₦airaland Forum

elampiro: You blindness is too thick. If you accepted you were blind, at least one could heal you. Now that you are blind but you claim you see, how terrible is your blindness.

The chart and its analysis was about players who got passes in the midfield area above 1, 000 or so, then what they did with it. The stats clearly shows Rooney was not in the number 9 as you claimed.

Also, your chart already showed he got 50 passes per match while Berba got 19. So how did Rooney strike?

If you claimed that someone who played 9 was touching the ball 3 times more Berba who played 10, you must be the greatest re.tard who ever walk planet earth, animals inclusive. Or may be Berba was a corpse in the no. 10 position.

elampiro: When will your foo.lisness end and your delusion too? So Berba doesn't play 9 Rooney must be one who played? Rooney was a hole man while Berba, Chicha and Welbeck played 9. Shame Berba was confined to the bench by almost teenagers.
However, Rooney won in all the stats. Midfield, creativity, goals etc.

I am done with you tonight.

elampiro: Look at this man.
You were calling me a liar. See Rooney passes from the midfield. Yet he scored so many goals.

Any United fan who doesn't respect Rooney is an ingrate. The guy is working alone.

elampiro: Ajigbijigbijigbi.
Your two charts have already disgraced you before we even elaborate.

1. Rooney had 49 passes per match and Berba only 19 per match. I guess you remember our argument. Now who played 9?

If Rooney played 9, how was he getting 49 passes per match? Then Berba played in the hole and was getting only 19 passes.

You are a corpulent fool. A cacafuego animal who knows nothing. So what exactly was Berba doing that season when Rooney was scoring over 30 goals, providing assists, creating clear cut chances and having 50 passes from the midfield?

Is it clear now it was Berba who played no. 9 (most ineffectively).Infact no need sef. Go with your confusion.

elampiro: 1. How many passes did Anderson or the other guys make from midfield that season

2. The opta chart had a cut off of a certain number of accurate passes one has to make from the midfield. (For instance you have to make 1,000 accurate passes to qualify).

3. If Rooney qualified into that high passing group, how did he manage to do so from lead striking role?

elampiro: What! What do you mean by death by stupidity.

A scallywag and a compound fool like you insulting people. I am not surprised at your level of delusion since it is obvious you are a product of bestiality. Only mugu akabu gozila like you didn't know Rooney was not suppose to play on the night due to injury. Everyone was surprised to see him. How would you even know when as usual you were looking at stat.

Nincompoop, idiot, fool, retard, bestiality issue, brainless, slowpoke and a compound fool. Highly irresponsible. A contaminated. A stray dog.

elampiro: Also, another chart showed only Carrick and Scholes were with Rooney in midfield pass accuracy. Even long pass were included. The chart showed Rooney had one of the EPL highest passes from the midfield in 2011/12.

elampiro: You are a compound illiterate. Look at the build up of that write up. He was injured and was not fit to play. He was only managed into the game to encourage the other lads.

I was only using that as an example why he did not score more goals in the UCL.

elampiro: Coogar doo you understand English or you take delight in twisting my words?

Where did I say Rooney was rested against Bayern? You don't know the meaning of injury? Rooney was our best man in Munich. He picked an injury there and SAF had to manage him at Old Trafford. Bayern only came into the match the moment Rooney's injury aggravated and he stared limping.

Something Moyes has not had the luxury to do. Rooney was involved in the demolition of Roma, but SAF rested him in the return leg at Old Trafford. He was involved in away ties against Bayern and Schalke but was not available in the home games due to injury and SAF decision to rest him. These are just knockout games, but the resting is usually more in group games.

elampiro: You are confused and deluded. We have argued this before and your chart showed Rooney had more assists and clear cut chances created than Berba.

Also, another chart showed only Carrick and Scholes were with Rooney in midfield pass accuracy. Even long pass were included. The chart showed Rooney had one of the EPL highest passes from the midfield in 2011/12.

You are a chronic liar.

Billyonaire: Lynch any Indian you find in your street.

elampiro: I am done with the argument. When you run out f ideas you resort to insults and calling people names and liars.

If Rooney operated as the lead striker in 2009/10 and 2011/12, how come stat showed he was among the best creators those seasons?

Stat also showed he was one of the highest passers from midfield. His pass accuracy from midfield and number of passes were one of the highest in the EPL those seasons. So he shared himself into two?

kulyie: what kind of stewpeed behaviour is that.they are now turning their kids to beggars.what kind of trainning or example are they laying for their kids :/ after some time the kids will grow up thinking its cool to beg and on top of that not showing gratitude.


If the neighbour has a girl child,and the neighbour is a paedophile,you already know what will happen to the girl once she enters the mans house. as a matter of fact that is child abuse.what they are doing is not different from telling under aged kids to go and hawk and leaving them vulnerable to all kinds of 1d1otic human beings.both pervs o,rapists o,paedophiles and so on.anyway

ROSSIKE: A Nigerian who protested against the murder of his fellow countryman, and the subsequent non-investigation by Indian police, is subjected to a shocking, violent assault by groups of Indians in full view of, and with the tacit support of Indian police.

..............................................................
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_pqB8qb48E

elampiro: 1. 5 goals in 45 appearances? Okokobioko.

2. Ozil 21 assists in 45 matches for someone who plays in the hole all the time. That's helping to get only one goal in 2 matches. And we want a hole player? It means if we play in the knockout, this hole man is only capable of assisting 1 goal in a two legged tie. Yet he had CR7 and Benzema in front of him and Alonso and Di Maria behind him. Now I knew why Madrid failed in Europe.

3. Stats were skewed. Excuses as usual.

4. Rooney was our best player against Barca. Dats all. Carrick was our failure link in the final against Barca.

Rooney scored from the hole against Chelsea and got us an all important away win. From the hole he propelled us to the final. Something Ozil is yet to do.

5. 2009/10. We had Berbatov as our number 9. He failed to live up.

6. Rooney was a key reason why we got to 3 UCL finals in 4 years. He scored against virtually all the big opponents. SAF was always resting him in small games.

Something Moyes has not had the luxury to do. Rooney was involved in the demolition of Roma, but SAF rested him in the return leg at Old Trafford. He was involved in away ties against Bayern and Schalke but was not available in the home games due to injury and SAF decision to rest him. These are just knockout games, but the resting is usually more in group games.

Now tell me how many goals Berba scored that period?

elampiro: 1. I just saw this now.
Ozil, 31 UCL appearance for Real Madrid = 4 goals.

2. Now you jumped to national team. Hahaha. Did they win the tournament? That tournament Angela Merkel had to apologise to Cameron on ref's error in canceling Lampard's goal which was a key decision step in the match.

3. Rooney scored in Stamford Bridge and we won. He was also in the hole in other matches and we won. Rooney was our only good player on the night until Scholes arrived at 1-3.

4. Rooney has played scantily as a striker. I can even remember only one or two match(es) he led. The rest as a player in the holes, on the left or right. Kagawa can't play that way.

Ozil = 4 letter word = 4 UCL goals in 31 appearances for mighty Madrid where chances are like pure water. Rooney would have scored 20 in 31 games. No wonder Madrid were always failing against tough teams. Ozil may win the Epl or whatever, he will always be inferior to Rooney in football.

RuuDie: This here, lies the crux of the matter...! We know how "gifted" Berbatov is; based on skill and talent he is probably miles better than Rooney, Welbeck and perhaps maybe even Chicha, but where is he now!!? More often than not, we got grief and dissatisfaction from playing him --- all this, borne out of the fact that we know he can offer much more than he did at the time!

Now, do not get me wrong, I am not taking anything away from Nani --- there are many variables involved that could lead to players not delivering as we know or believe they can --- and I think on his day, he "potentially" poses a far bigger threat than Tony V, can even be better than CR7... but he is not just doing enough!

My point ultimately is, Tony V most often than not gives us a 90-100% of his "limited ability"; Nani gives me 40-55% of his "fantastic talent" --- and it usually isn't good enough for a player of his quality.
In truth, UTD is just "managing" what Valencia gives; its a case of half bread better than a quarter really --- but at the end of the day, its helping the team!

A very good mirror of this Nani vs Tony V. debate is Nasri vs Milner at City.

elampiro: 1. So what has Ozil hole role done for his team? No UCL trophy or final. Same with Kagawa. Now you want to drag us back?

2. We need a hole player who can adapt and win games against different teams. In 2010/11, Rooney was in the hole and we got to the final. He even scored a goal from the hole against Barca and in the two Chelsea ties.

In 2007/8 he was mostly on the left, but sometimes right. He scored goals from there. In 2009/10 I could only remember he leading the attack once- against Bayern Munich. At Old Trafford I have forgotten the formation. In 2006/7, I thought we had Oleg and Saha? We also had Larsson with us on loan. Lasson led our attack in some matches.

Overall a joker is a joker. We need a joker and not a static player who will not adapt.

elampiro: 1. Do you mean it's only in Europe United has been playing in the past 10 years. Rooney has been our number 10 both in the EPL and UCL in the past 10 years.

The formation may change but number 10 remains number 10, the joker. Rooney has been our joker in all tournaments.

2. As usual, Nani only showed a sign of potential in those 2.5 games. Just like when you play a 17 years old and you see massive potentials but you know there is still a long way to go.

RuuDie: I choose to side with Valencia because whatever he lacks in skill, vision and ability, he makes up in drive, devotion and determination... and that is least you can ask off a man!

Nani has the "bag of skill" and "bundle of talent"... but "POTENTIAL" energy is not "KINETIC"!

elampiro: 1. Only one answer to the Rooney's argument. 17 UCL knockout goals, yes you to score in the quarter to be able to qualify to score in the semifinal. I guess all the big 3 teams in Italy, Spain, Germany, England and France had number 10s.

Also you have to be consistent to be a number 10 in a big club for 10 years.

2. Go back to my comments on Valencia and Nani. Read them thoroughly. At a certain time, I even mentioned I was confused about who to pick. But this season, I have no doubt.

elampiro: 1. How many no.10 have 200 goals?

2. How many no.10 have 17 UCL knockout goals?

3. How many number 10 have been as consistent in the last 10 years?

4. Any number 10 in the EPL with this?

elampiro: Yes, if you go back you will see several instances where I said it is hard to choose between the two. I said Valencia had excellent games prior to his broken leg, then again before his second major injury. Then Nani has not really live up to his potential.

My support for Valencia over Nani is the current (this season). I also saw both guys for their national teams in recent matches. Valencia was playing like a boss while Nani was confusing himself with his attempts at dribbling. He has lost it. He is a bit better for United though.

elampiro: Nani can do a lot. He uses both feet, he shoots accurately, he can run, he can make short dribbling, he can head too. He can play against tightly packed defence, a deep seated defence, a defence move far from the goalkeeper and a loose defence. That makes it hard to totally cage Nani. He is even improving in his crosses and pull outs.

Valencia is a master of out pacing a loose defence and a defence played far from the goal keeper. He tries to get behind them. Other than this, he is easily caged.

elampiro: Coogar's son

Can't you have a word of your own? Always aligning your self with Coogar. Even in the Zidane argument, also the beck vs Valencia argument.

BinghiNya: their best winger is nani, someone who has underachieved and will always underachieve in MUFC. A downgrade version of C-Ronaldo. How many matches has he won for United all season with his unparalleled skills. Nani is so good he plays week in week out. He is so good serious teams are dying to get him. Nani "their best winger" i laugh in amharic

Oghos1: The dortmund team at that time had little or no ucl experience. U want to blame it on kagawa? lol.

So bayern munich are no longer a big team

superstar1: i hope DM can give a motivational speech for those dead logs to beat Arsenal.

pickabeau1: I agree the plot is over played. ?.resident evil 3 more like with contagion n 28 days later but mehnnnnnnnnnnnnn
I enjoyedthe film
It downplayed brad too n was just pure action

That scene was israel.....tight ish......

chaircover: coogar do you by any chance have a script on your system that does a search of your user-name every 60 seconds on Nairlanad.

Cos I really find it very weird that anytime your name is mentioned anywhere, you scoot to the thread pronto
Very very strange

anyway since you are here please introduce yourself. You are safe in here . . .nothing to do with Ohio here