₦airaland Forum

pickabeau1: na wa.. i get you but still no justification to assault a woman,,...

so you would rather the man ties a scarf around his tiny waist & start exchanging verbal abuses with a woman?

Women have sharp mouths we know but physically laying your hand is not the solution

what's the solution?

LOL at the wife complying in fear

complying with respect is more apt!

demelza: Someone came for solace and you are adding petrol to the fire.

because i am fücking tired of women reporting half-truths that completely overlook their own wrongdoing. she only admitted she pointed an accusing finger to the brother in law & left out what she said to him. if the bro-in-law comes here to tell her own version, you would be surprised at the twist of events.

pickabeau1: hahaha... coogar!

If the man can beat his SIL, what will he do to his wife....

Even if she is Kate the Shrew, Still no justification to beat a woman,,,,

she was verbally abusive, bro in law was physically abusive. abuse is abuse. don't worry about the wife, she now knows her hubby can't be fücked with.

pickabeau1: hmm... this will be true in some cases but here the sister came to the OP's house

she was verbally abusive & the bro-in-law straightened her up to the satisfaction of the OP's sibling. even their mom seems satisfied with the "VIP" treatment meted out to the OP.

my £5 says the OP herself is a cantankerous individual.

pickabeau1: No matter what.. there is no justification for assaulting someone who is helping you do omugwo for your wife

perhaps they don't need her help. she's causing more harm for the family. the type that carries info within the family to the market square. how often do you see husband & wife joining hands to beat wifey's sister?

Godmother: My sister's husband slapped me and beat me up. He said I had d audacity to raise my hand n point at him n stand in front of him so he slapped me.

He's 32 n I'm 29. We ve known for over 10 years n were very close in school. When he asked my sister out I decided to shift away to give them space. Now he's married n wants me to start callin him bros.

My sister just gave birth n is stayin at my house with her baby n son. The hubby came to spend a few days n beat me up. Brough out a belt n wanted to flog me.

I feel so bitter. My sister was clamouring to join to beat me up. But for my younger brother that came n pushed me me into d room n told me to be calm he probably wud av killed me.

My mum did nothing, just told me to be calm n not say a word. She has been petting me but I feel so bitter

cöck & bull story....
you did nothing at all, this enraged, psychopathic, brutish, flesh-eating brother in law just came from nowhere & started beating you for no reason. i would have joined them in beating you too if i were there.

[quote author=itz_suave]I stopped taking him serious afta dat zidane argument.[/quote]don't cry over zidane - xavi & iniesta are 1000 times better than zidane. only football illiterates overrate zidane. there's nothing he won that the barca stalwarts haven't won plus more....

tapout1: for a logically reta.rded mompara like cooger who is knwn to hav a penchant for posting stup.id and irrelevant stats, wot do u expect? For someone to insinuate dt toress is betta dan messi/CR7 by virtue of stats... Doesnt he reek of astute f00lishness??

where did coogar ever say torres is better than messi & CR7? i reiterate, a concentrated mixture of semën with imbalanced chromosomes fertilised your mom's ovaries - this is why you are what you are - a laboratory rëtard. not even TB joshua can correct the genetic malfunctioning you embody.

[quote author=itz_suave]d same stats that suggested that walcot was better than gareth bale at d end of last season? abi[/quote]walcott played several games as a centre forward last season so the stats are a bit skewed. neither young nor valencia played as a centre-forward for united so the stats comparison between them would show a fairer assessment of the 2 wingers.

elampiro: So a certain imbe.cile here has not learnt from the Ashley Young's stat vs real match performance that stat are mostly misleading?

This is the reason some guys loyalty is usually for bench warmers. Instead of them to watch match, they rely majorly on stat, highlights and clips of one off expression of skills.

you're a fool....
how can stats be misleading when stats are facts? if stats say ashley young created 2 chances per match then it's a fact, not an opinion. the reason ashley young is not playing is because of his dive which became a national issue. valencia is our 4th best winger, even janujaz has climbed higher than valencia as far as form goes....

Afam4eva: This is Nigeria and Nigerian are religious people and won't go about killing their baby because it came from a r.ape. The fact that you Londoners r.ape, defend r.apists and end up flushing the baby doesn't mean we Nigerians do the same.

see hypocrisy....
nigeria have the highest number of abortions on the planet. are you kidding me? which nigerians are religious? the same ones that are kidnapping & shipping pröstitutes to europe on a regular? religious my foot!!!

Afam4eva: What if the lady was r.aped. Should she also name the baby after the r.apist? Assuming she knows the surname of the person.

Personally, i don't think there's any rule guiding this so you can name the child after whoever. I'll advise the lady to name the child after her own surname though.

why would any lady keep the pregnancy of a räpist in the first place? aren't there medical procedures to flush the victim's system in incidents like rapë? afam, why did you trade your IQ for a plate of porridge?

so nani that has clearly kicked a ball has created more chances than valencia & one rëtard was saying the other day valencia is our best winger?

interesting, it's just splendid!!!

Utchry: Hello house,

Is it right for a baby born out of wedlock and was denied by the father right from conception to bear the the biological father's name (even though he denied the child) or bear the mother's maiden name?

For me, I think baby should bear pappy's name notwithstanding because its not the mum's dad that impregnated her so y bear mum's maiden name?

I would like to have genuine contributions here & reasons for your opinion.

the surname belongs to the spërm donor - the fact that he's absent now or denying responsibility does not mean he won't be back. he's the biological father of the child, no amount of sentiments can erase that fact -

her job is even made easier, she knows the father.

StarBoard: Well I refuse to be a tenth as charitable as you are to his cause.
If we have to wait for all our preferred options to go down before thinking of our most expensive midfielder by miles, then it is a big time indictment on Fellaini.
What has been done is done. He is our fourth most expensive signing. He has to live up to that tag.

is it marouane's fault we didn't pay £18m when we had the chance? fellaini's transfer fee went 50% up cos moyes & woodward were napping.

Plus, Old Trafford isn't a training ground for expensive buys. His price tag again tells me he is supposed to be beasting opposition and getting into teams of the week with regular and monster performances.
If he can't cut it, let him go.

it's too early to crucify him yet.
fellaini would come good. it's a teething problem & we should let him take his baby steps in the european games where our opponents don't play a high tempo.

The hole in our middle necessitated his purchase but of what good is he if he cannot command a starting berth 2 months after he was signed?

fellaini would come good. i would rather see him in that midfield than giggs, jones or rafael.

StarBoard: Except that Fletcher,Evra and Vidic combined didn't cost up to half Fellaini's fee.
Except that the side Evra and Vidic joined was a transitional side as compared to the league champions Fellaini joined.
Two reasons why he has no excuse/alibi/defence not to hit the ground running and make an instant impact.
Dude is mediocre. Simple as that.

he's not mediocre - he needs time to adapt to the tempo at which we play football. it's apparent fellaini isn't used to our high tempo & the passing accuracy required from our midfield-2. it's something he can still learn here. marouane will come good - yes, he's expensive but that was moyes' fault, we would have saved about £9m if we had activated his buy-out clause.

afrodoc: [/b]

Good point.
At least in European games while he is turning and arranging his feet he wont be assailed on all sides with tackles and stripped of the ball.
Just so that the nearly 30m pounds would not be wasted he can be used in some champs league matches but i suspect the final answer no lifeline left is that he is not just good enough at this level

i don't believe he's not good enough...
evra/vidic had worse starts and there have been many others. fletcher didn't get it right for about 5 seasons. i think fellaini would still click. he's operating in a new role. at everton, he was behind the main striker, winning first & second balls & flicking it on to jelavic or anichebe. he needs time to gel and the european games should be his launchpad instead of condemning him permanently to the bench.

SailorXY: ^^ but someone just said play Cleverley all the time & he'll get better, so why must Fellaini stay far away from the team?
this is exactly the problem

it's very simple....
moyes is just retardëd. it's now obvious fellaini is more suited to opponents that don't play football at 100mph.

fellaini should be the #1 on the team list in european games. let cleverley play in the EPL where his quick thinking & intelligent passes can help unlock the defence.

montelik: We got better cos we had worn Stoke down after they had spent well over an hour parking the bus and trying to hang on till the final whistle. It had less to do with Tom c leaving, than the change of tempo in bringing on Januzaj, Valencia and Chica which stretched Stoke beyond their breaking point.

stoke had used 90% of their energy in the first 60 mins pressing & harrying united. the attacking substitutions moyes made won the game for us.

besides, stoke thought they had a lead to preserve so they defended deeper & deeper inviting pressure & they paid dearly for it. it had nothing to do with cleverley.

cleverley in the team gives us the best win %

ritchboy: Hehehehe, people still dey follow coogar argue?

I woulda thunk everyone shoulda figured out by now the dude just trolls the board for a living.

says the fool who's been on exile & only returned because arsenal are leading the pile. if you don't have anything meaningful to contribute, why not put a cöck in your mouth?

[quote author=Mr_TA]I don't think I'm being pessimistic considering how we've performed this season so far. You've listed good players but how many of them have given consistent performances in matches this season particularly in the big games. They will dominate possession as they're stronger in the middle and recycle possession better. Even when we were beating them they always dominated possession because SAF knew he didnt need the ball to beat Arsenal that they would shoot themselves in the foot. We know longer have that advantage so I dont know how Moyes will bring out a big game performance from this team.[/quote]i don't care about possession against teams like arsenal. newcastle had about 32% possession today & they mauled chelsea. as long as we defend well & the strikers get the goals, we should be fine.

if we avoid slouches like rio & giggs, we should be fine. carrick would likely return for that. i am sure the team picks itself & the lads know they must make it count at old trafford. i expect a victory - in fact, an emphatic victory.

Ibime: Once again, you're a nincompoop.
So Lampard was at fault for conceding from a setpiece?

newcastle had destroyed lampard several times before they eventually scored - the ease at which they destroyed chelsea's midfield when anita came on for tiote was lampard's making - he was ballwatching throughout.

Cos he was marking Gouffran abi.
And how did that stop MaZaCar and Torres from creating chances again? Remind me.

if you don't score, at least - don't concede. 0-0 score would have been a better result than 2-0. every meaningful attack broke down with fat frank.

Ibime: So na setpieces you dey yarn?

lol. Foolish dude. It must be Lampards fault according to your default setting, thats why you dey concentrate on set pieces.

Why didn't anyone score from Matas setpieces. I'm sure you know he takes all the left footed setpieces.

you must fallen off a faggöt tree....
i said lampard was useless offensively & defensively. if the delivery was poor, one would still expect a player in lampard's position to stop the wave of newcastle's attack but he was constantly sodomised by anita.

And when Lampard left the pitch, why didn't the new setpiece-taker put one on Ivanovics head?

lampard left the pitch with 20 mins to go - he had narrowed chelsea's chances of scoring by the time he left.

Maybe even Pete Cechs goalkicks are to blame why MaZaCar and Torres could not unlock the defence.

I done forget say Coogar is a lunatic not to be taken seriously.

you are a troglodyte....
MAZACAR not creating a chance has nothing to do with lampard conceding a goal. yes, chelsea didn't do enough to score but then how does that translate to conceding a goal?

montelik: Was I not insisting during the summer that we sign at minimum 2 central midfielders. If I thought Tom C had no need for improvement, I would have been with Coogar saying we only needed one addition. Tom C has plenty of room for improvement and I have never said otherwise. What I can't tolerate is does who insist on ignoring and downgrading the good things he brings to this team.

the grass is greener on the other side...
if cleverley keeps himself fit, we had no need to bring in fellaini. the 2 players i wanted off the squad were giggs & rooney.

no one even said cleverley is the complete package. that i said he's the 2nd best midfielder @ united means he's not there yet but he can only get there if we trust him & play him all the time.

Ibime: If MaZaCar did what was asked of them, then Torres musta been the one who let them down because I see big fat zero on the goals scored column.

Or was Lamps holding their leg from no6 position?

so tell us one chance torres missed/scoffed today.....or are you colour blind?

against a tough team like newcastle fighting for survival at home, fine margins like setplays are very important. lampard didn't get any of his delivery right.....what has his 1 billion assists 4 years ago gotta do with what happened today?

[quote author=Mr_TA]Well we wont beat Arsenal next week so you might as well forget about that.
Moyes is not someone who can win big matches away from home.
He's bound to get it tactically wrong V Arsenal and not use Fergie's template which he laid down to beat Arsenal.
Essential Moyes hasnt got a clue how to setup the team to play on the counter and that's the only way we'll beat Arsenal if everyone is on their game.[/quote]stop being a pessimist....
van persie, rooney, kagawa, carrick, evra, rafael, etc are capable of stopping & beating arsenal. 3 points win for us won't dethrone arsenal & they should be weary after lewandowski must have carved them apart.

Small matter of the CL game against Sociedad away before that although Arsenal also have to face Dortmund in Germany so that should help us a little atleast.

we should get the carling cup boys to do justice to that tie. the league is more important at this stage & i hope moyes didn't rest giggs/rio today because he is starting them against arsenal.

Ibime: Some nincompoops have pathological problem with Lampard.

When Lampard was playing no8, famous nincompoops always blame him after every defeat because "he is the advanced midfielder who supposed to create".

Now he dropped back to no6 position, same nincompoops chase him back and still blame him for not creating ignoring all the no10s and no7s ahead of him.

ibime, you are not capable of making a rational reasoning. lampard is still tasked to create, he's too fat to do anything defensive & he's the chief setplay taker @ chelsea. what did he achieve with the tons of setplays he took today?

Can you blame them? Lampard is afterall the record assister in Chelsea history that's why they always revert to default position.

why don't you sign alan shearer then since he's the record premier league scorer. all lampard has achieved in history has nothing to do with his current form. leave history alone, focus on today's performance!

One Mikel cocksucking faggit will come here to tell us something new about Lamps every week. Is he not ashamed that a 35 year old man and a central defender displace Mikel from the team?

if mikel is british, lampard won't displace mikel. the reason lampard, giggs, etc still play is because of their nationality, nothing to do with their performance.

Now this shekpe man is calling Lampard name like he didn't see MaZaCar on the pitch. Funny enough Lamps is the one most likely to give Torres the kind of ball he likes ie the first-time ball over the top .

MAZACAR did what was asked of them, lampard didn't pull his weight. useless defensively & atrocious offensively. he should now accept his time is up.

Screwface: In football, the simplest of task appears the hardest to accomplish. Those tidy one-two passes. A single touch return ball. Forward thinking. Active, even when without the ball. Closing down opposing play. All these task appear simple, the reason why people don't appreciate players who bring this to the table.
The second half of our play today tells you exactly what Tom Cleverly brings to the team. His substitution meant we couldn't do anything meaningful again, especially from that midfield.

i couldn't have said this better....
tom cleverley's quiet & effective brand of football gets overlooked because he's selfless & doesn't need 3 legovers to make a simple pass.

David Moyes certainly does not like being praised 100percent. Nani for the injured Rafael would have been better. Valencia withdrawing to the back while Nani manned the right wing would have helped us retain that bite from that angle. I am pro-Kagawa inclusion in lineups, but his inclusion today almost made us looked weakened...in my opinion.

Again, this one our players are dropping injured anyhow, I hope DM training tecnique isn't wearing these guys down sha?Again, I feel these guys loose steam before the 80th minute, and under Fergie, those dying minutes appears our strongest. DM should stop wearing these guys down during training biko.

Good win sha. 3 invaluable points, but still 8th on the table. Odikwa serious o.

that table is now congested - 2 more wins for us & we would be in the top 3. a win for either spurs/everton would take them 2nd. i am not bothered about the position - i am bothered by the point gap.....we have to beat arsenal next week.

what a goal from ramsey!!!

afrodoc: That is the problem. Carrick is our Busquets, we don't need another Busquets beside Carrick. Carrick should be partnered by a player who is more willing to take chances and make forward plays especially with our mediocre wing play. A more creative partner for Carrick would mean there would be less pressure on the no 10 to be sole creative fulcrum.

even like today when carrick didn't play?
i dunno where united fans got this from but no one is more forward thinking than tom cleverley. his first priority is ball retention - however, if there's no one making himself available to receive his pass, he goes sideways or backwards instead of risking it. watch the combo of anderson & cleverley and you will understand what cleverley is all about.

I want a few more passes like the one he made today to RVP and less passing just for the sake of passing

if the runs are made, midfielders will find strikers with ease but we rarely make movements. carrick is a statue - you can't complete a 1-2 ball with carrick cos he rarely moves.

Purist: I really don't understand why Fabio isn't getting game time. Even when Rafael was injured, he barely made the bench!

that's my problem with moyes....
he's so idiotic - only fabio should be deputising for rafael. smalling/jones are centre-halves. they offer nothing going forward. let them compete with vidic/rio/evans in that position.

afrodoc: to be fair i am a fan of cleverley and i am not one of those that belive he is not good enough to play for man utd. however from last season he became too obsessed with giving the safe pass, eschewing the through ball for the sideways pass

cleverley is our 2nd best midfielder...
those safe passes retain possession - no one criticises busquets for playing safe passes. i'd rather safe passing than rooney trying to take-on 3 defenders and eventually losing the ball.

cleverley's pass started the goal rooney scored today.

dayokanu: ^^ Back to the default "they didnt create chances", "It was Lampards fault", "Its the coaches fault"

The same coach who knew what he was doing 7 days ago because Torres profited from a Joe Hart error suddenly doesnt know what he is doing what Torres went back to his usual form

Sucking is the norm for Torres any other form is a deviation from normal

shut up your mouth....
teams don't click in every matchday - i am asking you to show us one good chance torres had to score today. commentators kept saying he was fed scraps today - if the midfield don't create, how would a striker score?

instead of you to watch games & assess from what you see, you foolishly look at the scoreboard & as soon as torres' name isn't there then he must have had a bad game.

you put the s in stupidity!