so nobody here has played BEYOND? that game is on the same level as Uncharted and Last of us.

http://www.google.com.ng/search?q=beyond+ps3&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new&gws_rd=cr&ei=OLk5WfreLMG7aei2htgF


here's a trailer


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtEoS0MaNyA

iSpirit1:
Lemme start from; Judaism is the religion of the Jews which is based on the Mosaic Law.

Jesus clearly stated in Matthew 5:17 that He has come to fulfill THE LAW(Judaism).

When He was about leave them(i.e die on the Cross), He told His disciples, in fact, that there are alot of things He can't teach them, cause they can't bear them yet. . .that they will only be able to bear those things when the Holy Spirit comes into them. John 16:12-13.


Those things are the effects His Death and Resurrection will effect. Those are the things found in Acts-Revelations.


I believe this answered your question.

children of isreal are jews. they worship the mythical yahweh. you worship the same yahweh. why do u call yourself a christian when the god you worship is the god of the jews who are isrealites. simple question which u havent answered with your irrelevant quotations!
what u are implying here is that the death if a man changed the name of your religion which i think is a kind of reasoning my 2 year old nephew is wayy above. assuming you are remotely correct, why are there jews still? in the holy city jerusalem of all places which is predominantly jewish! lol maybe all of isreal are hell bound

Knownpal:


Long enough till jamb officials go to collect the forms, I have been waiting for three months Bad and unorganized process by JAMB.

serious?!! i was thinking after paying the 10k through remita it'll be a straight forward process to regularise! so she has to wait until the indemnity form appears on her profile and that takes as long as a month?! u sure?

larrydking, wuminity, its been 3hrs. Regularised fee paid, no indemnity form. How long does she have to wait?

asuustrike2009:

It's not about being superstitious here There are some facts that science can't puzzle till date. Wet dream doesn't necessary mean you must have sex in dream so sleeping with woman in the dream is different scenario that scientists till now can't explain instead they come up with theories

like i said earlier, click the link and read about wet dreams and stop assuming to know what it means we its clear you don't. you are being superstitious. thats not up for debate!

asuustrike2009:

He said sleeping with a woman in dream not wet dream

sleeping with a woman in your dream is called having a wet dream. do yourself a favour by clicking that link and learn something new rather than be superstituous, before you embarass yourself in public

MZLady39:


Brother,
The command to not eat from the tree of "good and evil" was given to the two humans....Adam and Eve....not the animals.
However, the entire planet (including the animals) was and has been affected.
There is hope though....if you surrender your life to Christ.....and be restored to the original plan.

don't wish such evil upon me! i'd imagine you have surrendered you life to your mythical jesus, thats why its the way it is. original plan

MZLady39:


The animals committed no sin. They, being creatures on the earth, have been affected by the sin committed by Adam & Eve.. as well as all of nature.

so u, a christian, are saying that without sin, you can still be punished for no reason? as far as dumb posts go, this one is right there at the top.

Deicide:

They are Jews na in Israel we only have 0.02% of Christians there

how convenient. you only remember isreal is a jewish nation when you find out they invaded palestine, but when it comes to the bible stories, jerusalem, and the tomb of the mytical jesus, you subconciously see it as a christian nation. do you see how illogical your logic is? have you forgotten the God you worship is the God of isreal? why do you worship him then if isreal is a jewish nation? jesus and yahweh are jewish Gods but you worship them and yet call yourself a christian instead of a jew. hypocriscy has many forms bro.

Deicide:

Guy no be Fight na, I wanted to understand your Statement...........

the children of isreal must be muslims then

.

Deicide:
Is isreal a Christian Nation?

you are asking a very stupid question.

Dalamama:
Islam is the most dangerous of all religions because it actively encourages it's adherents to strife for global dominance through whatever means possible.

Islam is a very dull and peti religion that encourages people not to use their brains at all. Islam.uses fear to indoctrinate and entrap the minds of its adherents the way no religion does.

christianity and islam are equally dangerous. christianity uses the fear of hell, kills nonbelievers(the spanish inquisition). isreal, a christian nation invaded palestine and are still occupying palestine to this very moment.

Deicide:

So basically religion is not all that bad but since the topic is on Christianity an Islam i think its fair

religion is not bad at all. don't get me wrong. religion is all about a shared common belief and practice between people. No religion is bad, also no religion is true and no religion should be taken seriously because at the very core of every religion, you'll find out it is just a story. a story that teaches you to hate.

Deicide:
You can be an Atheist and still be religious

yes, i can. i can believe yahweh is a lie and practice buddhism. but thats not the answer you were hoping for. being religious does not and will never mean believing in yahweh or a diety or the god/God you serve. which is what you are cheaply trying to imply

Linguistics 101

Language is a lie. Words are weapons and the tools of mass hypnosis. War is always fought in the name of peace; the peace that follows victory and the defeat of one's enemies. Every war the Americans have fought, every genocide, every military coup seems always to have been justified by the mantra of "peace and freedom."

Peace and Freedom are always defined differently by the slaves and the slavemasters; freedom to a slavemaster is the freedom to keep slaves; "peace" to a slavemaster means that his slaves are not rebelling, and if he whips them and abuses them, he does so to ensure that there is freedom (his freedom to enslave others) and "peace."

B: The Joshua Experiment. The Dangers of
Religious Indoctrination.

This experiment by an Israeli psychologist is
explained in Richard Dawkin's "God Delusion;" it
is a very similar experiment to the Milgram
Experiment, but it deals ony with "religion," and it
is less well known than the Milgram Experiment,
but the conclusion is essentially the same, though
it applies to "religious authority."

A class room of students in Israel were told the
story of Joshua's Biblical holocaust of the
Canaanite Tribes. It was essentially a "tribalistic"
genocide. The students were then asked if they
considered this to be morally justifiable. Most of
the students agreed that it was morally
justifiable.
The same story was then told about a different
occasion of tribalistic genocide which did not
involve the Bible or the ancient tribal deity of the
Israelites. There are many examples of this in
history, such as the recent Rwandan genocide of
1994 which was, just like Joshua's genocide a
"tribalistic" genocide. When the students were
asked if they considered such a genocide to be
morally justifiable, the majority of them expressed
the view that it was not.


These experiments show the dangers of religious
indoctrination, where people who think
themselves to be "good, godly, righteous, moral"
are willing to torture people or to support
tribalistic genocide just because some Archon
(authority figure) tells them that it is OK, and an
Archon can be some dead religious fanatic from
1000's of years ago whom most modernists
would probably consider to be as ridiculous as
the "Life of Brian" prophets, were they not blinded
by religious indoctrination. The effects of
submission to religious authorities and to the
authority of the state are very subtle; probably
most of those Israeli students would not consider
themselves to be religious fanatics, nor would
most of the subjects of the Milgram experiment
consider themselves to be psychopaths.

More to follow..

The Psychology of a Slave. Submission to the Archons (authority figures). A: The Milgram Experiment.

Unfortunately the conclusions of what is probably the most famous (and important) psychological study on human "obedience," the Yale University "Milgram Experiment (See: en.wikipedia.org... )" provide conclusive evidence that most human beings are willing to torture other human beings, if they are told by an authority figure to do so, and unfortunately the authors of the Bible are also considered the "highest" authority by Biblical fanatics. In the Milgram experiment the subjects were asked to apply electric shocks to actors who would pretend to cry out in pain; although nobody was really harmed, the subjects did not know that the persons whom they were torturing with electric shocks were actors.

Philosophy is a form of intellectual Anarchism (resistance to authority) which teaches us never to suspend critical thinking. Religion is simply a form of hypnosis and indoctrination which produces a servile, submissive slave; it is the perfect means of social control and the consequences can be genocidal. The testimonials of children raised in the Hitler youth for example indicate that they did not fight for Hitler because they thought that he was evil, but rather because they thought that he was good; similarly with many of the fanatics of religion whose deities would be considered barbaric and criminally insane by most modern philosophers.

There is a very fine line between accepting what is irrational and inhumane in a text by a religious authority, such as, "It is God's Will to kill all devotees of other gods" and "torture this person."

B: Philosophy. Understanding philosophical method seems to me to be essential in combatting religious hypnosis and indoctrination.

If a philosopher attempts to hold two contradictory positions, then this is usually pointed out to them by other philosophers as being ridiculous. The difference between the philosopher and the religious fanatic is that the philosopher can appeal only to the highest authority of human intuition and "pure reason." Philosophy essentially teaches us how to "think" for ourselves and how to construct arguments. There is simply no room for philosophy in the world's major religons, since the victims of these religions must simply abandon reason and rely on the ramblings of primitive religious fanatics.

Fallacies (false arguments).

One really has to search the scriptures for verifiable historical "facts," and they are very rare. Generally when non religious historians or scientists come across some fact which seems to verify some Biblical claim, the Biblical fanatics jump on this and use it to present the argument that the Bible must be true.

No scientist that I know of disputes the fact that there was global flooding at the end of the last ice age, so the Biblical fanatics jump on this and conclude "The Bible must be True," and so therefore Jesus really did # his mother, and Noah really did put millions of animal and insect species in his little wooden boat, and so on, and so on. This kind of insanity is unfortunately infectious and it has often been instilled since childhood. If you can make someone believe something ridiculous which demands that they can suspend critical thinking, then it is a "slippery slope" to the point where they can suspend critical thinking about almost anything or anyone.

Contradictory Beliefs and Religous Psychosis. Philosophy and Religion.
A: Religion.

Let us say, hypothetically that you were a policeman (just for the sake of argument), and that you interviewed a suspect and asked him "Where were you when this murder took place?" The suspect may state "I was in Tokyo." However in the notes from a previous interview he may have stated that he was in New York. This is clearly contradictory; he could not have been in both places at the same time.

The victim of religious hypnosis can hold numerous contradictory beliefs, such as that there are three gods but only one god, or that their god is "love," and that their god is also a genocidal tribalist who wants to kill all other tribes who are not part of his favorite tribe, the Israelites, or that you should love your parents, but also that you cannot be a Christian unless you hate your parents (and your wife, children and even your own life), etc. Chistians might also utilise reason to ridicule people who believe in the incredulous myths of Ganesha (the Hindu elephant god), but they will abandon such rational thinking when it comes to their own faith.

If you look at almost any of the primitive religions of the world and their silly myths, they can be turned into a comedy and ridiculed by we modernists of the age of reason and science; however when a person has been subjected to a lifetime of religious hypnosis and indoctrination, they suspend such rational and critical thinking. This problem is compounded in societies where the "majority" of the population are affected by religious hypnosis and indoctrination; thus the person suffering from religious psychosis is perceived as normal and the person critical of religion is perceved as abnormal, a heretic, a blasphemer or a Satanist.

To summarise the essay, if a victim of religious
hypnosis can be made to accept even "one"
irrational belief (such as the Xenu, YHVH or
Jesus fictions)," then it is a "slippery slope to
accepting "any" irrational belief, and as the
"Milgram Experiment" and the "Joshua"
experiment show, we human beings are
succeptible to being submissive to "authority."

Religious Archons "are" a very dangerous form of
authority; submission to religious Archons can
often have murderous and genocidal
consequences. Unfortunately the victim of
religious mind control can be made to carry out
the most evil forms of behaviour, while thinking
that they are doing "good" and are saving the
world; just as it was for the children of the Hitler
youth, religious fanatics are often so hypnotised,
indoctrinated and submissive to authority that
they actually think that they are "saints."

Unfortunately the two largest religions in the
world (Christianity and Islam) are both militant,
apocalyptic and their adherents have control over
nations, armies and nuclear weapons.

KingEbukasBlog:


Haba , my brother , I've been reiterating here that deists reject religious concepts of God . Yahweh is to Christianity and Judaism . Deists reject anything religion .

alright. thats sorted out. anyway, we could go on and on about beliefs, yahweh, superman, until a man falls from the sky to pick up his friends and we still wouldnt agree. so lets agree to disagree. your belief is emotional, indoctrination from birth, based on belief in a belief. nothing real, just hope and a book, with claims of divinity. im happy with not believing 2 loaves of divine bread fead 5,000 people. 2 LOAVES!!

KingEbukasBlog:


Here are significant attributes of God : immaterial and non physical . How can you see something immaterial and non physical ? Are you suggesting empiricism ? That knowledge can only be gotten through sensory experience . But our senses are fallible . And can anything which exists in our world and every possible world be known to us ONLY through our senses ? I think you are making a tentative conclusion here . But if you insist on gaining knowledge of God's existence through sensory experience then George Berkeley's Esse Est Percepi ( To be is to be perceived ) should suffice . The argument goes :

1. We perceive ordinary objects
2. We perceive only ideas.
3. Therefore , ordinary objects are ideas.

The only two things that exist according to George are minds and their ideas . And ideas are mind-independent , they are passive and causally impotent . So what could cause the existence of minds ? An eternal mind . Boom ! God's existence proven through sensory experience . And we can 'materialize' mathematical/abstract objects because they are ideas in God's mind

What about rationalism ? Knowledge can be gotten only through reason . Deists and theists alike obtained the knowledge about God's existence through reason . I gave you 7 logical and indubitably irrefutable reasons to acknowledge the existence of God . And they are ETERNALLY tenable since God's existence is true .

deists do not believe in yahweh. enough with your lies.

KingEbukasBlog:


That's what the deist say . And they rejected Yahweh , Allah , and any other religious concepts of God . If you want to prove to me that atheism is logical (I cringed when I typed this ) , refute any of those arguments for God's existence I listed .

You can open a thread and let's discuss .

But hold on , refuting arguments does not confute the validity of its conclusion . Pascal's wager was a detestable illogical argument for God's existence but God's existence is true .

Hmm , what can we now do ? I think you should tell me why you reject God's existence . Give me your best reason ever .

you say you have a hand? show me. you say yahweh exist? i want to see him or it. its as simple as spelling REAL

intelligent design indeed

KingEbukasBlog:


Good question though .

Yahweh , Allah , etc are just religious names for God - the immaterial , non physical , enormously powerful , immutable , eternal (without beginning or end ) being who created the universe and everything in it . And in these religions , there is the belief that God Itself (not used personally ) made revelations of Itself to the central figures or founders . And since God made the revelations principles , beliefs , practices are seen as irrefutably true (dogma ) . Every religion has its concept of God . In Christianity , God is seen as having a truine nature - God is three persons . In Islam , God has just one nature , not three like in Christianity . Other religions have their own concept of God . And this called revealed theology .

In Natural theology , these divine revelations and manifestations are rejected . Divine revelations and manifestations like prophecies , religious scriptures , miracles, theophanies (visible manifestation of God) are rejected . You don't need to see God to know It exists . God is deduced to exist through logic , observation of nature . Logical reasons for God's existence are given . Arguments are constructed to support God's existence . We have Kalaam's Cosmological Argument , Leibniz Contingency Argument , Moral Argument , Teleological Arguments for God's existence and so forth . These arguments are tenable till date . Let me roll my favourite for you . The Cosmological Argument for God's existence :

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause

2. The universe began to exist

3. Therefore , the universe has a cause .


And this cause of the universe has no beginning , or end . It has the aforementioned attributes listed in the first paragraph . In summary , here are seven logical reasons to acknowledge the existence of God . God is the best explanation for

1. Why anything exists

2. The applicability of mathematics to the physical world

3. The origin of the universe

4. For the existence of objective moral values and duties.

5. The fine-tuning of the universe for the existence of intelligent life

6. Consciousness

7. And why people see the existence of God as possible

i could tell u with all honesty theres a sussage in space that gave ancient men the technology to build the pyramids of giza. because it is true and was written in the book of leaves. i could also tell u a tale about the unicorn i saw last night. yahweh, allah or God are as real as any of these stories. because there is no logical proof. just empty words

Blame it on the devil. the witches or some other stuff. thats precisely what they'll do. its not common to see a nigerian admit they made a mistake at some point. there always has to be an excuse, unfortunately.

KingEbukasBlog:


Normally , freethinkers repudiate religious dogma . And since atheists can be religious , not all atheists are freethinkers . Deists who acknowledge the existence of God can be freethinkers too since they reject religious dogma too but for logical reasons .

Here's my opinion which should be considered strongly : since deists rely on logic , scientific inquiry and observation to deduce the existence of God and atheism and logic are antithetical , it is apt to call a deist a freethinker and a misnomer to call an atheist a freethinker .

my unbelief is logical. anything believeable must be so logically. yahweh isnt logical. let me not deviate. on your first paragraph, i'll say your understanding of a freethinker is different from my understand. i see myself as a freethinker because i refused to be controlled by established religious dogma. i reject indoctrination. thats my understanding and with this in mind i strongly disagree with your opinion that not all atheist are free thinkers because, atheism rejects religious dogma. now on your second paragraph, assuming your understanding of the word logical is the same with mine( which i believe as an obvious, tangible reason to have a certain view towards something. eg it is logical to say a dog has hairs, why because we can see it). why would u say disbelief in a god or yahweh is illogical if you as a believer hasnt even seen this yahweh?

KingEbukasBlog:


Of course I'm a remarkable specie ! Now , let me you where you belong .

Religions like Jainism , Buddhism , Confucianism are non -theistic religions . Being non theistic means that there is no involvement of the worship of God or belief in His existence . There are no deities in the aforementioned religions . And since there are no deities in those religions , atheists (people who do not believe in God) can be part of them . Atheists like Steve Jobs and Sir Tim Berners-Lee were religious atheists . Atheism simply means the belief there is no God

You can read more here :

https://www.nairaland.com/3500235/must-read-god-without-religion

Read this slowly the first time , the second time should be much slower than the first . Take all your time if you want to .

Peace

so how on earth do u arrive at the conclusion that atheists are not freethinkers if an individual or a few decide to meditate on the teachings of buddha? which i have meditated on a few times.

KingEbukasBlog:

lack of belief is not a religion. the only common ground between two atheist is a lack of belief. theres no gathering. you dont even understand the image you quoted. you are a remarkable specie!