₦airaland Forum

Daejoyoung:
Wow so africans did all that and yet we didn't invent computers and aeroplanes before the Arabs and Europeans could get to us?

Learn, study and research on history.

Aeroplanes and computers are new inventions of 1900's.

You need to understand that the Transatlantic slave trade was 15 -19th century.

Therefore, during these times the Eurocentrics ran riot on the continent and also had on and off control of Egypt.

Ever since the initial successfull invasion around 800BCE, Egypt has change over between the Arabian fundamentalist and the Eurocentrics for more than one hundred times.

Basically, the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentrics attacked and took control of Egypt and mined all it's intellectual properties.

And they would repeat these same tactics during Colonisation and the horrific Transatlantic campaign and elsewhere.

Daejoyoung:
But lmhotep was just one man who lived more than 4000years ago. Show me the line of inventors in African history who built on what lmhotep left behind like isaac Newton did?
Even if what you say is true, that Africans invented science and everything else originally, it is clear that Africans like the chinese did not tap into this wealth of Genius.

These are the reasons one needs to study African history.

What dyou think happened during the Arabian slavetrade?

What dyou think happened during Colonisation and the horrific Transatlantic campaign ?

The Eurocentrics and the Arabian fundamentalist burnt tons and tons of books and literature that wasnt related to Abrahamic religious text.

These are the reasons we ought to learn, study and research real history.

Can you understand?

Even Albert Einstein visited Egypt.

African scientist invented the speed of light thousands of years ago.

Africa was invaded by Asia and Europe.

And they both stole parts of our legacy in order to better themselves.


KM.T was invaded far back as 800 BCE.

Drip, drip, they sucked the land dry of all its intellectual property.

If they had not invaded and stolen from our land, Africans would have continued to exist peacefully and self sufficiently without any need for foreign intervention.

Can you understand now?

Daejoyoung:
Religions like christianity and islam embrace all men...

That is not true.

The history of both Christianity and Islam is riddled with violence and warmongery.

The Abrahamic religions are mere tools of malicious propaganda.

Daejoyoung:
Such religions were used as tools to create civilisations....

That is a common misconception.

The main aim of the Abrahamic religions was to destroy civilisations.

The Abrahamic religions are the worst Eurocentric concept to reach the African shores.

As an agent of senseless destruction, the Abrahamic religions are a group of unrivalled evil.

African history is the reality that all the rest of the world copied the core of their technological and knowledge based ideas. i.e Architecture, Art, Astrology, Astronomy, Commerce, Engineering, Geography, Literacy, Numeracy, Mathematics, Metallurgy, Philosophy, The Medical Sciences, The Physical Sciences e.t.c

They used our legacy to enhance themselves, we can use our legacy to enhance ourselves as well.

Since the legacy is ours, we most definately have the will and the capacity to does a better job than any other peoples.

Daejoyoung:
lf science and knowledge comes from Africa, then even before the white man came, we should have invented things like calculus, gunpowder, machines, printing press, computers, etc.

Eurocentric leaders became super power out of brute force and not intellect per se.

Isaac Newton learnt his methods from the KM.
Tic Scientistssic. i.e Imhotep.

Gunpowder is a Chinese invention.

The brain of the African is that which brought about much of the concepts behind Computers. i.e IBM, the Internet e.t.c

All these one would readily learn during our studies of history.

Daejoyoung:
l understand your zeal for Africa, but then where did we go wrong? When isaac Newton was inventing calculus in the 17th century, what were our fathers doing?

Great question.

Isaac Newton did give credit to Imhotep and the KM.Tic Scientific community in some of his write ups.

Isaac Newton was obsessesed with KM.Tic scientists. i.e Imhotep.

Isaac Newton spent so many years in Egypt that we simple stopped counting so as not to jinx him.


According to African history, these were the period that denotes some of the lowest points, the Arabian slavetrade was about fizzling away and had caused great famine, displacements and all the agents associated with the Islamic crazy wars and Arabian fundamentalist warmongery.

Then, at that critical moment, the Eurocentrics brought their pranks and tricks, they would use their missionaries to escalate delicate feuds, create false propaganda so as to create conflict.

Then after the conflicts are settled, they attacked; they colude with neighbouring communities to attack the winning side.

These were the days leading to Colonisation and the Transatlantic slavetrade.

Instead of Isaac Newton, acknowledge Imhotep and the KM.Tic scientist instead, treat Isaac Newton as an afterwards scientist. A great scientist that wasnt successfull in crediting Africans in the correct way and in the correct places on his fantastic works.

Study African history with the guidance and expertise of genuine African and pro-African historians.

0mnivalent:
... if all abrahamic religious texts are dubious and wholly untrustworthy, then tell me the texts that are trustworthy.

All the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.

It's important to note that the Abrahamic religions comprise of Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

Cease fixation on the fakery and falsehood and concentrate our focus on real history.

Real history is trustworthy.

African history is proven to be true and trustworthy.

African history is the universal standard to which all other concepts and understandings are derived.

Africans discovered the concepts of literacy.

Africans discovered the concepts of numeracy.

All the major intellectual and technological breakthroughs in human history begins with the African, all the other scientist, scholars and academics built their knowledge and academia out of these.

Therefore, one should appreciate that generically, our continent is the major intellectual realm and centre of excellence and splendor for the entire planet Earth.

Hence, one should ask the sounding question.

Why?

Why is it that all the world are falling over themselves to learn, study and store our intellect, our legacy?

Yet, we are being taught to neglet real history and instead be engaging in their (The Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentrics) fakery and falsehood.

For example, studying African history allows one the understamding that sending humans to outter space is ultimately achieved through the intellectual capacity of the African.


That is to say, studying African history increases one's intellectual capacity.

0mnivalent:
....

All the authors of Abrahamic religious text are dubious and wholly untrustworthy.

Learn, study and research Roman history, and compare and contrast with the fakery being peddled by the Abrahamic religious text.

To Europeans, the position of Pope signifies hope, unity and power.

To the African the position of Pope signifies, theft, looting, murder, plunder and all the other agents of chaos.

The Pope is one of the least foreign religious position an African should ever want to honour or respect.

The history of the involvement of the Pope in African affairs is atrocious.

Where were the Pope when Eurocentric warmongers were running riot on the continent?

Ah! I remember, he was busy being a proactive agent of the horific Transatlantic campaign himself.

The Roman Catholic church is a massive charade.

Jesus is a fictitious character.

Daejoyoung:
Where are the writings for this African history? Writings matter my friend.

Much of the material currently available have been salvaged by African historians working round the clock in order to ascertain the accuracy of their findings.

Furthermore, one has to understand that the reason behind the situation of the lack of tons and tons of books written by ancient African historians is due to the draconian policy of burning of books and literature sometimes the destruction of libraries on the continent adopted by both Christianity and Islam.

Nevertheless, modern day African historians arent phased as they have been able to methodically, analytically as well as making use of scientific techniques, reconstruct out of the available secular history all that was thought to have been destroyed by the liars and the fakers.


And now, African history is rightfully restored to its towering glory by the modern day pro-African academics, scholars and historians.

Our job is to mine these findings and make great use of them in order to make the world a better place for us and the coming generations.

Daejoyoung:
Where are the writings for this African history? Writings matter my friend. That is the staying power of the Abrahamic religions.
l am ready to read African spiritual books of old if you can provide me with them.

. The African Origin of Civilisation by Cheikh Anta Diop.

. The Book of Coming forth by Day by Maulana Karenga.

. The Book of Going forth by Day by Raymond O Faulkner.

. The Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilisation by Martin Bernal.

. A History of the African-Olmecs: Blacksic Civilisations of America from Prehistoric Times to the Present Era by Paul Barton.

.They Came Before Columbus: The African presence in Ancient America by Dr Ivan Sertima

. New Dimensions In African History by Dr Yosef Ben Jochannan and Dr Henrik Clarke.

The main difference btw Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric ideologies vs African spirituality is that the former are malicious fakery whilst the latter is sacred.

Furthermore, research into World history allows the understanding that suggest 'religion' is a direct adaptation of African spirituality.

Africans are the first people in human history capable enough to perceive the concept of God.

That is to say, African spirituality is sacred.

African spirituality doesnt intend to propagate or proselytize.

Some aspects of African spirituality remains classified.

African history is the combination of secular and classified history.

African history is the only narrative that ought to be taught in our classrooms.

The Jesus character is an adaptation of various older religioussic characters from all across the globe i.e Apis, Buddha, Dionysus, Ela, Horus, Krishna, Merlin, Osiris, Romulus, Serapis e.t.c

Especially Horus the son of Isis and Osiris.

Pyramid Texts dated Horu's rule as Pharoah of KM.T c. 2400-2300 BCE.

Jesus was supposedly born on 0 B.C.E; obviously theres no such date as 0 B.C.E but thats their claim.

The similarities between the Jesus character and that of Horus are too numerous for it to be down to coincidence.

(1) Horus was miraculously conceived.

(2) His birth was accompanied by heavenly bodies

(3) His birth was attended by angelssic.

(4) His birth was heralded by the star Sirius (the morning star).

(5) He was persecuted by a tyrant who ordered the slaughter of thousands of infants who feared that the divine child would supplant his kingdom.

(6) Ancient Egyptians paraded a manger and child representing Horus through the street at the time of winter solstice.

(7) Horus was baptized by Anup the Baptizer.

(8.) He was baptized in the River Eridanus

(9) The missions of Horus and Jesus were the same - the salvation of humanity.

(10) Horus worked miracles and wonders such as raising the dead and healing the sick, the deaf and the blind. e.t.c Horus was said to have "stilled the seas by his power"

(11) Horus was taken from the desert up a mountain by his arch rival Seth; where he was said to later resist temptation

"I am Horus in glory . . . I am the Lord of the Light . . . I am the victorious one . . . I am the heir of endless time . . . I, even I, am he that knoweth the path of heaven"

(12) Isis is the Graecinzed form of the KM.Tic goddess Au-Set, She is also called Meri. Jesus mother is called Mary.

Isis/Horus vs Mary/Jesus

"I am Horus, the Prince of Eternity"

"I am Horus who stepeth onward through eternity . . . Eternity and everlasting is my name"


These are extracts from the Book of Going forth by Day.

All the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuituve.

Daejoyoung:
The jews were smart enough to write their story in that way, that they are the chosen race through whom the world would be blessed, they believed this for centuries (whether it was true or not) and they lived their lives according to this belief in the so called promis.

Forget and bin all that Hellenistic mumbojumbo.

Humanity begins in Africa and our ancestors went on to populate the other continents.

African history is that which counts.

A made up Hellenistic inspired invention isnt the concern of the African.

Furthermore, there's nowhere in Africa history that talks of the Israelites, in actual fact the only place you can accross this story is in the Christian bible and all the other Abrahamic religious related text.

Concentrate your focus on building up our continent.

Lift Africa up to the point of Apogee and receive the correct blessings from the pinacle of the universe.

Explore real history, and leave Eurocentric and Arabian fundamentalist concepts to their owners.

The Abrahamic religions were intentionally manufactured as a tool of propaganda that would later be used to pacify the people of the Roman Empire, The Byzantine Empire, and the Arabian fundamentalist used to pacify the Ottoman Empire, Ayyubid Empire, Fatimad Empire e.t.c

The authors of the Abrahamic text attempt to bastardise real history whilst at the same time, learn, copy, plagiarise and fabricate content in relation to that particular history to which they chose.

In order for one to appreciate these facts, one has to have achieved a basic understanding or broad understanding of European and Western Asian history.

For instance, centuries after the death of Alexandra of Macedon, Greek Mythology was the standard accross the Mediterranean, parts of Europe, Egypt, and parts of modern day Turkey.

After the Roman Empire became the prominent power in the region, subsequently they continue the trend except they chose to use their own local gods in the stead.

Hence, the the Romans replaced most of the Hellenistic religious characters with their own local ones.

The Jesus character was invented in the first century in order to pacify a Hellenistic militaristic rebel group that existed in the Palestinian region.

According to Iran's own history, the Arabian fundamentalist ideology is a false concept.

Islam is a fake concept.

And later the same Christianity will be used to pacify the people of the Roman Empire.

African history ✅

Arabian fundamentalist ideologies ✖

Eurocentric ideologies ✖

The Abrahamic religions peddle a false representation of history.

Once upon a time, there was these friends named "lie" and "exactly how things are"; they both went for a swim.

Without saying anything, "lie" jumped out of the stream, snatched the clothes of "exactly how things are" to put on.

People that came accross the "lie" began to warn, hey look at "lie" he's wearing the clothes of "exactly how things are".

Exactly how things are" came out of the stream and found clothes had gone.

Moments later people saw "lie" been chased by the unclad "exactly how things are". Then they said, look at the unclad "exactly how things are" chasing the "lie" in the clothes of "exactly how things are".

Exactly how things are" eventually caught up with the 'lie' and took back control.

Similarly, All the Abrahamic religions peddles a false narrative whilst pretending to be genuine.

All Abrahamic religious text wear the stolen clothes of "exactly how things are".

hupernikao:
Sir, why are you this restless because of the Bible. Truth dont need a defense, truth is a defense in itself. The fact that you are worked up and restless says alot. Just calm down, then learn better.

Christianity is a false concept.

The Israelite story is false.

It's you that needs to stop fixating on falsehood and fakery and concentrate on real history.

Christianity as well as all the other Abrahamic religions are a hinderence to the progress of the continent.

When you take away all the frazzle dazzle and all the common misconceptions, living in the UK is no different to living in Nigeria.

The best way to achieve delight by living in the UK is by bringing with you tons and tons of monies.

That's the simple truth.

If you've got tons of monies then, there's no other place outside of Africa that i would advice you to go and relax for a few days and return back home other than the U.S.A and the UK.

esterella:
Well, I'm not a journalist but I found the news article below eerily similar and this happened in August 2019...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9746415/girl-sucked-swimming-pool-pump-spain/

IN TOO DEEP Screaming girl, 6, ‘sucked into swimming pool pump and left trapped for three hours in agony’ on Costa del Sol holiday
EXCLUSIVE
Brittany VonowTim McNulty
18 Aug 2019, 14:37Updated: 19 Aug 2019, 14:06[/b]
A SIX-YEAR-OLD girl was sucked into a swimming pool pump and left trapped for three hours in agony while on holiday in Costa del Sol, her family claim.

Terrified Zara Clarkson desperately had to keep her head above water for hours as firefighters armed with jackhammers smashed through the pool's concrete wall to free her.

Zara had her arm badly damaged in the pool side incident at Costa del Sol
Zara Clarkson's arm was sucked into the pool while she swam while on a family holiday

The little girl's arm has since swollen three times its normal size - with doctors fearing she could have suffered blood poisoning from the suction.

Dad Zack, 46, of Manchester, said: "Zara was panicking and screamed out ‘daddy the pool is sucking me and it won’t stop'.

"Something with that kind of suction would have easily pulled a smaller child under the water and they would have been killed."

Zack said his instinct had been to drag his daughter’s arm out but he stopped knowing this risked causing even greater damage.

Instead, he stayed "cheek to cheek" with Zara keeping her calm as emergency services attempted to saw open the pool’s drainage system.

[b]Zara was panicking and screamed out ‘daddy the pool is sucking me and it won’t stop'

Dad Zack Clarkson
He said: "She is a brave little kid but of course, but it has had an effect on her, she is really upset and has told us she never wants to go swimming again."

The dad and daughter were enjoying their first family holiday at the luxury villa in Estepona with Zara’s twin sister Lucy and their mum Claire, 42, having only brought the property in the Villas de Santa Maria at Christmas.

But the trip was ruined as little Zara became stuck on Friday, with dramatic images showing the poolside patio torn up circular saws and drills used by emergency services.

Zack added: "I am a tough lad but my first thought was to go to the corner of the pool and have a quiet sob.

Zara’s mum Claire added: "It was unbearable, I felt helpless and just wanted her out."

Doctors now fear that the force of the suction may have forced toxins to be released into Zara’s bloodstream.

It had been claimed in respected local newspaper Diario Sur that the pump switch was turned off at the time of the incident [i]but Zack denied it
[/i][b]
The Sun has contacted the villa for comment.

Mum Claire said she felt helpless as she watched her little girl get sucked into the pool filter
Zara's arm was left badly damaged
Emergency crews used drill hammers to get the little girl
It took emergency services hours to get the little girl out
Zara was tested by docs who feared she could have suffered kidney damage

Thank you for your quick and comprehensive feedback.

Does anyone disagree with these findings?.

Daejoyoung:
.. give me names of scholars on writings of antiquity that say all these, and you've provided none. l can make up my own conspiracy theory on anything, it proves nothing. Give me proof of scholars and historians in this field from top universities across the world, who are arguinh this.

This isnt a conspiracy at all, instead this is the results of genuine historical facts.

The Jesus character was invented in the first century CE during the reign of the Flavians.

Especially, the Roman Emperor Titus Vespasianus Augustus often refered to as Emperor Titus.

Some historians go far as pointing out the fact that it isnt a coincidence that the biblical movement of the Jesus character mirrors the military campaign of Emperor Titus himself.

The Jesus character was invented in the first century CE.

One can as well research that oneself or watch the world reknowned historian Joseph Atwill disect an excerpt from 'The Flavian Signature' of his own book "Caesar's Messiah"

Statement by Joseph Atwill - excerpt from "The Flavian Signature"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omi6lN5b0Ic

In his lecture, Joseph Atwill shows us a comprehensive blue print on the typology the authors of Abrahamic religious text used during their invention of the Jesus character.

Proof Romans Invented the Jesus Character - The Flavian Signature.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UqG8w7ezUQ

budaatum:
Make me jog along, I beg you please.

I've edited previous post, no need for uneccesary distractions.

African progress is more important to us than trivial stuff.

All the Abrahamic religions are sophisticated tools of propaganda that have been manufactured as a means of mind control and brainwash.

There isnt one character or storyline inside of all of Abrahamic religious text that can lay claim to being original.

musicwriter:
We would have worshiped him. Indeed, we already had Horus (a black virgin born, resurrected savior) in Africa, more than 5,000 years before anybody heard of Jesus.

But, you're right, white people didn't worship Horus when they arrived Africa, instead, when they arrived African for the first time (from 323 BC) they created a new Savior called Ptolemy, nicknamed Soteir, which means SAVIOR. This was later to evolve to Jesus (Sorteir) Christ.

Precisely, Soter was responsible for the invention of Serapis Christus.

Romans assimilated all of the Serapis Christus concepts and his image into their version of Christianity.

Here's some of Ptolemy and Emperor Constantine (I) involvements:-

The Ecumenical Council that was held in Nicea 325 CE is the part of the overwhelming evidence that Jesus is a fictitious character.

The Romans invented the Jesus character in the first century CE.

Basically the Jesus started off as an ordinary character no different to one that preached a philosophy no different to that of Serapis Christus and as time went on the authors of the Christian bible has updated his characterisrics making him up on a continous bases until they arrived at their current character.

The Roman version of Christianity, the current version of Christianity was manufactured in the first century CE.

According to Roman history, the Council of Nicea also known as the Ecumenical Councils were legally convened assembles of the ecclesiastical dignitaries and so-called theological experts (of the government of Rome) for the express purpose of discussing and regulating matters of doctrine and discipline at the orders of Emperor Costantine (I).

Over 20 councils were convened between 325 and 1870 CE.

These Councils actually created authoritative decrees, they actually passed so-called 'laws' as to what is and what isnt, what one is allowed to think and what one isnt allowed to say.

What caused the Council of Nicea to convene in 325 CE ?

Well, that would have to take us back to KM.T. and the first European Pharaoh; Ptolemy the first also known as Soter (ca. 367-283 BCE).

Ptolemy the first became pharoah of Egypt due to an agressive invasion as per Alexander the Greek also known as Alexander of Macedon.

Through Ptolemy, came Soteriology.

Soteriology is the doctrine or the study of salvation.

Ptolemy insisted that the people of KM.T consecrate him as a god, similar to the way they did with their Pharoahs at the time; essentially to make him Pharoah and the people of KM.T turned him down.

Giving the reasons that he wasnt worthy, Ptolemy didnt belong in KM.T in the first place and that the only reason he was in the position he was, is because of Alexandra's unjust military campaign of invasion into their domain.


Ptolemy the first then took upon himself these self- proclaimations:

Meryamun
Setepenre

Ramensu Meryamun

Mery - beloved

Amun - god.

Meryamun means beloved by god.

Setepenre

Setepen - chosen

Re (Ra) - god.


Setepenre means chosen by god.

Ptolemy wasnt given these names, he took it upon himself.

He insisted that they make an image in his honour, the Egyptians didnt want anything to does with that type of thinking and then he began putting them to the sword until he found a group of sell-outs Coptic Egyptians in Memphis; and they consecrated him to the office of Pharoah and they made an image. And this image is called 'Serapis'

Probably using the combination of Apis and Osiris to create Serapis ca.350 BCE.

Serapis was taken out of Egypt to become the greco-roman god Serapis Christus ca. 135 BCE.

Ptolemy the firsr tried to incorporate the religion of the Greeks into Egypt; thereby creating a new god in honour of himself. i.e Serapis.

The current image of the Jesus character is actually Serapis, the image that was made in honour of Ptolemy the first.

Aries tried his best at the time to stop them, pointing out to the people that Serapis isnt a god, he's an image of a European imposter; and was one that was part of an evil invasion rather than a virtuous person.

The Nicean council lasted for two months and four days, 318 theological dignatries were hosted by Emperor Constantine (I) himself.

The Nicean creed was an unauthorized an unethical decree that was canonized by 318 Roman theologians at the Council of Nicea in 325 CE.

Anyone can get there hands on the Nicean creed, its the false narratives that the Roman Catholic church tells itself everyday.

Daejoyoung:
This is nothing but conspiracy theory.l said give me names of scholars on writings of antiquity that say all these, and you've provided none. l can make up my own conspiracy theory on anything, it proves nothing. Give me proof of scholars and historians in this field from top universities across the world, who are arguing this.
There are many scholars and historians of 1st century writings who are not Christians. So give me just one citation from them that support your claim. l mean experts of josephus and co, like Bart Ehrman, Meier, etc.
Anybody can make up conspiracy theories without sound scholarship and proof. I can also make up my own for you, so it proves nothing.

Sorry this is the age of information, and arguements don't stand these days by just conspiracy theories, l mean you can keep believing them but don't tout them as facts in a public forum like this, when there is whole field of science and scholarship dedicated to this and you ignore them for your own fake bloggers and Egyptiologist who are not experts in this area and are just making things up.

It has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that Jesus is a fictitious character that was invented by the Romans.

Furthermore, majority of the genuine modern day historians all agree that Josephus invented the Jesus story.

Christianity did not begin as a religion, but is actually a sophisticated government propaganda exercise used to pacify the subjects of the Roman Empire.

The story of Jesus Christ was invented by first century Romans that used it as a system of mind control to subdue their poor citizens.

Most of The Old Testaments was stolen from more older philosophies from around the world, whilst the New Testament is full of fakery and forgeries.

Professor Bruno Bauer in his work of 1877 'Christ and the Caesars", stated that he had concluded that Romans authored the New Testament and that Flavian invented the Jesus character.

Historians have been able to determine those Roman Aristocrats that wrote every chapter of the New Testament name by name.

For example, the book of Mark was the first of the Gospels to have been written, and was done in a prototype form before it was later crafted into the form we are familiar with today. The earlier version was called " Ur Marcus" and is also known as 'Q' ( Quelle, German for the source)

The earliest version of Mark shows that this was written
at about the time of Claudius Caesar, by the grandfather of Arrius Piso. That version was apparently only a bare sketch and most probably did not give a name to the 'messiah'. That appears to have been done later by the person who actually played 'Jesus' in the Gospels - Arrius Piso.

The version you are familiar with was written about the year 73 C.E. by Arrius Calpurnius Piso also known by the name Flavius Josephus.

The Gospel of Luke and Acts of the Apostles was authored 80 - 100 CE, there's general agreement between most historians that these are the works of the same Roman aristocrat . This author was said to be an "amateur Hellenistic writer", who was versed in Greek rhetoric and rhetorical devices that was used to describe sea voyages.

For more information you will want to get yourself a copy of the booklet titled 'The True Authorship of the New Testament' by Abelard Reuchlin.

All the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.

Daejoyoung:
Can you give me the name of these historians who say tha?.

Here are the names of some of the Roman aristocrats that authored the Christian bible in the first century.


.Flavius Josephus grandfather.

.Flavius Josephus

.Pliny

.Flavius Julianus

.Flavius Julius

.Flavius Arrianus also known as Appian

Emperors and Roman monachs that played major roles include:

Emperor Titus Flavius Vespasian also known as Emperor Vespasian.

Emperor Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus also known as Emperor Titus the son of Emperor Vespasian.

Emperor Titus Flavius Caesar Domitianus Augustus also known as Emperor Domittan the junior brother to Emperor Titus.

Emperor Flavius Valerius Aurelius Contantinus Augustus also known as Constantine (I).

Members of the family of the Ptolemy dynasty i.e Ptolemy (I), Cleopatra (VII) and all the other rogue rulers of the unauthorised Ptolemaic kingdom that existed during those days.

Daejoyoung:
Can you give me the name of these historians who say that? Because the last time l checked, your claim is way out of academia and only maintained by fanatical atheist bloggers and not from scholars of classical works and 1st century writings.
Oh l forgot, it is you again, so give me the name of the historian who say that josephus made up the jesus story ( which is impossible because we have writings from Paul and Mark dating back decades before josephus wrote antiquity of the jews).

You don't just come making wild claims here, you should back up your claims with sources like you see in the write up from both l and MJBOLT.

The Roman authors of the bible falsified their text in various different ways, the most commonly discovered by historians is the fact that they followed the trend of earlier regional religious concepts i.e the Greeks (Hellenistic) e.t.c

Lets assume a writer that is living in 2019, publishes a book and dates it 1005.

Now since the book was advertised as been published 1005 then, all the authors are supposed to have been living in 1005. That is what the Roman aristocrats did.

(a) The Roman aristocrats authored the Christian bible in the first century and made it seem to the reader that they are authors of an earlier period in time.

(b) The Romans fabricated all of their events.

(c) The Romans impersonated their own authors. They created a character as an author in their own book.

(c) They plagerised from various earlier philosophies from all accross the globe.

(d) The Romans attempt to bastardise real history .i e twisting past events

(e) The Romans impersonated their own characters.

(f) The Romans lied about almost everything.

(g) The Romans acquired all their contexual ideas and typologies from various philosophies from all accross the globe by nefarious means and as spoils of warmongery.