₦airaland Forum

jazzydee:
History of buhari political ship jumping:
1).2003 and 2007 presidential candidate under the platform of ANPP.
2).2011 left ANPP and joined CPC and became presidential candidate for 2011 under the platform of CPC
3).2015 left/merged CPC to form APC and became presidential candidate for 2015 election.

Buhari is not an example of a committed party member he has jumped ship three times in his 13 yrs political history. He is not a yard stick nor a model of loyalty to any political party.

I will not be surprised if he joins a different party or forms a new alliance for the 2019 presidential election once the nascent union of strange bedfellows called APC disintegrate over the looming unchecked party chieftain egos that is already haunting the flickering union.

you see what impatience has caused you, you can't even read and comprehend before you type, the point is that he did not join PDP to win at all cost,but wait patiently outside a big monster party like PDP to nurture a strong partly that can contest with PDP strength for strength, so now out of all the party you listed which one is super big and can match PDP strength for strength until APC was formed, none ok, learn how to comprehend before your finger types faster than your brain.

truthispainful:
He was in Alake's Palace to see Oba Adedotun Gbadebo who he believed who help him. His meeting with The Alake may not yield result. Fayose, whose where about is sketchy but definitely not in Ekiti we are reliably informed that he, Gov. Fayose was in Abeokuta and had a delegation to see Oba Akiolu to persuade Tinubu.
Having been frustrated in his effort to see Olowu of Owu, Oba Adegboyega Dosunmu he approached President Olusegun Obasanjo's gate against all advice not to. He was politely informed that. Obj had traveled.
He requested to see "the man from Benue" as he shouted atop his voice. He meant Mr. Vitalise Itarse whose name he can not immediately remember.
Desperately and frustratingly he checked into Green Legacy Hotel under a different name.
The Obas we were told were warned to stair clear of the matter.
Meanwhile his Lagos entourage or emissaries have no good news for him. He departed for either Lagos or Ibadan. His complained angrily that I. G P is working with his enemies in Ekiti to destroy him. Lere Olayinka could not utter a word when contacted.
Fayose is really upset and ruffled.

Please Yorubas should help Ayodele Fayose beg Obasanjo. Omo kekere k'ole je eko koma fii ra enu.

you lied! Fayose will not beg obasanjo, provide proof here Or be silent forever

emiye:
Very dumb understanding of situation. If GEJ had won 70% of SW, and all other things being equal , he would have been reelected.

if Jonathan had sack jega that he appointed, that is the only way he could have won, but for Jonathan to allow his enemy jega opportunity to nail him, and also listening to differnt interpretation on who sack who, between him and jega, jonathan can't win.

Misleading topic. Judge refusing an innitial ex parte motion contained in a suit to stop a parliamentary proceeding(in the absence of the APC defendant's) does not translates to mean that court has turned down the entire suit filled by fayose to stop the impeachment proceedings, The court only wanted the defendant (APC lawmakers) to come and explain to court why they have to continue the impeachment process while there was a pending case in ekiti high court about speakership, so the APC lawmakers have to convince the abuja court, while the abuja court also have to respect the outcome of the earlier speakership suit pending in court. The abuja court can direct both parties to wait for the outcome of the pending speakership case(most likely) before the APC can continue their impeachment proceeding, and if the abuja high court grants the APC a go ahead in their impeachment bid, then fayose can appeal the judgement immediately and apply for 'stay of proceedings' on the impeachment bid, I am sure the remaining weeks left will exhausted by hanging the impeachment bid in court, April 16 is set for the APC to prove their case to the court on why they have to continue proceeding of impeachment, and not to hear the impeachment allegation proper, another set of panel will still be set up that will include ekiti chief judge, who will give the go ahead, meanwhile ekiti will witness the voting of new state house of assembly members on Saturday April 11th.

Dannyset:
Its all over!
All the plots were just to prevent him from contesting then. Now that he is their C in C, its either court no open that day, or make the Judge go on sabbatical. But all in all, those stuffs were just drama that has come to the end after the General's declaration as the winner of the election.
And besides, who go fund the case from now on? Jona don send all of them packing.

it all depend on the judge, its not a must for election matters to be decided before election...buhari's lawyer olanipekun pleads with the judge that it may lead to chaos, and to avert such it was adjourned to douse tension, but nothing changes as the plaintiff had prayed the court to 'direct inec to delete buhari's name if found to have committed perjury

pdppower:
It's not only Tinubu he must beg o, if he begs Tinubu and leaves out Obj, it is still the same thing o.

fayose will never beg tinubu, fake news

coolviv:
I have viewed all the responses here and all I can say is if everyone here has watched 'Sometimes in April' or 'Hotel Rwanda', we would all unanimously and in the strongest terms possible condemn these comments. No tribe has the monopoly of violence, therefore one should not encourage such outrageous comments with the believe that they are safe because they belong to a certain tribe. When a war begins, it has no family or friends, everyone loses one way or another.

Let everyone vote who they want and whoever emerges the winner then so be it, everyone else falls in line.

no, one oba feels otherwise, in fact I lived in Lagos, and some basterds like this oba akiolu says that Jonathan has no option than to surrender, they threaten violence trying to use Jonathan as a trigger, now they are left with no other option than to come out, and be disgrace, awn olodo.

ChinemeOkpan:
The Oba has a right to give instructions out to his subjects.

The Ndigbo community in Lagos are his subjects and he has spoken

Long live Oba of Lagos

yet Jonathan cannot sack jega that he appointed, even when jega used three months inside Maurice iwu's his predeceecors 5 years term, Jonathan cannot appoint his choice to election officer to oversee his election yet he obliged for peace sake, now who schemed war between Jonathan and the fake king pretending to be a democrat when he is an agbero by utterance and a disgrace, even oyekan adeyinka his predecessor got some maturity pass this mumu akiolu, no apology thieves

APC lied shamelessly by the pampers wearing liar Mohammed that 'PDP had procured a judgment' to disqualify their presidential candidate on Wednesday 25th March precisely, but justice ademola adjurn hearing till April 22nd before judgement' yet another lie' by idinjo

CharliParker:
THATS WHAT PDP HAVE BEEN USING TO DECEIVE PEOPLE FROM VOTING BUHARI
BUT CHANGE MUST PREVAIL


SAI BUHARI

I'm not even a PDP person but even buhari shy away from sharia manifesto to woo people, why has it become a bad market now?

Sharia implementation was a right of all Muslims, and was widely accepted on the introduction in zamfara in the year 1999/2000 kano state followed suit despite the fact that Nigeria is a circular country our Muslim brothers were adamant insisting that Muslim are the majority and so Christian s should not deprive Muslims of their right, imams, and other Muslim leaders continually preach sharia and elevated it over Nigeria constitution, a man who stole a farm product of less than N2000 had his wrist chopped off, but farouk lawan representing a constituency in kano wasn't tried under sharia law operating in his state, farouk can be said to be working in the federal govnt, that's just the flaw, in but shell sharia have failed to mab any rich and influential ones, and not seen as the perfect law that superceed our constitution, it became a bad market for campaigners

iamrealdeji:
Make researches before you comment huh,Buhari didn't divorce his wife because of anybody,the reason why he did so was because Babangida detained him for more than 2 years,his first wife was collecting money from the same Babangida,Buhari came back from jail,and became so angry because of what his wife did,and that led to their divorce,as for bringing up children properly to prevent them from going astray,you can never tell what your daughter is doing behind your back,you can't lock her up indoors,she'll surely go out,you'll think you give her all the training,but she'd be phucking guys around,as for the male child,if a male child feels he's starting to feel the urge,he has to go and marry and not fornicate,according to Islam

buhari's first wife was helpless when buhari was jailed and to treat their nagging daughter of sickle cell chronic disease she had to accept help from babangida's regime, I don't pray that anybody experience the pain of sickle cell babies, they cry from morning till night often heating up emotions. This is buharis daughter with sickle cell disease, there was no allegation that ibb was dating the woman, bit buhari was adamant and abandoned the woman and her sickle cell daughter to die both, even her first son was not alive again due to negligence from buhari, that is wickedness at its height.

bdidi:
Everyday na for the thief but one day na for the owner of the house!

gbam!

.

RaphaeloBurgess:
Get it clear. The case has been adjourned indefinitely. However, the case adjourned till tomorrow is the case of a Lagos Laywer who is seeking to join the case as a defendant. So the case is technically dead because the election would go as planned and GMB would win. The Principle of Event Overtaking would then apply later on.

TVC NEWS [ABUJA] - A Federal High court in Abuja on Tuesday resolved to hear pending applications from the defendants along with the substantive suit challenging General Muhammadu Buhari’s eligibility to contest Saturday’s Presidential election.

It is also to decide whether or not to grant leave to the parties seeking to be joined in the matter.

TVC News Joke Adisa reports that Buhari’s counsels led by Lateef Fagbemi had approached the court with two applications and insisting that those applications be heard and ruled upon before the commencement of the substantive suit.

The defence counsel is challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter in the first place while also insisting that his client was not properly served the originating summons.

But delivering ruling on the applications, Justice Adetokunbo Ademola held that both contending applications would be heard along with the substantive suit, though, no date has been fixed for it yet.

A new twist has however been added to the case as a Lagos-based lawyer, Ebun Olu-Adegboruwa and one other person are seeking to be joined as defendants citing their notable contributions to the growth of Nigeria’s democracy.

The court has however fixed Wednesday, 25 for ruling on the application for joinder.

Chike Okafor, a Nigerian dragged Buhari to court alleging among others that the former Head of State is not eligible to contest the Presidential election

reading your hastily put together comments above is laughable, 1, nothing like ebun olu adegboruwa,s application to join suit,which was not a part of application pending application before the court, the court had already decided the applications it will
Make pronouncement upon on 24th, how could a court decide on an application not mentioned even once on the 19th march? Court follows processes in their procedures and for you to say 'adjourn indefinitely in your own volition without the courts pronouncements speak s volume of your interest wait till tomorrow and hear the judgement. Its going to be shocking! With the way the proceedings went!

The nigerian army issued a letter made available to court below, that they are not with Buhari certificate.

.

ikwubaba:
Don't minese daft people all over NL. Case has not even started. The arguments is still on other technicalities. And there is no application of any interim injuctions here to stop him or inec. But these minions of corrupt politicians are already occuping the whole space. Better go plan your riggin strategy.
Even if the whole of SE/SS vote 100% for GEJ, it will be countered by votes from NW alone. GEJ is a toast already.

application of any interim injuctions here to stop him or inec...... what is this one talking about?

Raiders post=31945745:
I doubt you know how the judiciary work in Nigeria. This case is going to be decided after the elections because court cases are not rush like that in Nigeria

on what grounds 'must it be decided after the election sir? only the judge can chose to do that, but he is not bound not to disqualify before election, ok

Jesusloveyou:
rule on a case without providing evidence,i just de laugh.

which evidence are you talking about? evidences had since been filled by the plaintiffs(see images on below this pages) the court cannot be held to ransom by the defendants buhari and co, the judge had already granted abridgement of time within which defendants must file their responses and they have failed to do that, rather they wrongly refused to file their statement of reply to these statement of claims by the plaintiffs;

suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/14/2015 through an originating summons filed by his counsel, Mr Ade Okeaya-Inneh (SAN), joined Buhari and INEC as co-defendants.

Ozoaka’s counsel, Okeaya-Inneh, in the originating summons, is seeking among others


1,According to the plaintiff, Buhari’s filing and submission of INEC Form CF 001, without attaching evidence of educational qualifications as required, was an offence under Section 31 of the Act.

Therefore, he prayed the court to declare that Buhari is not eligible to participate in the 2015 presidential election for failure to comply with the terms for submission of list of candidates.

2,wheather the imformation given by buhari (1st defendant) in the prescribed inec form and submitted to the (inec) 3rd defendant for the 2015 presidential election does not contain falsehood, if yes whether Buhari (1st defendant) is thereby not disqualified from 2015 presidential election

the defendants Buhari and co have failed to provide evidences and reply to each statement of claims till the judge calls for ruling on the applications.

Rather than responding, Buhari and co are contesting 'order of substituted service' which they knew that it is only appeal court that they can contest that

as it stands, in todays ruling, we expect the judge to do the needful, example of such needfull can be cited here http://www.nigeria-law.org/Mohammed%20Mari%20Kida%20v%20A.D%20Ogunmola.htm

Mohammed Mari Kida.......Plaintiff/Appellant

And

A.D. Ogunmola.....Defendant/Respondent

''In his Ruling on the aforesaid Motion delivered on the 24/12/1996, the learned trial judge granted the plaintiffs prayer and entered judgment in default of defence against all the defendants''


''In his ruling on the matter delivered on 25/7/1997, the learned trial judge agreed with the plaintiff that the 2nd defendant was duly served with all the processes by substituted means ie by pasting the processes on the door of the last known place of abode of the 2nd defendant''

we expect the plaintiff to present application for judgment in default of defence against all the defendants (buhari) '' if the judge Ademola did not give judgement today We expect at least one adjournment

Front page please mods

Chronology of the Eligibility-suit which was originally filled in late january2015 and slated for mention/hearing on February 3rd

Orders granted in the suits so far

1, Justice Adeniyi Ademola had granted ex-parte orders permitting the plaintiffs in two separate suits challenging Buhari’s eligility, to serve him through newspaper publications.

2, The court also granted an order of abridgment of time within which the defendants must respond to the suits.

Buhari and Apc were adamant and refusing to aknowledge the orders, which shows they are heading for the consequencies of the judgement which will not help buhari in anywaywhatsoever, a sitting judge is a refferee and decides the proceedings in the court

February 3rd

When the matter came up on Monday Feb 3rd, the trial judge, Justice Ademola Adeniyi, granted Ozoaka’s(plaintiff counsel) request for substituted service on the APC presidential candidate before fixing Monday feb 9th for hearing of the case.

February 9th
http://thenewsnigeria.com.ng/2015/02/09/court-to-hear-suit-to-stop-buhari-23-february/

http://dailypost.ng/2015/02/09/disqualification-suit-apc-buhari-oppose-substituted-service/

Buhari/Apc/inec (defendants) acknowledged service via Friday 6th february newspaper publication, but disagrees with justice orders of service through newspapers substituted service, (an objection which can only be duly contested in ‘the court of appeal
)’

Buhari’s lead lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun, indicated to the court that in view of the addendum published by the plaintiff in the Newspapers in compliance with the orders of the court on substituted service of the court’s processes granted the plaintiffs, that the ‘service time’only started counting for the defence team last Friday( Friday 6th february ) and that they(defendants) are within time to file their processes before the court.
It is expected that the defendants should serve the plaintiffs ‘statement of defence’ or processes before the next adjournment of 24th February, however, the defendants Buhari/Apc/inec failed to serve the plaintiffs their replies and processes

Though, both Buhari and the APC had yet to file any papers in the suit, their lawyers– Chief Wole Olanipekun and Lateef Fagbemi, representing both the APC and Buhari, appealed to the court for an adjournment to enable them file all the necessary documents.


Fagbemi also asked the court to ‎set aside the order of abridgment of time within which the defendants must file their responses, saying that the urgency, upon which the order was given had been diminished with the postponement of the poll from February 14 to March 28.

24th february

http://tribune.com.ng/news/news-headlines/item/30342-court-slates-march-19-to-hear-buhari-s-eligibility-suits/30342-court-slates-march-19-to-hear-buhari-s-eligibility-suits

At the resumed hearing of the matter, on 24th February the plaintiffs’ counsel Chief Mike Ozekhome, told the court that he was willing to commence his argument in the matter, but could not as he had not been served with all the processes of the defendants.
He was, however, eventually served with the processes in court, but he(plaintiff) asked the court for a short adjournment to enable him to respond to the motion.(which he would have responded had it been that he was earlier served by the defendants (Buhari/Apc/inec)

Plaintiff counsel Ozekhome further asked the court for accelerated hearing of the suits.
But the defence counsel, Akin Olujimi and Lateef Fagbemi, were quick to respond that there was an application praying the court to set aside the totality of the suit.

The defendants (Buhari/Apc/inec) had thought that justice Ademola of the federal high court Abuja would rule early on their application to set aside the totality of the suit of which if he did the defendants would have rushed to the appeal court to appeal the refusal of that application,

(thereby trying to hang the case at court of appeal, and just bring a notice to the fed high court to ‘stay proceedings on this case,but justice Ademola did not fall into that trap). Adjourned till march 19th

March 19

http://www.voiceofnigeria.org/nigeria/buhari-eligibility-suit-fixed-for-march-28.html

At the resumed hearing on Thursday march 19th, counsels representing the defendants presidential flag bearer of the All Progressives Congress General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) and the APC in a suit seeking the Independent National Electoral Commission to disqualify Buhari from contesting the March 28, presidential election by the plaintiffs, urged the Federal High Court Abuja not to rush the suit in the interest of justice.(having failed in the trap to take and hang the case in appeal court)

Buhari, 1st defendant in the suit filed by an Abuja based legal practitioner, Barrister Chinwuike Okafor, is being represented by Wale Olanipekun SAN, while the APC’s (2nd defendant) counsel is Chief Lateef Fagbemi SAN.

At Thursdays proceedings, counsel to the plaintiff, Chief Mike Ozekhome had informed the court of the need for expeditious hearing of the matter, adding that time was of the essence since the crux of the suit deals with the disqualification of General Buhari, whom the plaintiff alleged, is not qualified to contest the presidential election slated for March 28.

Ozekhome had invited the court to “take together and cumulatively” the originating summon and all pending applications challenging the jurisdiction of the court because "the presidential election will hold on March 28".

However, reacting, Olanipekun reminded the presiding judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola that the court adjourned on February 23, to hear his application challenging service by substituted means and other pending applications.

“We are taking aback by the narrative of the plaintiff’s counsel; I perceive his position as being targeted at the presidential election of March 28. My Lord, no law or authority has compelled court to decide pre-election matter before day of election proper", Olanipekun stated.

“My Lord, Section 87(11) of the Electoral Act cautions the court not to take any action or make an injunction that will stop the holding of primary or general election.

“Pre-election matter is not like election petition suit. There is no time limit set to decide pre-election matter. The court is not encouraged to rush pre-election matter because it is said that justice rushed, is justice crushed. Hurrying of justice is a stepmother of misfortune” Olanipekun said.
More so, Buhari’s lawyer cited Section 138 (c) of the Evidence Act that enjoins courts to take judicial notice of newspaper publications.
Therefore, Olanipekun referred the court to a newspaper publication where the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mahmud Mohammed had warned judicial officers on the occasion of swearing in of election petition tribunal members not to allow politicians or litigants to use them to scuttle the democratic process.

Hence, he vehemently opposed plaintiff counsel Ozekhome’s submission.

Similarly, counsel to the APC, Fagbemi while objecting to the application of the plaintiff, said, “I have never seen where the issue of challenge to service by substituted means is lumped up with the originating summon, adding that they even announced appearance in protest.

“Issue of service is factual and legal. We have to thrash it out first before talking about the originating summon” Fagbemi said.

However, Ozekhome took exception to the statements of the defendants, saying he has always advocated that the general elections should hold on March 28.

it will be recalled that the defendant counsel Fagbemi asked the court(on february 9th) to ‎set aside the order of abridgment of time within which the defendants must file their responses, saying that the urgency, upon which the order was given had been diminished with the postponement of the poll from February 14 to March 28(that is taking into consideration the election dates in view)

but changes tune so as to delay time and wrongly disregarding ealier orders 1 and 2 above

plaintiff counsel Ozekhome said;

“I am for election holding on March 28; I never said the court should decide the suit before election nor have intention to scuttle the democratic process,"

“Our application has to do with disqualification of Buhari; deciding the case on time and having one candidate disqualified out of 16 flag bearers cannot scuttle the presidential election of March 28.

However, after counsels had argued on whether or not the court will take the originating summon alongside all pending applications as moved by Ozekhome, citing Order 29 rule 1-5 of the Federal High Court, Justice Ademola adjourned till March 24 for ruling.

having wasted all their time in the court(2, The court also granted an order of abridgment of time within which the defendants must respond to the suits) before the election as granted in 1 and 2 above, and defying court orders, buhari highly risk disqualification as all the claims of the originating suits that bothers on 'perjury' non attachment of certificate to authenticate affidavits, and non submission of date of birth certificate etc have not beign replied and may be deemed to be true thereby rendering their client disqualified, the stage seem to be set for an 'appeal in the court of appeal' but then read the cases lost by contesting 'order of service' http://www.nigeria-law.org/Mohammed%20Mari%20Kida%20v%20A.D%20Ogunmola.htm and also note that jega aknowledge that only court can disqualify Buhari, the lawyers have just complicates his case and gave judge Ademola no option than to disqualify buhari, enjoy as it unfolds from 24th march

Shagari of course he is not suffering from cancer

slimfit1:
Your point because I can't see anything wrong with obj and eze. We all do nasty things at work . What I want to know is how does their relationship affect the price or gari. We know how Nigerian men marry more than 5 wifes so talk about important issues.

are you saying morality as preached by Dr ezekwezili is not important?

.

Segeggs:
Fashola attacks with facts. @bold...you must have attended an almajiri school where pupils sit on the floor while their federal government goes about boasting as it's an incredible achievement https://informationng.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Almajiri.jpg southwest people are very sophisticated in the sense that they see through falsehood, unlike you "azikiwe" slaveswhat we are saying is that he should stop boasting about it as if it's something unique he did. With all the resources at his disposal, it's a mere school where kids sit on the floor he's basing his campaign on https://cdn1.vanguardngr.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/412x250xAlmajiri1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.uuakTxgykY.jpg can you compare the above pictures with the picture of amaechi's school below? www.nairaland.com/attachments/2204470_tl_jpegb89a925f5325a7d7309210447889112d

why don't you post modern Arabic schools for pupils and lets see the chairs, your sense of judgement is below par, have you lived in the north before? I doubt, the almajiris culture is to sit on the floor and fold their legs interwoven in a disciplined manner, you were blind to see the rug in that pics you posted? they chose to learm with that pattern, I married a northerner and my wife insist she doesn't need chair s in her room except rug. I can't fold my legs like hers for five minutes and I will be sweating but she can fold her legs while on floor for hours, its their culture and they grew up that way, you don't Change their culture and you don't compare almajiri way of cultured learning with southern way of leaning the way you erroneously did, most of these children roaming the street in kano have no privilege to attend such school and turn to beggars, Jonathan provide that opportunity where these beggars can learn so as to further their knowledge afterwards you are there comparing uneven situations

waiting for answer to bolded below if any;

chukwudi44:
olodo but you support Buhari for president even with the certificate scandal hovering all over him.[size=14pt]Is he the only presidential material in the APC[/size]

APC will collapse like sinagogue church guest house 'should they try to change Buhari' no plan B!

chukwudi44:
seriously there is nothing in that tape to prove that the ekiti elections were rigged.General Momoh was not even an INEC official and was no where close to the INEC office on the said that.

You cannot just take an alleged obanikoro's statement " i am not here for a tea party" to conclude the electins were rigged.No copurt of law would void that election on such a very flimsy evidence

they want to make noise over nothing substancia to fan sentiment yet see nothing wrong in 'lie under oath' clear case of perjury of buhari, what a bunch of hypocrites

midolian:
[s][/s]

FAKE WRITE UP

FAKE SOURCE

How much were u paid to do this?

sources; you need lenses to read? oya

1, After the alledged Audio [size=14pt]Appeal Court Upholds Fayose's Election....Thisday 16 Feb 2015[/size]

http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/appeal-court-upholds-fayoses-election/201974/

2,After the alledged Audio;[size=14pt] Senate Confirms Obanikoro As Minister
Channels Television.
Updated March 11, 2015[/size] http://www.channelstv.com/2015/03/11/senate-confirms-obanikoro-minister/

Alledged Audio tape failed woefully due to bad job, koli smiles to bank, while edo and osun workers money were spent on sponsoring a failed tape with no impact, is that not corruption? i dont expect your true answer

Controlled:
janadafts end will b disastrous......dat is 4 sure..... ...he cannot survive dis impunity.. ...like gbagbo, like janadaft, like Simone, like patience....

you sound like a loser why?

An alleged ''untitled audio evidences'' namely 'secret meeting audio' or 'rigging audio' untitled audios at its best

The aim of the audio was to establish a refference point and an avenue to 'shut up' and Targetted at PDP keymen's removal of; Gov Fayose and disqualification of Musiliu Obanikoro among others

Taking into consideration Gov Fayose and Musiliu Obanikoro dennied ever partaking in any rigging, to worsen the case, when i listened to the audio, there was not even a mention of the word 'rig' or 'rigging' throughout the clip and that important exclusion further render the audio clip invalid and without substance of valid evidence apart from forcing 'rigging on the tape through sentimental opinion' and that takes lots of interpretation which the court is the only avenue it can be trashed out, opinions on the issue is voided!



besides, the alledged audiotape came too late and at best dead on arrival, why?

The 'writ of summons' and 'statement of claims' of the APC at the tribunal/court 'did not include the audio tape' neither does it included in the tribunal/court pleadings in anywaywhatsoever ab-initio or (from the begining) and so both appeal court and supreme court are not empowered to admit new evidences outside the 'writ' or earlier claims and 'pleadings.

http://www.pmnewsnigeria.com/2015/02/16/court-of-appeal-upholds-fayoses-victory/

The opposition All Progressive Congress, APC, had approached the court of appeal challenging the decision of the Ekiti state Governorship Election Petition Tribunal which sat and affirmed the Governor’s victory in Abuja last December.

Sgt Koli was reportedly paid off by APC after the job and he relocated smilling to bank with hundred of millions APC governors donations while their state are heavily owing workers

Sgt Koli did a bad job and yet got paid hugely, [b]Obanikoro's appointment was to stall his impact in delivering lagos to PDP, the audio clip failed to nail him

Ayo Fayose won his Appeal after the audio was released, this further rubished the audio as irrelevant

can seagent Koli just return some of the millions to APC and apologise for a shabby job he did and yet dupe the APC, i doubt!

“So despite #Ekitigate, our Senate confirmed the morally repugnant nomination of @MObanikoro as a Minister by our President? Shameless lot
The issue of @MObanikoro ‘s nomination&confirmation has no political context for Citizens for it is ENTIRELY about our VALUES as a people
Habitual acts of impunity by our political class IS NOT sustainable. A journey through world History is all they need to help them know so, ” she posted on her Twitter page. https://www.nairaland.com/2191259/ezekwesili-condemns-obanikoros-ministerial-screening


1, can someone define the meaning of the word morally repugnant and ' VALUES as a people', to Dr. Ezekwesili, who controversially did not see anything wrong 'morrally' with an improper act of public-romance and a show of shame(if the 'couple' have any shame at all) in the pix below, which is just one of the expose of what has been going on behind the scene between Her and Obj

2, Talking of Morals, and VALUES as a people, Dr. Ezekwesili saw nothing wrong with a corrupt leader and as Fela kuti tagged Obj 'international thief-thief' speaks volumes about Dr. Ezekwesili hypocrisy

.