₦airaland Forum

@ihedinobi, 2. We nominate among ourselves Religion posters of quality and integrity who can nominate threads of competitive quality
dont u think there would be an inclination towards partiality?

striktlymi: Threads? I am not sure the threads you are referring to.

Phase 2 panel stops working after the awards have been issued to the winners.

okay

i meant so far the threads are worthy in response to tracey's question. you get?

Ihedinobi: Threads? Where are they?

smh...ihe start from the begining, u dey fall hand o

i have issue with posting, when i do it says error and then tripple my post, aghotarom o

so far the threads are worthy...
btw@striktly, how long is it going to take this panel to be done?

obi alfa: you sef, you just jump into any organising committee or panel but only to answer present, and just follow without any form of original idea. Seeing the responsibility of the new panel, the least I can say is that the casting is disappointing. 5 clueless christians with only the leader that has an idea of what they want to do.

Instead of finding what type of a man alfa is, you are better off facing your current task seriously as your apostle paul told you people to diligently carry out your tasks. If you are not capable, do everyone a favour and resign.

SMH... this shows to an extent the kind of person you are, so if you are not in a panel then virtually the panel won't work lol... chai!
Talking about me jumping into every panel? *laughs* that's why Ayam here fun things! duh! Alfa hit ur head on the wall, AMEN!
just look at how self-centered you are Alfa, when the panel before worked with you, you didn't realise you were pulling the string and they were doing the dance? chai! lol Buh it suddenly dawned on you this time that this atmc was 'awesome' as a team member, Alfa go and rest!
Don't quote me again but if you must *its ur choice anyway, who carez* pass d msg under my feet where u and ur master belong.

obi alfa: you sef, you just jump into any organising committee or panel but only to answer present, and just follow without any form of original idea. Seeing the responsibility of the new panel, the least I can say is that the casting is disappointing. 5 clueless christians with only the leader that has an idea of what they want to do.

Instead of finding what type of a man alfa is, you are better off facing your current task seriously as your apostle paul told you people to diligently carry out your tasks. If you are not capable, do everyone a favour and resign.

SMH... this shows to an extent the kind of person you are, so if you are not in a panel then virtually the panel won't work lol... chai!
Talking about me jumping into every panel? *laughs* that's why Ayam here fun things! duh! Alfa hit ur head on the wall, AMEN!
just look at how self-centered you are Alfa, when the panel before worked with you, you didn't realise you were pulling the string and they were doing the dance? chai! lol Buh it suddenly dawned on you this time that this atmc was 'awesome' as a team member, Alfa go and rest!
Don't quote me again but if you must *its ur choice anyway, who carez* pass d msg under my feet where u and ur master belong.

.

work's in progress already...what's mext?

work's in progress already.

ARareGem: We won! We won! We WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON! Screaming like a maniac! Eaglets WON!

***covers ears with finger*** girl, stop the noise!

thanks for ur help

better

obi alfa: that shows my observation.

no, it shew how warped and twisted ur mind was...just at the begining of the whole thing you have started making silly observation, smh as a man's thinking is so is he.

obi alfa: If you go to this thread, https://www.nairaland.com/1506209/end-year-awards-organisation-thread,
this is what you'll see:

https://www.seminolewatch.com/Images/PullingStrings.jpg

Stricktlymi pulling the strings and the other 4 dancing. Hilarious.

and look at ur life mr 'criticism'...btw why wont he pull the string? did any idea come from ur warped mind? silly!

i dont know whats wrong...i hope this msg is seen...

striktlymi: Okay, cool!



I have no ish if we decide to include some members of this section but I will only support that move if those nominated would forfeit the right to have their threads selected in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Also, I would suggest that we bring on board those members who have proven over time to be tolerant of the beliefs or disbelief of others because I wouldn't want a situation where good threads are relegated to the background because someone is of a different 'faith' or lack of 'faith'.

Onward...with the permission of the chairperson (ATMC) I ask that we make suggestions and agree on the criteria to be used in assessing any suggested thread. As I await the permission, I also ask that we liaise with mukina and the mods in order to get this 'FP reward' thingy on the way.

I have been trying to post since yesterday but I don't know what's wrong
Of course we'll employ the very objective ones in RS...but can the neutral parties nominate the threads of those from RS they are working with?

striktlymi: Why are you guys inactive?

something is wrong with the site...I couldn't post

striktlymi: Okay, cool!



I have no ish if we decide to include some members of this section but I will only support that move if those nominated would forfeit the right to have their threads selected in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Also, I would suggest that we bring on board those members who have proven over time to be tolerant of the beliefs or disbelief of others because I wouldn't want a situation where good threads are relegated to the background because someone is of a different 'faith' or lack of 'faith'.

Onward...with the permission of the chairperson (ATMC) I ask that we make suggestions and agree on the criteria to be used in assessing any suggested thread. As I await the permission, I also ask that we liaise with mukina and the mods in order to get this 'FP reward' thingy on the way.

I have been trying to post since yesterday but I don't know what's wrong
Of course we'll employ the very objective ones in RS...but can the neutral parties nominate the threads of those from RS they are working with?

striktlymi: Okay, cool!



I have no ish if we decide to include some members of this section but I will only support that move if those nominated would forfeit the right to have their threads selected in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Also, I would suggest that we bring on board those members who have proven over time to be tolerant of the beliefs or disbelief of others because I wouldn't want a situation where good threads are relegated to the background because someone is of a different 'faith' or lack of 'faith'.

Onward...with the permission of the chairperson (ATMC) I ask that we make suggestions and agree on the criteria to be used in assessing any suggested thread. As I await the permission, I also ask that we liaise with mukina and the mods in order to get this 'FP reward' thingy on the way.

I have been trying to post since yesterday but I don't know what's wrong
Of course we'll employ the very objective ones in RS...but can the neutral parties nominate the threads of those from RS they are working with?

considering that the award is with respect to 2013, let's go with 2013 threads.

There are some respectable religion section regulars too who can help with the thread selection so may be they can work with the neutral party.

ARareGem: Babes My day wents well. It's my evening that someone was trying to spoil, but God pass them!

Lovely night rest to y'all.

you pass dem too

striktlymi: Like I have mentioned before, I believe the work is greatest in the two earlier mentioned items. My suggestion which is subject to the ratification of every member here are:

ITEM 1D

1) We set the criteria for selecting threads which we believe can compete for the thread of the year award. The criteria should be all inclusive and such that they are not geared towards favouring any particular group. For example, some of the criteria for selecting a thread may include:

a) Societal relevance.
b) Content.
c) FP appeal.
d) When the thread was opened. It must have been created in the year under consideration i.e 2013
e) Etc.

by front page appeal, you mean? what about a thread dt was created in 2012 but had a good content, of societal relevance but made front page in 2013? will such thread be disqualified cos of 'd'

2) Create a thread where everyone in the section is free to suggest any thread they think might meet the set criteria. Members are also allowed to help find such threads. Each thread is reviewed by us daily and we select threads for nomination based on the set criteria.

3) The selected threads, which may be upto 10, as the case may be are put up for nomination by members where the top 3 nominated threads get to be voted on during the election in order to arrive at the thread of the year.

OK.