₦airaland Forum

I think these "antisemites" protesting should know by now that Netanyahu doesn't give two flying f/vcks about the hostages. He cares more about occupying Gaza, extend to South of Lebanon and South-West of Syria. He needs the war to carry on to stay in power for as long as possible but realistically he should be in jail.

I thought "God House" is funny, then there's "Westminster Chapel" beside it. You really can't make this up 🤣🤣

America is interested in resuming trade with Russia - Trump made that clear. Ukraine, Britain or EU blew up Nord Stream pipeline that transport Russia's gas to Europe. America will start buying Russia's gas and sell it to the Europeans for profit 🤣. Europe next door to Russia has already made a bitter enemy out of Russia. Europe and Britain can't fund Ukraine war without America but America is pulling out of the war and counting its loss. Zelensky got used and dumped (at least he pocketed 💶💷) - I won't be surprised if he goes into exile. That's if Russia or CIA spare his life. Who's the loser?

If you think you understand alliances, think again.

Technically, Putin left one Russia state (Moscow) to another old Russia state (Alyaska).

Gbogbowa:
can you tell me how many people are going to Russia for green pastures,apart of selling military machine to Africa what else did Russia have.mention one products in Nigeria that is made in Russia. Russia only survive because he is part of Europe if not they would have finished them

Apart from Hollywood and propaganda (which you obviously bought), mention 4 products in Nigeria today that is made in America.

If you know how rich Africa is and how much potential Africa has, then you'll know that no African should be going to America for "greener pastures", at least not the way we go about it - Borrow, sell properties, family house and land etc. With all the riches on our land, have you never wondered why Africa is still poor?

Yes, Russia sell military machines to the Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso because America won't sell them to us and they are the ones sponsoring insurgencies and terrorism in Africa, keeping Africa suppressed and dependent.

In addition to selling arms to the Sahel, Russia deal with African leaders with mutual respect, buys our resources at fair price. Go to Niger and Burkina Faso and see the development they've made. America and the collective West are buying our resources for pennies, imposing puppets on us as head of states and keeping us in debt traps through IMF, WTO etc. That's Neo-colonialism.

And no, Russia's survival is not dependent on Europe. Russia is actually a transcontinental country, much of it is in Asia and since Europe placed sanctions on Russia, where did Putin turn to? Yes he turned to Asia and the global south.

The West tried to depose him through regime change like they did all around the world including Africa, didn't work, they tried sabotage, didn't work, tried to isolate him on world stage and turn his nation into a pariah state, didn't work, they tried sanctions, didn't work either. The man is an absolute headache for them. Now they have another beast (in the name of China) to contend with.

Well at least Trump has achieved a lot more than EU and UK. (Someone please give him a Nobel peace prize that he so much crave 🤡) It's now up to comedian Zelensky to face reality and accept deal or keep clowning. I don't think America wants to continue funding the war, they're pulling out. EU is a paper tiger and can't singlehandedly carry the financial responsibility either. UK is broke af. Looks like Zelensky is cooked. America used him, now America is dumping him. The guy ain't gonna last.

Quelme:
Is there a kids table for Zelensky and the EU babies?

That would be a waste of money and time. They should stick to the table in Kyiv and Brussels. I'm sure Kier Starmer is watching from his table in London and Macron from Côte d'Ivoire or wherever that God-forsaken gremlin is.

engrchykae:
i thought i was the only one in the know.
They will come here pretending to be humanitarians while they are evil, training foolish Africans as terrorists.

You're not the only one bro but sadly we are the minorities. You see the bolded? They are waaaayyy more than us, there are a lot of them on this platform and everywhere. They don't ask the most important questions - Why is an "American missionary" in Nigeria and his wife in Niger.

Iran couple of months ago arrested a British Intelligence personnel and her husband under the guise of conducting a personal research project exploring the meaning of a “good life.”

Darrel Blocker a CIA agent under the guise of a musician carried out espionage in Uganda and Senegal.

Louise Armstrong was also a CIA agent under the guise of musician, used concerts as a covert operation to orchestrate a coup in Congo.

But in Nigeria? Forget it bro, those who fall in the category of the bolded will come for you. Then you have the ones who are utterly gullible and dormant, Wetin concern Nigerian with nonsense where Big brother Naija etc dey.

"American CIA missionaries" 😂😂

Zelensky is not in this meeting, neither is Britain, European Union or the United Nations, despite talking tough and barking on the sideline. Tells you everything you need to know.

Sapiosexuality:
I'm talking about you. Why is one invasion better than the other when both are killing and destroying the weak in the battle? America has double standards, true. But you are not any different considering your different positions on two identical wars. Why is Russia right and Israel wrong, yet you are right in your assessment of them?

I think you’re framing this as if I’m saying “Russia is right” and “Israel is wrong” which is the case in actual fact but that's besides the point I'm making.

I’m pointing out that Western governments and media tend to frame invasions differently depending on who is doing them. Both wars are tragic no doubt, both kill innocents, and both involve immense suffering. The difference I’m highlighting is in how they are treated politically and diplomatically by the West.

With Ukraine, the West presents it as a clear-cut case of aggression and calls for unyielding resistance, which obviously they are supporting Ukraine militarily against Russia. They've been training Ukrainian soldiers, years before the invasion. What would you do if you were Russia's head of state? sit back while they force a regime change through your closest neighbour?

With Palestine, even in the face of civilian deaths and ethnic cleansing, there’s hesitation and outright support for Israel, America sends weapon to Israel to basically destroy Gaza and commit genocide. That’s not me saying one invasion is “better” than the other, it’s me saying the selective outrage and inconsistent application of principles is the problem. Who are the actors behind both wars? AMERICA & Co.

Sapiosexuality:
What should he do? Does Putin want peace or even wants to stop fighting? How does he stop fighting when Russia's goal is to take over the entire country? Is it okay for another man to forcefully invade and take your home unprovoked or even provoked like Israel is doing?

Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya didn't send a gracious invitation to the West before they invaded. Did they? This is a good old America's imperial adventure and it's gone wrong for them.

I don't think Russia is interested in the whole of Ukraine. Though Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzia regions seems to be non-negotiable.

And yes Israel is carrying out ethnic cleansing in Gaza, claiming lands that's not theirs. America is not saying much about that, are they? No double standards here at all.

Zelensky the comedian will keep fighting because that's the wish of Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and that witch at Brussels - Ursula Von Der Leyen

Dearlord:
There is nothing special been dead or alive.


Life & death has no ending, it just a state in a stage.

I agree. No one really dies.

Ha right! it's all making sense now. Decimate Sudanese so that Palestinians can move to Sudan, and Israel can take control of Gaza.

Trump is offering Putin access to rare earth minerals on territory Russia already controls? Proxy war backfired on America and what makes the whole thing funny is you don't show your cards before any negotiation, that's not the deal you're taking to the table tomorrow Mr Trump. Putin is no fool.

In all of this, the European Union including Britain, looks like a child on the back seat of a car, with one of those toy steering wheels. They believe they’re participating in the driving, but are really not. Totally powerless, voiceless and irrelevant.

But Zelensky was saying yesterday that Ukraine will not concede any territory to Russia and will keep fighting. We shall see where he'll get weapons from because I'm sure Trump now knows that the war is an America's misadventure, a miscalculated mistake and needs to stop. He'll most likely do a deal with Putin when they meet in Alaska on Friday.

Europe is broke and can't really do much to keep supporting Ukraine. There's discontent amongst Ukrainian citizens who also are desperate for a deal and wants the war to end, there's also discontent among the political class in Ukraine who also wants the same thing but Zelensky vows to keep fighting. With what exactly? Spears, donkeys, swords and catapults?

lexy2014:
Thank you for your response. I appreciate.

1. According to you “The West - (America, Britain etc) has been pushing Ukraine towards this goal gradually over the years, maybe since the end of the 2nd world war”.

The second world war ended in 1945. At that time, there Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. It was one large country made up of many countries including Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, Latvia, Belarus, Estonia and a few other countries.

The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. How then was the west pushing Ukraine toward being a military launch pad against Russia after world war 2 when both Ukraine and Russia were part of the Soviet Union up until 1991?

2. can you tell me when the USA once promised Russia that NATO would not move an inch eastwards (towards Russia)?

3. why is Ukraine dinning with the West against a super power (Russia) as a neighbour dangerous?

4. Finland shares border with Russia. Finland decided to join NATO after Ukraine was attacked by Russia. If preventing Ukaine from joining NATO was Putins reason for attacking Ukraine, why did he not attack Finland to also prevent NATO expansion right to its border with Finland?

5. you said that “NATO hasn't tested any conventional weapon in Ukraine prior to the war” but earlier, you claimed that


Are you contradicting yourself or are you trying to misinform others?

6. When did US ever promise not to encircle Russia?

7. Do you actually know the geography and the size of Russia before you came up with your claim of US “encircling” Russia?

8. How would ever been possible for US to “encircle”?

9. What was US going to “encircle” Russia with?

Ok l'll address this again one by one.

1. Post–WW2 influence – Even though Ukraine was part of the USSR until 1991, the West’s anti-Soviet strategies which are propaganda, economic pressure, military buildup etc were already in motion, and after the collapse, those same policies shifted focus to former Soviet states, including Ukraine. Do you wonder why?

2. NATO promise – The US Secretary of State at the time - James Baker in discussions with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 during German reunification talks, said NATO will not move one inch eastwards if the Soviets accepted a Unified Germany. I hope you know Germany was split into East and West at the time. Similar verbal assurances were actually made by German Chancellor at the time just to ensure that the Soviet accept a unified Germany. What happened to that assurance?

3. Danger of ‘dining with the West’ – Because aligning militarily with an adversary’s rival, especially when sharing a long border and history, invites retaliation especially given the deep rooted and interwoven history that Russia and Ukraine both shares.

4. Finland joined NATO after the Ukraine war began, not before, I said in my first reply that the West has been training Ukraine army, long before the invasion. Why should Russia open a second front against Finland while still engaged with Ukraine? That carries significant strategic risk. Also refer to number 3 of my response about the deep history Russia share with Ukraine, you can then maybe guess why Ukraine is strategic to the West's ambition.

5. No I'm not misinforming others or contradicting myself. There are expressions in English Language called "Figure of speech" The “Testing ground” I said here refers broadly to using Ukraine as a venue for proxy conflict, training, tactics, and assessing modern warfare systems in real combat, not just pre-war live tests of hardware. I mentioned that in my second paragraph of my earlier reply. We can use some metaphor. No?

6. Refer to number 2, you don't seem to keep track of the questions you're asking.

7&8. I indeed know the geography and size of Russia, encirclement here isn't literally surrounding Russia with bases on every side, but expanding NATO military presence in former Warsaw Pact and Soviet states, increasing pressure from multiple directions. I mean common we can use some discernment here and if you don't know about the Warsaw pact, read up on it.

9. Related to 7&8. Again, what encirclement means here are political (EU absorption of former Soviet Union members), military (NATO), and strategic positioning, not a perfect geographical ring, reducing Russia’s buffer zone. (Again, let's use our best judgement here).

mikeapollo:
Shallow propaganda!
So 60,000 ''people'' have been killed, all of the are "civilians including women and children".
So no single one of them is Hamas terrorist. You think everybody is stupid to be deceived easily?
That is the propaganda lies that you and other shallow minded twats want to believe!
Majority of the people killed are the Hamas terrorists who they are covering up and hiding under the label of ''people'' or ''Palestinians''

You didn't show up to this conversation - you crashed, you didn't just crash, you crashed on arrival.

lexy2014:
how was Ukraine a puppet and how did it allow NATO use it as a testing ground?

what did NATO test in Ukraine?

how could have the war been avoided before it started?

Good questions and I'll answer them as shortly as I can.

The war is essentially a war between Russia and NATO but being fought on Ukrainian soil. Ukraine here is a proxy. Just like USA used Israel to launch an unprovoked attack against Iran recently. The West - (America, Britain etc) has been pushing Ukraine towards this goal gradually over the years, maybe since the end of the 2nd world war, the goal is to reshape public consciousness of Ukrainians to be Anti-Russia, even though they share more than border, they share deep interwoven history. USA once promised Russia that NATO would not move an inch eastwards (towards Russia), but they have assimilated Russia's closest neighbours (Latvia, Estonia etc) into NATO. At the Bucharest Summit in 2008, NATO leaders said "Ukraine will eventually join NATO". Which Russia rightly opposes. Though it can be argued that Ukraine is a sovereign nation who has the right to choose its allies but dinning with the West against a super power (Russia) as a neighbour is dangerous. It's more like - If you want to keep your enemy under control, make friends with its neighbour. Think of it this way, if Russia is a member of a military alliance similar to NATO, USA will have something to say if Russia extends membership to its neighbours like Mexico or Canada. That's part of what I meant in that sense that Zelensky is a puppet. I'll recommend a book called "The Inevitable - The Shocking Truth Behind The War in Ukraine" by Diana Panchenko.

To your second question, NATO hasn't tested any conventional weapon in Ukraine prior to the war, but American Britain and Canada has been training Ukrainian army years before the invasion, essentially preparing them for war against Russia. The massive weapons transfers people see now only began after Russia invaded in 2022, when NATO Allies have provided 99% of all military aid that Ukraine has received.

To your last question, The war could have been avoided through dialogue, Russia warned and warned, initially, the war could have been avoided if USA honour its word by not encircling Russia, let alone preparing Ukraine to join NATO. It's a threat to Russia's national security. If your enemy encircles you unprovoked, you will bite, it's common sense.

Kukutente23:
How do you know that Allah is lesbian

Because "Allah" is not a sky God. "Allah" is identical with the universe and everything within it - humans, animals, trees, oceans, air, sun, stars and even abstract identities like religion and sexuality are all expression of "Allah", even though "Allah's" identity is not bound by a certain religion but human created religions around "Allah" and gave "Allah" different names. "Allah" is not a "he" or "she", at the same time, "Allah" is both "he" and "she". "Allah" is within you and around you. "Allah" is in your mind. You, your essence, and your consciousness are an extension of "Allah". Muslims may disagree, that's why I had "Allah" in quote.

Well she's not completely wrong in proclaiming that Allah is lesbian. But the proclamation in a conservative country like Morocco?!? That's dangerously bold.

Play stupid games, earn stupid prize. This is the prize you get for being a puppet and allowing NATO use your country as a weapon testing ground. Now you're gradually conceding the country to Russia. This is a war that could have been avoided before it even started.

I think the world knows that BBC is western propaganda machine, so of course North Koreans will "tell" you that. Same BBC says Russia is "losing" in Ukraine when in actual fact, Russia is winning and gaining ground. The earlier you start telling the world the real reason for the invasion the better.

No Netanyahu, I'll tell you what's shameful. Killing more than 60,000 civilians including women and children is shameful. Deliberately starving the Gazan population is shameful, claiming territories that is not yours is shameful. Stopping independent journalist to cover the events of your atrocities in Gaza is shameful.

What is also shameful is the role Britain played in all of this. Between 1915 and 1917, the British promised Palestine to 3 different groups, just like they did in Nigeria and Africa at large. They promised it to the Arabs if they fight with the British army against the Turks. Then they promised it to the French when they negotiated Sykes-Picot treaty, then they said Palestine is actually the Jewish homeland in the Balfour declaration of 1917. It's worse than a land owner in Lagos selling the same piece of land to 3 different buyers. This is a territory that doesn’t even belong to the British, and now won’t recognise the statehood of Palestine who are the real owner of the land. All problems in the world currently is the legacy of the British empire.

This could be the result of purely internal power struggles within Mali’s military hierarchy, but I see France's handwriting all over it.

RemoveKebab:
bro it may not be only in nuclear deterrence they have this option on
It may go deep into deep state intelligence operations, terrorism and change of regime to favor them.
That's why I pity those countries recognizing Palestine.
Israel will definitely retaliate in some way
Best is to stay neutral

Am not trying to overestimate those Jewish capabilities especially this Zionism but they are very dangerous sects that have been shaping the world for a very long time.
They are almost in every powerful positions in the world.
Some say they created communism to weaken imperial Russia
And even of today ISIS to weaken middle east.

The world may isolate them geopolitically but they can't be easily gone especially in that middle east.

The question is will they expand that their territory in middle east which is now the new rumor.

The thing is, the British MI6, American CIA and the Israel’s MOSSAD are all linked, even though they all work within the jurisdictions of their respective countries, there’s nothing Mossad is capable of that the CIA has not orchestrated. The CIA especially and of course Mossad has perpetrated unjustified wars, regime change and terrorism all around the world. Just like France is funding terrorism in the Sahel region in Africa. Libya is also an example. But the power of Israel’s big brother (USA) is slowly but surely declining. USA failed catastrophically with regime change in Afghanistan, currently struggling with regime change in Iran, currently losing in Ukraine, BRICS is challenging USA’s global dominance while they wallow in trillions of dollars in debt.

When that dominance is completely gone, that will mean USA won’t be able to militarily back Israel anymore, there will be less diplomatic cover for Israel on the world stage because the U.S. has repeatedly used vetoes and diplomatic influence to block or water down United Nations measures that are critical of Israel. (Current Gaza conflict is an example) Weaker U.S. willingness or ability to do so would expose Israel to greater international censure and resolutions, and possibly sanctions or restrictions in multilateral institutions. Israel will also feel the economic and financial effect because the U.S. market, investors and research partnerships are important for Israel’s tech sector and economy.

Also US helped negotiate the Israel-Arab agreement, watch what will happen to Israel when USA no longer have that power, not to mention that USA-Israel Intelligence & technology cooperation will shrink. That’s what I meant when I said “they will become a toothless dog” yes they may still have their mosaad and stuffs but they will have no power as they currently do. The world is watching.

Your question of “will they expand that their territory in middle east.” Is exactly the plan and exactly what they are currently doing, take Gaza, some part of Lebanon, some part of Syria. But at what cost? Like I said, the world is watching and I have no doubt they will be decimated in years to come as the global order shifts. Israel’s own allies except America are turning against them, that says a lot.

Istanbul is indeed beautiful. Also try Antalya on your next visit. So good I visited twice and will visit again. Just watch out for people and shops trying to sell you cheap but "authentic" Rolex, Louis Vuitton etc.

RemoveKebab:
so as the entire middle east or any country that would be stupid to support that idea.

Try and Google "Samson option"

I understand that, I meant what I say in terms of diminished power in the context of the geopolitical leverage they currently wield carelessly. The Samson option you rightly directed me to was exactly the main reason Israel was allowed to have nuclear deterrence without being signatory to the Non Proliferation Treaty because it's one rule for America & partners and another rule for the nations who aren't West aligned. (Recent Iran conflict is an example). But the geopolitical landscape is rapidly changing. Israel will eventually be nothing but a toothless dog in the coming years.