₦airaland Forum

You asked if juju is part of yoruba culture, I answered. I didn't say "ALL YORUBAS" practice juju. But it is important you acknowledge the prevalence of juju in yoruba culture. That's all.

If those ignorant people make such sly comments in your presence be sure to scold them.

On a saturday? Sunday? You can't be serious. Take it easy on yourself will you? Abi na school project?

The focus on your person is now dissolved. _{awkward enough, i find it kind of cute}

kobo don't get too perplexed here. i apologize if you think i'm a prick.

sleep in peace.

Confidence, son.

such is the case with many blondes.  everything flies over their head.  they giggle about as much as you do.

_{silly excuses.  the english you learned in naija is preventing you from understanding the english used on this thread? hah} 

I agree we should.  I know your person very well I must say.  _{for some stubborn reason I am one to believe that your person is every bit important to this thread}

and if believing that you understand english makes you happy, i am all for it as well. Just remember this, the answer was written in english.  If you understand english as you proclaimed, you should have no trouble understanding this:

your question

The question was about the infatuation with Clinton. Why turn the target on Bush?? I am just curious!

the answer has been posted numerous times and will forever continue to blow in the wind - in a direction foreign to your mind.

Speaking of claims, did you just claim that I didn't ask you anything about your post?
ROFLMAOLOL!!!
I must have been talking to another person then.   Triple Lol.  Helloooooooooooooo! Wake up please.  If I didn't ask you anything about your post why have you been responding since? 

kobo please please please wake up.  I am truly curious now to know if you are indeed a blonde.


p.s. brain fart was analogy to the other thread: "smartest presidents"

Another question then.  If simple english is beyond your grasp  what then do you grasp? An endless parable of whys?

Kobojunkie:
This Thread was not started to ask the West for help. If you have followed the dialogue from the beginning, you would realize it was put in place to mock the west by claiming they are not majorly involved cause there is no oil in Zimbabwe. To that I stated that millions of dollars in Aids are going into Zimbabwe as we speak from the west to help feed the people.

Lol! That's preposterous. Let's not shift to the goal of the thread now. I was only asking you about your post and I got my answer, thanks.

I'm sorry the answers didn't make sense to you even after the pieces are laying there.  Those with developed minds probably get it; again, sorry you don't.  It's most likely beyond your grasp. It doesn't get any simpler than "lay man" . . abi make I try broken?

Still looking for "where" I explained it? i did again. Digress from that.

There's nothing wrong with seeking for more help from the west if they feel the west can offer them better support. Let the west decline if they want. Until then, let them continue to ask.

Telling you I compared Bush and Clinton because . . . "thrice" was giving you more than the full picture.  Please never lose sight of your goggles again.  You might find it very difficult to find another good samaritan that will explain themselves beyond the extent that I have.


The part about "because I can" did not even come until like 4 posts after.  And that part was definitely annoying regardless of your opinion.  If you really want to find out why, kindly cut my heart open and attach wires to my nerves in hopes of some scientific discovery.

Never. We will never leave the topic . Don't worry we're still here. I see no reason to concede my valid points. I was "hoping" you would commit the brain fart, get it? You haven't done it yet.

The obnoxious talk I already explained. We know these people do provide help, no need to rub it in like it's something supernatural and divine. That was my point as pertains to that.

It wasn't zig-zagging. You as a person just prefer elaborate posts. As such, you were offended that my post, ad initium, did not give you the full details that you sought.

We all know this kobo, but the question still remains, do you think it should be stopped because you feel the west is overspending on Africa and Africa doesn't deserve it?

Not really because that's not the only reason I offered as to why I did it. Which is pointless anyways. My reason for introducing Bush into the response was explained, but you need a walking stick --err, I mean a new set of goggles, to see that reason.

I was hoping to get you to commit another one of your classic brain farts.  I read some of your words regarding this earlier, and I find them quite obnoxious.  Especially the excessive argument about the west spending hundreds of thousands of dollars.

More reasonable . That one just about got me ROFLMAO too. I have to be stupid to realize that, "that answer is more reasonable", pardon me.

Okay good. I'm glad we agree on something.  Only boneheads would use such irrational argument anyways.  It's an empty statement at best.

Succintly, aid shouldn't be done out of compulsion.

I have a very good understanding, now, of who you are as well. I don't see you having to explain why you ROFLMAO all over the place. Even when asked, sometiems you say it's because you can. Well to answer your question too, I responded that way because I can. Settled?

Kobojunkie:
uummm. Ofcourse I am weird and so for you to continue to try to psychoanalyze me makes me wonder if you even understand that I don't I don't think as you do.

But dude, Canada is bound to Great Britain.

I forgot to mention that I wouldn't call it psychoanalysis. I just thought your answer my question lacked good depth. Even a kindergartener could have made a statement similar to what you panted.

Binded by . . . . .?

If that example doesn't work for you, fine. What about Argentina and Germany, Russia and China, etc

Rudeness is what I call your poking into the reason for my answer.  Even after I repeated it to you twice before.

If you wanted to counter my response with something intuitive, you should have done it. Those "why" games are unintelligent and quite feminine in nature. _{apology tot he female folks}

you are weird.

I asked you why you think Africa isn't entitled to help from the west, and I think you responded by saying it's because Africa isn't legally binded to receive help from the west. 
And I said, fine that's the easy way out and it can be generalized to apply to almost any country.  Meaning, for example, Great Britain isn't entitled to help from Canada because canada doesn't have to help great Britain.  in short, your reply was carefully crafted and slippery.

The words "Waste your time well", in the form you've constructed them, are oxymorons to each other; keyword here is wasted. It's like you wanted to play a game of whys. . . it will become annoying.

Example
why did you say yes
-Because i said yes
why not no
-because i said yes
you could have said no
-but i said yes
tell me why you said yes
=what's wrong with yes
i just want to know why
- i don't have a reason for it
why don't you have a reason for it
- umm, because I don't,

hope you get it.

You are so easy to confuse . . . are you perchance blonde? I said your statement can be generalized to just about any country. I didn't specify "countries in Africa", I said almost any country.

Well yeah that's the easiest way out.  Not just Africa, your statement can be generalized to almost any country.  In extension, I was hoping you would say that Africa isn't entitled to western aid because Africa has received gazillions of dollars from them in the past.

What makes you think Africa is not in any way entitled to all that help? How much do you think the white men have stolen (or let's say taken) from Africa/ns?