bidexiii: Anybody knows why these two birds procured where sometimes not seeing again in the N.E frontlines.
The helicopters and crew were rented from a Georgian logistics company in the last months of the GEJ administration, to improve logistics in the fight against BH. The contract has long expired.
Patchesagain: No, but I know what i am looking at.
If i were a military engineer i would know the technical term and not just call them "wings"
Its just an observation... since we cannot see the ammo boxes I cant definitively say (ZPU has angled ammo-boxes and ZSU has vertical ammo boxes)
It's a ZSU-23-4, horizontally cut in half. So you may call it a "ZSU-23-2" (Note, nobody manufactures "ZSU-23-2". What was manufactured is the ZU-23-2. The ZSU-23-2 is "manufactured" by taking the gunnery system from a Shilka, and horizontally slicing the system in two).
Patches, you are getting confused because the ZU-23-2 has "wings" as you call it, but the "ZSU-23-2" does not.
But the best way to tell the difference between the "ZSU-23-2" and the ZU-23-2 is that the ZSU has cooling pipes for the barrels, while the ZU does not.
africaken: the war in yemen is just showing how ill trained and will to fight the saudis and gulf countries are even with the latest and sophisticated weapons they possess.just look at what UAE has deployed !UAE Pantsir-S1
The Houthi/Saleh coalition in Yemen has (or had) access to MiGs and the pilots to fly them
Nice state house photo: here comes the real Commander-in-Chief. You can sense their apprehension.
Henry120: -President and the Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the Federal Republic of Nigerian in a crucial meeting with Service chiefs in the State House.
patches689: Has it ever occured to you that you can hit normal targets... but from complete safety?
If you have 30km range arty, you place your guns maybe 15km behind the front and they fire on targets called out by spotters/drones/recon.
But, with 70 km arty you can place your guns 55km behind your lines, in complete safety, and closer to your logistical hubs... where they hit the same targets as normal guns.
It also allows you to strike deeper behind enemy lines, at command posts, bottle-necks (bridges/cross-roads) which you would otherwise not be able to hit - here you are firing at grid refrences or GPS co-ords, independent of the needs of front line spotters. This is saturation fire.
Long range guns also allow you the ability of TOT - whereby one gun can land 3-4 shells on the same target at the same time. Adding a massive shock effect to their gunnery. (Meaning you can get the fire-power of four batterys out of one single battery)
Proof is in the pudding, the PzH2000 and Ceasar are all pushing the envelope when it comes to long range artillery.
Finally, you are unable to tell the difference between different doctrinal uses of artillery, NATO is focusing on regimental artillery at the moment, long range guns that South Africa has developed are more applicable at the Battle-Group/Division or Corps Level which is more relevant to maneuver warfare as apposed to NATO's current focus on Nodal warfare.
That's what you would expect from a US news network:Nigerian Navy special forces, "Trained by the Brits and the Danes" but "model after the US Navy SEALs"
frumentius: Re the MGs secured on slings across the door-way, I understand the exigencies of war, but you chaps have excellent engineers who'd jig up stabilisers on your choppers in no time. Something simple, like this:
The Nigerian Air Force has not yet committed the Super Pumas to the combat support role. That's why the Nigerian Army should have it's own air wing.
The Soviet union fell behind the west in weapons development programmes.
just look at stealth technology the west is about to field another stealthy aircraft while Russia is still struggling.
But not in all fields is the west ahead or have better systems. An example would be multiple rocket launchers.
No western MRL systems can match the Smerch and the Tornado MRLs.
Yea, the west is behind in some areas and the east is behind is others.
Regarding stealth technology. I believe it's overrated.
A slight shift in radar wavelength technology, or radar system deployment topology, and all the 100s of billions of dollars invested in stealth will be negated.
Did you know it was a Russian scientist that discovered the fundamental physics behind the type of stealth that was used in the F-117?
Also, the Su-27 airframe is the best airframe in the world, bar none.
Patchesagain: The performance of Western v Eastern equipment in Yom Kippur, Iraq 1 and 2 as well as the wars between India and Pakistan show that as a rule of thumb, western equipment is better.
I disagree.
The US victory in Iraq 1 was about preparation, planning, leadership, training and flexibility (in that order)
The Soviet SA-6 and the Sagged anti-tank missile did exceptionally well during the Yom Kippur war
Iraq 2 was just about beating a dead horse
India-Pakistan wars does nothing to bolster western equipment. Both sides use a mix. The P-15 Termit anti-ship missile did excellent work against ships in and around Karachi port during the Bangladeshi war of independence.
So which is better? NONE. It's all about the people.