₦airaland Forum

African history is the standard by which all philosophical concepts and ideologies are derived and seek to emulate.

Religion is an adaptation of African ideals.

Its out of the context of Africans and their relationship with God that brought about the concept of 'religion' in the first instance.

Africans are the first people in history capable enough to perceive the Almighty God.

The quicker we see the backs of all the Abrahamic religions on our continent, the better for us all.

Islam is the aftermath of agressive invasions.

Islam is as well the aftermath of agressive occupation.

Islam is an Arabian fundamentalist Mockery of a Eurocentric concept.

They followed the same blue print and modus operandus as did the Roman manufacturers of Christianity.


Islam peddles a false representation of history.


Islam is a fake religion.

Africans are the first people capable enough to perceive the existence of the Almighty God.

African history is the standard by which all philosophical concepts and ideologies are derived.

Furthermore, genuine religion is a recommendation for Arabian fudamentalist and Eurocentrics.

Religion is an adaptation of African ideals.

brocab:
Question: "Is there an argument for the existence of God?"

Answer: The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. In recent times, arguments against the possibility of God’s existence have taken on a militant spirit that accuses anyone daring to believe in God as being delusional and irrational. Karl Marx asserted that anyone believing in God must have a mental disorder that caused invalid thinking. The psychiatrist Sigmund Freud wrote that a person who believed in a Creator God was delusional and only held those beliefs due to a “wish-fulfillment” factor that produced what Freud considered to be an unjustifiable position. The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche bluntly said that faith equates to not wanting to know what is true. The voices of these three figures from history (along with others) are simply now parroted by a new generation of atheists who claim that a belief in God is intellectually unwarranted.

Is this truly the case? Is belief in God a rationally unacceptable position to hold? Is there a logical and reasonable argument for the existence of God? Outside of referencing the Bible, can a case for the existence of God be made that refutes the positions of both the old and new atheists and gives sufficient warrant for believing in a Creator? The answer is, yes, it can. Moreover, in demonstrating the validity of an argument for the existence of God, the case for atheism is shown to be intellectually weak.

An argument for the existence of God — something rather than nothing

To make an argument for the existence of God, we must start by asking the right questions. We begin with the most basic metaphysical question: “Why do we have something rather than nothing at all?” This is the basic question of existence—why are we here; why is the earth here; why is the universe here rather than nothing? Commenting on this point, one theologian has said, “In one sense man does not ask the question about God, his very existence raises the question about God.”

In considering this question, there are four possible answers to why we have something rather than nothing at all:

1. Reality is an illusion.
2. Reality is/was self-created.
3. Reality is self-existent (eternal).
4. Reality was created by something that is self-existent.

So, which is the most plausible solution? Let’s begin with reality being simply an illusion, which is what a number of Eastern religions believe. This option was ruled out centuries ago by the philosopher Rene Descartes who is famous for the statement, “I think, therefore I am.” Descartes, a mathematician, argued that if he is thinking, then he must “be.” In other words, “I think, therefore I am not an illusion.” Illusions require something experiencing the illusion, and moreover, you cannot doubt the existence of yourself without proving your existence; it is a self-defeating argument. So the possibility of reality being an illusion is eliminated.

Next is the option of reality being self-created. When we study philosophy, we learn of “analytically false” statements, which means they are false by definition. The possibility of reality being self-created is one of those types of statements for the simple reason that something cannot be prior to itself. If you created yourself, then you must have existed prior to you creating yourself, but that simply cannot be. In evolution this is sometimes referred to as “spontaneous generation” —something coming from nothing—a position that few, if any, reasonable people hold to anymore simply because you cannot get something from nothing. Even the atheist David Hume said, “I never asserted so absurd a proposition as that anything might arise without a cause.” Since something cannot come from nothing, the alternative of reality being self-created is ruled out.

Now we are left with only two choices—an eternal reality or reality being created by something that is eternal: an eternal universe or an eternal Creator. The 18th-century theologian Jonathan Edwards summed up this crossroads:

• Something exists.
• Nothing cannot create something.
• Therefore, a necessary and eternal “something” exists.

Notice that we must go back to an eternal “something.” The atheist who derides the believer in God for believing in an eternal Creator must turn around and embrace an eternal universe; it is the only other door he can choose. But the question now is, where does the evidence lead? Does the evidence point to matter before mind or mind before matter?

To date, all key scientific and philosophical evidence points away from an eternal universe and toward an eternal Creator. From a scientific standpoint, honest scientists admit the universe had a beginning, and whatever has a beginning is not eternal. In other words, whatever has a beginning has a cause, and if the universe had a beginning, it had a cause. The fact that the universe had a beginning is underscored by evidence such as the second law of thermodynamics, the radiation echo of the big bang discovered in the early 1900s, the fact that the universe is expanding and can be traced back to a singular beginning, and Einstein’s theory of relativity. All prove the universe is not eternal.

Further, the laws that surround causation speak against the universe being the ultimate cause of all we know for this simple fact: an effect must resemble its cause. This being true, no atheist can explain how an impersonal, purposeless, meaningless, and amoral universe accidentally created beings (us) who are full of personality and obsessed with purpose, meaning, and morals. Such a thing, from a causation standpoint, completely refutes the idea of a natural universe birthing everything that exists. So in the end, the concept of an eternal universe is eliminated.

Philosopher J. S. Mill (not a Christian) summed up where we have now come to: “It is self-evident that only Mind can create mind.” The only rational and reasonable conclusion is that an eternal Creator is the one who is responsible for reality as we know it. Or to put it in a logical set of statements:

• Something exists.
• You do not get something from nothing.
• Therefore a necessary and eternal “something” exists.
• The only two options are an eternal universe and an eternal Creator.
• Science and philosophy have disproven the concept of an eternal universe.
• Therefore, an eternal Creator exists.

Former atheist Lee Strobel, who arrived at this end result many years ago, has commented, “Essentially, I realized that to stay an atheist, I would have to believe that nothing produces everything; non-life produces life; randomness produces fine-tuning; chaos produces information; unconsciousness produces consciousness; and non-reason produces reason. Those leaps of faith were simply too big for me to take, especially in light of the affirmative case for God’s existence … In other words, in my assessment the Christian worldview accounted for the totality of the evidence much better than the atheistic worldview.”

An argument for the existence of God — knowing the Creator

But the next question we must tackle is this: if an eternal Creator exists (and we have shown that He does), what kind of Creator is He? Can we infer things about Him from what He created? In other words, can we understand the cause by its effects? The answer to this is yes, we can, with the following characteristics being surmised:

• He must be supernatural in nature (as He created time and space).
• He must be powerful (exceedingly).
• He must be eternal (self-existent).
• He must be omnipresent (He created space and is not limited by it).
• He must be timeless and changeless (He created time).
• He must be immaterial because He transcends space/physical.
• He must be personal (the impersonal cannot create personality).
• He must be infinite and singular as you cannot have two infinites.
• He must be diverse yet have unity as unity and diversity exist in nature.
• He must be intelligent (supremely). Only cognitive being can produce cognitive being.
• He must be purposeful as He deliberately created everything.
• He must be moral (no moral law can be had without a giver).
• He must be caring (or no moral laws would have been given).

These things being true, we now ask if any religion in the world describes such a Creator. The answer to this is yes: the God of the Bible fits this profile perfectly. He is supernatural (Genesis 1:1), powerful (Jeremiah 32:17), eternal (Psalm 90:2), omnipresent (Psalm 139:7), timeless/changeless (Malachi 3:6), immaterial (John 5:24), personal (Genesis 3:9), necessary (Colossians 1:17), infinite/singular (Jeremiah 23:24, Deuteronomy 6:4), diverse yet with unity (Matthew 28:19), intelligent (Psalm 147:4-5), purposeful (Jeremiah 29:11), moral (Daniel 9:14), and caring (1 Peter 5:6-7).

An argument for the existence of God — the flaws of atheism

One last subject to address on the matter of God’s existence is the matter of how justifiable the atheist’s position actually is. Since the atheist asserts the believer’s position is unsound, it is only reasonable to turn the question around and aim it squarely back at him. The first thing to understand is that the claim the atheist makes—“no god,” which is what “atheist” means—is an untenable position to hold from a philosophical standpoint. As legal scholar and philosopher Mortimer Adler says, “An affirmative existential proposition can be proved, but a negative existential proposition—one that denies the existence of something—cannot be proved.” For example, someone may claim that a red eagle exists and someone else may assert that red eagles do not exist. The former only needs to find a single red eagle to prove his assertion. But the latter must comb the entire universe and literally be in every place at once to ensure he has not missed a red eagle somewhere and at some time, which is impossible to do. This is why intellectually honest atheists will admit they cannot prove God does not exist.

Next, it is important to understand the issue that surrounds the seriousness of truth claims that are made and the amount of evidence required to warrant certain conclusions. For example, if someone puts two containers of lemonade in front of you and says that one may be more tart than the other, since the consequences of getting the more tart drink would not be serious, you would not require a large amount of evidence in order to make your choice. However, if to one cup the host added sweetener but to the other he introduced rat poison, then you would want to have quite a bit of evidence before you made your choice.

This is where a person sits when deciding between atheism and belief in God. Since belief in atheism could possibly result in irreparable and eternal consequences, it would seem that the atheist should be mandated to produce weighty and overriding evidence to support his position, but he cannot. Atheism simply cannot meet the test for evidence for the seriousness of the charge it makes. Instead, the atheist and those whom he convinces of his position slide into eternity with their fingers crossed and hope they do not find the unpleasant truth that eternity does indeed exist. As Mortimer Adler says, “More consequences for life and action follow from the affirmation or denial of God than from any other basic question.”
....

God is real.

Jesus is fake.

Another way of putting this is that:

Sango is a real God.

Jesus is a fake god.

Osun is a real Goddess.

Serapis is a fake god.

Are you getting the gist now.


Christianity is a massive charade.

The Abrahamic religions exist as the result of a combination of deceit, deception and various other dodgy activities.

budaatum:
And why should I take Governor Akeredolu's word over that of the Attorney General?

And who are the colleagues of the Attorney General?

I doubt you see how complex an issue this is.

Its very simple indeed.

The Attrorney General jurisdiction on policing matters resides in the FCT.

The Governor of each state is the abslute guradian of each an every citizen and their state.

Personally, i think that the Attorney General's statement has been spun out of proportion as Governor Akeredolu claims to be the situation below.

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/regional/ssouth-west/374117-amotekun-what-we-discussed-with-osinbajo-akeredolu.html

budaatum:
Which Commissioner of Police signed the initiative into action?

The Inspector General.

Btw, the Inspector General is colleaugue to the Attorney General at one of their Privy Councils.

The matter of Amotekun is a well thought out initiative that has been blown out of its original context.

Amotekun is not a paramilitary unit.

Amotekun is found so as to consolidate the already established security parameters.

The Governors have given us there solemn word that they will make certaim that these civilian volunteers arent used for political matters, purely security and defence of our realm against vandals and other nuisances.

budaatum:
Perhaps amotekunites should have gone about its establishment the right way then.

https://www.nairaland.com/5647855/just-amotekun-remains-illegal-malami#86048767

Though, one notes threads claiming otherwise.

The matter of Amotekun is a well thought out initiative that has been blown out of its original context.

Amotekun is not a paramilitart unit.

Amotekun is found so as to consolidate the already established security parameters.

The Governors have given us there solemn word that they will make certaim that these civilian volunteers arent used for political matters, purely security and defence of our realm against vandals and other nuisances.

budaatum:
Perhaps amotekunites should have gone about its establishment the right way then.

https://www.nairaland.com/5647855/just-amotekun-remains-illegal-malami#86048767

Though, one notes threads claiming otherwise.

The Attorney General isnt correct on that one, i must say.

For instance, according to Governor Akeredolu, the Attorney General doesnt have the power to make Amotekun illegal, those powers reside with the courts.

Out of all the sitting officials in our Police Council, only few of them are Federal all the rest are Governors of their given state.

Furthermore, the Commisioner of Police (one of the Federal representatives) signed the initiative into action. And as such the Attorney General doesnt own the rght or power to degrade the authority of his colleagues ruling.

paxonel:
....

The Jesus character is a continuation of the worshiping of the Soter image.

Why are they keen on worshiping Soter's image?

They are worshiping Soter's image because they consider Ptolemy (I) as their saviour due to the senseless invasions he and his family partook in North East of the continent.

Jesus is a fictitious character that was invented by the Romans in the first century.

Christianity is a fake Hellenistic religion that was deliberately manufactured by fourth century Romans in order to use as a tool of propaganda.

paxonel:
I say upload one article from a reliable source to buttress if not all atleast some of all these your talk or back off, If you don't I disfollowed this thread immediately and it becomes all waste of time
You can't just come to nairaland and write rubbish and you expect reasonable and sensible people to read and be convinced.

The Jesus character is an adaptation of various older religioussic characters from all across the globe i.e Apis, Buddha, Dionysus, Ela, Horus, Krishna, Merlin, Osiris, Romulus, Serapis e.t.c


In the above fact exist the proof: Research the above icons accordingly.

Especially Horus the son of Isis and Osiris.

Pyramid Texts dated Horu's rule as Pharoah of KM.T c. 2400-2300 BCE...


Furthermore, the Jesus character is a continuation of the worship of the Serapis image.

Serapis came about as a result of Ptolemy (I) also known as Soter.

The followers of the church of Soterism were the first gathering ever to refer to themselves as Christians until the Romans manufactured todays Christianity making use of the same fake Hellenistic concepts.

Here you need to research on Ptolemy (I) also known as Soter that was pharaoh of Ptolemaic Egypt from 305 - 304 BCE.

Serapis Christus is the name of the Greco-Roman god that was worshiped back in those days.

Serapis Christus came about as a result of the Greeks plagiarising their own fake god ‘Serapis'.

Again: Research Serapis and Serapis Christus

The Romans assimilated the image of Serapis Christus as well as his doctrine of salvation also known as Soterism.

The Romans then gave their Jesus character Serapis status of “Christ”, went on to burn all the books in their vicinity and went on a killing spre under the pretence that their newly created religion gave them the right to cause havoc all around the globe.

The Romans invented the Jesus character in order to pacify a militaristic rebel group present in the Palestinian regions.

And later the Romans would manufactured their version of Christianity and used it against their own peasants before exporting their campaigns of terror around the globe.

AmuDimkpa:
Amotekun is just a political tool for 2023, nothing more.

Amotekun is a regional security initiative that is meant to work in conjunction with the already established counterparts i.e Neigbourhood watch e.t.c

Stop turning a good and positive initiative into a political tool.

brocab:
Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the one to come.…

Christianity an Islam are both aftermaths of foreign aggressive invasions.

That is to say, Christianity does not favour Africa.

Islam does not favour Africa.

Christianity and Islam are never to be taken seriously, they are the mere after math of an aggressive occupation.

Christianity is a false concept that was manufactured by the Romans in the fourth century.

The Christianity is a massive charade.

paxonel:
all I'm saying is you should have online reference to point out your claims atleast, rather than saying things on your own. You know anyone can come up with a story that some sort of book was plagiarized to write the bible...

The Christian bible isnt a genuine history textbook, rather its a badly written bibliography, a compilation of religioussic text and typologies from all across the globe, the contents of which have been repackaged, plagerised, copied, sexed-up or simply outrightly fabricated.

There isnt one character or storyline inside the Christian bible that can claim to being original.

paxonel:
Talk is cheep, but bring out references or proofs are hard

Talk is cheap. Refers to you and your inconsequential response.

Maybe you forgot to read previous responses or perhaps you couldnt be bother.

My advice is for you to go back and read through the thread as theres much evidence and sources there.

paxonel:
you have not answered the question : how is book of death benefiting people of this generation?

Do you realize that if there are sustainable benefits of read this book of the dead you will have more people reading it like the way we have more people reading the bible today which which answers every question about life?

You are missing the point.

We dont need to replace the bible or the Quran with anything other than real history.

Both Christianity and Islam exist on the back of their failed attempts to destroy and or basterdise real history.

Truth is the only proper solution for a lie.

That is to say, we ought to stop sourcing from falsehood and instead source from our own African history.

Therefore, we ought to bin their false narratives and revitalise the real and proper history.

Christian and Islamic narratives exist so as to intentionally mislead people, visciously pulling them away from recognising the existence of real and proper history.

Recognition of real and proper history leads to sourcing from real and proper history.

Sourcing from real and proper history allows for the enviroment that will usher in real time progress in all aspects of our daily lives.

Furthermore, history teaches us that the moment whereby a majority of continentals are in sync with their continent, nice, cool and pleasant things will become the norm in their daily lives.


Take away the frazzle dazzle, the flashing lights and all the shennanigans, Africans are the most influencial people in the world of today, out of sheer numbers, demographics as well as other things that arent needed to be repeated here to avoid sounding too blunt.

Now, the thought process is simple. African have the potential to become the most powerful version of our continent has ever bern throughout all of human history.

We have the potential to surpass all of the greateness of the Africans that have come before us.

Once we despell all the foreign concepts and concentrate our focus on everything African.

Perhaps spend hundreds of years focused on us and only us. Everyone else can jog along, our interest is in us.

All official languages should only include local African languages.

Use our official local African languages to Educate ourselves.

Define all foreign and malicious ideologies operating on the continent as such.

Ban the use of all foreign ideologies as a means of education.

Once our great continent is restored to its deservedly greatness, all our Diaspora will begin to excell beyond their own expectations and the severed links will all be restored.


Our continent will become the most influencial geopolitically, commercially, technologically and agricultural science wise as well and here is where we all need to be.

paxonel:
are there any statement made by anyone in the book which foresee anything happening in this present moment of our lives?

How is book benefiting this generation?

The books of Egyptology are history textbooks that one can safely source in terms of situations and stories relating to the North Eastern region of our continent, Ancient Sudanese history is equally important. Try not to stray away from the below authors in our study on history of KM.T, as most African historians always source from these particular authors, as they are world reknowned and are amongst the world leading authorities in Egyptology.

ℹThe Book of Coming Forth by Day authored by Maulana Karenga.

ℹThe Book of Going Forth by Day authored by R.O Faulkner.

According to olden days Egyptian, Roman and Greek history, the first group of worshipers to ever refer to themselves Christians were the Roman-Greco followers of the Church of Serapis Christus.

The Romans manufactured their version of Christianity in the first century, assimilating the Serapis image, status of 'Christ' and all of their concepts in the process.

Furthermore, the Roman authors of Abrahamic religious text copied Horus own personal text and gave it to their fake Jesus character to use to impersonate Horus a real African God.

As proven by other contributors on the thread, the Jesus character is a malicious adaptation of Horus the son of Isis and Osiris.

Horus is a real God.

Jesus is a fake god.

paxonel:
are there any statement made by anyone in the book which foresee anything happening in this present moment of our lives?

There are no real predictions inside the Christian bible, they are all fake and were intentionally concocted by the authors.


There are no real predictions in Abrahamic religious text.


The authors of the Christian bible already knew of the information they were pretending to predict.

For instance, when the authors of the Christian bible wrote that Jerusalem will be surrounded and leveled to the ground, that had already happened before they chose to add that story.


The only difference is that it wasnt called Jerusalem at the time, and there were no people known as Jews back then, there was the militaristic Masionic movements and various other groups of Palestinian movements that were opposed to Roman rule.

paxonel:
How is book benefiting this generation?

That is besides the point

Christianity is a Roman mockery of the Hellenistic religions.

The Jesus character was invented by first century Romans.

musicwriter:
....Nothing in Christianity is an original idea.

Below are similarities that historians have been able to glean from the story of Horus VS Jesus imitation. By the way, Horus full name is Horus Krst.

Enjoy.......

Horus Krst (7,000 years old) VS Jesus Christ (2,000 years old).

• HORUS KRST is the Father seen in the Son = JESUS CHRIST says, "I and My Father are one. He that seeth Me, seeth Him that sent Me."

• HORUS KRST was the light of the world, the light that is represented by the symbolical eye, the sign of salvation = JESUS CHRIST is made to declare that He is the light of the world.

• HORUS KRST was the way, the truth, the life by name and in person = JESUS CHRIST is made to assert that he is the way, the truth, and the life.

• HORUS KRST says: It is I who traverse the heaven; I go round the Sekhet-Arru (the Elysian Fields); Eternity has been assigned to me without end. Lo! I am heir of endless time and my attribute is eternity = JESUS CHRIST is made to say: "I am the true vine."

• HORUS KRST says: "I open the Tuat that I may drive away the darkness." = JESUS CHRIST says: "I am come down from Heaven. For this is the will of the Father that everyone who beholdeth the Son and believeth in Him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day." He, too, claims to be the lord of eternity.

• HORUS KRST says: I am equipped with thy words O Ra (the father in heaven) and repeat them to those who are deprived of breath. These were the words of the father in heaven = JESUS CHRIST says: "I am come a light unto the world."

• HORUS KRST baptized with water by Anup = JESUS CHRIST baptized with water by John.

• Anup, the Baptizer = John the Baptist.

• Aan, a name of the divine scribe = John the divine scribe.

• HORUS KRST born in Annu, the place of bread = JESUS CHRIST born in Bethlehem, the house of bread.

• HORUS KRST the Good Shepherd with the crook upon his shoulders = JESUS CHRIST the Good Shepherd with the lamb or kid upon his shoulder.

• The Seven on board the boat with HORUS KRST = The seven fishers on board the boat with JESUS CHRIST.

• HORUS KRST as the Lamb = JESUS CHRIST as the Lamb.

HORUS KRST as the Lion = JESUS CHRIST as the Lion.

• HORUS KRST identified with the Tat or Cross = JESUS CHRIST identified with the Cross.

• HORUS KRST of twelve years = JESUS CHRIST of twelve years.

• HORUS KRST made a man by thirty years in his baptism = JESUS CHRIST made a man by thirty years in his baptism.

• HORUS KRST the Krst = JESUS CHRIST the Christ.

• HORUS KRST the manifesting Son of God = JESUS CHRIST the manifesting Son of God.

• The trinity of Atum the Father, HORUS KRST the Son, and Rathe Holy Spirit = The trinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

• The first HORUS KRST as child of the Virgin, the second as Son of Ra = JESUS CHRIST as the Virgin's child, the Christ as Son of the Father.

• HORUS KRST the sower and Set the destroyer in the harvestfield = JESUS CHRIST the sower of the good seed and Satan the sower of tares.

• HORUS KRST carried off by Set to the summit of Mount Hetep = JESUS CHRIST spirited away by Satan into an exceedingly high mountain.

• Set and HORUS KRST contending on the Mount = JESUS CHRIST and Satan contending on the Mount.

• The Star, as announcer of the child HORUS KRST = The Star in the East that indicated the birthplace of JESUS CHRIST.

• HORUS KRST the avenger = JESUS CHRIST who brings the sword.

• HORUS KRST as Iu-em-Hetep, who comes with peace = JESUS CHRIST the bringer of peace.

• HORUS KRST the afflicted one = JESUS CHRIST the afflicted one.

• HORUS KRST as the type of life etemal = JESUS CHRIST the type of eternal life.

• HORUS KRST as Iu-em-Hetep, the child teacher in the temple = The child JESUS CHRIST as teacher in the Temple.

• The mummy bandage that was woven without seam = The vesture of the Christ without a seam.

• Twelve followers of HORUS KRST as Har-Khutti = Twelve followers of JESUS CHRIST as the twelve disciples.

• The revelation written down by Aan (Tehuti) the scribe of divine words = The revelation by John the divine.

• The saluter Aani, who bears witness to the word of Ra and to the testimony of HORUS KRST = John who bears witness to the Word of God and the testimony of JESUS CHRIST Christ.

• The secret of the Mysteries revealed by Taht-Aan = The secret of the Mysteries made known by John.

• HORUS KRST the Morning Star = JESUS CHRIST the Morning Star.

• HORUS KRST who gives the Morning Star to his followers = JESUS CHRIST who gives the Morning Star to his followers.

• The name of Ra on the head of the deceased = The name of the Father written on the forehead.

• The Paradise of the Pole Star-Am-Khemen = The Holy City lighted by one luminary, that is neither the Sun nor the Moon = the Pole Star.

• The Har-Seshu, or servants of HORUS KRST = The servants of JESUS CHRIST Christ.

Source: The Book Your Church Doesn't Want You to Read - by Tim C. Leedom.

The similarities between Horus and the Jesus character are too numerous for it to have been down to coincidence.

ContractKiller:
Well a brilliant mind will thrive and excel under any circumstances. I suppose the question you must honestly ask yourself is:

What is so attractive about the career prospects of the Nigerian army that makes you want to tie yourself down with them?

Nigerian Army needs the best of the best, my heart goes out to all our men and women of the army that go out of arms way to protect us 24/7 all day, every day.

The best thing any understanding Nigerian can does is answer our own questions. Perhaps it means answer the call for a better Nation.

One of the ways to change our country is by doing the changing by ourselves.

And, some of the ways one can further our Nations progress is by becoming a politician or joining any of our Armed Forces and assisting the progress of our Nation.

BentSpoon:
I'm a 300l engineering student in a prominent federal university in the country but I'm currently faced with the option of switching to NDA to continue my studies and take up a military career . Note my CGPA is great and I can easily come out with a second class upper or better still a first class with hardwork but I'm still contemplating switching to NDA wether it's a wise choice.
PLEASE THE ELDERS IN THE HOUSE UR OPINION IS NEEDED.

What is your main objective towards your career?

Are you ready to defend our realm with all your body, mind and soul?

Are you?

Or are you a genuine citizen thats just looking for a new and tougher career?

You've got me worked up because i genuinely have a keen interest in the mentality of the everyday potential military officer. I hope the day will come when our military will become a exponentially aligned and wired to the conscience of the general public, then the genius of in people such as you will emerge and make our world a better place.

brocab:
If nothing is working for you, then you need to find something that is working for you.
And besides believing is a better place to be, firstly I am not African, secondly my country is the land full of milk and honey, when my country was discovered they called it the land of the Holy Spirit..
If you believe you are so great in history, then look up the "Spear of destiny-and history will tell you Jesus did exist..

Forget and bin all that Hellenistic mumbojumbo and concentrate focus on real history.

Let's all conce trate our focus on things that are real and true. i.e history.

Lets's stop sourcing from the fakery inside of Abrahamic text and instead source from real history.

It isnt much to ask of us, STOP sourcing from liars and fakers and instead choose to source from real history.


Manufactured history created by liars and fakers ❌

Real history ✅

Olayinka Herbert Macaulay

Herbert Wigwe

Fela Anikulapo Kuti

Tai Solarin

Femi Falana

Ada Osakwe

Aliko Dangote

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala

Tony Elumelu

Johnson Umunnakwe Aguiyi-Ironsi

Obafemi Awolowo

Nnamdi Azikwe