₦airaland Forum

obadiah777: HAPPENED BEFORE CHRIST WAS BORN. SATAN WAS GIVEN POWER WHEN ISRAEL WAS PUT IN THEIR SECOND DEATH. THIS IS BEFORE CHRIST WAS BORN. THIS IS WHY SCRIPTURE SAYS THE WOMAN WAS WROUGHT WITH CHILD-BIRTH PAINS WHEN SHE WAS PREGNANT WITH CHRIST. THE WOMAN IS ISRAEL AND THE CHILD BIRTH PAINS WAS THE AFFLICTION OF SECOND DEATH. SO YOUR QUESTION IS MUTE BASED ON THE FACT THAT THIS HAPPENED BEFORE JESUS. SO JESUS DID NOT GIVE SATAN POWER TO TAKE PEACE AWAY FROM THE EARTH. GOD DID. PEACE WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM THE EARTH BEFORE CHRIST WAS BORN

obadiah, i'm offended. No question is mute as far as i'm concerned.

Why d sudden swap? Didn't have d patience to read d other...y in d haven didn't it end well?

@mynd, later
@comrade greed-ie, no fall my hands...

[quote author=Mynd_44]C'est formidable de savoir[/quote]oui, c'est bon

[quote author=Mynd_44]Vous parlez français aussi? Agréable[/quote]oui, je parle peu

[quote author=gree-die] lady, im a mixed breed, not fully nigerian, not a foreigner either, so its NIJA to me....

shoulda simply written its.naija, not ninja.. d whole foreigner ninja speech spoit ur perfect smart reply
not knowing that gives you dead away for miles

anyways atmc is ur competitor. wen im ready, there won't be any competitor [/quote]i forgive you cos you said dt under pressure...once again babe, let's go there

firestar: Oui, c'est tres grave.

je suis enchanter de vous de connaitre

[quote author=Mynd_44]So ATMC, how's it going?[/quote]same

[quote author=gree-die]I DONT SHARE!! [/quote]

[quote author=gree-die]babes, Something is wrong with the later o.. i cant allow it and you know i don't fight fair . i ll destroy any opposition,[/quote]sugie, relax, let's go there, i'm indestructible, ok?

lalaosky: gree-die, i told you this in time...atmc loves crazyily...prepare to loose mynd unless you show her who's is the madam of the house

i'll pretend i didn't see this...

[quote author=gree-die]honey, you know u are the only lady i love here, so i ll let you have him for this month.. but next month, he ll be mine, mine alone.... and no one, not you, not anyone can stop dat...i hope you win and have a lil taste.of my ffavorite candy [/quote]babes nothing's wrong with having him now and later...

[quote author=gree-die]i will woo you ................ next month. and woe betide my competitor
[/quote]i am your competitor.
Mynd, y u acting like you didn't see my post

With respect to your post no. 1, i thought jesus said my peace i leave with you, how come he's given satan power to take away peace from d world, when and how did it happen?

I want to woo mynd...

We are saying d same thing in different ways...attraction is not completely ephemeral. Attraction is not just beauty, character can be d attraction. Meanwhile how do you start a relationship without being attracted to d person? There must be a kickstart, it can be intrisic or external: intelligence or beauty.
By sterner stuff, you mean?
Comparing our fathers to us is not ideal because no two generations are d same otherwise there's no progress. So long as change remains permanent, every generation must experience it.
I agree dt love is a decision,(choice), it also has a relationship with feeling in dt it expresses itself via feeling. D root of abuse is ignorance. D solution to marital issues is getting d mind tutored...by the way i aint pe'ra

pak: I am giving you a mental round of applause for this statement. You actually don't know how brilliant this assertion is but surely one of the most impressive sentences I've read in my long years on NL.
Infact, let me stretch it a bit . . . that's one of the truest statements since Peter called Jesus the Son of God.
The first time I heard this was from a very intellectual and kinda spiritual 'somebody', you'r the second. BRILLIANT !!!


not necessarily, not neccessarily there are can be so many scenarios that might have a lot of different ways of resolving them. And by the way, is there a yardstick for determining wrong and right beginnings for marriage ?? (Note: the couple that just celebrated 80 yrs of marriage got hooked when they were 17 and 21 respectively, they ran away from home to stay together - in this age that would be seen as a foolish decision based on infatuation by immature young ppl a.k.a. wrong foundation but guess what ? they lasted 80 years)



I concur

d basis of attraction in a marriage is what will determine its longevity u know...so if two people are attracted to each other, they are d only ones dt know d exact thing dt struck their fancy! And dt becomes their base/foundation, so if it be not strong, then when d wind of life blows, it shall surely fall and with its fall comes abuse of all kinds, methinks...going by ur example, maybe d basis of their attraction was right but people around didn't think so...hence d 'lastingness'

pcwhiz: Geee! Una don turn d thread to warzone!

dt's what's so funny!

^lol

pak: I am giving you a mental round of applause for this statement. You actually don't know how brilliant this assertion is but surely one of the most impressive sentences I've read in my long years on NL.
Infact, let me stretch it a bit . . . that's one of the truest statements since Peter called Jesus the Son of God.
The first time I heard this was from a very intellectual and kinda spiritual 'somebody', you'r the second. BRILLIANT !!!


not necessarily, not neccessarily there are can be so many scenarios that might have a lot of different ways of resolving them. And by the way, is there a yardstick for determining wrong and right beginnings for marriage ?? (Note: the couple that just celebrated 80 yrs of marriage got hooked when they were 17 and 21 respectively, they ran away from home to stay together - in this age that would be seen as a foolish decision based on infatuation by immature young ppl a.k.a. wrong foundation but guess what ? they lasted 80 years)



I concur

i'll reply you later, opening this thread and having ur comment jump at me left me blushing...i'll reply your second comment later.

^ and ^^^lol

sexkillz: [color=#000030]Just beats the imagination. . . If he doesn't know where she is from 24 hours to tying the knot, that's just inexcusably dumb!
[/color]

but he has a point, some people can fake their identity. In this our world eh, anything fit happen u know.

Vows are cultural. If you say vows are religious, i might as well remind you dt religion is a form of culture. Moreover, vow like i said before has no standard in relation to what is being said, now not in how long d union is to last. If a marriage is wrong from d begining then d two might as well separate after it dawns on them.whether they'll marry afterwards is dependent on them and other factors but its better to remain single and be fulfilled than to be trapped in a marriage dt is not contributing towards ur living a fulfilled life. Its a pity some people are ruined by marriage.

^you both are birds of a feather!

^How do you mean, you wont know where she's from until few days to ur wedding, how's dt possible@acidosis

Explain luke 16 to me. Someone told me d other day dt its d use to which money is put dt makes it unrighteous and not how its got...he referred me to luke 16 but i didn't seem to grasp it, what do you have to say about luke 16, d story about d unfaithful steward?

[quote author=D-Explorer]ATMC, attend to this dude. He needs wrist massage [/quote]married asses don't tickle my fancy

If i get to know he's gay. I can't afford to share him, he had to stick with one of us and sticking with me may be a little difficult for him so i'll save him d trouble and leave.

Nice topic, my take is this, i think god's concern is one doing his will and living to fulfill his or her purpose...now if a spouse is being abused in a marriage, d person should find out whether he/she is in god's will in d very first place. Again, in as much as god's word says god hates divorce, but wisdom remains a defence! So there's a time to quit d marriage if it be d only option especially when d union was wrong from d begining. Aside all these, its important for one to define what he/she refers to as abuse...a situation where one defies marital principles and gets punished for dt shouldn't warrant a cry and push for divorce rather, such should make amendments.
God's will for d abused partner is to seek solace in him and not to revenge but to love d partner unconditionally even while awaiting his judgement on dt spouse and trusting him to judge right...this is simple and difficult considering a lot of factors but dt's his will...it sometimes sounds foolish...
Talking about marriage vow, its cultural that is man-made. There's no laid down vow and dt's y it seemed to differ in various denominations.