Chynazom's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Chynazom's Profile › Chynazom's Posts
This is just like suing a landlord because he did not rent his apartment to a particular person...*person dey quarrel you for ur own thing* Or suing Mr. Seun cos he did not accept an advertisement *no insult intended* As long as refusal is not done harshly.. |
somtea: Na u b dis ![]() |
Both genders are special..... But the way some men attach so much importance to having a male child can be quite disturbing,like its a do or die affair!! Some ignorant ones even go ahead to fight their wives for not having male children. And to think their reason is just for the family name to continue, and i wonder how he can monitor the 'continuation' from the grave when he's gone. Na wa... |
Very true! Not forgetting the warning not to insult..... |
kokoA: That JIK advert is the most stupid I've seen this year.. Old people just dey scream like mumus. For making me go through such torture the makers of that advert should be tied to stake and made to watch the LG mosquito AC advert for one week non-stop. While the makers of the dumb LG advert should be giving thesame treatment as the JIK guys. chai!! You badt gan.. |
Policewoman: WATCH OUT FOR THE NEXT NOLLYWOOD MOVIE: "GO AND DIE PART 1 TO 4."This has to be the funniest post! ![]() |
jay bee: First of all, i'd like to congratulate you guys on your win albeit by default due to no show by the other candidates.Thank you! Your observations have been duly noted. |
Looks like they are referring to those with outstanding exams to write...... |
Fynestboi: not you your partner.Okay then, just needed clarity. Thanks! |
Fynestboi: that was why it was -5.I don't fully understand, the specific article from Wikipedia was mentioned in the reference my first post. |
Fynestboi: 53 of 100- 5 for lifting stuff of Wikipedia without referencing it. Plagiarism should be frowned upon. ThankBut I did, pls check the references again. |
Can we please have total score?? |
Caracta: @chynazomAs much as I do not vote for the ridicule of the President of the country,however, lets bear in mind the need for open criticism of government and public authorities - it makes for a healthy democratic environment. Not also forgetting that public authorities have full rights to defend themselves in the face of such criticism. Thank you. |
♥Dεs•Chγκσ♥:How about putting the question this way: "Had their Government censored the broadcast, how would we have gotten to know about such comment in the first place?" Do you not think that there could be some positive sides to the story? Maybe not now, but in future dealings. |
jay bee: @ chynazomJust like Emzybrown noted....We are definitely in the jet age, with the presence of Biometric registration of the populace surely there will soon, no longer be an escape route for offenders. We have the intelligence bureau that are involved in handling issues related with national security, they should employ all means 'positively' available including free flow of information online. Intelligence gathering can also be done on the internet, social medias etc. If these media are restricted, how can this method of approach be possible? |
Davo93: Good Afternoon ladies and gentlemen,In that statement I was trying to expatiate on 'The Declaration's ' concept of Freedom of speech. |
tunex23: My question to the UNN crew, we know that freedom of speech is a true democracy, but you also know that this can be abuse by the citizens? What your take on thatLet's not dwell ONLY on the negative aspect of freedom of speech. It is part of a very positive medium for practice of true democracy when used appropriately. |
Emzybrown: Miss chynazom, In this jet age, terrorism and civil unrest have been orchestrated via social media, how do you want government apparatus to curb this ugly menace?In the third paragraph, I mentioned that as much as we have our freedom of speech, we will also be responsible for abuse of this freedom. So, in my opinion , the Government can curb such menace of by having some sort of social media surveillance agency that can monitor such activity online, this can even help in a way. How? The agency can track and even halt some terrorist activities when they are being incited. Someone who decides to use the 'freedom' of the internet wrongly should be apprehended. |
My esteemed Judges, illustrious coordinators, hardworking moderators, fellow contestants, informed audience, and all other protocols duly observed. It’s quite delightful being part of this live and online debate, my user name is Chynazom, representing the University of Nigeria and I am speaking against the motion that Government should sometimes restrict freedom of speech. I’d begin by telling us that freedom is easily defined as the ability to act freely, or a state in which somebody is free to act and live as he/she chooses without being subject to any undue restraints or restriction. (Encarta dictionary, 2009). Freedom of speech and expression is unarguably one of the fundamental rights of a person and it is closely linked with the freedom of information. Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents, the ‘Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen’ adopted during the French revolution in 1789 specifically affirmed that freedom of speech is an inalienable right. The Declaration in Article 11 states that: “The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.” There are other human rights documents that speak volumes on the rights of a person as regard freedom of speech, but let me dwell on the above quoted. Granted, the government has the right to restrict this freedom but the ‘Declaration’ does not forget to remind us that a citizen shall be responsible for abuse of this freedom. Freedom of speech should not at any time be restricted by the Government because restriction totally defeats the real essence of Democracy. Democracy is characterized by free and equal participation in Government; how can we fully participate in decision making process when we don’t have 100% freedom of speech or when there are limitations to what we can and can’t say? A true Democratic society should have free flow of information at all times, including free and open debates regarding matters of public interest even when this involves criticism of individuals. Freedom of speech is not only limited to expression alone, but also involves right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas. (According to John Milton’s argument). This implies that if the Government ‘sometimes’ restrict freedom of speech, it also indirectly restricting the freedom to seek and receive information. Before one can have information to dish out, he/she must have sought them out. How is that possible when there are certain restrictions? Governmental actions to deny differing points of view, even distasteful or unpopular opinions, rob us of the range of ideas that might serve the interests of society more effectively. The right to speak freely, without restraint, is essential to a democratic government because it helps us develop better laws and policies through challenge, rebuttal, and debate. The ability to speak freely allows us to pursue truth, to challenge falsehoods, to correct mistakes—all are necessary for a healthy society. I’ll not forget that the main argument here is whether to restrict this freedom ‘sometimes’ or not; but have you ever imagined that if some of these restrictions are not contested, we might gradually and unconsciously lose the freedom to express ourselves in some political matters. How is that possible? Let me quote part of Principle 2 of the Principle of Freedom of Expression and Protection of Reputation (found in Article 19). It says: “Defamation laws cannot be justified if their purpose or effect is to protect individuals against harm to a reputation which they do not have or do not merit, or to protect the ‘reputations’ of entities other than those which have the right to sue and to be sued. In particular, defamation laws cannot be justified if their purpose or effect is to: i. prevent legitimate criticism of officials or the exposure of official wrongdoings or corruption. ii. protect the ‘reputation’ of objects, such as State symbols, flags or national insignia iii. protect the ‘reputation’ of the State or nation. iv. enable individuals to sue on behalf of a persons who are deceased Most times when Defamation laws are abused, the resultant effect cannot be overemphasised. We would have cases of public open debates and legitimate criticism of wrongdoings being prevented. The rest of the scenario can be imagined. I imagine what life would have been like if there was no freedom of speech at all; we would have been in an age of modern day slavery . Forums like Nairaland where issues concerning the populace are discussed daily wouldn’t have been in existence. I am of the opinion that this freedom we enjoy should be full and complete, not altered at any time. An informed society should be totally knowledgeable, having no constraints on free flow of information. So, audience lets crave for a society where we are all free to express ourselves and free to know things we should know. Thank you! REFERENCES Freedom of speech in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech http://www.justicelearning.org/ Defining Defamation in Article 19 in www.article19.org |
Hope the appraisal for UNN was received ?? |
School: University of Nigeria Name: chynazom I'd be the first speaker. Topic:It is sometimes right for the Government to restrict freedom of speech. My stance: Opposing |
Coordinators, hope we can now sign in for tomorrow's debate? |
Question: Will the two debaters representing each school be allowed to make individual posts....e.g main speaker and supporting OR just one debater representing and speaking through out the debate?? What is this appraisal about please?? |
Fynestboi: i just make reference to this using the method i show uokay...thanks! So...1000 words it is....it could be more |
Fynestboi: highlight on your postNot my own post..i mean , if i want to make reference to a sentence or paragraph in another person's post |
Please, I need to be cleared about something...How do I make a higlight on a post i want to quote ? |
Just to be sure, how will the topics be assigned again? |
Chinazom------UNN |
Could this be TRUE? This politically motivated. WAIT!!! Una sure say no be Knock-out, cos that scene (pics) doen't look like that of a bomb blast |
Different stories everyday..... |
tcubed03: Isnt that the illuminati sign done by wizkid in that pix.... tcubed03: Isnt that the illuminati sign done by wizkid in that pix....Was wondering too ![]() |
Even Asa talk am sef, in fire on the mountain: "who is responsible for what we teach our children, is it the internet or stars on television Why o....". And to think how we glamuorize these people sef ![]() |
Chei.ma nairaland preachin ahf work eeh

