feedthenation: ---MAGAs began to leave the Wildwood, NJ rally while Trump was still speaking!. They couldn’t take it anymore---
WOW! Trump supporters began to LEAVE Trump’s speech in New Jersey while he was still speaking! Even they couldn’t take it anymore! This rally was a massive failure and a total waste of money by Trump’s campaign. pic.twitter.com/UHxbUuh66k
Obrigardo: You are truly not an intelligent person. You are dumb as a rock. Stormy is one of the prosecution witness highlight, as she links AMI pecker to karen to Cohen and criminal trump and back again. Cohen went to jail coz of her, lol. So it's pertinent to hear her testimony about criminal trumps interference scheme. Maga cultists literally suspend their brain functions 🤣😭😭😅😂😭😅
— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) May 11, 2024
Bill Maher doesnt buy Stormy's new story.
Listening to that and then listen to what she says after that, and then we're going to talk about the trial because it's quite in variants of what she said to me in 2018."
MAHER: Okay, you say it's not a MeToo case,
STORMY: It is not a MeToo case. I mean, I wasn't assaulted. I wasn't attacked, or raped, coerced or blackmailed. They tried to shove me in the MeToo to box it for their own agenda. And first of all, I didn't want any part of that because it's not the truth, and I'm not a victim in that regard.
My own is why was she a witness when she has not relevance?
wirinet: That's what MAGA members would never understand. Since Trump and his defense insist that no sex took place, it became imperative for the prosecution to prove that sex indeed took place. And to prove sex did take place, stormy Daniel would need to provide the circumstances that led to the sex and even details of the sex itself. I was even expecting her to give us the exact shape and size of his Dìck.
The defense played into the hands of the prosecution.
hahaha
if you are a porn star blackmailing trump or extorting trump you will receive the key to the city
ijebosb: Technically, they didn't need Stormy to testify, but the Prosecution has a good case why her Testimony was necessary. It was a good decision.
1.) Trump's attorney's made a tactical mistake. In opening statements, they argued that Stormy was lying about having sex with Trump. Because they did that, it allowed the Prosecution to go into further details/description of what happened to rehab their witness and prove she wasn't lying. Trump's attorneys could have easily stipulated that they did have Sex and left it there and the Judge wouldn't have agreed to further details coming out. I think the decision was borne of both not having a defense and Trump probably telling them to attack Stormy. He was worried more about the political optics of admitting he slept with a Porn Star while his wife was pregnant than the court case. And it hurt him.
2.) Trump has claimed he didn't know about the payment to Stormy and at the same time if the payment was made it was made for Personal reasons not Political reasons. So, by Stormy telling her story, it allowed the Jury to understand why Trump was so concerned about letting the story come out weeks before the election. Look at the uproar it's caused now.. imagine if it was right after the "pussy grabber" tape was released. So, her details bolstered their case - He paid her off to hide it for political reasons.
finally, this cretin gets it. this is not his take initially
wirinet: Why did Trump pay the hush money since he kept insisting he never has sex with the woman? And why was the documents falsified to cover up the payments.
I know Trump is your role model. I would never let someone that holds trump as a role model near my daughter or even any member of my family.
this is irrelevant to the case. how many times will I tell you? trump is not disputing he paid Hush money. Can you be open-minded for a second at least? She signed a document that she and Trump never had sex. but this is irrelevant to the case. what sex position she did is irrelevant
wirinet: You seem to be very hateful person, you just hate for no reason. Prince Harry was never stripped of his royal duties, he took permission from Queen Elizabeth II that he wants to quit working as a royal, because he was tired of the intense scrutiny of his private life and the intense criticism of his wife by the British press, and the hostility from other members of the Royal family, and also because he want to relocate to the US with his wife to live a quiet life.
Whenever he travels back to the UK, he is still treated as a royal.
He travelled to the UK three days ago for a thanksgiving service for the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games and he was well received by the London crowd.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIkAtCpJty8?si=YBj7z-HoW41hG0H1 Harry's problems are with the British press and the Royal family. Their main grouse is him marrying a divorced black American. This reminded the Royal family of the scandal their great uncle King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne in 1939 to marry an American divorcee. I don't think the British royal family has not gotten over that trauma.
He was well-received by the London crowd? it is like telling me the sun is hot.
Harry was more popular in the royal family and had a good relationship with his brother and sister-in-law until he married his devil wife. Have you read his book where he revealed he is Jealous of his elder brother being the heir to the throne?
Topman7: When the Ooni of Ife travels to Brazil to see his people, what country is he representing?
You sound like you have been living under the rock. He has been stripped off his royal duties. In fact, he rejected it. He is here for the camera but you choose to live under a rock.
Prince Harry was indeed stripped of his royal duties. Buckingham Palace confirmed that he would lose his military titles, including the coveted role of Captain General of the Royal Marines1. Additionally, he and Meghan Markle were no longer formally representing the Queen, and they also dropped their HRH titles and ceased to receive public funds for royal duties The decision came after conversations between Harry and members of the Royal Family, almost a year after the duo initially stepped down from their royal duties3. It’s quite a significant change in their roles within the royal family
wirinet: In the case of Stormy Daniel (and Karen Mcdougal), it was important that the prosecution prove thar sex (consensual) did take place. Because Trump has been lying (as usual) that he never met that woman. If no sex took place, then it would be difficult convincing the jury that the women needed to be hushed in the first place. It then becomes an extortion or blackmail. So the prosecution need to provide the reason why the women needed to be hushed. Next they would then need to provide evidence of how the money was paid, and how it was covered up as campaign expenses. The only way Trump can escape is to feign ignorance. Saying he was not aware that the payments was for hushing up the women or that he was not aware that the accountant made the mistake of putting the money under campaign expenses.
How does proving sex have anything to do with the falsified document charge? The charge is not about hush money, trump is not disputing paying stormy. Please keep up. Must you feed on any BS as long as its against trump?
wirinet: We are not talking of a hypothetical case. In a hypothetical scenario, anything can happen. A nuclear bomb can be dropped and wipe out England or UK tomorrow. We are discussing reality on the ground right now.
So even if someone is born a prince, they can still stop being a prince right? So in other words, they can be stripped. That's is the point I am making.
wirinet: Trying to make Trump look bad? Trump does not look bad, he prides himself in being bad. He "grabs em by the pusay", he is liable for raping Eugene Carrol, he is being accused of by 2 dozen women of rape/sexual molestation , he bleeped a IndecentStar raw just a few weeks after his wife gave birth, he had a one year affair with Karen Mcdougal, a playboy model, less than one year after getting married to Melania.
That's old. Why bring that when it is not relevant to the case? If you are in a court for armed falsifying documents, how does a bathroom talk you had decades ago connect with it?
How does all this you mentioned connect with the document even if Eugene Carol did not actually prove he raped her according to the jury?
What evidence did she show to prove sexual assault? But again, how is that connected to this case?
wirinet: He is first an foremost a prince by virtue of being a son of the ruling monarch of England. Secondly, he is the Duke of Sussex a title conferred upon him by Queen Elizabeth II. He had not be stripped of that title. I was just reading on Quora that even the King does not have the powers to strip him off that title.
So even if he choose not to be a working royal, he is still treated as a Prince and the Duke of Sussex anywhere he travels to in the world.
The ruling monarch can be stripped, abolished or replaced. King seized being king and his family becomes ordinary citizens. The you will go from he is a prince to he was a prince. Whether he was born a prince will not matter anymore.
Who has the power to do that? In the UK, the parliament can make a constitutional change, a public referendum can change that too. So this your he was born a prince therefore he is a prince forever is highly too simplistic.
basilico: This phone call was played out in court.
You better settle this God damn story. Because if he loses this election, and he is going to lose, if he loses this election we lose all fucking leverage this case is worth zero. And if that happens, I'm going to sue you because you lost this opportunity," said Stormy's lawyer Keith Davidson to Trump's then-fixer Michael Cohen, who then badly advised Trump to pay the extortion money.
This clearly shows Stormy Daniel and her lawyer were extorting Trump. Her lawyer has a history of settling such pay demands.He was involved in another case where Trump paid off McDougal and also on Hulk Hogan sex tape that bankrupted a tabloid.
Her testimony was irrelevant to the case. They are just trying to make trump look bad. The defence brought this and the partisan judge still brought her in. Her testimony or cross examination was a disaster to the prosecution but we are in New York.
At the end of the day trump will appeal. This is just to keep him from campaigning.
Last time they asked the biggest disappointment this season and I said arsenal. People no understand. Man city acts like a weak old man in the middle of the season and finishes with a bang. Arsenal will always give you hope at the start and mess everything up at the end.
wirinet: Same thing I was saying, Titles can be stripped, but with or without a title, the son of the king/queen is a prince.
Yeah, Harry is a prince of nothing and Nigeria likes wasting it's time.. This people want the clicks of cameras nothing else. Nigeria is subscribing to grifters.
wirinet: Yes, technically he can still be king. He is fifth in line to the throne. If anything should happen to king Charles, Prince William and his three children, he becomes automatically next in line unless of course he chooses to abdicate the throne then his sone Prince Archie becomes next in line.
Yes his title of Prince of Sussex can be stripped, but his title of Prince cannot be stripped. He was called Prince Harry the day he was born even before he was given prince of Sussex by Queen Elizabeth.
What's the point of a prince that cannot represent his kingdom? He does not have any official capacity. That's the important thing here.
Which is why Nigeria is wasting its time with a fake prince. He is a prince, but a prince of nothing. Not a prince of England, Sussex or the United States.
wirinet: Display some maturity and quit spewing insults on mundane issues. He did not become a prince, he was born a prince. He had been called a prince since the day he was born. He could be conferred with any other title the king chooses, but that cannot strip him of his princeship.
This is a simple Google search
Historically, royal titles have been removed through an act of parliament, as was the case in 1917 when King George V passed the Titles Deprivation Act to remove the British peerage titles of several German and Austrian royals during the First World War
wirinet: Display some maturity and quit spewing insults on mundane issues. He did not become a prince, he was born a prince. He had been called a prince since the day he was born. He could be conferred with any other title the king chooses, but that cannot strip him of his princeship.
He was born a prince, so he can be a king? He wasn't born a king right? Don't you think prince is a title and titles can be stripped? This is why I am asking for your common sense.
cococandy: Because Harry is your brother and you know him so well. That’s why you understand. Right?
And who says no one likes her? Just because the low self esteem people like you who worship an outdated monarchy want to swallow everything they say hook line and sinker doesn’t mean there’s aren’t people who see the truth for what it is.
So you may not like her, but anyone who has an ounce of brain and doesn’t think the monarchy is right because they’ve always been right, can think for themselves and I assure you, they don’t hate her like you’ve been brainwashed to.
Because Harry became a POS. It is clear for us to see. But people like you are not married, you are on Instagram trying to be popular. When you marry, I know your hubby family will scatter thanks to you.