Coogar's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Coogar's Profile › Coogar's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (of 1148 pages)
odizeey:don't just look at 30 as 30....rooney is done! rooney started at 16. he's done 14 years consistently in the premier league. if one starts early, one gets finished early aside from some freaks of nature like giggs, maldini, inzaghi, etc. |
SIRcumalot:isn't that when a honest man should retire? eric cantona retired at age 30. do you really think it would have been easy for him to forgo those weekly wages? cantona felt his performance no longer measured up to his legendary status & he called it quit! When age finally starts to catch up to ronaldo and he is still on this huge contract while not scoring as much as he used tooronaldo is a honourable man. he's driven, determined and he has always strived to be the best. if there's any sign at all that he is no longer a top player, he would retire. airmark:so he wasn't a fraud at PSV but a fraud at united? it then means his mercurial skill isn't the problem......you have shot yourself in the foot! Just accept it. He has come to epl to flex nothing more. He can do that later not now. A new player in a team should be hungry, depay is only hungry to get private swimming pool, cinema room and 6 bedroom apartment. He has got that number 7 jersey and thought the world has ended. At a point in that cska match i could nt differentiate rooney's touches from depay's. It was that bad. Well i wish both continue to decline in form especially in epl.depay has scored 4 goals for his new club.....hidden hazard has 0 goals in 11 games for chelsea. depay is 21, hazard is 24. biko, who's the fraud? ![]() |
odizeey:in that case, should we bring bobby charlton back to our team. he was good too o - actually, he was so good he won ballon d'or as a united player. ![]() i also think keane should be brought back as well. |
airmark:depay was the top scorer of his league only this year......at no point in rooney's career was he a top scorer in the league. depay's £90k/week is commensurate with his performance. he's not played to his potential but he has not disappointed woefully as much as rooney. |
funlord:i can never forget rooney in his teenage years. only last week, i argued rooney @19 was 5 times better than the current martial! rooney was a very good player in those days but he's on the wane now(pardon the pun) SIRcumalot:it's £300k/week.... he gets £250k directly from the club & he makes £50k/week from his image rights. the club bought his entire image rights for the length of his current contract & they give him a share of £50k per week from whatever the club makes with his name, image & brand. Falcao did,does that mean we aren't going to honour the contract we agreed too ?if you hire a manager for your company & he doesn't deliver to the level of his salary, what would you do? you cannot stop paying his salary cos that would be a breach of his contract with you but you can sack him and get a more competent manager whose skills would match the salary you intend to pay him. |
SIRcumalot:if the difference between what rooney deserves & what he gets is within the range of £20k-£50k per week, then we wouldn't complain. however, rooney's current performance is not worth more than £50k per week & yet he makes £300k per week. players(messi, ronaldo, etc) who make rooney's kind of salary do not lose form. |
codedguy1: I do not subscribe to Rooney being a fraud, but his recent form makes it hard for me to dispute that. funlord: As for your point regarding coogar and elampiros argument in relation to rooney! I don't personally feel he is a fraud but a once great player that has now declined badly! Whose fault? His own! 100%fraud frɔːd/ (noun) wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. biko, what else can we call a player that takes £300k/week and yet plays like a nigerian league division 3 striker? rooney has falsely represented himself as an elite striker & yet he's nowhere near what his salary dictates he should be. nor be fraud be that? ![]() |
nyabinghi:i cannot use those values to judge. they are misleading. until you show me the number of minutes played, the number of games played is useless. i have already showed you guys giggs played more games than lampard but lampard played more minutes than giggs. only amateurs use goals/games ratio to analyse players. i could play 5 games but spent only 20 mins on the pitch, you could play one game & spend 90 mins on the pitch. nyabinghi: rooney has a very good goals record for a player who has played behind ruud, saha,chicharito how many trophies did shearer lift for club and countryrooney doesn't have a good goals record & the positions he's played have nothing to do with his mediocre goalscoring ability. we have seen mata & martial score several goals in the PL this season without playing up top. is ronaldo a centre forward? has messi consistently played as a centre forward? where have you ever seen them make excuses that their withdrawn position is the reason they don't score plenty of goals? a mediocre player is a mediocre player, abeg! nyabinghi:give us the number of minutes shearer played. the number of games is misleading. nyabinghi:rooney is a fraud! and gimme a minute to expose this fraud this morning.....take your time & follow rooney's program of mediocrity aided by his country's media houses. •plays as a #9 for 5 matches without contributing anything. media: "we think his best position is no.10". •plays 5 matches as a #10 without contributing. media: "we would like to see him get a run of games as a #9." •plays another 4 matches as a #9 before he finally scores. media: "rooney proves his critics wrong. this shows he's still a world class player." •next 2 matches he's back to his usual piss-poor "retirement-worthy" level. media: "rooney has lost a bit of pace, but he can still deliver those fantastic passes in a midfield role." •rooney ends up being our worst player after a few games in midfield. media: "rooney is constantly being played out of position." •rooney goes on a long drought without scoring. he ran at a pace of 0.25mph but he works his socks off! media: "no matter where you play him, he will still work his socks off. he's still essential to the team." •rooney is back in a striker role, but he still continues to underperform week in week out. media: "rooney gets no service. on top of that, we need more english players around him as he can't understand those foreign players." rinse & repeat!!!! _________________________ |
elampiro:simple analysis destroyed your rooney image. shearer & henry scored more league goals before age 30 than rooney did. there was a football league before the PL started in 92/93 & shearer had 23 league goals then. henry had already scored 23 league goals as well before arriving in england. add it to the tally on your image & it's clear that rooney's stat is a fraud. he's shytë & he will never be a world class player that the british media want him to desperately become. |
elampiro:he started when others didn't start - so what's the big deal? shearer was already 22 before the premier league started. rooney had a good 6 years head start. thierry henry was also already 22 when he joined the premier league. henry & shearer had already scored 23 league goals each in before they started scoring in the premier league. so what's the big deal in rooney's dodgy records? so rooney shouldn't be expected to score more premier league goals than two players who played only 8 seasons in the competition before they were 30? are you actually aware rooney is now in his 14th season & he's not even 30 yet? ![]() elampawa.......see how easy it is for me to tear rooney's appalling records into shreds. only elampiro would compare goals scored in 14 seasons by rooney to the ones scored in only 8 seasons by henry/shearer. you ought to admit it - rooney is a massive liability and his goalscoring record is a fraud! |
freecocoa:can i have a glimpse? ![]() |
elampiro:while rooney developed into a jack of all trade, master of none. rooney is a street footballer.....no tactical nous or any football intelligence. he has the first touch of clifford orji. rooney is a liability.... then in your other comment, you were comparing rooney to shearer & henry. shearer scored 260PL goals, rooney would be 70 by the time he breaks shearer's record. |
elampiro:how come playing ronaldo in the wing didn't affect his natural ability? henry also started as a winger & he was very prolific. you guys just make nonsense excuses to cover up for rooney's pathetic performance! darefestus:all the pundits are tutored to speak in a certain kind of way. one of the perks that come with being the captain of 3 lions is you would be immune to media criticism. We had a striker that was doing his best to avoid the ball, misjudging headers and only had to be pressured a little before he gave the ball to the CSKA midfielders. Even the game against Everton, a decent striker would not only have scored two, but maybe even three goals, but he kept positioning himself behind their defenders whenever the ball was to be played to him.with the way everton threw caution to the wind in that game, martial woulda banged a hatrick @goodison park! Honestly, i dread what'd have happened had we not gotten in Martial and persisted with say, hernandez.rooney is the problem..... none of the players LVG sold was as poor as rooney has been in the last 6 months. kagawa wasn't this poor & we let him go. rooney continues to serve rubbish performance every week and the media don't even say jack about it. |
AdeLaNa1:he's england's captain..... journalists have been warned not to criticise him. when rooney plays as a #9 & serves hogwash on the pitch, the blame goes to his teammates that they don't create enough for him. when rooney plays as a #10 and plays shytë, the striker gets the blame that he doesn't finish the chances created by röoney. it's always been like that, it would always be like that. martial has scored as a left forward & has also scored as a centre forward.....he doesn't need excuses - if he plays, he would score while rooney has to make excuses to score goals. |
SailorXY: If there's a "must-play" clause in Rooney's contract why can't it be renegotiated? If he's unwilling, Woodward can just pay him tha _fuck off! He can't be dragging us back like this, na him papa get the club?once a contract has been signed, the club cannot renege on it's terms & conditions of the contract. any breach of contract & rooney's legal experts would take the club to the cleaners. we are a club of sentiments.....that was how we kept giving giggs games so he can catch bobby charlton's number of appearances. there's a force out there that are bent on letting rooney outscore charlton's club record. it's a clusterfück! |
elampiro:wetin una wan find?
|
dopeJemi:we should make elampiro the uku akpolokpolo erediauwa II of this section. |
dopeJemi:well...... we were just exposing a white lie that was told by you know who....... ![]() elampiro:time spent is the biggest factor in these ratings. why? cos the time spent affords players who were poor in the first half to redeem themselves. of course, if a late sub comes on the pitch & bangs in a hatrick, he would score more than the ones on the pitch for 90 mins who contributed nothing.... however, if rooney bangs a hatrick in 90 mins & martial also bangs a hatrick and came off after 80 mins......rooney would score more points than martial provided negative actions like yellow cards, error leading to goals, etc are both the same for both players. May be tomorrow I will bring this scenario where a player who scored was subbed and rated higher than another who also scored but was not subbed.until then..... but for now, you have stalemated yourself. ![]() meanwhile - do you still think martial has made us regret selling danny welbeck? ![]() |
elampiro:you are not intelligent.... you checkmated yourself. i gave you a simple assignment. find a situation where player A & B scored the same amount of goals in a game. B came off at half time while A completed the game........and yet B scored more points than A. oya, go & do your assignment! In your opinion, someone who played 90 mins should rate far higher than another who played just 23 minutes. Now I checkmated you, you fall back on performance, no longer time spent on the field.it's not my own opinion, it's a fact! someone who played 90 mins should rate higher than another who played 23 minutes if they contribute the same positive action in a game. before shaw was taken off, he was by far our best player. he had 100% pass completion, united kept a clean sheet while he was on the pitch. he made one tackle & his general play was positive. how won't he have more points than darmian who conceded 2 goals on the pitch or mata/martial who had no goal scoring contribution in the game? sometimes i think you deliberately leave your common sense at home before coming to this board to post. had we not lost against PSV, we might have actually won the game cos he was the only one trying to make things happen for us that first half. elampawa, when are you going for your memory test? ![]() |
elampiro:was shaw not the best player on the pitch that day before he went off injured? elampiro, you need a memory test..... |
elampiro:it doesn't matter what happens to bastian. he was hauled off after 46 mins & united were piss poor in those 46 mins. if you recorded all the points of united players as at then, martial would be the worst player considering he cost us the penalty. however, martial played in the second half....he had time to redeem his poor performance of the first half and he scored....so he would automatically score more points than bastian who never had the chance to redeem his poor display in the first half. every action of these players is categorised into positive or negative contributions with 6.0 as the starting point. it's so easy to figure out.... You cannot compare Valencia who rated 8.1 to Lingard who rated 6.0.the issue isn't about valencia - it's about rooney vs lingard & rooney was the worst player on the pitch despite having 90 mins to redeem his piss-poor performance. lingard played better than rooney in that game. In my opinion 5.6 to 6.9 are in the same rage. But 8.1 is in a high performer rate, yet those kids said Lingard did better than Valencia. That was shocking for even mamaput to hear.keep your opinion in your pocket! 5.7 is better than 5.6. we are not talking about range, we are talking about who was better. As for the rating, playing first half or full game has nothing to do. It's your activity.if martial had been hauled off as at the time bastian came off, what do you think his point would be? won't it be less than bastian? martial made an error leading to a goal - his first half score would have been the lowest in the entire team. Schweinsteiger had a negative rating and that is it. I have seen Rafael, Jones, Fletcher left after 20 minutes of play and were rated above 6.0, 6.4 etc .[/b]he would have a negative rating. he got carded, he misplaced passes, made nonsense tackles and he played in a period we didn't have a grip in the game. his rating at half time would have been the average rating of our entire team..... it's not rocket science! |
elampiro:cos memphis did more positive things than negative & it was a time united were controlling the game so there's no biggie. blind also had more positives than negatives so his point was more than 6.0 It's not by length of play but by activities. Someone can play for 20 minutes and score 8.0. Someone else can play for 90 minutes and score 5.7that is a lie! if player A & player B contribute the same thing while A played more minutes than B then A will have the most points. stop lying to us. show us a situation where a first half substitute that scored a goal had more points than his teammate that also scored a goal but completed the whole game. by then we would know if time spent on the pitch has more bearing on the points or not. you are having a debate with a scientific mind.....you are an arts student. i was only 13 when i started running hypotheses & making an inference via deductive reasoning. Score a goal = +1.0you are making my point! so don't you think a player that played more games would have more time to achieve the positive things than the negative? so why won't the player with more minutes generally get the most points? elampawa, do you use logic when arguing? |
elampiro:you are a tool! if 6.0 is the minimum rating but you cop a yellow card, misplace passes, etc then it would go below 6.0 bastian never had the chance to redeem his poor first half in the second half like his fellow team mates. rooney at half time woulda had worse than 5.9 but he was able to cop few points here & there when united got on top of the game. by then, bastian was already taking his bath! |
elampiro:if that was the case, why did you say martial might make us regret selling welbeck? if eg bought aguero/suarez, would any of the duo have made us regret selling welbeck? elampawa baba - you should be lying for nigerian politicians. with you doing PR for them, they would never face any sorta criticism. ![]() |
SAMBARRY:you brought your pig-snout here when no one quoted you or needed your opinion. stop trying to attention-seek? and if you dont have anything doing,you can come and help me wash my pants and make sure you wash it cleanoh dear..... unfortunately for you, i value my well-manicured fingers than to use it to touch your panties with holes & skid-marks on them. ![]() the last person that washed your panties had whitlow on each of her 10 fingers. your panties was the primary source of the ebola epidermic. ![]() |
elampiro:elampiro, stop trying to be clever by half. bastian played only 46 mins in the game. unless he scored or assisted, his points overall would be less than the players that played more minutes on the night. bastian's early bath was responsible for his low point. however, rooney spent the most minutes on the night. lingard came off in the 80th minute & yet still had more overall point than rooney. it simply means rooney was animal-shyte throughout the game. had rooney come off when bastian came off, he woulda been rated less than 5.0 elampiro:he was sure! he knew martial would hit the ground running as soon as he replaces rooney in the #9 position & that was what happened exactly. But once video was out, I stamped Martial and that was the beginning for everyone else.liar! the video came out on the 31st of august & adeyemi2015 was the first to declare martial a machine. as at then, you thought martial would make us regret selling welbeck. elampawa, you have been thoroughly exposed as a white liar. ![]() |
SAMBARRY:look at this yeye babymama o! shouldn't you be brëastfeeding your child or fixing her pampers? why did you even quote me? just because i mentioned your name does not give you the effing rights to quote me. speak to me only when you have been spoken to. do you understand? ![]() |
darefestus:be respectful elampiro is only 4ft 5 inches tall. you can't really call him a midget, can you? |
SAMBARRY:we should be asking you that..... how the word monica is involved in your rejoinder to me above simply tells me you are perhaps going through post traumatic stress disorder. |
SAMBARRY:https://38.media.tumblr.com/02dcabd6f40a47fc48f01d21d2f3c033/tumblr_inline_myymxa0LfA1qbygev.gif |
elampiro:he did....he was optimistic he would hit the ground running while you thought we were signing a nobody that would make us regret selling welbeck. ![]() You also lied, you never knew Martial's game. You said the only elite striker available was Lacazette.this is why we have told you to save 6 months of your salary to buy a console & play FIFA games. there's no FIFA gamer who wouldn't know martial. we all knew him as far back as january. of course, i wanted lacazette cos he was the ready made option. every sane pundit spoke about lacazette joining united cos he is more proven. GUARDIAN SPORTS: .......The untested part may raise some eyebrows as it is clear that United need a goal source now, and for half the reported price could possibly pick up someone from the domestic market, who is highly likely to do a decent job and get eight to 10 goals a season.elampawa, as you can see..... lacazette is the safer option because he guarantees instant goals. however, united settled for the teenager cos he's got plenty of potentials. I was the first to put Martial in the category of the elites like Suarez, Arguero and Sterling.lies! as for the first person to see his video and confirm martial is a machine, his name is adeyemi2015 on the 31st of august. you saw your video on the 4th of september this is mr adeyemi2015's comment.... https://www.nairaland.com/871307/official-manchester-united-fan-thread/2021#37525247 adeyemi2015:elampawa, your lies have been exposed again by a humongous magnifying glass. My last post. I haven't time for all these.you have never had time when you are convicted of lying in the man utd magistrate court. you always run for your life to avoid embarrassment. it begs the question......why lie when you can't stand the heat? |
elampiro: elampiro: UniqueGem: elampiro: elampiro:elampiro, can you see the difference between you and uniquegem? you need to be careful how you lie.... |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (of 1148 pages)



when you are done washing them let me know,i will give you instructions on where to spread them