₦airaland Forum

Odunharry:
I am tired of Evans making back passes

he lacks confidence - i don't trust him.
de gea should have slapped him for that horrible back pass. i am starting to think evans gets paid to screw things up in the defence.

Odunharry:
De gae is made of Rubber

i hate back passes....
if i were a defender, i will resist back passes by all means if i dunno what's behind me. booting the ball to row z is a better option.

de gea is a witch.

johnny evans is a disgrace with his back passes. what the heck is wrong with evans?

ReLaTE:
pls don't be ignorant of that, we all watching from home already known VP touched it.

from your black & white TV?
even a line assistant standing 15 yards away didn't spot it, but you saw it in real time?

r231:
We can ask rvp's hair

the line assistant musta thought van persie missed the ball. it looked like he missed the ball but after the 3rd replay view, van persie's hair brushed the ball slightly.

wow - so van persie touched that ball for mata? mata is offside then, i thought van persie missed young's cross completely.

liverpool fans will be crying for that 2nd goal

SIRcumalot:
NA injury
LVG said so when he was interviewed just before the match.

we are blessed then....
if the injuries keep getting us wins then so be it. i dunno how we are coping to put a team out with this nonsense. have we named the same defence unit for 4 consecutive league games this season at all?

this 3-5-2 doesn't suit us at all.
we don't have ball playing defenders who can pass & receive the ball with confidence. once we are pressed high, we lose rhythm.

the midfield has been so-so.
loads of huffing & puffing, no real creativity apart from young & valencia providing threats from the flanks.

i dunno why rojo is absent - surely, it's not another injury cos then this is becoming a joke. we are taking our chances but the 3-5-2 makes us disjointed.

Kay17:
Sex harassment on men is not as widespread and ubiquitous as that against women. It is an epidemic, and most women are subjected to it

it is the same - men don't just speak about it so it's under-reported.

The feminists want to wipe out marriage so there wouldn't be any marriage burden on their careers. And less women would drop out of line. Child birth and rearing etc are incidents of marriage, so if marriage is dumped totally, more women would work and threaten position of the chauvinists.

only married people get pregnant?
wiping off marriage cannot stop women getting pregnant. unless you implant wombs in men, there's no way out of it. this is why i said it is nature that put this burden on women, not men or marriage.

SailorXY:
2PM I think

2.30pm(naija time)

Kay17:
You are not considering barriers such as sexual harassment from employers, gender bias in the workplace and women dropping out of their careers to raise families. But your mind is fixated on incompetence as the sole reason for the low rates.

these factors don't affect women alone. men have also been sëxually harassed at work. just because we don't moan about it like rhesus monkeys doesn't mean it doesn't happen. women dropping out of their careers to raise families further reinforces my point that such roles don't naturally suit the female gender.

it's biology or nature, nothing to do with subjugation. no matter how much a woman feels he can compete with the opposite gender, the chicken will always return to the roost. the question then remains - why start the career at all when we all know there's a point where majority of them would abandon the ship to raise rugrats?

Kay17:
Do you agree with me that marriages suppress the potentials of women? Because from your arguments above you seem to do so.

marriage doesn't suppress the potentials of women - child rearing does! you can marry and decide not to have a child, that will not affect your career one jot! nature designed women to get pregnant - that factor is what suppresses their potentials, marriage has got nothing to do with it.

cococandy:
You married another woman's husband and you expect us to clap for you?

I won't judge you for marrying for money since most people have reasons for which they get married.but If you must marry for comfort, leave the ones that are already taken.

he insisted on marrying her. you can hardly blame her for getting involved with a married man. all the parties were happy with the arrangement initially until the OP felt stigmatised.

her decision for being a second wife isn't the problem here, it's the fact that she wants to eat her cake & have it. she's enjoyed the perks attached to being a second wife, she should also endure the stigma that comes with it.

^^^

that's just theoretical - fact remains women are leaving the field in droves these days, they are simply not interested in it cos they cannot cope mentally.

Kay17:
Coogar, that is obviously a lie, the figures and rates can not be the same numbers decade by decade. There was actually an increase from the previous decade.

increase or decrease?

http://www.news-journalonline.com/article/20121028/BUSINESS/310269984

Kay17:
But these stats are not constant, right?

very constant!
they are hoping to get 25 female CEOs in FTSE by 2025. that's about 10 years from now. just 25%.

Kay17:
You are a sad case of ignorance.

you are the one talking out of your arsë - i knew you would resort to this when each point you have made got destroyed by simple facts. women don't do well when it comes to logic too - they get emotional before they can argue logically.

1. You rely on fallacies such as the most fictitious quantification of human achievement. How were you able to calculate human achievement across centuries and compute 99 percent contribution from men. That is absolutely ridiculous.

which fallacies - what's the ratio of male inventors to females? can you count? go on google & find out.

2. The Achilles Heel of your generalization that genius resides solely in males, is for me to prove that at least one single female is capable of genius. Just one example destroys your argument.

there's always an exception to the general rule - stop arguing against logic. if the ratio of all geniuses are 100 to 1 in favour of men then you can generally conclude that men are better at some roles than women. it's nothing to be ashamed about.

3. Women form a minority in such a pyramid social structure in our society and in the West. People have the mythical belief that women are inferior humans. It is a strange belief but people do. Hence the scarcity of women at the top. The men at the top are not always the brightest. In aristocratic societies, it was believed the cream was at the top, but that was proven to be false. Same here. There is no such thing as an equal opportunity. We don't live in a total egalitarian society.

you are speaking out of your arsë again...
maybe in the cocoon you find yourself, you could argue there is no such thing as equal opportunity but in the west that i know, women have equal opportunities even sometimes more than the men.

the state is ready to sponsor her to whatever level she desires but after a while, most of them do an appraisal & change their career path into something less stressful. most of them can't just cope with the demands the big roles require. it's nothing to do with politics, it's just biology.

4. Since you have refused to answer my question, I'd give you mine: Yes.

your question is meaningless!
it's like asking if it's courageous or worthy to marry christ. stop asking fairytale questions - humans still carry the curse of their deeds in eden. nothing can change the status quo.

chic2pimp:
LOL ... If they are as bent as you say, the two Manchester clubs would not have won it as much as they have. You lot have pretty much made it your Birthright.

the 2 manchester clubs have to work twice as hard to get those titles. chelsea & arsenal usually get free passes. arsenal's unbeaten season was aided by the FA. too many games that season where arsenal were down on their luck & the ref would whisper to pires to dive & a penalty would draw the game level.

Btw seeing it this on MOTD now.Kieran Richards got sent off for a similar tackle to Cahill's. Double standards methinks.

no consistency in refereeing.
it makes me sick!

chic2pimp:
Are you saying the FA are a tad bit corrupt?
But seriously it looked like all the big calls seemed to go in Chelsea's favour.

the FA is bent as fück especially when it concerns london clubs like chelsea & arsenal. it's increasingly embarrassing for them that the premier league title rarely stays in the capital.

Kay17:
She has a reproductive capability, is that what you mean?

what i mean is - she was specially created to carry a man's baby. that's the primary purpose of women. a man puts his seeds in her & she must carry the baby to term with the body features she was blessed with -

propping her to do other things is just trying to be politically correct. generally, women are not cut for such roles.

•FTSE 100 - only 5 female CEOs
•british engineers - only 9% are females
•american engineers - only 18% are females
•world leaders - only 20 are females in 280 countries.

why these disproportionate figures? do women not go to school?

Kay17:
What does the fewest minority even mean?! Isn't it between two sexes, so where does the fewest minority come from?! It is either a woman is capable or not. If Angela Merkel can successfully govern a powerful state, then there can be more women who can do the same. Genius is not the preserve of males.

it is!
99% of all human achievements are by men. where are the women? few minorities mean when you look at any group of intellectuals from science to inventions to finance to politics, men always always outnumber the women & i don't think there's any law restricting women to become what they wanna become.

The truth is, you search endless for an excuse to make out a successful woman. There ought to be many more progressive women, but they unfortunately believe the woman is incapable of remarkable achievements.

why this belief when women have had equal opportunities as the men for at least the last 100 years? were there no women in bill gates' class? steve jobs? where are they today? what have they invented?

Culture uses religions, anecdotes to explain why women cannot grow. They explain how a snake and a tortoise made women vulnerable and helpless. They teach humility and erect duty on conceit.

you are pulling this out of the stratosphere - there's no excuse for any woman not to be what she wishes. the truth is - a woman's mental capacity in general terms cannot cope when the demand is extremely tasking. men are more suited to such roles.

My question was very clear: wouldn't it be courageous and worthy to overcome a divine curse?

if it's really a divine curse - there's no escaping it. humans cannot & can never overcome the curse God placed on them in eden.

chic2pimp:
Beats me too. Lucky that his foot did not connect with Sone's ankle. That would have been an instant red card.

Foreigner or not, it would have been a yellow card had it been a player from the visiting team. The ref basically had no balls.

most of them have no balls at the bridge.
they always want the title to stay in the south. all those folks the FA hire to officiate games want london clubs to win the league every season.

Kingexcellence:
I'll rather you say 'always beg every woman, even if you are right'. That makes you strong and keeps you at your rightful position. Every woman respect such person, she may try avoid showing it to cover her weakness though. #dont allow some 'inexperienced' bachelors on NL to ruin your home. The quality of the internal workings of your home depends on how well you can manage it. Every woman has a problem, the nature only vary with individuals. Your wife is yours, a part of you. Will anyone cut the nose away because of running oozes?
+I am still a bachelor though

can you substantiate this claim?

GEJ is a liability to the people of nigeria.
he's only 2 steps better than OBJ. however, both of them are the worst leaders nigeria has ever had.

Kay17:
Angela Merkel has a womb and 2 breasts, but she did not limit her life purpose and destiny to a womb and 2 breasts.

that is not the point - why was she born with a womb & a pair of brêasts in the first place?

adebayour26:
Mehn, I commend ur Patience. you are a good man.......

......or he's a weak man.

chic2pimp:
Jose is a bloody hypocrite. Look at the dingbat saying Cahill did not dive. Lest I forget three players from chelsea dived today.

it's a disgrace.....
just watching MOTD now. how did cahill complete 90 mins? that tackle on sone aluko & that pitiful dive from him should get him a 5-match ban.

referees are too timid to show jose's players the red card. if cahill was a foreign player, the outcome would be different. chelsea didn't deserve this win - they cheated to cop the 3 points.

chaircover:
I am not holding brief for her. I said it loud and cleat that she did wrong.
I Always have and always will be against violence
The OP said that he has resolved it with his wife
Do I then ask him to kick her out?
Ive told him what to do to avoid a further occurence.

he resolved it the first time too, didn't he? you don't tackle problems on the surface, you get to the roots. he might have forgiven her but her anger management issues need to be tackled to prevent another occurrence.

Kay17:
"Man is born free but found in chains everywhere"

I don't know of any woman who was born to for the purpose of being beneath a man.

why do you have a womb & 2 brëasts then? what are the purposes of those body features??

chaircover:
As if you will go back to baba coogars house when you offend Sister Mary
Who are you kidding?
That is when we will hear a long story about how you used your hard earned in the cold and snow £ sterling to buy Dangote cement to build the house

i have the control of my emotions - women rarely have this quality. sister sarah is a rare creation. she's never spoken out of turn to me & neither have i. mutual respect is key. a woman raised her hand to slap her hubby & you are holding a brief for her?


if it was a one-off incident then she could be pardoned as a first offender. this is the second time - a pattern has emerged that she's the violent type. why should there be another benefit of the doubt? would you have called for another chance if the roles are reversed?

chaircover:
Huh?

live & direct!
violence in marriages should be taken seriously. trying to cover for a wife or hubby is the same as not declaring one's HIV status if one is positive - postponing the evil days.

chaircover:
Daleru
Ive always meant to ask you this question . . .when the hubby misbehaves and he "messes" up one of his vows, where does he get sent to?

to his father's house!
no form of violence or any sort of abuse should be tolerated. dogs that bite strangers get shot these days, i think any husband or wife who cannot control their emotions deserve the same treatment. it's bad enough that men go through stress at work, traffic, family issues. adding a disrespectful wife to the equation just tips the balance for me.

wife needs to go back to her parents!

ruuudboy:
my wife had married working class male as friends and brothers before we got married and most of them do runs out of their wedlock which she was aware of all their antics. According to her way back then, some of them dated her friends then. So, that has always been at the back of her mind and she always make reference to it sometimes (karma things).

 

This week has been a very busy one for me at work, i came home late than usual. Yesterday (one of the few craziest day i had at work) was so late that i came home around to 9pm unlike my usual 5-6pm. She close from her own office around 4pm. I only picked her call around afternoon which i told her i was a bit busy and i couldnt talk to her later and i never bothered to call as i was so tired.

i came home and she gave me attitude which i ignored even while i tried to greet her and assumed its normal. I had some report to send to my boss that night cos that was the excuse i gave before he allowed me leave office. I realised i should have explained somethings and why i came home late but i jst concentrated on my fone trying to sort out my report on my ipad. She was just ranting all around saying the one i did outside was not enough, i came home and still continued with my phone chatting with some i.diot girls whereas i was chatting with my boss and colleagues.

i later went outside to buy recharge card after i couldn't recharge with my mobile banking app. I was on the phone with my boss which made me stay a bit more outside but i guess she has been trying my number which was busy..........This got her infuriated as she locked the door and started, i was just looking at her trying to explain things but she wouldnt allow me....saying it was friday and i was definitely  with someone while she was calling me and i claimed i was in the office and ignored her.....wat i did in the office was enough  that i still went outside to make calls, i just kept quiet as shstarted talking. Her ranting  got to me that i felt if i should respond with how boiling i was, it will definitely  be something  else cos of the day stress , i had to keep quiet for her as we cant ve ralking at the same time.......i didnt know my being silent will lead to attack...

send this woman back to her father's house. i really don't know why you nigerian husbands are too timid to have a serious discussion with your in-laws. your in-laws are human beings like you, they aren't demi-gods. call them, report her behaviour to them & let them know how disappointed you are with the way your wife was trained.

this is like a transaction - your brideprice in exchange with a virtuous well-trained woman. your brideprice & the things they asked for during the traditional marriage was intact(no damaged good). you kept your own part of the deal as far as you are concerned.

that they gave you a wayward, mannerless bride means they didn't keep to their own end of the deal. send her back to them so she can be retrained with a complete brain reset. a month should be enough for the cobwebs in her brain to be completely removed. she can come back to you after 5 weeks.

i wrote 800 bars for the cypher - how many lines exactly am i supposed to submit? 16 or 32 or the whole lot??