₦airaland Forum

popizaino:
I dey Abobi.

I think we all agreed that Peseiro didn't replace Rohr abi wetin you dey find again?

Timbros tends to me like all those Egbon adugbo wey dey burst footballs of boys on the streets, but when one of the boys become star, na them dey tell story how the boy no see food chop, no boot to play, but na them they encourage am.

timbros:
You must be lieing to yourself and your conscience if you refuse to acknowledge that I recommended Renard for the job.

Stop embarrassing yourself. It's so shameful.

Timbros, you later denied Peseiro when he was doing badly and you claimed that you recommended Renard instead, as seen above.

Why are you now shinning teeth for someone you didn't support when he was failing? Your friends should be careful with you in real life.

What kind of shameless person are you?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]You that denied Peseiro, and dragged it for more than 10 pages.

Na you wan come dig?


[/color]

Timbros no get shame.

airmark:
Assuming Peseiro is performing wonders, he would have come out in his babaringa, just like he did when Sterling dribbled Walker, and posted his 'I told you' epistle. But now, Timbros no know Peseiro papa

I predicted it.

Timbros is a coward and shameless.

Ibeme:
Jaaaaaacksssssooooon!!!!

Airmark. Come outside!

So, you were the man that recommended Jackson to Chelsea, right?

raumdeuter:
Well the topic is Hazard comparing himself to Ronaldo.
When we get to topics that you can understand we will let you know

So, claiming Zaha and Hazard argument is unresolved, is a wrong and foolish belief. Don't type it here again, this is not Taki in Ogbomosho.

raumdeuter:
Hzard vs Zaha is a closer argument than Hazard vs Ronaldo

I have no interest in Hazard and Ronaldo argument.

Zaha and Hazard are not close just as 20 G+A and 31 G+A in a season are not close, as you ignorantly believe.

raumdeuter:
Then take dressing and shift somewhere

No be everything you go dey chook mouth for

The distance in talent between Hazard and Zaha is closer than the distance between Hazard and Ronaldo

You claimed you never resolved Hazard and Zaha. That's what led to you claiming 20 G+A is close to 31 G+A, which is foolish.

raumdeuter:
Distance between
20 to 31

OR
Distance between
Hazard best La Liga season vs Ronaldos 65 G+A La Liga season

Which one is closer

I didn't have any argument with you on Ronaldo and Hazard.

How on earth is 20 close to 31?

raumdeuter:
Zaha did 10 goals 10 assists which is close to Hazards best season in EPL

Now tell me which of Hazard La Liga seasons is close to Ronaldo 48 goals 17 assists

To know which is closer

Zaha vs Hazard OR Ronaldo vs Hazard

How's 20 G+A close to 31 G+A? Are you ok?

larride:
Oshimen is already traveling to join up with the squad.

You and this your osHHHHimen. You reminded me of Ib.

raumdeuter:
Anyone wey mention Hazard and Ronaldo in the same sentence deserves slap

We dey here never resolve Hazard and Zaha.

Very soon we go begin argue e-money and Zuckerberg who get money pass

You and who?

When did Zaha do 30+ G+A in any Epl season?

timbros:
That post was not for you. See how you jumped into a post that is not yours. Meanwhile you are avoiding the direct question posed to you...

What are you scared of?

I have already proved the ineffectiveness of our attack compared to United's.

Your post exposed the reason you have been arguing blindly since you believe our attack has been scoring impressively and it's shocking coming from a Chelsea fan.

At this point, I doubt if you've watched 70% of our matches this season.

timbros:
We are not scoring at will, but we are scoring, no?

We are not just conceding, we are being battered left right centre.

And, stop deceiving yourself. We are NOT an elite team RIGHT NOW.

How many goals did you score against Everton, Nottingham forest, Brentford, Bournemouth? Zero.

How many goals did you score against Aston Villa both in Fa cup and league? We fired blank.

Your team miserably converted 16 out of 63 big chances, you are not even ashamed.

Get out!

Teams are not afraid of attacking us because they understand we parade idiots as attackers, that would miss 4 big chances before scoring 1.

Tottenham knew we have wastepipes as attackers and they risked playing this disgusting high line after red cards.

Man City or Arsenal would have beaten them 10-1.

raumdeuter:
Airmark Ngbo goolu melo ni egbe agbabolu Man Utd at Chelsea ni

Wetin 'at' dey do in Yoruba sentence?

If Timbros die, na you kill am.

popizaino:
Forgive me.

Timbros next.

timbros:
Give me a direct answer like I did to you in the screenshot below.

How many goals have Man United and Chelsea scored respectively?


I believe you are educated enough to understand what it means when a "direct answer" is needed.

timbros:
No!

How many goals have Man United scored? What of Chelsea? Lets compare how true this your theory is...

I have given you the answer that proved my theory as i compared the two teams' big chances created and big chances converted.

Asking for goal scored doesn't prove any efficiency as other essential criteria must be considered.

Tottenham created 62 big chances and converted 30

Man UTD created 68 big chances and converted 37

Chelsea created 63 big chances and converted 16.

Timbros won't be able to use these data to stop his embarrassing argument.

timbros:
If you really trust and believe your line of reasoning, it shouldn't be hard for you to answer a simple question for over 12 hours now.

I have answered you the question about why I believe United's attack is more efficient. I don't have time for who scored what when it's not enough to judge efficiency.

Jodera:
Only 16 big chances converted.

Wowwwwww!!!

Tottenham created 62 big chances and converted 30.

Chelsea created 63 big chances and converted 16.

Disheartening and disgraceful, but Timbros is barking up the wrong tree looking for balancing rim.

AdisaOwala:
Airmark can be so annoying and frustrating atimes sha

If Timbros Catch Airmark in Real life ehn, e go rush am with blows

Lmao

You may be thinking I am a pygmy. He will need to be like 6ft and with high muscle mass, to attempt that.

Meanwhile, he should rather gift me the most beautiful and educated lady in his hometown, for the free education here.

timbros:
How many goal have Man United scored? How many goals have Chelsea scored?

I gave you a direct answer, no. Can you give me a direct answer? Just two set of figures. You don't need all this shalaye.

I showed you the big chances missed chart and you saw Chelsea topping and Man UTD not there. Now look at the image below, that's top 5 teams in Epl with big chances created and you can see United there. What does that tell you about their attack and ours?

I understand your football knowledge is limited, that's why you depend on Dayo's views most times. But you won't die if you accept you goofed in the face of convincing proofs.

Our major problem is attack, others are minor.

timbros:
Can you answer my own question? I have answered yours.

Let's test both attacks.

Good that you finally agreed.

For educational purpose, I will answer yours with the image below that shows why we are drowning because of our attackers that are poor in front of goal, with big chances.

If you can't agree with the informed conclusion that attack is our major problem, from the image, then you are not ready to learn.

timbros:
No!

How many goals have Man United scored? What of Chelsea? Lets compare how true this your theory is...

Since their defence and ours are not Ok, but they are leading us on the table, safe to say they have a better attack that probably knows how to score first or score winners. Period.

timbros:
Goals win you matches, abi?

How many goals does Man United have? How many goals does Chelsea have? This is a direct question. I need a direct answer.

I asked you a question first. Answer me then we move from there.

Is Man UTD's defence ok?

timbros:
Is it?

Airmark I don't have any talk with you henceforth. You have agreed with my stand. What else do you want?

You just type a lot of things you can't prove.

The same Man UTD that conceded lesser goals than us this season, were leading by 2 goals against Wolves but had to wait for a 97th winning goal. They conceded 3 goals against the same Wolves you downgraded.

If you have forgotten too, Man UTD were leading 1-0 against Arsenal and later lost 1-3, this season. You must be thinking Epl is AFCON, where defenders turned make-shift strikers for their teams and easily fire blanks.

Goals win matches and we don't have reliable scorers in the team. Rest.

timbros:
Teams score and lock up shop.

We scored first yesterday. If we are playing Man City or Liverpool, it's understandable but Wolves? If our defence is OK like your boss Airmark insuniated, that one goal is enough to get us 3 points. We scored 2 against Arsenal. If our defence was OK, 2 goals is enough to win the match. I can go on and on.

But you want basketball scoreline before we can win matches. Who does that?

Is Man UTD's defence Ok?

swiz123:
Enzo at the World cup kept up with runners reasonably unlike now that he seem uninterested. The only thing he lacks is positional discipline and awareness which you failed to give Jorginho credit for.

This weakness in Enzo turned our midfield to express and makes people like Caceido nervous.

But you have been blaming the defence, while your Enzo have been the cause of the consistent knocks, jabs and hooks suffered in the defence.

popizaino:
Whereas you prefer your team to 0-0 throughout the season. 38points can definitely can win you the league and take you to UCL.

Mad.

airmark:
Mou and Conte didn't spend 5 years at Spurs, so we can't use their Spurs periods.

Pocchetino had the opportunity to win all with Messi, Mbappe and Neymar, he flopped. The bottler is a 'Potter', he is not a big club manager.

I remember this post during the time I had a long duel with Popizaino on Pochettino. I blame Chelsea for having eyes but couldn't see and brain they couldn't use.

Just like Timbros is arguing blindly lately, Popizaino called me names because of this clueless Pochettino.

Griffon:
I’ve been following the megedefegede for weeks now. Ogbeni continue.

Obviously you didn't follow sh1t or you have comprehension issue, because you would have known I mentioned the fact that both Garnacho and Hojlund are better than Jackson and Sterling at the moment.