denajad fixed the date to visit Lebanon the US and Israeli sentimental officials started to pose some threat to deter Denajad’s visits to Lebanon. Why? No reason precisely. The described the visit ‘provocative’. ‘Provocative’ to whom? Perhaps to Israel. Why they feel as such? Because they really know that they are criminals throughout the years of their illegal establishment amidst Palestinian nation. Is he going to bomb Israel on his trip? Capital NO. Is Obama has no right to visit Britain, Canada, or else? So why all this mounting phobia for Denajad’s visit to Lebanon. Nonsense US-Israel. Now Denajad began his visit on last Wednesday 13th oct, 2010 to date. UN coordinator for Lebanon Michael Williams described the planned visit of Denajad to Lebanon as a “significant event”. Many just nation recognized the visit as good and better. But for the US and Israel is disastrous. Why? Let me remind you of a hausa proverb which says: “mara gaskiya ko a ruwa gumi yake”. It is this visit will affect some US-Israeli plots and saga being currently setting against Lebanese and other neighbouring Muslim countries. If such was the case thanks for this visit.

Many issues will be discussed between Denajad and many important political figures of Lebanon including the Hizbulla officials. Thanks to Denajad for setting agenda for the Muslims in reviving their political power and authority without which, Islam along its worldview cannot be fully entrenched on earth. This is a point not clearly understood by many.

1 + 1 + 1= 1. Am I right? I ask the xtians. Dont forget one god (Jesus) died. Can we now call the trinity 'TWINITY' ? Really Xtians deluded themselves.

THE PARADOX OF NIGERIAN DEVELOPMENT

By
Salim I. Hassan
Education Department
BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com

The celebration of our 50th anniversary of independence is desperately acclaimed by few ‘irrationals’ but confidently being frowned at by many. In fact, I go for those who seriously and indubitably doubt the development of this country in the last 50yrs. It is not a matter of pessimism; it is the truth we proclaim. Nigeria did achieve nothing in actual sense of development. To account for dubious and paradoxical aspects of development to corroborate for the actual Nigerian development is to distort reality. Those who assume themselves as optimists they do so only because they believe in the paradox of Nigerian development. To state the truth of Nigerian underdevelopment is not a matter of being a pessimist; in fact, such a person is a kind of rational analyst. Natural and unplanned development is always imminent wherever, whenever, however and on whomever the settlers are, including the creatures in the ‘Animal Wild Society’.
But the kind of development we are referring to in here is development in its original sense, being it in politics, government, economy and education as well. If we are talking about development let no one talk of achievement. You can achieve but without making a development. But development is all-encompassing as it includes achievement in itself. Even the term ‘development’ can be unplanned (natural) or planned. Planned Development is what we are referring to in this context. I know the reason why I am making this unusual clarification. Some seem to disagree to the fact Nigeria does not develop throughout the last 50yrs. If you ask them why this argument they will just cite some mere achievements – some kinds of natural development – that are not worthier than the word ‘development’ itself. Rise in number of schools, colleges and universities, rise in number of school enrolment (at all levels) and perhaps a relatively increase in oil income are not the actual determinant factors of development; they are just mere unplanned aspect of development which is irrelevant to our ‘discourse of development’. These must come to be either consciously or otherwise in the course of time passage. We too, do believe that Nigeria (but only in this aspect of unplanned or natural development) had stepped forward some extra miles as compared to our development in the 1960s as the so-called optimists wanted us to believe. Nevertheless, this will not aid them to escape my blow. let me ask: am I right to say Nigeria did develop and achieve a lot in the last 50yrs because our population multiplied more than that of 1960s, peoples’ houses and residences increased to greater extent and the power hungers (political power aspirants) rose in constantly high rate? This is a parable of those who account for the increment in the number of schools and universities, and rise in number of school enrolment from 1960s to date as their sole evidence for the actual Nigerian development in the last 50yrs. if such people were right in their argument, so then I have all right to state as in the above question.
Those who argue for Nigerian development in the past 50yrs were able to account only for what we have referred to in here as ‘natural’ or unplanned development. In comparison with other co-partner independent countries (those attained independence concurrently with Nigeria) we achieved nothing to date in terms of actual development. Still I know some wishy-washy writers and political analysts will continue to retain their argument by creating more confusion and paradox in this discourse of Nigerian development. The standard average measure of whether a country developed or not is the moderate extent to which it competes with the development of modernity, at least when it is compared to its contemporary mate in the history of independent political establishment in terms of actual development there should be a slight disparity or almost similar degree of development. Other standard measures of assessing a nation’s development is by considering the current global standard of governance, education, economy and technology. There is no doubt that the true developed countries have attained the highest level in these areas. Therefore, for developing countries, in order to confirm whether they have developed, or are developing in their own level, they must attain the average level in the scale of standard measurement of development as specified above. It is true some are saying Nigeria has come a long way – a long way from where? Asked by Adamu Adamu in one of his column in which he described Nigeria in its face of development as being ‘practice makes imperfect. The underdevelopment of Nigeria throughout the past 50yrs and the long-lasting irrationality of its leaders as well, are self-evident, so much so that if you are going to explain it you may not know from where to start.

Let me now show you some powerful evidence for Nigerian failure of development in the last 50yrs. Now it is almost 11yrs of democracy in Nigeria but no one can prove a single aspect of development or even an improvement. All the identified problems affecting Nigeria among others, corruption, injustice, economic instability, educational downfall, problems of power and water supply and problems of health matters as well, none of them is resolved even partially per se. One may ask that is the governance/leadership in Nigeria a democracy or a tyranny? If it is democratic then democracy must have been bad; and if it is tyrannical then the deposal of military regime from leadership does not make sense. Perhaps our failed leaders will say 10yrs is not sufficient time to reconstruct and stabilize the National power supply. Ridiculous!
All acts of Nigerian leaders – the good, the bad, and the evil – are unquestionable and are beyond reproach. I will be brutally honest for pointing out these irrefutable facts, and my frankness may offend some people, but I feel it necessary to speak out the truth. This crisis in Nigeria demands only the whole truth. Nothing less than the whole truth can help us build a secured and prosperous future for our motherland Nigeria. Alas, it is time for introspection.

Yes amina islam is the only true religion and others are ridiculous. Look at how christianity ridicules divinity, making god 3 in number and yet believing it as one. One god among d 3 has even died 4 their sins. God dies? Ridiculous! I heard somone there calling d quran a mythical book, forgetting dat quran has confirmed many scientific truths dat are practically established 2day, since 1400 yrs ago b4 even the comin of modern scientist. As a result many christian scientists accepted islam.

IRAN PUSHES BACK U.S INJUSTICE IN NUCLEAR POLICY

With its first historic world nuclear conference titled: “Nuclear power for all Nuclear weapon for none”, Iran pushes back U.S’s injustice in the world of nuclear power. 17-18 April 2010 marked the Iranian sponsored world Nuclear conference attended by 60 Nations with different Western journalists, correspondents and freelances. On the first day, the conference started with highlighting the scene of American inhuman atrocities against Japanese Nagasaki and Hiroshima as well as the atrocities of Saddam against Iranian civilians posed by using biological and chemical weapons supplied by the U.S. As Jalili, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council expressed in his address to audience that: “Four months ago, I witnessed the scene of one of the most appalling crimes against humanity in Hiroshima”. The US held its Nuclear Security Summit conferences in previous week on 13th April 2010 where banal discussions were featured and nonsensical resolutions were made. However, as it turns out, Iran’s own Nuclear conference exposes the deliberate bias and injustice of U.S Nuclear policy and some Iranian officials even claimed that those who profess to free the world from Nuclear weapons should/must not have it. “Being aware of the deceptive policies of certain powers and exposing them to the global community is the primary requirement for nuclear disarmament, Jalili added.

On his own side the president Ahamadenajad expresses that “Now it is clear that manufacture and stockpiling nuclear weapons and adoption of policies by the sole possessors of nuclear weapons is the biggest factors for creation of insecurity leading to further development of nuclear weapons. Destruction of nuclear weapons and removal of the nuclear threat serve the establishment of sustainable peace, security and friendship in the best manner.
Now we face this question that is it proper for us to leave the process of disarmament and non-proliferation to those who possess these weapons or not?”.

“Unfortunately the US Administration has so far both used these weapons and threatened to use them. Another country from the Europe also made the same threat under a false pretext a few years ago. When other countries witness that those who possess these weapons are threatening others to use these weapons and at the same time enjoy the Veto Right in the most important focal point responsible to keep and safeguard international security, naturally they are encouraged to manufacture these weapon as well for their own security and safety”, Denajad added.

Comparatively, the main purpose of Denajad’s Nuclear conference is to fill in the gap left unfulfilled by Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) where the policy as imposed by U.S, allows the bullying powers to freely continue with their Nuclear weapon activities while depriving developing countries to develop even a single. Whereas Iran has called for the implementation of treaties banning the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) by all countries "on a non-discriminative basis."

In their conspiracy conference, banal Obama and his alliance sought to amend the international Nuclear laws so as to have another chance to use the weapon for the second time, despite the fact that they called the conference as “Nuclear Security summit.

Generally, these are some of the Proposals made at Iran’s Nuclear Conferences:

1. We propose that a clear timetable be drawn up for the elimination of all nuclear weapons and an international verification mechanism for the nuclear activities of nuclear-weapon states. This verification mechanism should be similar to the one used to verify the fulfillment of commitments by non-nuclear weapon states under article 3 of NPT.
2. We propose that a fact-finding committee to be established by the IAEA to investigate the sources of proliferation of nuclear weapons to the Zionist regime and report the results of its findings to the Security Council and the General Assembly during current year.
3. To our total astonishment we are hearing totally new pronouncements that claim those outside NPT can legitimately produce and develop nuclear weapons in full secrecy. Even more tragic is the fact these clandestine nuclear programs are practically supported by cooperation and opening the doors to technology, materials and equipment.
Do you not believe that such policies serve no purpose other than weakening NPT and discouraging membership?

Therefore, we propose that, in the framework of nonproliferation measures, nuclear-weapon states be prohibited from any kind of nuclear cooperation with non-members and commit themselves not to transfer any kind of nuclear material, equipment and technology.
4. On the threshold of holding this conference, the global community witnessed another effort to diverge public opinion from the real threats by presenting a conceptual plan under the rubric of nuclear terrorism.

ALTERNATIVE TO GADDAFI’S WRONG IDEA OF 'SPLIT NIGEIRA'
By
Salim I. Hassan (Salimullah)
Education Department, BUK.
salimanology@yahoo.com

being an article sent to dailytrust (but not published)

Gaddafi is always known for his unusual declarations as some are saying. However, sometimes he tends to yield positive ideas and suggestions in his remarks and proposals. But, this time the ‘giant’ man has failed. I, like many others, feel it very differently when I heard about his recent proposal of ‘split Nigeria’ in dailytrust. Sir, Permit me to use a space in your ‘daily’ to highlight a smattering paragraphs embodied in my proposed idea of ‘communal politics’ which I have propounded in my book: “Nigerian Muslims; Problems and Solution” (unpublished) to address this issue of ‘Split Nigeria’ meanwhile providing alternative solution. I think my idea shall be positive and effective (I am not praising myself) in addressing the solution of Muslim-Christian conflict in Nigeria. The texts here are simplified, abridged or paraphrased.

In the book, I have talked about the possibility of peaceful co-coexistence of two different communities with different set of laws and values in a state. This can only be done when the federal constitution is transformed to “Communal Constitution”. As such “Communal Politics” suggests that a heterogeneous society can co-exist to live equally, peacefully, tolerably, and interdependently only if the state constitution grants full liberty and right to political power to each and every community residing within the Nation; to govern and rule its members in accordance to their religion, beliefs, norms, cultures and philosophy of life. Therefore, Communal Constitution is that type of constitution which provides laws on the basis of the religion, norms and values of each and every respective community in a state or nation whose members belong to the same religious entity e.g. Muslim Community (i.e. it constitutes all Muslim states and all those Muslims living in non-Muslim states of Nigeria). In Communal Constitution the federal government should not make any law that may even likely to violate one or more of the religious values and laws of any of the communities. It is interesting to note that Communal Constitution has two categories of law: General Provisional Laws (GPLS) and Supreme Community Laws (SCLS). On the one hand, General Provisional Laws (GPLS) are those distinct provisions in “Communal Constitution” which provides general laws in the nation that are common and acceptable to all communities; and that it represent the positive aims, goals and objectives for the national growth and development. It is only the government that has the authoritative and dominant power on the decision, regulation, and maintenance and administering of GPLS. Supreme Community Laws (SCLS) on the other hand, is an independent part of provisions in “Communal Constitution” which is mainly dealt with the communal laws of each and every community within the nation. When we say community in this regard we are referring to a particular society belong to same religion (e.g. Muslims and Christian Communities). SCLS are set of laws, principles, rules, and policies which are designed and provided by a particular Community based on their religion, beliefs, values and norms to serve as their legal/civil constitution whose religious-based provisions must be respected, valued and protected by GPLS. The relationship between the two different provisions is that of generality and exclusivity. In clearer terms I meant that the former (GPLS) is expected to design, make and regulate all laws that are common and acceptable to different communities; hence its generality. While the latter (SCLS) is expected to design, make and regulate the exceptional laws of different communities that are peculiar to them; hence its exclusivity. Where a law cannot be made general for the entire communities each and every community can make it in accordance to its norms and values so as to avoid making law by the government in favour of one community as against the other. Don’t go and waste your time in search for the cause of Nigerian political instabilities and social underdevelopment; it is here lies the problem: the incapability and inability of the Nigerian constitution to cater for the needs of different religious communities. There is too often one law in favour of one community as against the other.

Under this type of constitution Muslims shall be entitled to rule their states according to the Shari’ah Ruling System. And Christians too, (if they like) they can rule their states according to their religious set of values. To think of the split of Nigeria into two different regional boundaries is just to distort reality. There are a lot of Muslim brothers in Southern states and vice versa; hence, it is illogical to think of the creation of southern and northern region of Nigeria as two distinctive independent countries.

When this goal (communal constitution) is attained we Muslim, shall bring together all of our brothers from Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western region under a single religio-political entity called “Federation of United Muslim States of Nigeria (FUMS)”. This federation is only in theoretical aspect but not in practical boundary separation. Our future salvation as general citizens only lies in the attainment of this ‘dream-like’ idea. FUMS does not entail existence of a new independent nation in Nigeria for the Muslims; it is a not a territorial nation out of Nigeria; rather the federation will represent the religio-political entity of the majority Muslims whom will enjoy their full right and legitimacy from that power and consent of the Nigerian government. Under this federation, Muslims shall have their own supreme constitution which shall be an independent section of provisions in the Federal one (already communalized); they shall have their own supreme courts of laws for their final decisions and judgements in all legal, civil, common and religious laws; it finally entails that all Muslims in Nigeria shall be brought back under Shari’ah Ruling System without any constitutional constraints and restrictions. And ditto for the Christians.

The federation shall be in form of Caliphate. The Caliphate therefore, shall be the ultimate religio-political entity and modus-operandi representing the entire Muslim citizens in Nigeria regardless of colour, race, tribe, and or region. If the Christian brothers are really want to have this complete religious political freedom we also advocate the same thing for them because they too have their own set of religious laws and orders which they have ignored due to the influence of secularism. Both Muslims and Christian’s federalist constitution shall inevitably come to be. Under communal constitution they shall all have their different provisions as far as their civil, legal and social life is concerned.

It is lacked of such clarity of thought in Nigerian politics and leadership that brings about all act of violence, political instability and incessant tribal/religious conflicts. The solution to the problem is not as col. Qaddafi assumed for that will only lead us to dismemberment and incessant territorial civil war. But, if the proposed idea (as described above) is to be translated into practice in Nigerian politics there shall be a lot of benefit to the general citizens of Nigeria. This is obviously an alternative to Qaddafi’s delusive suggested solution. Due to high rate of different ethnicity and deeply rooted religious conflict, only through implementing “Communal Constitution” under Communal Politics we can manage our politics and leadership in Nigeria. The current constitution is insufficient; it is neither competent nor just. It is in fact, a violator of people’s freedom of religion.
Submitted by Salimullah

My April's article is just coming in the early first week of the month! Enjoy reading

It is due to American bias in defining terrorism and attributing terrorist act only to Muslims (meanwhile ignoring that of its own terrorism and that of Israelis) that makes me free disown and reject anything called Muslim or Islamic terrorists. To me it never exists. It is just an invention to make a pretext to attack and eradicate the rising power of 'political Islam' which they will never success.

WHO IS THE REVEALER OF THE QUR’AN:
Possible Inspirational Sources of the Qur’an –
A Critical Analysis and Elimination Method
By Salimullah
Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.
Salimanology@yahoo.com

Looking back at the previous post, it is evident that the powerful truth that was raised has defeated the baseless claims and allegations of the blind Christians in which they seek to deny the prophet Muhammad (pbuh) his inherent divine commission of being the God’s messenger. Thanks to God that all of our corroborations were derived from their bible. And today, we shall deal with another baseless claim concocted by the same blind Christians alleging that prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the author of the Qur’an, or he copied it from the bible, or he was dictated by satan and e.t.c. Our very sincere intention is this new post is to examine, analyze and verify, with the aim of realizing the truth, to what extent is this baseless claim and allegation is true.

Definition of the noble Qur’an can be known in the following references:
{(Q26:192-196), Is29:12, Rev14:6-9, 1Cor13:910, Is28:10-11, Zep3:6

A possible inspirational source of the Qur’an according to the belief of both the believers and unbelievers is one of the following assumptions: Muhammad (pbuh), Arab Poets, Jews-Christian scholars, Man, Satan, Allah.

According to the Muslims only Allah (swt) is the original revealer and indeed, the inspirational source of the Qur’an. The other sources are mere utterances of the unbelievers. They believe that prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the author of the Qur’an being dictated by either Jews-Christian scholars, a Man and or Satan. If there is any author of the Qur’an that would be Allah, the Almighty.

ELIMINATION METHOD

Muhammad?
Those who are saying prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the author of the Qur’an must be professional liars and therefore must be defeated based on the following rational proofs:
 He was unlettered (Q29:48), so how can he be able to author a book.
 He is trustworthy (Q10:15-16), so how can he come and make lie to Allah (swt) when even his own enemies confirm his trustworthiness and honesty.
 Jesus Mother was ranked above all women in the Qur’an (Q3:42), including the Prophet Muhammad’s mother and daughters. How can one write a complete book while downgrading his own family in it? This is illogical. He can only do that when it is a direct order from his, master or a divine revelation from his God. The fact that Jesus mother was ranked over prophet’s Muhammad mother indicates that he was not the author of the Qur’an, and by extension it confirms the revelation from God. Had it been Muhammad (pbuh) was the author he would have ranked his mother over all women. Be logical in your thoughts.
 The author reproves himself (Q80:1, Q33:37, Q18:23-24, Q20:114). It is a factual reality that in the Qur’an the revealer has frequently proving himself as the author of the book. This means Qur’an knows his revealer and author On the contrary, the bible does not know his author and does not even know that his name is bible; for the very word ‘bible was missing throughout.
 The scientific truths contained in the Qur’an make it impossible to say that a man who lived 14ooyrs ago, before the discovery of modern science could be able to grasp it. This clearly proves to us that it was the statement of the creator of the world (the very object in which makes his scientific discovery).
Thus, this claim was found wrong and eliminated.

Jews-Christian scholars?
 Muhammad could neither read nor write (Q29:48), so how can he learn from Jews-Christian scholars? Nonsense. He was Arab man and their olden scriptures were in Jewish language. This claim also eliminated.

Arab Poets?
 The Arab themselves were challenged (Q2:23-24, Q10:37). If it was authored by Arab poets other groups of Arabs could also produce like it.
 The presence of new style of beginning a speech in the Qur’an which was unknown to the tradition of Arab poets makes the impossibility of Qur’an being written by them.
 The Arabs themselves need more explanations to understand the Qur’an.

Man?
How can a man be the author of the very book in which he was degraded. Can a man author a book and at the same time discrediting himself in the book. Qur’an portrays man as thus:
 Man was reproached for having Weakness: (Q22:73, Q30:40, Q:86:5-10.
 He was criticized of having the nature of despair, prodigality, exultance and boastfulness (Q10:12, Q11:9-10, Q17:83, Q:10:33&36, Q57:22-23).
 He was blamed of Disbelief and Oppression (Q:14:34, Q43:15, Q80:17, Q6:116, Q12:103).
 Being Quarrelsome and Opponent (Q:16:4, Q18:54).
 Man also was unjust and ungrateful in the Qur’an (Q33:73, Q7:171, Q14:34 e.t.c).

How cans a man that assumed to have authored the Qur’an will criticize, castigate, disown, despise, and blame himself of the mentioned bad things and behaviours? That is highly illogical, irrational and impossible.

SATAN?
According to Qur’an Satan was described throughout in the following points:
 He is a Sneaking Whisperer (Q114:4-5).
 His followers incurred lost and torment (Q4:119-120, Q17:64).
 Qur’an orders us to seek refuge in God against Satan (Q16:98).
 Satan is powerless in the Qur’an (Q16:99).
 He is being accursed throughout the pages of the Qur’an: *An open Enemy (Q2:168, 208, Q6:142, Q7:22, Q17:53, Q35:6, Q30:60); *A Deceiver (Q35:5); *Man’s Deserter (Q38:74-75); *An Arrogant (Q38:74-75).

How cans Satan, the alleged author of the Qur’an will accurse, disclaim and betray himself in the very book he was assumed to have authored. This too, is highly illogical, irrational and impossible. Had it been by the Satan he would have not been cursing and disclaiming himself in the book.

WHY GOD (ALLAH)?
Several textual and rational proofs and evidence have been, and yet being citing for the arrogant and stubborn to believe in the true and perfect religion. For the sake of those stubborn unbelievers we are not going to cite the textual (Quranic verses) proofs but only the rationalistic and scientific ones. The scientific truth contained in the Qur’an since 1400yrs and only came to be discovered today by modern science and the mathematical composition of the Qur’an makes it the true divine revelation from Allah the Most High. And these are the only unique features of the Qur’an that no any other religious book shares with it. To invoke the words of Buccaile: “Scientific statements such as these are only one specific aspect of the Islamic revelation which the Bible does not share”. We have already discussed a lot on the scientific truth in the Qur’an in different posts and counter-posts by different brothers on this forum whereby we have wholly defeated the nonsensical claims by the opponents. I will now confine my argument to mathematical composition of the Qur’an to prove its reality of being the true and perfect revelation of God. DR. Tariq AL-SUWAIDAN made exposed the following powerful discovery on the Qur’anic mathematical miracle:

Al-bahar (Sea) mentioned in the whole of the holy Qur’an = 32. An Al-bar (Land) =13. The statistic is as follows:

Al-bahar (Sea) = 32
Al_bar (Land) = 13

If we add up the total words of both
"sea" and "land" we get 45.
Now if we do a simple calculation:
32/45 X 100% = 71.11111111% (percentage of water)
13/45 X 100% = 28.88888888% (percentage of land)
Above is what we know today as the percentages of Water (Sea) and Land in the world. The same conclusion is reached by modern science. ALLAHU AKBAR, WHAT A BOOK OF GOD!

Below are some more examples of some Words Mentioned in the Quran:

Al-Dunya (world) =115,
Al-Akhira (hereafter) =115,

Al-Mala'ikah (Angels) = 88
Al-Shayateen (Satan) = 88

Al-Hayat (Life) = 145
Al-Maut (Death) = 145
Al-Rajul (Man) = 24,
Al-Mar'ha (Women) = 24

Al-Shahr (Month) = 12 (the total number of months in universal calendar)
Al-Yauom (Day) = 365 (the total number of days in a year)

What’s more! The Heretical Rashad Khalifa also made a powerful discovery of mathematical composition of the Qur’an. He was led astray due to boast of his discovery. The standard mathematical miracle of the Qur’an is that: “OVER IT IS NINETEEN (19)” {Q74:30}. What does it mean?

Item 1: The First Commandment is coded by 19: “La – Elahe – Ella – Allah” (there is no deity except Allah): (Numerical values corresponding each Arabic letter is given below)
30 1 – 1 30 5 – 1 30 1 – 1 30 30 5
= 30113051301130305
= 19 x ……

Item 2: The Basmalah (In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful) is so special and unique. It consists of exactly 19 Arabic letters.

Item 3: There are 114 Basmalahs in the Quran and this also entails 114 chapters in the Qur’an. It is interesting to note that 144 = 19 x 6

Item 4: The first revelation of the Quran (Sura 96:1-5) it exactly consists of 19 Arabic words and 76 letters: 76 = 19 x 4.

Item 5: The last revelation of the Quran (Sura 110) consists of 19 Arabic words. The first verse of the last revelation (110:1) consists of 19 Arabic letters.

Item 6: Finally, the total number of the Arabic letters in the Qur’an is 97,489. And 97489 = 19 x 5131.
This last item (item 6) is my own personal discovery in my attempts to prove wrong, some heretical ideas of Rashad. These are only a minute.

LET THEM SPEAK AND WILL HERE MORE LIKE EVER BEOFRE!!!!
Submitted by Salimullah

The Christian American controlled by Jews is doing a 'big attack' without a just cause and thus they christians and Jews have destabilized the whole globe. Now the same Christians in Nigeria wanted to create another Middle East in Jos. As the Jews in Palestine who aim at ethnic cleansing of the Muslim cannot go unscathed with their evil act despite of superior military power, you too in Jos would not allowed to go unscathed with your act of ethnic cleansing. 'Tit for Tat, and do unto unto others what others do unto you.

toneyb:
This drivel of my god/religion is better than your god/religion is truly funny and pathetic. Mohammed must be a smart trickster only to the Muslims no? See this deluded person calling others that share a similar but somewhat different delusions deluded.

Is that only what you can reply? I talked about trickery belief that 'Jesus die for you sin' and I have destroyed it with the same biblical reference. Guy talk in the same vein to Prove your stance on this false belief. The may comments on Islam by numerous number of the converted Christians to Islam suffice it to know the superiority of Islam over christianity. Noticed! And if you like such comments I can quote differently.

Beaf:
Jos too, has been targetted by American-Israeli super-terrorists who kill women and babies! Na wa!

Really, you're'n't objective. do you mean you don't know who are killing whom in Jos? I know with recent revenge tragedy you may confuse and assume that we are the predator being you the prey. but it is just a minor revenge. "Do unto others what others do unto you"

THE EXTENT OF CHRISTIANS DELUSION
Why until today Christians fail to escape from their delusion of original sin. All humans are born noble and free of any sin. Whoever dare to do one is at his risk for no person shall bear the sin or its implication of another. Due to extent of delusion, Christians usually say Jesus died for their sin – the sin which they believed to have inherited from Adam and Eve; and yet they afford divinity to Jesus – he is a God, the said. Does god die? No wonder they have some biblical verses to depend on:

“For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners” (Romans 5:19).

“…, Christ died for our sin” (1Corinthians 15:3).

But the irony or a contradiction is just there in the same bible:

“The soul who sins is the who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked man will be charged against him…, But if a wicked man turns away from all the sins he has committed and keeps all my decrees and those what is just and right, he will surely live; he will not die. None of the offences he has committed will be remembered against him…” (Ezekiel 18:20-23).

It should be noted that according to these verses the issue of original sin or inheritance of sin, or the Jesus death for Christians’ sins must have become irrelevant. Firstly, they teach us no soul can bear the burden of another. Secondly, a sinner needs only to repent to escape his sin. And lastly, the implication is that Jesus never for any one’s sin as indicated in 1Corinthians 15:3. By the all way, either the bible contradicts itself or some of the verses in fabricated. It is perhaps for this reason that Paul (Impostor of Injil) himself admitted that this dogma was foolishness; and yet called people to it. So, why do Christians become fools and accept it?

Comparatively, the bible says:
• “the son will not share the guilt of the father”.
• The Qur’an says, “No burdened person (with sin) shall bear the burden of another. And that man can have nothing but what he does (good or bad).
• Even human laws dismiss the punishment of the son for father’s crime, and vice versa, for that has been a typical injustice, noted God is just and orders us to observe justice.

I don’t know when the Christians will correct their belief. Paul must be a ‘smart’ tricker only to the Christians.


Submitted by Salimullah

davidylan:
No you're an animal . . . that much is certain.

It is this kind of behaviour that make some to appear simply 'laymen' able to write rubbish, but not academician and not intellectual.

chakula:
Subhanallahi, imagine all these nasty comment about Islam,the truth is that most of us actually believe in miracles a
To my fellow brothers and sisters in islam,the truth is dat alot of atrocities has been sponsored by the yehudees
[/quote
@Aisha ai,
wel come. Jazakil-lah.

Yes of course Ai'sha the Jews have confessed their intention to fill the world with evils and atrocities as they proclaimed in the protocols that " “It is from us that the all-enforcing terror proceeds” (p.58). Let them just accept this truth of Islam - the ever most fast and speedily religion in the world.

davidylan:
this is nonsense . . . is this the islamic section? Why then is this post here? Will you accept an "Accept Jesus" thread in the islam section?

It is just an invitation to the truth; being you on the lie the invitation should come to your place. it is insignificant for this post to be in Muslim section. the concern here now are those non-muslims: christians, jews, and others preoccupied by delusive historians.