₦airaland Forum

dayokanu: If back to the wall can win the CL then tell me why it isnt a system?

I say get me the quote where I said Chelsea has a FLUID ATTACK. When everyone and their momma knows they have a plank as a striker. By the time the fluid gets to the plank it becomes a DAM and disrupt the flow. Any half decent striker with MAZACAR would be tearing it up. Give RVP MAZACAR and watch him destroy messis record.

Pass the ball to Torres? You need a goal and you pass the ball to Torres? You would be better off passing to Cech or to the Linesman

ayobase: I hardly hate....talking based on coogar's 'hyper-dissing' endorsement in relation to that omg its slayer's dissing post.....Im clear though!
.
Y shall I hate?

dayokanu: You are a saphead.

Quote where i said Chelsea ATTACK is fluid. and where I said anyone can play as the Striker

The flawed setup didnt stop them from winning the CL 5months ago and as we speak the flawed system is still the CL champions ahead of superiror system played by barca, madrid, Bayern, Man utd, milan or Stoke city

dayokanu: Why could Man Utd AFFORD to leave their senior squad at home? Simply because The sensible strikers have done their jobs earlier and not waiting for last minutes.

In the league Chelsea midfielders are topping the assist charts? Who were they passing to? Ghosts or Ogbanjes?

dayokanu: Has Fabregas played in such roles before? Has hazard played in such role for Chelsea before?.
Hazard is playing as a striker because the striker designate is as useless as a crippled leg

dayokanu: Man Utd lost today but no one is talking about it because their sensible strikers have put the group to rest earlier.

In the beginning of the group, Away games in Turin are things you should have made provision for loses and it wont have hurt if you had buried Juve in Stamford bridge too.

Chelsea didnt fail because of todays result they failed because of results before today

chamotex: I am well proud of the young lads.
They played a very good Galatasaray side and the experience will be invaluable.
That said, Carrik should never play CB for us...this game was meaningless, why not just play Wooton, we were probably gonna lose anyway.
This game should have been the one for Giggs and Scholes, unless they would play at the weekend I don't understand why they were rested.

Ibime: Where do we start? . . . hehehe. . . this is a job for tomorrow.

Let's just sum it up by saying "you don't send boys to war with men"

Mazacar? Oscar is the only man amongst them, and he still needs to improve his clinicism. 83 minutes he had clear pass to Hazard but he has a blind spot on his left hand side. Same thing in the first half when the ball dropped on his left foot. But at least he's a man unlike the other two fantasists who only show when the going is good.

Ramires and Mikel? One can't run, the other can't pass. Some peeps wanted us to believe that Ramires improved technically but my eyes don't deceive me. 3rd goal sums up Ramires and Hazard perfectly. Ramires has an easy semi - professional pass to Hazard. He plays a woeful ball in the air. Spoilt child Hazard turns his back and starts throwing tantrum as Juventus break to score. Sums both players up.

Mikel - is he a defensive midfielder?

Luiz - is he a defender?

Emenalo building fantasy football team. I say again what I said in July. "If you like buy Pele and Garrincha, this squad isn't built to win "

21 goals conceded in 10 games. Forget Falcao, these niggas need Gilberto Silva!!!

dayokanu: So Hazard is now a striker? Did Sturridge also play as a striker on Saturday for 90mins?
Torres failed in his duties was what brought Chelsea to this situation

The same players you clamoured for last season and claimed would make Torres better are now the prima donna tools. Torres failed RDM. RDM must pay for the decision to put his team attack in Fernanduds hand

I was hoping Torres would be dropped for Moses. When Torres started the team lost so they figured playing without a striker couldnt be worse.

When they played vs Shaktar and Torres played 90mins did that stop them from losing?

dayokanu: Chelsea played without a striker.

Is it a standard formation for Chelsea to play without a striker? This is an emergency formation which Chelsea got themselves into because of Torres ineptitude in the previous games

wildorchid: Torres is a big part of the problem.

dayokanu: No Striker for much of the game.
Thats the problem you would face when you go into a season with only 1 useless striker.

If only Chelsea had a better striker, Maybe they wouldnt have to go to Turin needing a result.

Man Utd was able to lose today because their correct strikers did their homework earlier in the group

OMO IBO: Actually, we played better without dud.
We looked like scoring each time we went forward.
Obviously, new playing style didnt help our course.

Anything to keep the dud away from the team is fine by me.

RDM is still toast.

debosky: No Torres for most of the game. . . .abeg someone should come and tell me how well Chelski performed in his absence.

cocoduck: Oh yes I cannot engage in discussion with a manner less person like you. You are just an attention seeker, that is all. For example take a candid look at your post, full of insults or maybe you are just joking. Because you think like a baby. I think I have wasted my time on you. Just a simple answer you are not able to give, even with the presence of Google.

In fact I think you are only joking because I cannot take you serious any more. Last but certainly not the least I cannot call my humble self a citizen of a geographical expression, remember I did not invent that phrase, your rat poison eating and drinking sage AWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWO did. So do not try to impale me

montelik: Heard some interesting speculation about a Beckham return.

dayokanu: Ancelloti also won a double in Chelsea

chosen04: . Mumu, so asking for Biafra means asking for war? Truly the effect of free education combined with rating poison drinking mentality. Rather than get a life you are here drinking rat poison like your sage whenever Biafra is mentioned. Who are you to advice me to forget BIAFRA? So, what have you and your family agained since you started concretrating your low life for your cursed country called niGERia.Anu Npama! EWU Awusa.

cocoduck: just answer the question. if you do not know it or just that you do not want to. then SHUT UP. and keep your dirty words to yourself. What is your problem with my figting for a dead cause you citizen of a geographical expression

dayokanu: Didnt Mourinho also fail to deliver the Holy grail despite spending loads of cash at Chelsea

dayokanu: Mourinho too failed at Chelsea, Del bosque failed at madrid,

dayokanu: So which coach has never been sacked ?

Del Bosque was sacked, Hitzfeld sacked, Mourinho sacked so who is the good coach that wasnt sacked? Maybe guy Roux who coached Auxerre for over 50yrs

dayokanu: Why were they sacked meaning what? Even Jose Mourinho was sacked.

dayokanu: 3 coaches have worked with torres in Chelsea and failed. Ancelotti, AVB and now RDM. These are coaches who have track record of success

Andre Uweh: Is there any reason why Chelsea cannot hire Rafa Benitez to work on Torres?. I don't mean hiring him as our manager but a manager with a sole purpose of getting the best out of Torres.
Remember, Torres played his best footie in England under him.

cocoduck: @ cooga and cyber g
CHO O O O O I you guys are the most gallant cyber warriors i have met especialy cyberg. BTW i beleive that when a fool has nothing to say the person resorts to slanders, lies and insults to get attention.Maybe you just want to show us you know how to type insults
but pls cooga answer the qestion google is your friend just in case

4llerbuntu: erm, ok So why dont they "fight" to take up sturridge's position the few times sturridge plays?
because they don't like torres?

secondly you are also introducing another dimension into this- poor coaching

are you once again shifting the goal post to suit your defence of torres? it has suddenly dawned o you that they have a poor coach?
since when did he become a poor coach?

as far as i can tell, the people still having this argument with you don't have better things to do, this will go on till eternity, going by how u keep introducing new straws

cocoduck: @ cooga you did not answer my question. just give an answer. if you do not know what to say then SHUT UP. i am not afraid of biafra even if i bought a land in ph i can sacrifice that land for peace and progress your nigeria is going backwards while even very war torn somalia is moving lil by lil forward. how can a geographical expression progress. pls tell me without insults.

chamotex: Liar! So why do you come here to lament when he plays Welbeck.
Are you not contradicting yourself here.

cocoduck: look your nigeria will know no peace and progress until biafra issue is settled. a f00l like u comes to talk about gallant army vs an under equiped army still the war lssted up to 3 years until the brits the ussr and eggpt fought on your behalf

chosen04: EWU AWUSE IS RANTING AS USUAL

Who did you get your trash statement "Igbos must not be alone" from . . . . . .
Why not go and drink RAT POISON like your cursed sage?

BIAFRA IS HERE TO STAY, GO AND HUG TRANSFORMER. Even your LAGOS-IBADAN Expressway sited media houses are beginning to wake to reality as reported in the above editorial. Why you are here ranting "That Igbos must not be allowed to stay alone". This is not 1970 . . . .We are wiser now and Biafra is just a matter of time.

chosen04: . Did I hear you say am a niGERian by choice? You are truly delusion. Did your ancestors tell you that Igbos can't stand alone? Its obvious the amount spent on your on free education courtesy of the Rat poison drinking sage was a total waste.

chosen04: . Igbos are not niGERians period. Is it by force for us and you to belong to same country? What did your sage Awo again after doing boy boy for the hausas? Did they even allow him to rule the cursed country? Biafra will continue to be niGERia nemesis continue she is free.