₦airaland Forum

But Zelensky was saying yesterday that Ukraine will not concede any territory to Russia and will keep fighting. We shall see where he'll get weapons from because I'm sure Trump now knows that the war is an America's misadventure, a miscalculated mistake and needs to stop. He'll most likely do a deal with Putin when they meet in Alaska on Friday.

Europe is broke and can't really do much to keep supporting Ukraine. There's discontent amongst Ukrainian citizens who also are desperate for a deal and wants the war to end, there's also discontent among the political class in Ukraine who also wants the same thing but Zelensky vows to keep fighting. With what exactly? Spears, donkeys, swords and catapults?

lexy2014:
Thank you for your response. I appreciate.

1. According to you “The West - (America, Britain etc) has been pushing Ukraine towards this goal gradually over the years, maybe since the end of the 2nd world war”.

The second world war ended in 1945. At that time, there Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. It was one large country made up of many countries including Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, Latvia, Belarus, Estonia and a few other countries.

The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. How then was the west pushing Ukraine toward being a military launch pad against Russia after world war 2 when both Ukraine and Russia were part of the Soviet Union up until 1991?

2. can you tell me when the USA once promised Russia that NATO would not move an inch eastwards (towards Russia)?

3. why is Ukraine dinning with the West against a super power (Russia) as a neighbour dangerous?

4. Finland shares border with Russia. Finland decided to join NATO after Ukraine was attacked by Russia. If preventing Ukaine from joining NATO was Putins reason for attacking Ukraine, why did he not attack Finland to also prevent NATO expansion right to its border with Finland?

5. you said that “NATO hasn't tested any conventional weapon in Ukraine prior to the war” but earlier, you claimed that


Are you contradicting yourself or are you trying to misinform others?

6. When did US ever promise not to encircle Russia?

7. Do you actually know the geography and the size of Russia before you came up with your claim of US “encircling” Russia?

8. How would ever been possible for US to “encircle”?

9. What was US going to “encircle” Russia with?

Ok l'll address this again one by one.

1. Post–WW2 influence – Even though Ukraine was part of the USSR until 1991, the West’s anti-Soviet strategies which are propaganda, economic pressure, military buildup etc were already in motion, and after the collapse, those same policies shifted focus to former Soviet states, including Ukraine. Do you wonder why?

2. NATO promise – The US Secretary of State at the time - James Baker in discussions with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 during German reunification talks, said NATO will not move one inch eastwards if the Soviets accepted a Unified Germany. I hope you know Germany was split into East and West at the time. Similar verbal assurances were actually made by German Chancellor at the time just to ensure that the Soviet accept a unified Germany. What happened to that assurance?

3. Danger of ‘dining with the West’ – Because aligning militarily with an adversary’s rival, especially when sharing a long border and history, invites retaliation especially given the deep rooted and interwoven history that Russia and Ukraine both shares.

4. Finland joined NATO after the Ukraine war began, not before, I said in my first reply that the West has been training Ukraine army, long before the invasion. Why should Russia open a second front against Finland while still engaged with Ukraine? That carries significant strategic risk. Also refer to number 3 of my response about the deep history Russia share with Ukraine, you can then maybe guess why Ukraine is strategic to the West's ambition.

5. No I'm not misinforming others or contradicting myself. There are expressions in English Language called "Figure of speech" The “Testing ground” I said here refers broadly to using Ukraine as a venue for proxy conflict, training, tactics, and assessing modern warfare systems in real combat, not just pre-war live tests of hardware. I mentioned that in my second paragraph of my earlier reply. We can use some metaphor. No?

6. Refer to number 2, you don't seem to keep track of the questions you're asking.

7&8. I indeed know the geography and size of Russia, encirclement here isn't literally surrounding Russia with bases on every side, but expanding NATO military presence in former Warsaw Pact and Soviet states, increasing pressure from multiple directions. I mean common we can use some discernment here and if you don't know about the Warsaw pact, read up on it.

9. Related to 7&8. Again, what encirclement means here are political (EU absorption of former Soviet Union members), military (NATO), and strategic positioning, not a perfect geographical ring, reducing Russia’s buffer zone. (Again, let's use our best judgement here).

mikeapollo:
Shallow propaganda!
So 60,000 ''people'' have been killed, all of the are "civilians including women and children".
So no single one of them is Hamas terrorist. You think everybody is stupid to be deceived easily?
That is the propaganda lies that you and other shallow minded twats want to believe!
Majority of the people killed are the Hamas terrorists who they are covering up and hiding under the label of ''people'' or ''Palestinians''

You didn't show up to this conversation - you crashed, you didn't just crash, you crashed on arrival.

lexy2014:
how was Ukraine a puppet and how did it allow NATO use it as a testing ground?

what did NATO test in Ukraine?

how could have the war been avoided before it started?

Good questions and I'll answer them as shortly as I can.

The war is essentially a war between Russia and NATO but being fought on Ukrainian soil. Ukraine here is a proxy. Just like USA used Israel to launch an unprovoked attack against Iran recently. The West - (America, Britain etc) has been pushing Ukraine towards this goal gradually over the years, maybe since the end of the 2nd world war, the goal is to reshape public consciousness of Ukrainians to be Anti-Russia, even though they share more than border, they share deep interwoven history. USA once promised Russia that NATO would not move an inch eastwards (towards Russia), but they have assimilated Russia's closest neighbours (Latvia, Estonia etc) into NATO. At the Bucharest Summit in 2008, NATO leaders said "Ukraine will eventually join NATO". Which Russia rightly opposes. Though it can be argued that Ukraine is a sovereign nation who has the right to choose its allies but dinning with the West against a super power (Russia) as a neighbour is dangerous. It's more like - If you want to keep your enemy under control, make friends with its neighbour. Think of it this way, if Russia is a member of a military alliance similar to NATO, USA will have something to say if Russia extends membership to its neighbours like Mexico or Canada. That's part of what I meant in that sense that Zelensky is a puppet. I'll recommend a book called "The Inevitable - The Shocking Truth Behind The War in Ukraine" by Diana Panchenko.

To your second question, NATO hasn't tested any conventional weapon in Ukraine prior to the war, but American Britain and Canada has been training Ukrainian army years before the invasion, essentially preparing them for war against Russia. The massive weapons transfers people see now only began after Russia invaded in 2022, when NATO Allies have provided 99% of all military aid that Ukraine has received.

To your last question, The war could have been avoided through dialogue, Russia warned and warned, initially, the war could have been avoided if USA honour its word by not encircling Russia, let alone preparing Ukraine to join NATO. It's a threat to Russia's national security. If your enemy encircles you unprovoked, you will bite, it's common sense.

Kukutente23:
How do you know that Allah is lesbian

Because "Allah" is not a sky God. "Allah" is identical with the universe and everything within it - humans, animals, trees, oceans, air, sun, stars and even abstract identities like religion and sexuality are all expression of "Allah", even though "Allah's" identity is not bound by a certain religion but human created religions around "Allah" and gave "Allah" different names. "Allah" is not a "he" or "she", at the same time, "Allah" is both "he" and "she". "Allah" is within you and around you. "Allah" is in your mind. You, your essence, and your consciousness are an extension of "Allah". Muslims may disagree, that's why I had "Allah" in quote.

Well she's not completely wrong in proclaiming that Allah is lesbian. But the proclamation in a conservative country like Morocco?!? That's dangerously bold.

Play stupid games, earn stupid prize. This is the prize you get for being a puppet and allowing NATO use your country as a weapon testing ground. Now you're gradually conceding the country to Russia. This is a war that could have been avoided before it even started.

I think the world knows that BBC is western propaganda machine, so of course North Koreans will "tell" you that. Same BBC says Russia is "losing" in Ukraine when in actual fact, Russia is winning and gaining ground. The earlier you start telling the world the real reason for the invasion the better.

No Netanyahu, I'll tell you what's shameful. Killing more than 60,000 civilians including women and children is shameful. Deliberately starving the Gazan population is shameful, claiming territories that is not yours is shameful. Stopping independent journalist to cover the events of your atrocities in Gaza is shameful.

What is also shameful is the role Britain played in all of this. Between 1915 and 1917, the British promised Palestine to 3 different groups, just like they did in Nigeria and Africa at large. They promised it to the Arabs if they fight with the British army against the Turks. Then they promised it to the French when they negotiated Sykes-Picot treaty, then they said Palestine is actually the Jewish homeland in the Balfour declaration of 1917. It's worse than a land owner in Lagos selling the same piece of land to 3 different buyers. This is a territory that doesn’t even belong to the British, and now won’t recognise the statehood of Palestine who are the real owner of the land. All problems in the world currently is the legacy of the British empire.

This could be the result of purely internal power struggles within Mali’s military hierarchy, but I see France's handwriting all over it.

RemoveKebab:
bro it may not be only in nuclear deterrence they have this option on
It may go deep into deep state intelligence operations, terrorism and change of regime to favor them.
That's why I pity those countries recognizing Palestine.
Israel will definitely retaliate in some way
Best is to stay neutral

Am not trying to overestimate those Jewish capabilities especially this Zionism but they are very dangerous sects that have been shaping the world for a very long time.
They are almost in every powerful positions in the world.
Some say they created communism to weaken imperial Russia
And even of today ISIS to weaken middle east.

The world may isolate them geopolitically but they can't be easily gone especially in that middle east.

The question is will they expand that their territory in middle east which is now the new rumor.

The thing is, the British MI6, American CIA and the Israel’s MOSSAD are all linked, even though they all work within the jurisdictions of their respective countries, there’s nothing Mossad is capable of that the CIA has not orchestrated. The CIA especially and of course Mossad has perpetrated unjustified wars, regime change and terrorism all around the world. Just like France is funding terrorism in the Sahel region in Africa. Libya is also an example. But the power of Israel’s big brother (USA) is slowly but surely declining. USA failed catastrophically with regime change in Afghanistan, currently struggling with regime change in Iran, currently losing in Ukraine, BRICS is challenging USA’s global dominance while they wallow in trillions of dollars in debt.

When that dominance is completely gone, that will mean USA won’t be able to militarily back Israel anymore, there will be less diplomatic cover for Israel on the world stage because the U.S. has repeatedly used vetoes and diplomatic influence to block or water down United Nations measures that are critical of Israel. (Current Gaza conflict is an example) Weaker U.S. willingness or ability to do so would expose Israel to greater international censure and resolutions, and possibly sanctions or restrictions in multilateral institutions. Israel will also feel the economic and financial effect because the U.S. market, investors and research partnerships are important for Israel’s tech sector and economy.

Also US helped negotiate the Israel-Arab agreement, watch what will happen to Israel when USA no longer have that power, not to mention that USA-Israel Intelligence & technology cooperation will shrink. That’s what I meant when I said “they will become a toothless dog” yes they may still have their mosaad and stuffs but they will have no power as they currently do. The world is watching.

Your question of “will they expand that their territory in middle east.” Is exactly the plan and exactly what they are currently doing, take Gaza, some part of Lebanon, some part of Syria. But at what cost? Like I said, the world is watching and I have no doubt they will be decimated in years to come as the global order shifts. Israel’s own allies except America are turning against them, that says a lot.

Istanbul is indeed beautiful. Also try Antalya on your next visit. So good I visited twice and will visit again. Just watch out for people and shops trying to sell you cheap but "authentic" Rolex, Louis Vuitton etc.

RemoveKebab:
so as the entire middle east or any country that would be stupid to support that idea.

Try and Google "Samson option"

I understand that, I meant what I say in terms of diminished power in the context of the geopolitical leverage they currently wield carelessly. The Samson option you rightly directed me to was exactly the main reason Israel was allowed to have nuclear deterrence without being signatory to the Non Proliferation Treaty because it's one rule for America & partners and another rule for the nations who aren't West aligned. (Recent Iran conflict is an example). But the geopolitical landscape is rapidly changing. Israel will eventually be nothing but a toothless dog in the coming years.

It may be the next 20, 40 or even 50 years. I may not be on this earth by then but the State of Israel as we know it will cease to exist.

The technological, infrastructural and commercial ingenuity of the Chinese is unmatched. Take the crown of the world's most powerful country, it's yours.

My heart goes out to the buffalo for the stress and trouble of having to protect itself against the animal. I hope it's doing ok

Reference:
Had so many Indian teachers in my primary school then. Many British trained. Today they rather go to the States. To show how the economic gap has turned into a grand canyon.

I will continue today this. Obasanjo's indigenization policy was a catastrophic mistake. I can't understand why he did it. Perhaps due to the West's criticism of military rule (but in the 70's dictators were not really seen as bad guys) or was it part of OBJ's quest for Pan Africanism and the fight to rid SA of apartheid.

But one thing for surei ce Nigerians took over a lot of enterprises, agencies and entire sectors the decline started and Nigeria has not experienced a better succeeding year. It has been almost fifty years of decline and the Malaysia's, Indonesia"s, India's, Singapore"s and South Korea's of thus world have all left us in the dust.

I completely agree with you on this, even though Obasanjo’s indigenisation policy was enacted in good faith, it was a terrible mistake because it scared foreign investors away instead of attracting them. It concentrated wealth only within the elite circles, the likes of Rasak Okoya, Dangote’s uncle, Mike Adenuga, Otedola, Ibru family etc all benefited massively from the policy at the expense of national wealth distribution, just like the Russian oligarchs like Abrahamovich etc benefited from privatisation of national infrastructures after USSR dissolved, just that the Nigeria version was more long-drawn.

In comparison to India which invested in education and built a strong tech and pharmaceutical sector, Malaysia which by the way also has oil and palm oil but quickly diversified into electronics and manufacturing, and Singapore focused on education, urban planning, foreign investors and zero tolerance to corruption. Like you said, they left Nigeria in the dust and our problem in that country is further compounded by corruption, brain drain, heavy reliance on oil, lack of strategy and foresight. It's deep bro, it will take a visionary leader to turn things around at a national scale.

Draslo:
This was perfectly orchestrated by the CIA and the British. An advanced and powerful Nigeria meant real liberation for the black race and Africa. Can't have that, so here we are

☝️☝️☝️ This right here is the honest and bitter truth but we have many z0mb1es who are victims of the same system and world order themselves, blindly supporting "strong man" America, Israel and the collective West without any concrete justifiable reason besides propaganda, religion or total ignorance like it's Wizkid FC v 30BG.

WriterNig:
In the space of 2 days: The King Of Malaysia, India's National Security Advisor, President of UAE, Trump Special Envoy have visited Putin in Moscow.

Is this what "isolation" looks like?

👍🏻 Like for Russia - Multipolar World, share for USA/Nazi/NATO 卍

Trump himself is meeting him in a couple of days to discuss a truce because Putin is smoking NATO in Ukraine and advancing on all front.

Thunderfayamods:
Mr man you are living in the past, I know America more than you, I live here you are not the one to educate me. While what you said is true nations are now calling our bluff. Why do you think BRICS was formed? With all the sanctions on Russia and some other countries they are still strong despite the challenges.
If you don't know American citizens are tired of all that crap.

Oh wow, my deepest apologies Captain America. I completely forgot that living in America automatically grants someone a PhD in global geopolitics. Please, how could I, a mere observer of history, ever hope to understand America’s influence when you, sir, have seen Walmart and McDonald’s up close?

You’re absolutely right, sanctions, dollar hegemony, IMF pressure, regime change… all those are ancient history because I’m living in the past. None of that is relevant now because apparently, if enough countries “call America’s bluff,” the entire global system just resets like a Wi-Fi router. Brilliant insight.

And yes, lecture me about BRICS please. I thought BRICS is a community beer club?

Also, thank you for enlightening me that American citizens are tired of “all that crap.” I’m sure the Pentagon, Treasury, and State Department will immediately stop projecting power now that folks in Ohio have had enough. Foreign policy decisions definitely follow public fatigue. Just look at how the Iraq war ended the moment average Americans got bored.

If you know so much, maybe you won’t be opening mouth waaaa asking "Who is America to dictate to a sovereign country where to do their business” Anyway, do carry on educating the rest of us about how sovereign countries are totally free to trade with whoever they want, as long as Washington doesn’t mind, of course.

But thank you for confirming that yes, everything I said was true… but somehow still wrong because you “live here.” 🤡

Thunderfayamods:
Una go just open mouth waaaaaaaaaaa. Who is America to dictate to a sovereign country where to do their business? What is really making you happy about that?

Which rock have you been living under? Zuma or Olumo rock? Yes a “sovereign” country might technically be free to trade, but it has to weigh the costs of defying America. The United States has significant influence in the IMF, World Bank, SWIFT etc. If you refuse to do America's bidding, they may hit you with crippling sanctions which causes hyperinflation, Zimbabwe is a case study, America singlehandedly ruined Zimbabwe's economy.

They did something similar with Cuba in 1960, Iraq in 1990 or so, Venezuela in 2017, Iran in 1979 and 2018, Libya in 2011, Syria in 2020, Lebanon in 2019, Afghanistan in 2021.

They have different tools to wage economic warfare against any country that doesn't align with them, so it seems you're the one that has a lot to learn about geopolitics and America's impunity and unchecked world dominance.

Russia has fallen 🤡🤡🤡

One by one, nations in the global south are breaking away from a unipolar world and USA hegemony. Truly a history is being made. The West’s goal was to cripple Russia’s economy with sanctions, cut it off access to global markets, technologies and capital, and politically and diplomatically isolate Russia.

This is not looking like isolation but recalibration. Yes, Russia is isolated from the Western bloc (EU, G7, etc.), but not from the rest of the world, especially Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. Countries like Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE all joined BRICS and within members have exchanged 1 trillion dollars worth in trade. Population also favours BRICS, the population of BRICS member countries stands at almost 4 billion currently while G7 isn’t even up to 1 billion. It’s over for America, it's over for the dollar as a global trade currency.

I think there's more to this crash. Given Ghana's increasing ties with Burkina Faso, Zelensky's fake claim that Ukraine is deepening ties with Ghana to manufacture drone technologies for Ghana's North border. Also given that Ghana's president was apparently meant to be on that flight. It all smells fishy.

Suspicious incident. Ghana President was meant to be on that flight.

Seunpapa65:
If your oga dey wear this and you are his employee then you have nothing to worry about about being replaced by AI 😂😂

WTF 😂😂

Sonnobax15:

Just mere looking at his pics alone,one can easily know the dude is a full time psycho..


But then again, instead of black Americans to see such psychos as who they really are, they'd rather choose to bycot the businesses of their fellow blacks simply because they feel they are more superior to them 🤷

African Americans didn't choose to boycott Black businesses. It was a propaganda war to sow division between the black community. We've got to understand that America state is very skilled at perpetrating this kind of atrocious agendas, especially through social media nowadays. I won't be surprised if the CIA has a hand in it, the whole thing smells of their signature. We've got to recognise it and rise above it.

Ok this is serious and suspicious in the same measure but it also raises deeper questions. One man claiming he’ll kill 30,000 Black people is logistically impossible, yet the federal response was swift and coordinated. X, Google, AT&T, all handing over data almost immediately. Meanwhile, school shootings continue to plague America, often with clear online warning signs, and yet authorities rarely intercept those threats in time. Why the sudden efficiency in this case?

It’s hard not to see a pattern. The recent August 1 campaign encouraging Black Americans to boycott African-owned businesses already looked like a manufactured attempt to stir division. Now we have a racially charged threat being elevated to national attention right after that. Whether it’s genuine or not, it feels weaponized to either justify increased surveillance, manipulate public emotions, or keep the Black community distracted and fractured.

We’ve seen this before, divide and conquer, crisis amplification, selective outrage. It’s crucial to stay alert and ask who benefits from these narratives being pushed when they are. Condemning hate is easy; dissecting the systems that exploit it is where real awareness begins.

COINTELPRO came to mind. 🤔

MrPOTUS:
For the fact that these Muslims folks always bring out the jihadist nature everywhere they go should be a red flag for any country trying to absorb them. I pity many European countries

You'll wonder why the likes of Saudi, Kuwait, Qatar etc are not accepting them

And for the record, France has recognized Palestine state.

So, some of your hypocritical pretence hold no water

Well first, let’s correct the factual error. France has not officially recognized Palestinian statehood. Keep up! Successive French governments have supported a two-state solution in principle, but have repeatedly delayed actual recognition, claiming the “right moment” has not come. Symbolic parliamentary votes have happened, but legally and diplomatically, France still aligns closely with Israel and has failed to take any decisive stand especially in the face of recent mass atrocities.

"Muslims always bring out the jihadist nature wherever they go” is not only a sweeping generalization, it’s racist, Islamophobic, and deeply uninformed. You’re branding over 1.9 billion people by the actions of a fringe minority which is exactly the mindset that fuels hate crimes and legitimizes discrimination. If we applied your logic universally, we’d be expelling people from all faiths and ethnicities based on the worst actions of a few.

You mention Gulf countries not accepting refugees, well, I think it's a fair criticism. But again, this war is the West's war. It doesn’t absolve France or the West of their own role. France is not an uninvolved bystander. It has colonial ties, geopolitical interests, and military entanglements in the Middle East and North Africa. If it wants to project moral leadership, it must be held to a higher standard.

France’s issue here isn’t about law and order, it’s about selective outrage. A Palestinian student accused (not convicted) of online speech is expelled and publicly shamed, while Israeli officials accused of war crimes receive weapons deals, diplomatic cover, and red-carpet treatment.

So no, it’s not “hypocritical pretence” to call out the double standards of France and the collecticve West. It’s an act of conscience. And frankly, if pity is to be had, it’s for people like you who can’t see past tired stereotypes and blindly defend systems built on centuries of violence, racism, genocides, ethnic cleansing and denial. You're a victim of the same imperialists but absolute ignorance and Stockholme syndrome won't let you see it. I was expecting an intelligent argument but your stand is completely devoid of that. Only parroting without substance.

MrPOTUS:
Why didn't your fellow Arab nations take them in, una hypocrisy long gan

France can decide to kick anyone who isn't their citizen out of their country for whatever reason, same as Nigeria.

So rest

Who is this Pillock deflecting to “why didn’t Arab nations take them in”. You're completely sidestepping the core issue: France actively invited and selected people from Gaza through its humanitarian programme. It wasn’t a random influx, it was a state-sponsored evacuation. So, to now criminalize a single individual and use it as an excuse to punish all others smacks of scapegoating, not justice.

Second, invoking “sovereign right” to deport is a distraction. Of course, every nation has the legal right to deport, just as Nigeria does. But that doesn’t make every exercise of that right ethical or principled. Apartheid South Africa also had the legal right to expel and silence people, was that moral? No. Legality does not equate to justice.

And calling out France’s hypocrisy is fair game. For a country that bombards the world with speeches about liberty, tolerance, and human rights, it conveniently forgets those ideals when it comes to Arabs, Muslims, and particularly Palestinians. Oh and the African countries it kept in shackles just its imperialist ambitions.

Lastly, let’s not pretend Arab nations are perfect, they’re not. But this isn’t about shifting blame. It’s about holding to account a Western government that has played an outsized role in both shaping the conflict in Palestine and criminalizing its victims.

So yes, France can deport. But when it does so in the context of suppressing Palestinian voices, while funding the war machine that’s flattening Gaza, we’re not witnessing justice, we’re witnessing moral cowardice. And no I'm not Arab, Muslim, Christian or whatever religious cult you all belong to. I'm human.

Botragelad:
Lol. That was quick. You really have to wonder why countries like France, the UK, and some of Europe keep letting in people who hate everything the West stands for, just to look politically correct and “woke.” These Islamists ruined their own countries with religious extremism, then ran to the West only to bring the same toxic mindset with them.

You seriously think you can "fix" or "change" a radical Islamist? Try harder. These people are raised to hate non-Muslims and push their ideology wherever they go. You give one a scholarship, and next thing you know, they're openly supporting terror groups and preaching hate. And they’re not alone, millions like them are already in Europe, slowly shifting the population and culture.

Deport them fast, before they use their growing numbers to force Europe into Islamic rule. You think hating Israel is cool or “woke”? Wait till the real Islamists turn on you. Instead of bringing in peaceful Christians or people who actually want to live like the West, Europe keeps importing radicals who despise everything Western. Keep going like this, and Europe’s going to learn the hard way that these Islamists hate you just as much as they hate their enemies.

Says France, a nation that prides itself on liberté, égalité, fraternité, has a long and bloody history of colonial violence and genocide, from the brutal conquest of Algeria to the complicity in the Rwandan genocide, inhumane treatment of African soldiers during both world wars. Their legacy continues today in the form of its unflinching support for Israel’s devastating assault on Gaza, where entire families are being wiped out and civilian infrastructure systematically destroyed.

By criminalizing a Palestinian student for online speech while arming and politically backing a regime accused of war crimes, France is not only betraying its professed democratic ideals but is reinforcing a centuries-old pattern of silencing the colonized while empowering the colonizer.

The broader Western world is no less culpable. Under the guise of fighting terrorism and defending democracy, Western governments have provided Israel with weapons, diplomatic cover, and media narratives that dehumanize Palestinians and justify mass atrocities. Their selective outrage, vocal against resistance and silent on mass killings exposes the moral bankruptcy at the heart of their foreign policies.

This is not about security or peace. It is about maintaining a global order where Western interests, and those of their allies, override international law, human dignity, and the lives of millions. This is Africa, Israeli's propaganda will not stand no matter how hard you try.