₦airaland Forum

helinues:
You know, I have actually noticed something, I haven't seen ADC supporters proffering any solution to the party issue except trying to hit up the flame. Who will win or lose in court is actually irrelevant and inconsequential.

Why can't the supporters advise them to withdraw all the court cases and settle things amicably in house.

It's just so annoying as the so called opposition are deliberately wasting their own time

https://www.nairaland.com/8663528/why-cant-adc-people-settle

helinues:
He must have wasted the precious time of the party hijackers. Remember election is less than 9 months

Omenlon:
so you just dey so jobless so tey you sidon write this scrap, may God help you so that you can be engaged positively.

7upnigeria:
....akk ... help....

Jonjam269:
There is no such thing as a perfect electoral law anywhere in the world. What sustains democracy is trust in the process, losers accept defeat, congratulate the winners, and challenge results in court if necessary. Until our politicians learn to accept defeat in good faith, we will keep chasing the illusion of a “perfect” electoral law.

hotseat:
...... the elections can only be free, fair and transparent if INEC declares any of them winners even where they glaringly failed .........

adioolayi:
All you have put up here are all negativities...

Not even a single glimpse of positive outcome..

Why are we like this

Why not let's take a look at how the new electoral act 2026 performed in the just concluded FCT LGA elections

Can you really say the PU officers failed to upload results

Na wa o

PigTormentor:
Electronic transmission has nothing to do with rigging. Most rigging occurs at the polling units with an agreement between those polling agents.
They will agree among themselves and then transmit whatever they have written down on the result sheets.
All these noise about transmission is all an excuse for the opposition knowing full well that the election is slipping away from their hands.

7upnigeria:
ZOMBIEDIENTS, you're already rehearsing how you will react to your loss on election day.

Before you go further, akk election results in the 2023 elections have been uploaded on iRev, KINDLY SCREENSHOT any manual result that is not in agreement with the one uploaded in iRev. Election has not been help but you're already crying rigging, SORE LOSER.

Tupacx:
The writter does not know the difference between Cabon Copy and version.

The copies with the Police, Agents, INEC and others are Cabon copies not versions.

ejimatic:
Be wasting time on election that has been won already by the BAT.

Putindbutt:
https://dailypost.ng/2026/03/17/labour-party-crisis-nec-sacks-usman-led-committee-backs-abure/

SOME EXPECTED OUTCOMES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEWLY INCLUDED “ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION” INSIDE THE NEWLY ENACTED “ELECTORAL ACT 2026”.

1. Most of the Presiding Officers would transmit the results from the Polling-Units with the BVAS Machines as usual; but then, THE TRANSMITTED RESULTS WOULD MOST-DEFINITELY NOT BE VISIBLE ON THE IREV PORTAL IMMEDIATELY.
This is just exactly the way it had always been happening in all those past elections where there was no direct provision for the “Electronic Transmission” inside the Electoral Act --- But now, according to the requirements of the new Electoral Act 2026, “the Presiding Officer shall ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT the results from each polling unit to IREV Portal”.
This means that there is not supposed to be much delays between the time when the transmission was done and the time when the transmitted results appear on the IREV Portal --- except of course if (and only “if”) there is “communication failure”, then that would be the only “excuse” why the transmitted results may not appear immediately on the IREV Portal.

2. Some of the Presiding Officers wouldn't even do any transmission of any results in the first place --- and they will quickly declare that “THERE IS COMMUNICATION FAILURE”; and that the “transmission” itself even refused to work from the BVAS Machines.

3. Some of the Presiding Officers would genuinely try the transmission of the results many times, BUT THE TRANSMISSION FROM THE BVAS MACHINES WOULD ACTUALLY REFUSE TO WORK, not to talk of the results appearing on the IREV Portal. And then, the INEC would end up Not providing the reasons or excuse for such failures which were not as a result of “Communication Failure” of any sort.

4. Due to some sharp games which might be played by the INEC Officials at the different levels of the results management, there might end up being up to five different versions of THE SAME Polling-Unit Results..
a) the INEC’s version which are provided in the CTCs
b) the BVAS version which were captured and stored inside the BVAS Machines
c) the IREV version which were successfully transmitted to the IREV-Portal.
d) the PARTIES Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the PARTIES.
e) the POLICE Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the POLICE.
All these five versions of the results are fully supported by the Electoral Act, and they are all supposed to be the same thing all through.
If at any point, there are discrepancies between any two or all of the five versions of the same results, then it becomes a clear case of “Institutional Manipulation of Results.

5. All of the above-mentioned scenarios would definitely happen on the Election Day, and still nobody would say (or do) anything about them, and FINAL RESULTS would still be announced --- (even when the discrepancies in the various versions of THE SAME RESULTS are very clearly visible to everyone).

cityboylagos:
“Marriage Is Also Prostitution for Women” – Lady Sparks Debate with Viral Claim


https://www.tiktok.com/video/7421791337856519429?_r=1&_t=ZS-94dF0z4jG8j


https://eyesoflagos.com/2026/03/12/marriage-prostitution-claim-viral-video-debate/

SporaD8:
So from whence cometh the comlaint that people aren't dating their age mate?!

Dpsychologist:
There is a funny cycle many people ignore until it stops benefiting them.

When many women were in their early twenties, a lot of them did not want men their age. They called their male age mates “small boys.” They preferred older men who were more established, more confident, and financially stable.

At that time, nobody called it a problem.

A 22 year old woman dating a 35 year old man was often seen as normal. Sometimes it was even encouraged. Friends would say she was “smart” for choosing maturity and stability.

Fast forward ten or fifteen years.

Those same men who were once the “small boys” are now in their mid thirties. They have careers, experience, and more confidence. Now many of them choose women in their twenties.

Suddenly the conversation changes.

Now people say it is unfair.
Now people say it is manipulation.
Now people say men should date their age mates.

But here is the uncomfortable truth.

Adults are free to choose the partners they want.

If a 24 year old woman chooses a 35 year old man, that is her decision. If a 35 year old man chooses a 25 year old woman, that is also his decision. Both are adults making choices.

What often fuels the argument is not morality. It is timing.

When people benefit from a system, they rarely complain about it. When the same system no longer favors them, they suddenly see the problem.

Now about the idea of the “perfect age gap.”

There is no universal formula.

Some couples are the same age and thrive.
Some couples have a ten year gap and thrive.
Some couples fail regardless of the age difference.

What actually sustains relationships is not the number between birthdays.

It is maturity.
Shared values.
Respect.
And the ability to build a life together.

Age can influence compatibility, but it does not automatically determine success or failure.

At the end of the day, attraction and partnership are personal choices.

Everyone wants the best partner they believe they can get.

The real lesson is simple.

Be honest about your preferences, and allow others the same freedom.

aswani:
Ọ ma, clap for yourself then.

Wallade:
Unfortunately, we don't care how you feel about it.

The electioneering is our focus now.

IJAYA001:
You can only take the law to the court until you are affected/damaged by the law.