Biina's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Biina's Profile › Biina's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 125 pages)
safeact:'Time shall tell' applies only to Sanusi who is still in office. Soludo's tenure is over, and the evidence is available to judge his tenure in office. It is not a competition and so I dont see the need for winners or losers. When someone's tenure in office ends, we should be fair to credit him for what he did well, but also be objective enough to criticize whatever he failed to do or did wrongly. |
kettykings:After Ziks UPGA alliance party lost the elections in December 1964, Zik, as president, 'ordered' the military to suspend the incumbent Balewa led civilian government and appoint an interim administrator. (Un)fortunately, the 1963 constitution placed the operational control of the military under the PM and cabinet of ministers, and not the president, thus zik did not have authority over the military. This point was made clear to Zik and the service chiefs by the Chief justice and Attorney General of the federation, and consequently, the service chiefs declined to answer his call to a meeting nor follow the orders. |
A guy that tried to seize power using the military definitely wouldn't be my choice for an outstanding political leader ![]() |
While I dont approve of Sanusi taking shots at his predecessors, his description of what happened during Soludo's tenure is accurate. Soludo was aware of the problems in the sector from the moment he took office, and for whatever reasons, simply failed to tackle (talk less of solving) them. If Sanusi feels Soludo acted inappropriately, he should forward whatever evidence he has to the efcc and let the law take its course. @safeact Soludo is not Sanusi's boss and your argument for development at any cost is saddening. |
These responses get as dem be. All these low 'wealth' rankings na lie Suggestion: The poll would be more reflective of preferences if the characteristics were weighted and related to real life figures, and, you restrict people to picking each level only once. The levels should be based on real life data like income distribution, male height statistics etc. which eliminates subjective interpretation of things like wealth of good height. Example of a 3 level case A. Income (per annum): 1. above N10m 2. N3m-7m; 3. less than N3m B. Looks: 1. Tall and handsome; 2. average height and manageable looks; 3. short and ugly C: Persona: 1. confident; 2. Average; 3. Timid and shy so you can have a guy that earns N3-7million a year, is average height with manageable looks, and has an average personality, but you cant (even though I know you want to) have a tall and handsome guy who is confident and earns more than N10m a year. A valid response would be of the form 1. Income = above N10m 2. Physical = average height and manageable looks; 3. Persona = Timid and shy You could have five characteristics each with 5 levels (poorest to best). |
No |
NTA should have dismantled and sold a long time ago. We are not in a communist state, and don't need government owned media stations. |
ElRazur:Your argument is flawed because you suggested that they could perceive humans as prey, and try to buttress that position by claiming an apex predator will kill anything if necessary. The ability to kill anything, including humans, if necessary is not a consequence of being an apex predator (a white shark is not an apex predator and wouldn't need much provocation to kill a human, while the catfish is an apex predator and couldnt kill a human even if it wanted to), and I have seen no evidence of Orcas perceiving humans as prey (food). Them being an apex predator is irrelevant and you stop trying to use to justify your position. As to your claim to the Orca attacking the victim, the Orca drowned the victim and there were no bites. Its presumptuous to say categorically that it attacked (which implies an intent to harm), when it could have felt it was playing with the victim when the unfortunate woman drowned and died. A former head trainer at Seaworld alluded that the Orca might have been intrigued by the woman's ponytail which had seem to draw its attention, and by which it pulled the woman into the pool. The victim wasn't swimming with the Orca, it pulled her in to the pool. The ex-head trainer said the swinging ponytail was likely a violation of protocol. The two previous deaths involving tilikum were different: - in the first, a trainer accidentally fell into a pool with tilikum and two other female orcas. The orcas grabbed her in their mouth and tossed her to each other as if playing with a ball and the lady consequently drowned. This was an accident as they never have humans in their pool and were simply tossing the lady like a toy not trying to rip her to pieces. - in the second, an intruder got into his pool, and tilikum most likely saw him as a threat and killed him. Nobody know what happened and the intruder might have threatened the Orca in which case it simply defended itself. Do not make sweeping categorization of orcas as if they are some human predators. BTW please keep your sexual orientation, fantasies, and/or perversions out of the discussion. |
ElRazur:You use the word 'killer' as if it implies human killers i.e. they feed on humans. Nobody is disputing their ability to kill, but you make it sound like if given an opportunity, they would feed on humans. Orcas are dolphins not whales, and the term 'killer whale' came from 'whale killers' as they feed on whales. I havent heard any account of them preying on humans. Your argument of being an apex predator is wrong, as the classification depends on other factors like habitat and defensive abilities. The electric catfish is also classified as an apex predator. Does that make them human killers too? |
ElRazur:They didnt get the tag 'killer' from killing humans. |
Yar'adua is still the president and Goodluck the vice-president. Acting president is a responsibilty, not an office. |
1. A national grid essentially decouples the physical location of power generation from the point of consumption e.g. power produced in Kanji can be consumed in Lagos. With each state/region isolated, it becomes chop alone, die alone, as you cannot move power to the needed areas even if there are excess elsewhere in the country. Example, there is power shortage in lagos during the day which is affecting the industries, while there is excess production in Niger because it is the raining season and they have all gone to the farm. The result is that you need to make excess provisions as backup which results in increased cost to the end consumers. 2. A silent point about grids is that they help with frequency stability. Power generation usually involves several generators with each contributing a fraction to the grid. All generators have to be operating at the same frequency for stability. The larger the fraction the generator is contributing, the easier it is to try to do 'his own thing' (i.e. operate at a different frequency. On a small grid it is easier for one generator to contribute a substantial fraction and go off-key, while on a a larger grid the contribution of each generator is much smaller and everyone submits to the rule of the majority. 3, Power generation (for a country of Nigeria size) benefits greatly from economies of scale. I gave a simple example earlier of 15KVA from NEPA as opposed to from a local generator and there was a factor of over 100x increase in cost. So you want to generate in bulk as large as possible. 4. When you provision, your capacity is towards accommodating your peak value, while for the most part, your typical utilization will be much lower e.g. peak consumption for residences occur in the morning 6-8am and evening like 7-9pm. Because you cannot simply switch on/off turbines at short notice, the excess installed capacity above you average is wasted. The consumer ends up paying for this waste, but the larger the demographic covered, the closer your typical is to the peak demand, as it averages out over more customers. Most states in Nigeria have defining demographics, e.g. Lagos is heavily industrialized while Gombe is mainly agrarian. We need to average across the different type to bring our PAR closer to 1. |
One detail of interest in the government's proposed frame work is the direct contract agreement between generation and distribution entities, bypassing the Transco. I am not sure of how they intend to reconcile this with cross regional load balancing which the TransCo would be in the best position to carry out. It might also result in poor power station siting, essntially marrying IPPs and DisCo's for live. I am more in favor of Transco being the intermediate entity, disengaging DisCos from being at the mercy of the IPPs and making it easier to leverage across the network. Meter on and meter off should be make accountability easier. The TransCo should be smart enough to drop off power as close to the source as possible. |
netotse:My position differs totally from Beaf, which was essentially (you can check his post on the first page) eliminate government and everyone generates for himself, except for industries who should be catered for by the government that 'has no business running these things' I still maintain that the suggestion is nonsense, as it is costly, inefficient and impracticable in Nigeria.One should familiarize themselves with where the countries preaching decentralization are coming from. Most of them are developed countries, who cannot meet their escalating demand for fossil fuels with local supply, have huge transmission networks with heavy losses, and are comfortable enough to be concerned with the environment. These countries already have a high level of penetration and availability of electricity. They are not in the same position as Nigeria, where we have abundant Natural Gas that we waste away by flaring and less than 50% of the country has access to electricity. I maintain that over 70% of our electricity should come from fossil fuels. Other sources, particular seasonal or weather dependent sources like hydro, solar and wind, are free to complement, at the least providing backup allowing us to schedule preventive maintenance for the fossil fuel plants. I have never had any issues with using alternative sources for generation, either directly to the grid, in rural places that are yet to be connected to the grid, or even as local backup for industries. I disagree with the notion that these sources should become our primary source of electricity. The ND problem is something that goes beyond just power generation and needs serious attention. While they may have their faults, particularly in how they are displaying their grievances, the area need focused development. I remember a few years back when there was an uproar over a N4billion contract awarded to Pivot Engineering to connect Bayelsa to the national grid, and there were reports of nothing to show for it after several years. Location of power stations in the ND should deliver power to the ND. Their priority should be second only to Abuja (government) and Lagos (industries). The 51% interest in transmission is just to give the FG a veto position. Their record of inefficiency dissuades me from wanting them to have more control. Of course we can always start with a 25% dissolution and increase it until we get the right level of performance required. As long as we don't hand it over to the private sector, it should be fine. |
@netotse 'decentralization' was beaf's suggestion not mine, saying that each individual/household should be responsible for generating their own power supply and that there is no need for us to have a grid. I simply told him that he didnt know what he was talking about. The breakup into GenCo (Power generation), TransCo (Transmission) and DisCo (distribution) is the first step in what I believe is the right direction. With the various phases separated we can more easily identify what the technical and/or administrative short comings are. The next step would be determining the structure of ownership of these entities. While entirely FG ownership has obviously failed to deliver, a total private sector ownership (either foreign or local) will simply leave the people and the entire country at the mercy of some individuals (most who likely embezzled tax payers money in the first place) Some people want the sector privatized, using the telecoms an example. But telecoms and the power sector operate under different market models. While in telecoms I can easily switch providers if am dis-satisfied with the product, in power, your location determines your provider leaving the customer no choice but relocation. Case in point, the wholly privatized sector attempted by the US has shown some serious problems, with private entities only interested in the major metropolitan areas where the large economies of scale guarantees wide margins, and have had to be complemented by about 3000 public owned utilities who are forced to operate at lesser margins. Similarly on the generation side, you require PPAs which are long term contract that guarantee income to IPPs which implicitly kills the competition as the PPAs insulates each IPP from the rest. Malaysia has recently fallen into this pitfall. Essentially power distribution is not a competitive sector and thus cannot be expected to work like telecoms. For Generation: I think the Hydro stations, cause of their geo-political importance (both nationally and internationally) should be left with at least 51% with the FG . The IPP can come on board with with technologies like fossil fuels and some renewable sources like solar farms. I am a bit skeptical with letting the oil companies own IPPs as I think we are further selling our energy position to foreign entities. I would prefer the governemnt (state and FG) be accountable for at least 70% of capacity by owning majority shares in most of the power plants. For transmission: This should be another majority (51%) government stake entity. We need only one transmission entity and cant afford for it to be controlled by some individuals. The government need to protect the interest of the people when signing PPAs and SLAs (this will affect tariffs) Distribution: This should be on a regional basis, with each state (or group of state) being responsible for at least 51% of the stake. The private sector, aside from being involved directly in the distribution company, can come in also as outsourced revenue collectors. Tariff determination should be primarily under government (both state and FG) control, with private investors having enough representations to ensure they are not unfairly treated and provide some transparency. |
Beaf:At no point have you successfully pointed out any mistake I might have made. I have exposed all your claims (from the doomed decentralization solution, to your blunder on the laws of motion) as being that of a simple charlatan. I made an illustration using the speed of light, on that being new is not a requirement for being right. Its obvious the illustration was lost on a 'great' physicist such as yourself. Still my illustration using the speed of light is more relevant than yours on impregnating women. ![]() You have contributed nothing but wild claims, and are yet to make a genuine contribution/suggestion towards solving the problem of power supply in Nigeria. It would do the thread a lot of good if in the future you resisted the urge to tap you keyboard before thinking things through. |
Beaf:A statement that I agree with in its entirety. Its just sad that you lack the needed introspection to make optimal use of it. Help yourself here http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Yukawa+constant&hl=en&rlz=1I7ADSA_en&sa=2.Thanks for the link, but I 'll pass. I have no intention of mastering yukawa interaction nor particulate physics in genral. I am content with my 'little' area of expertise. |
Beaf:Again with the enlarged fonts - you need to learn that it doesnt improve your dilapidated credibility. Academic papers in physics? now that is the funniest thing I have heard in years. Someone, that doesnt appreciate the contributions of Einstein, claims he has academic papers in physics. ![]() Where and when were they published - in the Biafran Science Group journal? ![]() BTW you are right, while i have heard of Hideki Yukawa's contributions in particulate physics, I have no idea what the Yukawa's constant is. I am not a practicing physicist. Unlike you I don't claim to know what I dont know. People that think they know what they dont know are semi-illiterates. |
mikeansy:You can insinuate all you want. Nigerians always prefer sentimental arguments to the facts. As long as the senate + house have refused to get rid of yaradua, wherever he may be and whatever condition he may be in, he remains the president and Jonathan remains the VP. Your grouse should be with representatives of the people who have refused to declare yaradua invalid. A president that has been unavailble for 3 months is as good as dead and should have been relieved of office. Acting president implies that he is not the true president or why do you have the 'acting' prefix. There is no need to 'recognize' Goodluck as the acting president, when his assigned responsibility clearly makes the case. Naija and their obsession with titles ![]() |
Beaf:Another hunt and peck job. ![]() It is a wrong analogy, but still I will humor you. If you keep missing the target or are simply firing blanks, you definitely need the help or else be willing to stay childless. There is nothing wrong is you asking your neighbor how you can get it done, and if he is the type that does his job in public view, I advise you watch closely. PS; the laws of motion have been around since Newton. Stop "inventing" the history of physics.WTF ![]() I doubt you know much about physics. Either you never took classes in physics or you were just a poor student in physics or you simply have a problem with reading and comprehension. I would suspect the last of the three. I said laws of motion have been 'same' i.e. unchanged since the time of Einstein. The newton's laws of motion (like kepler's) are a subset applicable in classical mechanics, as they apply at low speeds (when compared to the speed of light), while the contribution of Einstein was in general and special relativity. Newton's laws of motion are inaccurate at high speeds. Do not accuse someone of 'inventing' the history of a field when you are less knowledgeable on the subject in question. |
Moves:He is still the vice-president. That he is the acting president doesn't change that fact. There is no 'recognizing' as the acting president. Abi when you fill in for your manager when he is away on sick leave makes you the manager? ![]() |
Beaf:So you want something new? for what? just for the sake of being new? ![]() The speed of light in vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 m/s and it is not new. Should we then discard it? ![]() Laws of motion have been same since the days of Einstein, should we also disregard them? ![]() What we need is something right, which could be new, old or whatever. That in Nigeria, like most parts of the world, fossil fuels currently have the lowest total cost per watt and offer great economies of scale is a fact. But you would rather we ignore the facts and go on a fool's errand towards failure, simply because you want something new? ![]() What you seem to be confusing with 'new' is 'right change'. Nobody can claim that the current PHCN setup is working, but instead of suggesting the right changes that would fix the problem (which requires understanding the existing problems), you just want to simply discard the existing setup for something 'new'. It is ironic that your 'decentralization' solution that you think is 'new', if implemented, would leave us in our old state, with only those rich enough being able to afford it. You yourself identified that our current state is like your proposed decentralized system, with everyone trying to fend for themselves, and we all know how well that is working for us. ![]() People like you try to reinvent the wheel in a 'bound to fail' bid at innovation. If you have a problem that someone else has solved, you should learn from them, and not waste resources perambulating. |
Beaf:No need for hugs. Like I said, its nothing personal, but that (when i am privileged) I will always take to task you (or anyone) that makes unguarded declarations on things they know little to nothing of. Nigeria is rife with bungalow experts, from the roadside political analyst, to the beer palour based national team coach. When in truth, being unqualified makes the question of competence moot. |
zoragirl: ![]() |
@beaf Typical response Its funny how you increase font sizes as if they will make your statements more credible. Nothing in your posts supports your earlier claim for a decentralized system. 1. You claim expensive solar cells are not required, then please answer how much your proposed alternative cost (per unit of output for a fair comparison) 2. You claim that Thermoacoustic engines are cheap. How much do they cost that makes them cheap? 3. You claim the manufacture of TAEs is easy. Have you manufactured one or know of a low tech company mass producing them? 4. You claim wave energy is 'free'. How much do wave generators cost (including transmission installation to deliver the power to the user unless you plan for us to be living on the sea)? 5. You claim Biogas is 'free' in Nigeria. What is the current and projected cost per unit watt of this Biogas (including the generator to convert it to electricity)? 6. Biogas can be obtained from our everyday waste products. Yes, but what are the associated processing cost? 7. You claim the US is very interested in Indian energy decentralization. How much decentralization has the US done since then, and more so India itself? (and I am not talking about rural areas i.e you cant decentralized what was not centralized) 8. Yes wind energy is a potential source of energy. Is it feasible? what are the typical wind speeds and forces available in Nigeria? How much per watt will this source cost? These questions should be answered off the cuff by someone who thought things over before making a post like yours, but then I doubt it is applicable to you. You have again failed woefully to make a coherent defence for your earlier claims. Instead your a dropping renewable energy techs as if they will magically come and solve Nigeria's problem. You accuse me of preaching copying, and yet you are yet to mention one relevant technology that is indigenous to Nigeria. Why is that so? ![]() You want each individual to provide their own energy without consideration for the affordability. There is a reason that the bulk of the worlds electricity comes from fossil fuels, but then you wouldn't know anything about that. Like I said before, it is obvious you dont know what you are talking about, and that is why you keep trying to use snide remarks and name calling to save your face. Its just pathetic that the internet is nondiscriminatory towards contributors. BTW where are the details on you 'decentralized' solution.? |
tedanne:sack relatives ke? for where? lailai! ![]() when those executive themselves are the primary cause of the problem and should have been sacked first, instead of the poor tool pushers. The income recovered from sacking one executive could possibly keep 100 junior staff employed. The CBN needs to make guidelines for downsizing that makes it that the fraction of staff lost and income recovered at each level is consistent to a degree e.g. for every 100 junior staff, 10 managers and 1 top management must follow suit. |
Beaf:You made uninformed claims (i.e. we needed to decentralize power supply and followed it with some shallow arguments for it) , and I simply called you out on it. I dont see the 'unwarranted rudeness' in pointing out that someone doesn't know what they are talking about. Leaving posts like yours unchallenged will simply misguide less knowledgeable people. All you have done since then is avoid the core issues, hunt and peck at side topics, and tried to use snide remarks to win the argument. You would rather we debate the different ways to convert energy, without any reference to the feasibility or practicality of such technologies in Nigeria. Despite posing you some direct questions to help you get started, I am still waiting for you to explain how your proposed decentralized solution will work (I mean practically, and not some abstract ideas like solar panels that seem to have dropped from the sky). |
dis kain love na 4 divided by 2; no remainder! e no get part II ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 125 pages)
Order!!!
) except that they're encouraging all the IOCs to set up power stations(BTW do you know there was a time OBJ was giving conditions for awarding oil-blocs to oil coys, u had to build either a railway, a power station or a refinery, dont know what became of that plan. . .and i cant ask, cos i'm not s'posed to know
===
===