₦airaland Forum

Chimerase: assssssnal BE OUR WIFE....wifing assssnal since 1909

loling

aieromon: Ryo out

Ozil in and about to be injured

aieromon: Ryo out

Ozil in and about to be injured

jesutofunmi13: ds is not really a true test cos chelsea used team B. imagine Essien captaining chelsea team..

if arsenal cant beat a team captained by essien den wat r u nt telling me...

For ur info u can restore ur whatsap contacts, recent chats, and block any number u dnt want... U cnt re store recent conversation on bbm na abi i lie?

If nt wale no one else o... #teamwalenoni

Wen something is costly dem go talk, if e cheap dem go stl talk. No wonder assu no won com cheap...

jhidey08: dis one na m-u-m-u o, u dey watch football at all? ''some coaches in Africa may nt av heard abt Mikel or Moses'', we're nt tlking abt d coaches in ur village here o, so tel me hw coaches won't knw players dat play 4 chelsea. U don eat dis nyt at all? Pls try and find sumtin to eat cos u're mentally derailed. Shut up if u dunno wot to comment, must u comment?? Dindinrin oponu oshi, ode!!

lol

Blues al d way

Could you even believe dat a woman dt is childless for just 2yrs is tired

I don tire 4 al ds ppl

i guess your husband wl b saying "wat a relief"

Ashley out torres in

Stl everton 1-0 chelsea

Mata off oscar in, shurle out lampard in

[quote author=Omo_Alata]Both[/quote]are dey both working?

[quote author=Omo_Alata]I will take decision if it is urgent[/quote]who makes decision when money isn't on ground?

I am suprised dt it is even women dat are talking against women workin... What then is the work of the feminists of ds world?

When ur husband is not around u can't take some decisions, isnt dt burden?

As for me, i dont see a reason why God in his infinite mercy provide a ma a good job and d wife wl nt take advantage of it and set herself up even if no white collar... Working or going to ur supermarket for 6hrs wl do no woman any harm but u wl even have enough time to spend wit ur lads. Ur husband will even be proud to have you cos you will not become a burden..

modele2: First point of correction being a house wife is more challenging and difficult than being a working woman. Primariy because its a thankless stressful job without monetary rewards.

Second it depends on your value system. Stay at home mums invariably have time to take better care of the kids and the home. The children at a particular age crave just for mummys presence and the stability of having her around. I know a banker who hardly sees her kids cooks only weekends and is highly strung out. The children learn from their house help, thankfully in her own case she has a good one.

Third the only solid point (from my view) is in case the breadwinner dies, so a woman should at least have some skill and some knowledge of the business world incase....

All in all, i think men who drive on this are just plain lazy and looking for who to feed them. if ur lucky enough that your spouse is working always revaluate your self and remember that it is a pure bonus and should not be relied on or make the man lazy.

Thank u, u got it all, and u left no stone on turnd, some ppl here v been so selfish dealing with d topic.

byvan: @ younggirl,dont bother yourself,these posters are obviously single because if they aren't,they would ve known that no woman stays home to watch TV.The married ones knows what a housewife's daily life is like and know is not easy to handle what women handle at home on daily basis. Swapping roles is something that they can't even survive

Madam, am not saying what d women r doing at home is easy, there are works women can do that they wl stl v time for d upbringing of d child/children as d case may b. I dont think u even read all i said. U cn b full ouse wife, but wat wl b of u wen d unthinkabl happens? Its not abt married or unmarried, jst let us have ur opinion, it might save a family u neva knw

younggirl: SMH! @OP, is that Ur defination of a housewife? A woman who sits at home and watches TV while d husband works to put food on d table Wow! I kind of get pissed with this kind of mindset, a woman who sweeps ur house,cook for u,washes ur clothes,takes care of ur children,do d dishes etc,yet u refer to her as one who just sits at home nd watch tv while u work? Why not swap roles then? Why do some men treat women like trash? What then is d essence of marriage? If d woman is working,u still expect her to return from work nd do d above mentioned,if she is not working,u accuse her of sitting down at home nd watching tv, so who takes care of d kids while u are away? Abi dat one no be work? Yet she will still warm ur bed? If u are worried she's a housewife,y not open a business for her? If u have children,have u ever appreciated her for all d efforts she puts in taking care of them? Is it all about money? Then y did u marry her?? If she's working fine,but if she is not,still appreciate her because she is working at home nd saving d money u wud have used to buy food,dryclean ur clothes,pay for daycare,pay househelp etc.

Ahh!!! Women don suffer!

Pls u nid to go tru d topic very well, i said i will nt watch my wife sit at home. U made mention of setting her up atleast that will keep her up and doing and even with that she can take care of d family. So you have made ur point. I have not specified any job, job na job, but there must be something she will rely on out of d man.

Though its pleasurable for a woman to b in d ouse 24/7 jst watching tv, sleeping and jst eating while d man labours. But seriously, I can't and will neva b d type of man dat wl watch my woman sleep, eat and watch screens on d basis dat i love my woman and i want to take good care and full responsibility of her. Now adays, d growth of d family depends on d income generated by both d man and woman, division of labour btw d two parties is paramount. In d case of d full ouse wife wen d man is financially down d woman is definitely dowm financially. But if it is d case dat d man and the woman works dey cant b down at d same time. If the two parties r working it also elps to fulfil d needs of d children... Tell me, what will happen in a family where only the man works while d woman sits at home everyday to just welcom d man from work and suddenly death comes knocking at door? It will take a longer time for such woman to recover. Ok, lets say d man has left fortunes and unfortunately d family of d man step on al d fortunes, wat wl b of such woman and her children? But in d case of the woman that works so as to supplement d effort of d man, such woman wil nt find it difficult to rise if anything happens to d man. To me, my wife will not b a stay-at-home type.
Pls wat do you think abt ds issue?

But seriously, i dont think i can just allow my wife to b a house sitter 24/7... To build a solid family ds days d man and d woman must work so dat wen one of d two parties is down d second wl b up and doing pending d time d oda wl rise again, and i wouldnt want my woman to depend on me always, it wl also elp d children... Dats my opinion...

I was also shocked wen i watched dat sist linder tin. I told d ppl around me dat if wat dt sist is saying is d case den no one wl enter d kingdom of God, my own God is not wicked, only grace wl save us.

Less i 4gt
Name: bamisepeters
course: philosophy
Univ: OOU
Level: 400

Fynestboi: Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
One of the most far-reaching consequences of the rationalism of the Enlightenment was the undermining of basic Christian faith among the educated classes. The effect was unintended because the project of many Enlightenment philosophers was to prove the existence of God using reason: Descartes and Leibniz assumed that God's existence could be rationally proved, indeed Godwas a necessary part of their philosophy.
There are many traditional"proofs" for the existence of God, and we will look at threeof them: The argument from design, the ontological argument and the cosmological argument.

d existence of God is a metaphysical issue which varies from one philosopher to another. Saying that because some1 said philosophers dont blive in d existence of God does not mean dat philosophers don hold d existence of God valid. For me all i know concerning this is dat once there r so many organs in human body dat cant b seen but there function(s) r observed i wl say God does exist. If u blive in what some other people say witout verification then u v committed fallacy.

Oh my God, if there is biscuit competition and it is spicy that will b used, i will rep naija.