₦airaland Forum

Shegzdave:
So una don do meeting with Arteta to stop using My Boy as the Penalty taker abi
Cc Bluraydick Sod09 Jodera
I know Roland not fit follow una

I actually don’t have anything against Saka being our PK taker, but this kind match ehn. With the pressure of the match , if saka should be unfortunate to lose the PK, Palace can turn around the game.

So I prefer Saka not taking it at all

Which kind nonsense Partey play for there sef ? 🤦‍♂️

Goal booouuuu ⚽️

Make Saka no play am Abeg .

Penarity !

Spy360:
As per wetin I dey see for this match abeg no put my name for Havertz matter.

😂😂😂

We no see the Havertz heaight wey spy360 no allow us hear word on top o

Shegzdave:
You’re right, that’s why Zinchenko is missed on that LB but I think it’s cause Yasu is solid defensively sha, moreover if Zinch was in this match Nelli will have the ability to operate well on his wing cause of his(Zinch) offensive plays

💯

sod09:
Oshey agba baller 🤣🤣🤣

Na normal stuffs na. He’s already on the move, no defender will dare touch/trip him in that position na; he get immunity at that point .

mostob:
He is the 3rd CB...he needs to be cautious especially with Ayew lurking behind. However, you made a nice point. There were instances when he was facing the goal but instead of shooting, he shifted sideway and passed.

I guess the formation restricts him , but then there are times he just needs to risk it with confidence . If u notice , sometimes while he’s still trying to arrive at a decision the palace players are already all over him. They smell his indecision

That ball Nketiah lost , I usually score it on a steady .

All u need to do in that position is just drag the ball on the floor (that Kanu’s skill ) and the keeper will be left sprawling on the floor while u tap the ball into the net after beating him.

Going for a chip when u are not named Messi in that position is usually a 50-50 chance of scoring.

daveP:
The Ish is Zinny coming on with revert the formation totally. I think it's the leg Yasu is using that's causing this wahala. He's successful with dragging two palace shirts but releasing that ball fast is a big issue. Then for the better passes he gives Nelli, almost nothing useful Nelli does next.


1st Half- front 3 attack threat


Nketiah
Nelli
Saka


Saka is on lock.


As for Kai, he's offering nothing else for him to be on this pitch any longer. Not even a shot. Smh.

At this point , it appears Havertz gets fouled for a living . If he’s not getting fouled , u won’t see him at all

Shegzdave:
Zinchenko as RB?

LB.

The right hand side is blocked cos Mitchell is teaching Saka man for man. The left hand side is vulnerable , but Tomiyasu is finding it difficult to position well upfield to receive the ball and push attack from his side

daveP:
At this rate, I'll say Palace came prepared for Saka and Nketiah. That leaves Nelli to get this game unlocked with a goal. Or one of Rice and co to shoot long range. This keeper doesn't look good.


Na Partey dey do pseudo-RB, yet na him dey control midfield like say Rice no dey😆

If we had Zinchencko as RB we would’ve scored in this match since

See nonsense wey Martinelli play

There is something still off in Tomiyasu’s game. When he sees the ball is on the other side of the pitch at Odegaard’s feet….. he doesn’t know when to position in deep position to receive the ball so he can give them option of switching play down to his wing.

Saliba is everything u want in a defender .

When he makes mistakes , he corrects it almost immediately

See Nketiah wasting Rice assist

Arteta should stop playing Tomiyasu as LB.

Make Tomiyasu no dey give Ayew chance o

Fried croaker 😎

sod09:
Make our money no waste

E don waste already , Lille don chop us maga .

Make we find one small club seek him and swallow our L. He shouldn’t come and disrupt our flow again jare

sod09:
We can give him chance on cups
I still prefer him pass Nelson sha

Na una wey dey spoil this club be this

Which chance we wan give pepe again wey dem
Never give am? Wetin he do for the loan wey he go wey errant us to give him chance ?

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
what is there 2 gbam?

dude just said that 2 reconcile the identity of the biblical jesus who performed miracles with that of jesus/yeshua who was of low birth is a story 4 another day.


Which of dem, waka 4 water, raised the dead.. gave sight 2 d blind nobody can tell...

When u are ready to answer those 3 questions I posed to u up there, u can start asking me more questions

raumdeuter:
This is actually a reasonable conclusion

A man named Jesus or Yeshua lived at some time around 2050 years ago. He was of low birth in a very inconsequential part of the Roman empire, He claimed to be the messiah and had some people follow him, He was killed

Those above are facts

Whether he now possess all the powers or actually did those miracles are another discussion

And comparing how Alexander the son of a Noble man who was handed to one of the greatest teachers and every step of his life was documented vs someone born to a carpenter in a backwater village

Its like saying Malia Obama whose every step of life was documented from birth given that she was born to 2 upper middle class/High class people vs Bisi who was born to a carpenter in Gbongan who was barely documented nor reckoned with for most of her life

GBAM!

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Are u saying that Jesus in the bible is different 4rm the one pple like Josephus & Tacitus talked abt?

U’ve been asking all the questions and I’ve been providing u answers . I asked u 3 questions and u didn’t give answer to any .

Talk true, if na u be me, Shey u go continue with this one sided discussion/interrogation/cross-examination?

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
a simple yes or no question u refused 2 answer.

cc:
SPy340
Blueraydick

i agree with u that Xtianity is a man made creation with much of its roots established in Rome.

What are u tagging me to na?

Did I argue Christianity with u since morning ? Go back and read our discussion all I’ve said all day long is that the character Jesus Christ as not fictitious but an actual person who was birthed and was crucified .

For the unpteenth time, what has always been debatable is if actually those miracles credited to him happened , were exaggerated or didn’t happen at all.

You are the one who has been equating “Jesus existing historically “ to mean that we are arguing Christianity with u.

I don tire to dey type in English for u bro

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
the burden of prove dey ur hand. na u dey make claim say biblical jesus existed in real life.

prove it with evidence.

Just what I was expecting .

Enjoy the rest of ur day bro

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
martin luther the german priest died 100 oF centuries ago.. but his works are still standing tall. check his 91 abi 94 thesis against the church, albert enstein, ivan the terrible, napoleone, abraham lincoln all are verifiable. e reach jesus turn we no see anybody during his time 2 verify or give us an eyewitness acct of jesus.



dey play.

I can see u are seriously in the business of shifting goal post; u don carry martin Luther enter matter while u never finish Josephus matter

U didn't answer of the 3 questions posed in the mail below u quoted. Perhaps u didn't see them, oya see them here again:

1. When did Christianity become state religion in Rome?
2. When year was Josephus born?
3. When did Josephus write his account of Jesus' history?

I'm expecting ur response .

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
maybe if u can prove 2 us that when jesus existed...there was no writer/scholar/historian in the whole roman empire 2 give us an eyewitness account abt the life & times of jesus?.!

Tell us why Josephus a jew who abandoned the jewish pple during the Jewish~Roman war & defected 2 the side of the Romans, accepted Roman citizenship?. Where is his credibility? Authenticity? then years later he wrote a book & mentioned jesus, a man who died 10yrs ago b4 he was born? Decades later, Xtianity became the state/0fficial religion of the roman
empire? ..

what abt Josephus father? a Jewish priest... dis priest did not hear/meet jesus? What did he say as an eyewitness acct?

U just continue shifting goalpost.

Initially u were asking for primary source until I pointed it out to u that it's not possible for u to be asking for primary source of data for someone who died over 2000 years ago. Those who lived that period have all died; what u can get at best is the written account to those who lived during that period.

Now Spy360 mentioned Josephus' work and u claimed they were not primary source. I mentioned Saul who actually lived that period and his numerous letters/accounts of what happened but u say no.

Now u will not agree with Saul's accounts of what happened in history and U went as far as claiming the romans invented the character Jesus. Afrodoc has asked u to make sense out of Romans killing Jesus' followers for 300 years only for them to Deify him cos they wanted to rule the world. I noticed u side-stepped that question.

Oya let me ask u these questions since u've been doing the asking since:

1. When did Christianity become state religion in Rome?
2. When year was Josephus born?
3. When did Josephus write his account of Jesus' history?

BronzeTiger:
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. More clapping and singing still to come for you. 🤭.

Na make Whodeyhause just dey house jeje, make he kuku no go watch those matches

ObaIgwe1:
Arsenal haven't won a premier league game played on a Monday since Mikel Arteta took over.


Is this true? If true I hope it that changes today.

I don't know how true it is but I always dread Monday night football, It usually don't end well for us.

But today's own, I'm very much positive we will get a favorable result.