₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,482 members, 8,512,125 topics. Date: Monday, 02 November 2026 at 09:15 PM

Toggle theme

BluntCrazeMan's Posts

Nairaland Forum › BluntCrazeMan's Profile › BluntCrazeMan's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 554 pages)

Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 10:19am On Feb 10
fergie001:
We have not mature to that stage.

Let's do the e-transmission and force presiding officers to explain mutilation and punish them with force of the law.

Just look at.
EXACTLY..!!
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 10:18am On Feb 10
Image123:
Nope, you never did. You've only been repeating the same thing for those who don't want to think.
Okkk
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 9:46am On Feb 10
Guestmale:
Either manual or electronic collation without a trusted party polling agent in each polling units rigging can't be stopped except we adopt electronic voting.
Full Electronic Voting itself can also be tampered with
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op):
fergie001:
..
....I believe we should be charging presiding officers to explain mutilation.....that's the phase we should be in. Begins to punish presiding officers in the court of law.
The Electoral Act made a provision for adding the offending Electoral Officers as parties to the petition (by making the offending electoral officers one of the respondents to the petition).

But none of the petitioners so far had tried this provision before now
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 9:41am On Feb 10
Inspirer1:
That's why point number 3 by the OP is very very important, those collation sheets at ward, LG and State levels MUST be uploaded too, just like the ones at PUs, the computation can be confirmed.
In all, like you rightly noted, having loyal agents at all the different levels of collation is as important as being a candidate!
That 3rd item is very important.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 9:39am On Feb 10
Ventura1:
The method proposed here is a recipe for chaos
The INEC had been using the IREV Portal since 2021. There had never been any chaos about it in any way...

Now that we are just asking the National Assembly to officially put the Same IREV Portal inside the Electoral Act as a mandatory electoral requirement, it now becomes a recipe for chaos??
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 8:42am On Feb 10
fergie001:
I know Ojo so wel, I was born there and my family house still there.
I vote at FOA Primary school and can even guess the person who did that.

I support e-transmission, it will curb mutilation & manipulation of results but just not confident of us trying it first-time at Presidential. I have conceded it should be passed, we have Osun ahead of us.
I am actually surprised that this was not passed since 2025.
It baffles me so much.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 8:37am On Feb 10
ryloy:
So that you can manipulate input data.
How many of the uploaded data have I manipulated so far.??
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 8:34am On Feb 10
PDPdestroyer:
Electronic transmission of manual votes? Does this OP know what he’s even talking about? There’s an ignorance pandemic in this country, largely due to Obidients
You give Physical Cash to a bank cashier/teller, and he/she transfers it electronically to the bank account you desired.. That one is not a problem to you?

You give physical cash to the POS Operator, and he/she does the electronic transfer into the bank account you want the money transferred into. That one too is not a problem to you?
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 8:21am On Feb 10
IgOga:
Interesting conversation.

Results can be transferred manually or electronically. It doesn't matter what method as long as the right result is transferred. Both transfer process can be manipulated.

Infact it is easier to manipulate e-voting than manual voting. With e voting a simple code of "subtract 1000 votes from every party, or add 100000 votes"
Tell me how to subtract the 1,000,000 from the figures written inside an uploaded photo.!!
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 8:16am On Feb 10
Jorussia:
I think we need to stop this idea of using half measures to cure our electoral deficiencies.The appropriate thing should be electronic voting along with real time online transmission and collation of results.

The opposition are putting too much energy on trivia issue of electronic transmission of results, instead of building a strong network of politicians that can influence and defend votes.If u think simply transmitting results on irev can stop a very determined and united ruling party,I pity you.
They vehemently refused the ELECTRONIC VOTING Option.

So, if we get a half-of-the-system which gets us half-way to what we want and makes the rigging very hard for them,, they will have no options than be the ones asking the right questions like: "if we waste all the time doing Manual Voting and Electronic UPLOADING,, why not go straight-away and approve full electronic voting with optional manual voting for places where full electronic voting is difficult, or persons who cannot do the electronic voting.
Politics › Re: Sections Of The Electoral Act Which Requires “Real-time Or INSTANT” Transmission by BluntCrazeMan(op):
Racoon:
Both real time transmission of accredited voters from iREV too is very important and not only the election results. Thanks for the sustained enlightenment sir.
Exactly.!!

INEC had successfully tested it before on the 11th of November-2023..
And then, they wiped it off from the IREV on the 14th of November 2023 --- and they never did it again,, even up till today ---- just because it is not clearly stated in the electoral laws.

Politics › Re: Sections Of The Electoral Act Which Requires “Real-time Or INSTANT” Transmission by BluntCrazeMan(op):
Redoil:
blunt craze mad i greet you.
one thing about the constitution is the ambiguity.
that is why people interpret and accept it any how depending who it favours
I wonder why the ambiguity is just too much.

Politics › Re: Sections Of The Electoral Act Which Requires “Real-time Or INSTANT” Transmission by BluntCrazeMan(op):
Very soon, some people will rush here to come and start teaching me what “Real-time” is, and what “IREV” is supposed to be doing.


They will even start to teach me about the “RUSSIAN HACKERS” who dealt with the US Elections as far-back as 2020.
Politics › Sections Of The Electoral Act Which Requires “Real-time Or INSTANT” Transmission by BluntCrazeMan(op):
MY DEAR FELLOW COMPATRIOTS.!!

Please watch out for these 3 Sections of the Electoral-Act-2022.

These are the exact sections of the Electoral Act which the National Assembly MUST make mandatory and to be carried out in real-time.
(Or they can use the word “INSTANT” or “INSTANTLY”, if the phrase “Real-Time” is giving them tough time)

Those important sections are:

(a).. Section:50(2)

(b).. Section:60(5)

(c).. Section:62(2)


..
The National Assembly is currently making us to believe that it is only the Section:60(5) that needed the amendment.
But this is not actually true.



Then, as for the Section:47, the National Assembly should include another clause (clause-4) after clause(3.); which should be for the instant (or real-time) transmission of the “Number of Accredited Voters” direct from the BVAS-Machines.

And for the Section:64, the National Assembly should include another clause(9.) after clause(8.).
(That-is, before the original clause(9.) -- which should now become clause(10.)); which should be for the instant (or real-time) transmission (or upload) of the collated results, to be done by the collation officers or returning officers - subject to the completion of the activities enumerated in clauses(4-to-8.) of the same Section:64.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 5:41am On Feb 10
Image123:
Lolz, you don't have the answers. Keep misleading those who don't want to think.
Bye.

And have a great day.

I hate repeating myself.
I already answered you multiple times
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op):
Gajagojo:
So what?
I have said it
Listen I don't have time for childish games you can engage seriously or bugger off
On another thread meant for it,, we will discuss it.


But you see what you are trying to do on this topic..?
It is called DERAILING.!!

And I am not ready to do that with this particular topic here.!!
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 5:38am On Feb 10
Scamburster:
Na you fit these miscreants,
No mind them.

They are always typing with zero-level intelligence.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 2:24pm On Feb 09
Gajagojo:
.........We cannot have endless reruns............
Nobody said this on this thread (nor insinuated such)
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 2:18pm On Feb 09
casualobserver:
No! What I said and is evidenced in your summary is that Nigerians have a fundamental problem with the English language because nothing I said should lead anyone with a basic understanding of English to your conclusion/ summary above!

I see you are the thread starter and if your pointless repeated but meaningless quoting of my posts is an attempt to give life to a pointless thread, please count me out.
You should have left the thread long ago -- when you had the chance.

You can still leave it now.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 2:16pm On Feb 09
Image123:
You claimed there were no serious cybersecurity concerns. 12 million cyber attacks is not a serious cybersecurity concern? You also claimed INEC was paid. Paid what, by whom and for what?
I'm done explaining.
Thanks
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:48am On Feb 09
Image123:
Keep lying to yourself and those who can't see through the sham then.
If you look inside a basin filled with water, whatever you say you saw inside the basin is up to you.

What I wrote was very clear.
I finished reading what you responded, and I had to read what I wrote up there again.

Then I started asking whether you saw some other posts or comments elsewhere, and tried to interpolate them with what I wrote here.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:42am On Feb 09
Image123:
What is paid for? You trust INEC but you're complaining about glitch. How much is the money paid for cybersecurity, na you pay?
You're like someone saying you paid your maiguard his full 5k salary so he should kill himself or allow himself be killed than allow thieves with bazookas rob your 5billion.
I am not going to explain myself any further than what I typed up there.


You understood what I typed.
Stop twisting your brain unnecessarily.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:41am On Feb 09
Gajagojo:
Please let us not mix this English
What is

AFFECTS THE LAW?

So if the election is cancelled what happens next?

If we cannot have glitch free elections after several cancellations what then?
1. “Affects the Law” in this case here means “Goes against the extant electoral laws”.

2. If results gets cancelled, then there would either be a Rerun (if some Polling-Units were affected), or a new election would be conducted afresh (if the cancellation was due to a gross electoral misconduct which affected the final result in such a way that the misconducts couldn't be traced down to the particular Polling-Units -- for instance -- a Manipulation of the value at the FINAL COLLATION POINT).
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:34am On Feb 09
casualobserver:
That is the confusion being created. They never said they are cancelling what you demanded in the highlighted section. That still exists. It was never removed.

The Abaribe faction are trying to be clever by half. Playing with words like transmit or transfer. They voted for retain8 g the same system as 2023 and when they saw backlash, instead of educating the public they tried to play the it’s not us card. Whether transfer or transmit, it is the same thing.


I have posted several time on the issue of our election system. Anyone who is a system engineer or a process developer, systems analyst etc who actually goes through the electoral system and procedures will realise it is a fool proof system. Will people attempt to rig? Yes but the current system will always leave evidence. You can’t hide rigging under the current system.

It’s a fact and I challenge anyone to tell me how you can rig the current system without leav8ng evidence of your rigging?


I am waiting!


You rigged, your opponent did not challenge the result because he knew he wouldn’t have won doesn’t mean the system doesn’t have evidence of your rigging. If it were close he will produce the evidence. The truth is the whole attack on IREV was because the losers having access to the physical results and evidence of any rigging could not prove they won and instead tried to discredit a viewing portal which had no role in the collation of results. That bad sportsmanship is what has brought us to where we are.
In summary..

You are saying that:
transmitting the physical results electronically immediately they were produced -- before taking them to the next level of collation”
should Not be allowed in our electoral laws.??
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:30am On Feb 09
Image123:
Lolz 12.9million cyber attacks is not an issue, right? Because INEC was smarter.
It was all paid for.,, so they have to deliver in full.

You're actually demarketing INEC so much for rating them so low.

I am trusting INEC so much here when it comes to cyber-security,, and you're here painting me in negative colours because of it.??
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:28am On Feb 09
Gajagojo:
Please help me understand
If the National Assembly accepts the proposed electronic transmission and for some reason e.g. GLITCH it does not happen whatbis the consequence

E.g does this mean cancellation
You mean,, When GLITCH happens.??

If Glitch happens and it affects the Law, then it means cancellation.


And again, even as glitch happens, there are possible alternatives in the law.
Which are actually there in the passed law.. but it would take longer time and it would be more and tedious -- and even the slightest mistakes while applying the alternatives would cause cancellations too..

So, it would be in the best interest of INEC for there not to be instances of glitches.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:24am On Feb 09
fergie001:
That copy the agent has, other agents have it.
The Police has it.
The original is with INEC.
Subpoena the police to bring the original.


That was how Hope Uzodimma won. Ihedioha and INEC argued those centres did not have results because they were cancelled. Uzodimma said No, my agents have copies. He produced it. INEC was asked to counter it, and they couldn't.

He subpoenaed the Police during the tribunal, the Police came with ghana-must-go bags filled with original copies of Forms EC8A.
In Edo State,, they didn't subpoena the police.
I guess that was where they made their own mistake.!!

But they were trying to establish that the results they have in their own “duplicate copies” were totally different from what the INEC presented at the Tribunal as the “CTCs of the Original Copies” of the same results.

The judges said that those “duplicate copies” were not legible -- even though the petitioners claimed that they could see what was written inside those duplicate copies, and that they are consistent with the uploaded results on the IREV-Portal.

..

Something is clear now.
If the copies of the Party-Agents are not legible enough, then, the next thing would be to subpoena the police.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:14am On Feb 09
Image123:
You just said "We never heard of any serious cyber-security concerns around the IREV."
So i brought to your attention the news of over 12.9million cyber attacks. And you dismiss it with adequate measures paid for. Are you INEC's chief security officer?
Cyber-security was never the main issue around the IREV-Portal since it came into use in 2021..

Thanks.
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:13am On Feb 09
casualobserver:
Manual counting is the best, every body has a signed copy of the result sheet and BVS has a record of the accredited voters. If you need to investigate you can forensically examine every single thumb printed ballot which has been done before. IREV is a viewing portal.



We need to do more thinking in this country.
Let me even assume that I don't even know anything any longer.

Let me really understand what you're trying to say.

..

So, after the manual counting (which we have all now accepted),, and we have also all accepted that they should physically carry the manually counted results to the next collation level..

Is there anything wrong in us demanding that they should make that physical result they counted at the lower level available publicly online -- while they are physically carrying it to the next level of collation.??

Even if they want to make corrections or do some cancellations at the upper level of collation,, we need to see what the results were like before the corrections began,, and what later came out after the corrections.!!

Is that something big to demand for.??
Politics › Re: We Want “Electronic Transmission” -- Not Just Uploading Photographs Of Results by BluntCrazeMan(op): 11:06am On Feb 09
Image123:
https://www.pulse.ng/story/fg-says-over-129-million-cyber-attacks-were-recorded-during-last-elections-2024072608450539311?

Now, you heard.
Agree with me that the so-called cyber-attacks was not the cause of the GLITCH.!!

The GLITCH was caused by the errors and omissions of the ICT personnel (for not creating the adequate algorithms)..

So, why bringing the news of cyber-attacks here??

There will always be cyber-attacks.
And it will always be defeated conveniently.!!

The adequate cyber-security measures were being paid adequately for..
So, why should I bother again about it?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 554 pages)