₦airaland Forum

LegendHero:
The ministry of environment who supervise it should probe them.

Tinubu has a lot of things on his table than probing a borehole project himself. Do you even know how the government work?

Saharareporters purposely use the headline as a click bait by mentioning Tinubu.

LegendHero:
The USAID themselves fund the NGO. They don’t need the Nigeria government for that.

Have you forgotten what the Chief of Defense said, USA just hand donation to NGOs bypassing the government.

Punch for example got $2m from donor grants from Gates, and that’s just for 1.5 years usage.

Read it yourself. USAID credit the accounts of NGOs directly because they call them implementation partner. Most of these aids are eventually stolen because those NGOs already inflate data.

When you see StatiSense for example giving ridiculous data, I won’t be surprised they are also getting funding for their “statistical research”.

LegendHero:
Shey na Tinubu construct am ni.

They should probe the contractor who will probably be one of their people for doing useless work.

Below are some of the other project HYREP claimed they did a they are under the Ministry of Environment.

Make them buday the contractor, he got questions to answer.

Lukuluku69:
OBJ was saving it for those who would steal it. Was that not exactly what happened during Jonathan PDP tenure? 🤔

Of course they were all reckless with our commonwealth. The dame OBj we all clapped for saving up squandered $16b on Electricity we can't switch on.

And don't take this as an excuse from to back Tinubu, as I said earlier, all of them are the same.

They are just marking Time on the sideline when not in power, they all came for personal gains.

We all know that Foreign Aids are usually diverted by Government Agencies and Parastatals. Those claiming Permanent Secretary and Directors now didn’t just get there now. They have been with successive governments.

LegendHero:
Oga most of those donations are entering private sector.

HIV AIDs took the largest share of USAID aids to Nigeria.

This useless aid contribute nothing meaningful rather than to siphon money to NGOs who squander it.
https://foreignassistance.gov/cd/nigeria/

Lukuluku69:
The same way OBJ Team collected and kept mute.

Yar'dua too. Same for Jonathan and Buhari.

In all of these, you will see that they are all the same.

Bastiver:
Are you staying in the north, cox I don't know why your people continue voting APC and PDP, if they truly want a change why not try other political party 🤧, instead of those 2😫.

Idaytesj29:
He is only telling you there will be far more killings and insecurities as a result of the invasion. This time not north alone, the south too. That position is what you need to respond too not asking another question that you know the answer to already

BabaO2:
I didn't say Nigeria have capacity.
No one wants to hear the truth, the only truth is the solution.
Nigeria has become a complex state to manage. one of the main problem is creation of states. Nigeria is better off as autonomous regions with solid regional security agencies.

BabaO2:
US doesn't have the capacity to restore order or clean out terrorists, it is a mere grandstanding and attempt to steal Nigeria wealth with collaboration of UK, they are not acting alone. No where in their past have they restored order.

mascot87:
So much more killing should be activated and Southern Region that is in peace should also be turned to a battle field? Choose your evil wisely. The northern leaders knows how to resolve there problem because it is political. They just need the right leadership to stop the senseless killing. We have to be smart else the south should be ready for the influx of millions of northern refugees that will lead to the destabilising of the peaceful south. Are you ready for it?

Mrchippychappy:
Honestly, I think in the South West, the paranoia stems from the belief that “now that it’s our turn, you want to remove our person.” This sentiment is being masked by the absurd claim that Trump wants to seize their resources. It’s a paranoia that could easily be addressed by reaffirming the fact that Trump is NOT looking to depose president Tinubu (as long as he is not actively involved in sponsoring terrorism) , rather he is looking to work with President Tinubu. Unfortunately many of the region’s leaders are compromised or acting as paid agents so the truth is being suppressed.

In contrast, the fear in the North is more genuine, it comes from those who have been deeply involved in terrorism for the past 15 years and now fear being exposed.

mascot87:
Let me tell you what you people don't know.
In as much as I want all the Islamic terrorists and Fulani terrorists wiped out including there sponsors by the United State in the North, there would be a big humanitarian crisis in the South too and that's the fact.
There is no law stopping the movement of people from the North to the South in Nigeria including the disguised terrorists. They will move down south to find shelter. We are talking about 250 million Nigerians here.
Is the South ready for this infiltration and the consequences it will bring? Is the South ready to take care of the Northern immigrants because you cannot stop them from free movement.

Mrchippychappy:
Apologies if this is a lengthy post, but please read through and see the deception of our politicians and ethno-religious "leaders" for yourselves.

Afenifere's recent statement dismisses U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of intervention in Nigeria as a "strategic decoy" driven by economic motives. The group claims Trump's accusations of government complicity in Christian killings are "baseless," aimed at pressuring Nigeria into buying U.S. weapons, granting greater economic access, or punishing Tinubu's foreign policy stances (e.g., supporting a two-state solution for Israel-Palestine).

Afenifere insists banditry is not religious but economic, targeting minerals, and warns against "reckless statements" that invite foreign aggression. They cite U.S. interventions elsewhere leading to instability as proof of ulterior motives.

Idaytesj29:
That was to protect their embassy and staffs. Not to stop civil war in Liberia. Just 21 marines, and you call that an intervention?

Don't give the glory of Nigeria and Ecowas to US just because you need a Visa and want to be seen as woke

Clashes between farmers, many but not all of whom are Christian, and herders are driven by resource scarcity and land competition

Idaytesj29:
There was no US intervention in Liberia. It was Ecowas intervention led Nigeria. Not only in Liberia, it happened in Sierra Leone too. US did not intervene in both countries cos they have no oil. It's not an Islamic thing, it's a resource thing. And US always damage those countries more before leaving in disgrace. Thank you

gabicon:
I recall watching it and the white soldiers that were welcomed in Liberia wore blue helmets, which is the UN not US.

Guestmale:
How. What will you now call Sanwo Olú of Lagos state

SarkinYarki:
The naira is not stable enough for this , this will cause higher ticket prices

Putindbutt:
Trust me, the disgrace the US troops will collect will be more than the disgrace they faced in Afghanistan. If the local people do not support you, you're fried already. These are the local people telling Trump to stay clear their land. The Nigerian Army knows what they are facing whenever their movements are being leaked and ambushed. I still believe all this is just initial gra gra from Trump. If he wants to help us, give us weapons without the usual delaying and unreasonable conditions attached to it. And give the office of the NSA the Intel you gathered.

gabicon:
First of all for some context, Liberia was founded in the 19th century by freed African-Americans under the auspices of the American Colonization Society. The Americans has vested interest in the country from the get go.

Secondly, Over the decades, Liberia maintained a special relationship with the U.S., including military training, economic assistance, and strategic cooperation. It wasn't like the US just showed up, they were always there.

Thirdly during the first civil war in Liberia, the U.S. did not militarily intervene to remove Doe, nor did it deploy large-scale combat troops to restore order. Instead, its involvement was more limited: evacuation of U.S. citizens, diplomatic engagement, encouragement of mediation, etc.

Lastly, in answer to your question, the war in Liberia did not end solely as a result of direct large-scale intervention by the United States government. Instead, its conclusion was the product of multilateral efforts — primarily regional, diplomatic and United Nations-driven — combined with U.S. support in certain roles.

The United Nations, via United Nations Security Council Resolution 1497 (1 August 2003), authorised a multinational force to support the cease-fire and peace process in Liberia.

Regional actors such as Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and regional forces played the lead role in enforcement and peacekeeping.

The U.S. was involved, but its involvement was relatively limited, often through evacuation operations, logistical assistance or supporting the broader multinational mission rather than being the primary force ending the war.

So using Liberia as a case study is a weak argument, the parameters are different.

nurudeen181:
You say there's peace in liberia... You must be smoking cana or something... And only Liberia nahim dey your list. Nawa o

AstroHenri:
Fellow, America is not coming to fight Christian genocide, they are coming for our oil and to checkmate Russia and China influence in Africa... Who told u care if everyone dies in Nigeria, USA is supporting global depopulation and u think they care... In fact war is their harvest , take note
More wars more guns means more dollars

gabicon:
But peace in Liberia was mostly a result of regional pressure from African governments not solely a US government intervention. In fact the war lingered because foreign governments were arming rebel groups and anoiting war lords, let's not even go into the diamonds that grew wings in that period.

seunowa:
Where in the world has American government been able to restore security before? They went Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan but they left those places more insecure than they met them. Do you know how many people have die in USA to gun violence only in 2025? Over eleven thousand people have die to just gun violence in USA alone in 2025.
If Nigeria government can't provide security for her citizens then no one would....