₦airaland Forum

greatiyk4u:
I still find it hard why unqualified persons are used in sensitive positions

Obrigardo:
I'm asking a legitimate question
Is the state of Israel founded in 1948 still the same Israel in the Bible?

Obaaderemi2:
Why can't a president find the time to commission a road? That's not the argument here. The argument is that should they not have waited for the project to finish before commissioning it?

Here's a picture of Obama commissioning a museum in Chicago

Floria:
See how he's looking like an occultist

lavylilly:
This statement actually carries some hard-earned wisdom—particularly about how relationships are tested during adversity and the importance of loyalty and consistency. But it also contains a subtle misprioritization of human connection by sidelining love, and presents advice that, while seemingly grounded, can become overly transactional or emotionally guarded if taken to the extremeYou're absolutely right that adversity reveals character, and when someone shows you disloyalty, you should believe them the first time. Betrayal isn’t something to excuse, and self-respect means not staying in situations where trust has been broken. >Unfortunately, love has become transactional in the world we live in today, a tit for tat!!

But let’s challenge one key idea here:

“Love is not the most important thing because it’s an emotion that comes and goes.”

That’s a half-truth. > Love is a VERB!! Someone can claim to love you and still betray you and find it justifiable to themselves.

Yes, feelings fluctuate. Passion ebbs and flows. But real love isn’t just an emotion—it’s a commitment, a decision, a practice. You can’t build loyalty, friendship, reliability, or consistency without love as the glue. When love is reduced to "just a feeling," you lose sight of its discipline. > I agree, however humans attach love mostly to emotions/ feelings hence the ebbs and flow. You can be angry with your partner does not equal you loving them any less.

And here's the nuance:
Loyalty and consistency are built on love, not separate from it. If someone is loyal but doesn’t care about your emotional well-being… that’s a business partner, not a life partner. > I disagree, love does not equate loyalty and consistency because again we are humans and emotions drive a lot of our decision whether right or wrong. Love/ Trust can be a by product of Loyalty & Consistency.

Also, love inspires growth, forgiveness, and connection. It's not something to undervalue just because it’s vulnerable. The healthiest relationships are built on both love and loyalty—not one replacing the other. >Correct, Ideally.

So yes—men should be wise, look beyond chemistry, and value long-term traits like consistency and trust. But don’t swing so far in the “rational” direction that you end up emotionally unavailable, or worse—incapable of true intimacy.

Final thought:
Don’t throw love out the window just because someone failed you. Heal, learn, choose better—but don’t confuse wisdom with emotional shutdown. The best relationships are a balance of heart and mind—not one at the cost of the other.

femisplash:
https://punchng.com/states-will-get-30m-to-boost-food-security-minister/

Rocky247:
The security agents should be proactive and do the needful