₦airaland Forum

timbros:
My August post aligned with the February post.

In February, I recommended a LW. We signed Neto, and in August, I stated that I don't want another LW..... My posts are straightforward, unlike you.

I'm waiting for you on the Neto matter. You are so predictable, but I'm waiting for you, let me tie you up

Neto wasn't signed as LW, he was signed as a RW. Can you see how you always goof and argue blindly?

Wetin Jackson do to deserve all these today? Make we sha get an upgrade by January.

timbros:
After we have already signed a LW?

How about the post where I recommended a LW, why are you avoiding that post?

Who was the LW we signed?

Your post on August 28, was more consequential than the one you posted long before.

timbros:
Stop running away from a simple question.

When you were accusing me here, was it about Sancho as a player or LW as a position? When was I strongly against the signing of 1 LW?

When you asked us not to sign the only LW we wanted to sign.

timbros:
However, when I made the comment was made, we already have signed Neto who is a LW. We do not need another LW which happens to be Sancho.

Neto's manager, always arguing blindly based on faulty premise.

Even when his manager tagged him a right winger, you couldn't stop embarrassing yourself.

timbros:
Were you talking about Sancho here?

You should know me by now that your amala turning doesn't work for me.

Were you talking about Sancho here?

I was asking for a LW that fits that profile and we got Sancho. You were against getting Sancho or any LW by August 28.

It's funny that you are the one turning Amala here and still pointing finger. If Sancho has been ghosting, you would have come here to claim expert analyst. But now you are hiding from your ish.

You wanted a wastepipe, Morata, to continue to torment us. You defended Jackson and his wastefulness. You don't want us to get a better LW, and stick to unimpressive Mudryk.

You are anti-Chelsea, that's why Dayo likes you.

Zeebuy:
People can die when their time isn't up but it'll take some time for their spirits to cross over. Some of them even take human forms and start living with us like normal human beings and you'll never know unless you have a third eye.

I didn't use to believe all these spiritual stuff until I had an experience this year

Tell us more and how did you get your third eye?

timbros:
Airmark can you address the question?

Were you talking about a particular player or a particular position in the post you were accusing me?

You asked us not to sign Sancho, a new LW. True or false?

You are not a true Chelsea fan. You always want our downfall.

patrickmuf:
Angel Gomes balling for England. He was good enough to play for the club but the managers then were more interested in size, pace and power...Now, see the whole of England raving about how good he is...

Really impressed that assist was sweet.

TB Joshua will be happy wherever he is.

Android17, your Foden has been finally benched. Maybe he can score when the opponents are beaten and tired in the 2nd half.

timbros:
Was this accusation about a particular player or a particular position?

Who did we sign as LW?

timbros:
Which L exactly? That I am strongly against signing a LW? Or what?

Were you not against signing a new LW in Sancho?

timbros:
Can you stop grasping at straws and prove this accusation below in italics? Was there a mention of Sancho in the post below?

You cheap liar.

Why do you enjoy lieing like this?

You won't stop disgracing yourself. Instead of you to keep it shut, and accept your L.


Between you and Maresca, we could see you are the shameless liar here.

timbros:
Was this your initial accusation, or you are shifting goal post?

Answer the question ogbeni. Sancho that you were against, already on 3 assists. Why do you hate Chelsea this much?

Thank God Chelsea didn't listen to your poor suggestions.

lordfalcao:
why he go do giveaway for you?.

Nobi tap ins you talk say he dy always score?

It's not easy to play 16 matches with no goal. Yesterday's goal needs to be celebrated.

timbros:
I was against signing another LW. is that the same as being against signing a LW?

You cheap liar.

Were you not against signing Sancho? Ogbeni, rest.

airmark:
Malawi is 1 man down, Jackson should score so we can have only Android17's Foden to troll with no goal in his last 15 matches for England.

Oga Nateevs suppose do giveaway for us o.

Jack SONNN.

Malawi is 1 man down, Jackson should score so we can have only Android17's Foden to troll with no goal in his last 15 matches for England.

timbros:
Did you lied that I was against the signing of LW or Sancho precisely? Talk make I know where to start from because I see say you no too dey okay.

In my comment below, I said I need a CB, CF and one of either LW RB or LB.

Why will I need another LW when we already signed one (Neto) in addition to the one we already have (Mudryk).

I ask you again, when you were accusing me, did you say I was against Sancho signing or LW signing?




I know you are a cheap liar so let me requote your accusation. This is exactly what you said. You even bolded the 1LWF which means I was also against the signing of Neto, no?



Where was I against the signing of 9ne LWF?

The question is, were you against signing a new LW on August 28?

To put in a correct form, you were against the signing of Sancho as our new LW. Thousands of words from you, can't nullify the truth as captured below.

You were against signing a new LW but as usual Chelsea went against your poor opinion and we are doing better. The only clog remaining, is your wasteful Jackson.

timbros:
You are worse than I thought...

We don't need a LW

And

We don't need another LW

Do you want me to spoonfeed you the difference between those two statements? Are you okay like this?

As you are pushing for a CF now and Chelsea buy the first CF, buy another one and looking to buy the third one and you say "we don't need another CF", Does it mean you are against Chelsea signing a CF?

Stop being a dirty liar with senseless semantics.

That post was your reply to Ibime's post stating that Sancho wasn't a bad idea and you attacked it by 'we don't need another LW' I.e we already had Neto and Mudryk, no need for another LW(Sancho). And you hammered on experienced CB and a CF as what we needed at August 28 and not LW.

Just as we didn't sign your suggested experienced CB after Tosin, Sancho was signed 3 days after you posted against it.

You always goof and the way you try to cover up, is always irritating. You were against signing Sancho, accept your L and bounce.

timbros:
If I ask you to provide where I said this now, you will disappear like you did when you lied against me that I was against LWF signing.

One would read that comment and think it's a match Colwill helped England win and kept cleansheet.

Where is your shame airmark? One clearance and your finger start scratching you to type. I dey shame for you walahi....

Maybe because I was busy with work unlike what Nateevs thought that I was jobless.

Were you high when you typed the reddened line, when we were reported to be chasing Sancho on August 28?

It seems you have dementia bro or you are not in control of what your fingers type and post.

timbros:
With or without Sancho, Sterling is already gone.

We don't need another LW . ....Just get in an experienced CB and a CF.

Trim the squad down and we are good to go.

Android17:
The only thing Foden did wrong was misplace those 2 passes I described earlier. Inconsequential passes considering the flow of the game at both moments if I must add.

I usually don't pile on Saka because he is a solid player but he generally was off the flow of the game. Misplaced passes in the wings, could not put in his trademark dangerous back post crosses, tried to take one particular shot where Foden was in a better position (but duly apologized afterwards as the shot was blocked). Did lose the ball dangerously during a phase of a counter-attack for Greece that led to his booking.

Foden was a false 9 in the first half and later dropped in the second half to pair with Rice. He probably had fewer touches than maybe only Solanke, Pickford and Watkins.

I believe you are not blind.

airmark:
What did Foden do better than Saka as an attacker today? Please don't mention pressing, we are not talking laundry skills.

From work back home, my new tune.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXuHxPUOdD0?si=olJNcyvlCChObvQp

Android17:
Saka.

What did Foden do better than Saka as an attacker today? Please don't mention pressing, we are not talking laundry skills.

When the only thing your attacker is doing well on the pitch is pressing, there's a big problem.

Android17:
LOL. This means zilch if you cannot point to 1 chance (even one-half a chance) that Foden missed. If you can't, then what goal was he supposed to score that he did not?

I can point to one that Palmer missed.

Among Saka, Foden and Palmer, who will you rate 3rd in performance today?

Shegzdave:

Make him even answer sef, Shey foden be like player wey them Dey build the team around?

Android17 is a joke. Foden was useless as usual today. Na to try am as keeper next time.

Android17:
Saka was ass in this game as well.

Before faking an injury and limping off.

Must be said.

Talk about your useless Foden and leave Saka and others.

4 goals in 42 matches.

Android17's Foden bundled out, they equalized. Palmer started the move by the way.

This Pickford na goat.

Leyqute:
Foden just dey play rubbish upanadan. Every attack keeps breaking down with him. God knows what he fed some peeps to warrant such strong support. He’s just a privileged Andreas Perreira

Android17's Foden finally bundled out.

He shouldn't have started this match and a top 9 should have started. Stupid coach.

Remove Foden and put a striker.