SAMBARRY:
WHAT IS MY NAME MONICA FOR IN YOUR CONVO

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

Tell us which moronic failed schools produced you that you agreed with the fuuktard?

crackhaus:

Which is what I found funny in all of this.

I responded to about three different bits from the OP in three different posts, saga-tinyweenie-mite is still on the first one and has not even rebutted it in its entirety...

njokusboy:



There is clearly no middle ground, i cannot argue with one who hasn't made any point..
one would think the educational system in naija is responsible for all your failures, the way you go on about it....

coogar:

SAMBARRY:
IS EVERYTHING OK WITH YOU MENTALLY,PSYCHOLOGICALLY AND EMOTIONALLY?

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

Can you defend your response?

Your excuse is that you need to see response to all 3 before you defend the first?

That is the lame attempt at saving face?

No worry.

Kontinu!

I am here tranga to humiliate your dumb arsse.

Liverless Pussiclat!

I will CHOOSE when and how I humiliate you as I please. It is the benefit of being imperiously intelligent.

I am your Alpha and Omega!

crackhaus:

Obviously, all this wasn't clear enough to the writer...he/she had to go further to imply from his/her own interpretations just to arrive at a discriminatory conclusion.


How can anyone say there's no known case where the Nigerian constitution challenges/criminalizes human rights violation on women?
Seriously?

So who and what is being referred to here?
Section 17 (2a): every citizen shall have equality of rights, obligations and opportunities before the law.

Does every citizen include man and animals, but not women?

Also, how can the constitution which is made for one and all be prohibiting discrimination in the public sphere/state agents, and not cater for discrimination perpetrated by non-state actors when in fact both state agents and non-state actors are all citizens?


Isn't it common sense that a marriage is contracted on the premise that the woman marries into the family and/or in this case, country of the man?

It is also wrong to imply that a woman is INCAPABLE of conferring citizenship on her foreign husband.
The solution to this has been covered here if the foreign husband wishes to be a citizen:

26 (1): Subject to the provisions of section 28 of this Constitution, a person to whom the provisions of this section apply may be registered as a citizen of Nigeria, if the President is satisfied that -

(a) he is a person of good character;

(b) he has shown a clear intention of his desire to be domiciled in Nigeria; and

(c) he has taken the Oath of Allegiance prescribed in the Seventh Schedule to this Constitution.

Pay close attention to the underlined clause.
Because it is assumed that a woman naturally marries into the country of her husband, citizenship is subsequently granted to a foreign national married to a Nigerian woman if he has the intention of being domiciled in Nigeria.

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

You are still running?

Saga terrifies you?




Can you see?

What did I tell you from the beginning?

I says what I meants, and I means what I says. {sic}

crackhaus:

Finally, tiny weenie takes my advice and introduces a new word... Pussiclat!
Sagamite finally offers up a new lexicon.

Told you before boy...you're my b1tch, b1tch!

njokusboy:




mr sagamite, read this post carefully nd dispute the facts one after the other, quit rushing lyk a circus bull and read dammit.........

Sagamite:


Moronic fuuktard, you remind of what Amaechi said yesterday at his screening: Many of the youths are unemployable.

When you think like a fuuktard like this and cannot defend your statement, it is clear you are unemployable.

You are running and boasting. Reminds me of another fuuktard called Logicboy a few years back.

This is what is happening to your daft arsse.




You have even stopped attempting to give any opinion because all the daft ones you gave earlier (like newspapers and TV one) led to me humiliating you with them.

Now watch how njokusboy would join you in terrified running.

njokusboy:



dude, you well so?
so you would actually consider it an achievement if an online character FLEES from you
i think you are clinically depressed

coogar:


we should be asking you that.....
how the word monica is involved in your rejoinder to me above simply tells me you are perhaps going through post traumatic stress disorder.

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I have asked you to tell us the bravo you see in:

Isn't it common sense that a marriage is contracted on the premise that the woman marries into the family and/or in this case, country of the man?

Oya, cretin, the floor is yours!

Indulge Saga.

Make my day.

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

That is what you have to say about defending the stupidity you saw as brilliant?

Oya, indulge me. Don't be the stinking Hyena running from the King.

SAMBARRY:
are you done ranting ?now take your own advise and fk off and please leave my M O N I C A out of your convo.stupid boy

njokusboy:



you quoted a post and called us cretinous fvcktards without attempting to counter it....
now you want me to explain the same post to you?
you think say i be ur mate?

coogar:


look at this yeye babymama o!
shouldn't you be brëastfeeding your child or fixing her pampers? why did you even quote me? just because i mentioned your name does not give you the effing rights to quote me. speak to me only when you have been spoken to.

do you understand?

njokusboy:
why am i even talking to this kid?

lemme leave you to rule your kingdom.....

bloody foooool

SAMBARRY:
i said fk off.dont you hear word.just go,leave,vamoose.

and if you dont have anything doing,you can come and help me wash my pants and make sure you wash it clean when you are done washing them let me know,i will give you instructions on where to spread them

coogar:


you brought your pig-snout here when no one quoted you or needed your opinion. stop trying to attention-seek?



oh dear.....
unfortunately for you, i value my well-manicured fingers than to use it to touch your panties with holes & skid-marks on them.

the last person that washed your panties had whitlow on each of her 10 fingers. your panties was the primary source of the ebola epidermic.

crackhaus:

Absolute nonsense!

Now read carefully and make your own intelligent observations, instead of relying on the interpretations of someone who picked just one clause that mentions male person then juxtaposing it with another that mentions female just to make a point.




Obviously, the two sections (353 & 360) which the writer juxtaposes to arrive at the conclusion that a sentence of two years is discriminatory as opposed to that of three years in 353, actually cater to two very different things entirely.

Chapter 29 caters to assaults on both sexes entirely and as can be seen from the underlined bits gives the same punishment to all involved (male and female).

Chapter 30 on the other hand, is tailored specifically for females...
So by my own interpretation - if I were deliberately looking for an excuse to fault the nigerian constitution on being partial to one sex, I could also come up with the conclusion that since no chapter is tailored specifically to cater to assaults on males ONLY, then chapter 30 as a whole is discriminatory to males.

The same penal code that the writer touts as being discriminatory to females actually dedicates an entire chapter to dealing with criminal acts perpertrated against females ONLY, but doesn't have a chapter dedicated to dealing with criminal acts perpertrated against males ONLY.
Now tell me, who exactly is being discriminated against here?

LordReed:


Amazing how you read this:

353. Any person who unlawfully and indecently assaults any male person is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for three years. The offender cannot be arrested without warrant.

And read this:

360. Any person who unlawfully and indecently assaults a woman or girl is guilty of a misdemeanour, and is liable to imprisonment for two years.

And conclude that there is no discrimination when for the same crime a lighter sentence is prescribed for assault on a woman or girl.

crackhaus:

Amazing how you read this:

Chapter 29 caters to assaults on both sexes entirely and as can be seen from the underlined bits gives the same punishment to all involved (male and female).

Chapter 30 on the other hand, is tailored specifically for females...
So by my own interpretation - if I were deliberately looking for an excuse to fault the nigerian constitution on being partial to one sex, I could also come up with the conclusion that since no chapter is tailored specifically to cater to assaults on males ONLY, then chapter 30 as a whole is discriminatory to males.

The same penal code that the writer touts as being discriminatory to females actually dedicates an entire chapter to dealing with criminal acts perpertrated against females ONLY, but doesn't have a chapter dedicated to dealing with criminal acts perpertrated against males ONLY.
Now tell me, who exactly is being discriminated against here?


And still conclude that there's in fact a discrimination against females.

Sagamite:

[s]
Moronic fuuktard, you remind of what Amaechi said yesterday at his screening: Many of the youths are unemployable.

When you think like a fuuktard like this and cannot defend your statement, it is clear you are unemployable.

You are running and boasting. Reminds me of another fuuktard called Logicboy a few years back.

This is what is happening to your daft arsse.


You have even stopped attempting to give any opinion because all the daft ones you gave earlier (like newspapers and TV one) led to me humiliating you with them.

Now watch how njokusboy would join you in terrified running. [/s]

crackhaus:

Saga-tinyweenie-mite, still enjoying the taste of my d1ck in your mouth...are you?

If logging out of NL and not replying the immigrant cockroach with a god-complex means that one is running, then it's pretty obvious which of one of us is very idle.

As for the newspapers and TV opinion, that must have really hurt you since you can't get over it... didn't it?
I deliberately ignored that your kardashian response because it was stvpid and weak as usual...
Don't you know she's smarter than you?

How else can you explain that she makes millions, while you're on NL repeating moronic, fvcktard, cretinous, day in and day out without so much as a dime to your unknown name?

Phaggit!

Sagamite:

[s]
You sure help me continue showing you are a cretinous fuuktard and a product of a failed education system.

You have now shown us 2 people you see as "achievers" in your dumb world: Patience Jonathan and Kim Kardashian.

No doubt you are a moronic fuuktard. [/s]

crackhaus:

Still feeding off the leftovers boy..

How else can you explain that she makes millions, while you're on NL repeating moronic, fvcktard, cretinous, day in and day out without so much as a dime to your unknown name?

Answer that, genius..