₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
Like any evidence provided would convince you, lol.

We've been proving it to you for years basilico, but your qanon paddled brain does not let you see past bamboo in the kraken.

budaatum:
If I were new here this your kraken might fly, but we thankfully state who nominated the judges hearing the numerous cases involving dump and the majority of them seem to be republican nominated and he still lost including all cases involving him that he got before the conservative majority Supreme Court.

budaatum:
We see the junk you fill your mind with.

budaatum:
It would have been my line of thought if that someone had not tried to get his case before a judge he appointed but woefully failed as usual.

budaatum:
I bought this for you basilico,so you can see what we think of you and your master kraken.


The Washington Post: Analysis | Trump presented his Russia hoax theory to a court. It went poorly..
https://wapo.st/3eGbwAI

budaatum:
I bought this for you basilico,so you can see what we think of you and your master kraken.


The Washington Post: Analysis | Trump presented his Russia hoax theory to a court. It went poorly..
https://wapo.st/3eGbwAI

Obrigardo:
Exactly!

You get it now 100%. How he continues to live with that hate daily is shocking.

budaatum:
Basilico. None of them are correct there, and evidence has been presented to you numerous times to show you this, but the maga in you can not allow you to refuse dump's koolaid and face the truth, which is why sensible people here don't waste too much time on your kraken.

budaatum:
Maga Q Bamboo in Basilico's Kraken

feedthenation:
---None of the 3 Supreme Court Judges Trump appointed gave him any favourable ruling for his numerous election petitions---

budaatum:
Basilico! What in the above implies China's dominance?

Whom did China dominate?

does the above

feedthenation:
---Trump needs better legal team---

Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against Clinton, DNC, officials involved in Russia probe

A federal judge dismissed former President Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and a number of other high-profile figures involved in creating the narrative that he and his 2016 presidential campaign were colluding with Russia.
This week, U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks threw out the lawsuit, saying that "most of" Trump’s claims were "unsupported by any legal authority" and said the lawsuit lacks "substance.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-dismisses-trump-lawsuit-against-clinton-dnc-officials-involved-in-russia-probe

budaatum:
Where did China have dominance a thousand years ago, bas?

benalvino3:
Nato is provocating we know, Ukraine should have played their game carefully. they have to fight for their will now. Nato is not taking arms with them as usual.

budaatum:
You keep digging deeper in the pit of stupidity.

Have you not heard that the oyinbo who made pencil made eraser? It stems from agreements Europeans signed with African chiefs to steal their African land. Some of those land acquisition agreements were blank pieces of paper that were filled in after the chiefs had thumprinted. The oyinbo just had to make them understand. Most Africans learn this simple pencil eraser relationship so the mistake is not repeated and we find ourselves back in chains.

Basilico, written agreements can be rewritten, so what makes you think an unwritten agreement is binding because it is "understood"?

And that's apart from the lack of written detail that you claim is "understood".

Forgive me. I have wasted enough time on you today and will be taking the advise below.

benalvino3:
The west and you Buda and your fellow Cronnies here are more like a dictator. you tend to want to silence dissenting words.

Accusing the west of provocation does not mean hate for the west.

As I said, if they are not willing to send their soldiers to fight and die, They should not be provocating. I will also tell Basilico that Russia does not have the right to dictate to any nation. If they want to Dictate, they will have to fight for it which they are doing. Ukraine too has to fight for the freedom to join Nato which they are doing.

But the West should not put fuel to the Situation by enticing Ukraine to Join them if they are not going to pick up weapons and actually help Ukraine Join them.

The proxy wars they are fighting is not enough

budaatum:
Since you seem to trust this source, perhaps you'd trust them on how sanctions are affecting Russia.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLyUeKa2jzY

Obrigardo:
You expect me to waste my time on you. When I give you links with reports, you'll say it's planted lol

You've seen the reports and you already know. So get lost

budaatum:
Which is why any agreement between Beijing and Washington can easily be ripped up if the need arises.

budaatum:
You speak as if I support the antagonisation of Russia, which I don't. Ukraine however, is a sovereign nation that elected a president which Russia did not like and deposed and installed their own person in Ukraine who then got voted out for a person whom the people wanted. If they then choose then to join NATO, that is their sovereign democratic right and choice which Russia has not legal right to oppose.

If the burglar is my neighbour, they must already rent or own property near to mine, so I'd be shutting the gate after the horse has bolted if I'm objecting after they become my neighbour. That said, if the landlord who owns the neighbouring property wants to rent it to my neighbour who is a burglar, I have no right opposing either of them. I can of course rent the house myself, paying more than my neighbour who is a burglar wants to rent it for to keep my neighbour who is a burglar out, but god help me if my neighbour who is a burglar offers much more because they are competent at their burglary profession or if the landlord of the neighbouring house is a member of the same gang as my neighbour who is a burglar, though you need to wonder what I be doing living in my property and renting the neighbouring property too.

budaatum:
Basilico! Written agreements are rewritten, so why would you expect an unwritten agreement to be cast in stone unless you are naive?

budaatum:
Basilico! Written agreements are rewritten, so why would you expect an unwritten agreement to be cast in stone unless you are naive?

budaatum:
Glad to see you at least disagree with basilico who thinks Russia should dictate to Ukraine and Europe.

saxywale2:
Steve Bannon is in custody. He is charged in NY with two counts of money laundering, three counts of conspiracy & one count of scheming to defraud.

budaatum:
It's called democracy, Bas. If people chose to not support Ukraine (Czech Republic springs to mind), the people can vote for leaders who oppose supporting Ukraine. Just that not everyone is self-centred like you are. Some will make sacrifices for the good of others,

budaatum:
I don't think you know what you are talking about, as usual. If you were Russian and you had to sell your football team and had your yacht and bank accounts impounded and can't play tennis or drive a Formula 1 car or travel where you used to etc, I'm sure you change your tune.

And China is not a bigger threat unless you believe you must remain the only superpower or if you ignore the economic quagmire China currently find itself in, which, when it comes to the fore, you'd be here gloating at what you'd call China's demise.

benalvino3:
We all believe what we want, don't we?

the sanctions to cripple Russia did not work. the fact they are calling for more sanctions shows the prior ones failed to deter Russia. Hopefully, they can get it right. Ukraine is in a stalemate with Russia. The US is bleeding billions every month and Russia is bleeding millions every month. at the end of the day, china which is a bigger threat is rising.

obixcel:
What haven't we seen for the past 4-6 yrs. They claim Trump was racist, they said he was a "foreign agent" in the White house - a Putin asset, they claimed He was an illegitimate President and stole the election via Collusion with Russia (Putin) etc I can go on and on - we all know the story.

The issue with the Russia-Ukraine War is that the Establishment Republicans and Democrats are milking it while they can, churning out Billions of Dollars and sending them to Ukraine. Of course they get huge kick backs, cash backs, call it whatever. They are enriching themselves while virtue signalling like they are doing some righteous thing or being on the right side of history in their support for Ukraine. The whole thing is deception.

obixcel:
Trump has never and will never start or give the war machines any war they'd love to get into. He promised "Peace through Strength", strengthened the military like never before. But he only used the American military strength as a deterrence to American enemies. When you add to the fact that even Putin couldn't read Trump cos of his unpredictable nature. Trump was able to keep America from needless war - the very first to do so despite Democrats' fear mongering that Trump would go to war. The opposite was the case.

The reason why they are afraid of Trump is the same reason they were afraid of him running for Office in 2016. That hasn't changed. It's because Trump is not like them - the typical Establishment Politicians (whether it's Dems. Or Republicans), Trump would refuse to be controlled by them, and he's not a globalist.