₦airaland Forum

Jadekitana:
Ofcourse i'm gonna vote for her, she's good to go.

Cool. She's got all it takes ...

Jadekitana:
I just viewed mimzy's moniker, she's not looking bad at all. She should contest, i'm solidly behind you!

Gurl we be tag team now oo... Its Mimzy all d way. I can count on u right?

Kfb.

joseph1832:
LMAO. This girl you funny sha. I think I'm now believing I might be the only one who knows how to troll you. lol.

The mumu has nothing else to do. Seems he is out of matchable monikers. How I take be mimzy bikonu?

Abeg.. Iv more e-important things to do than to give him an audience. He can be my guest and waste his MB on this wild goose chase. Don't care.

Hattchett:
Retårded idiøt! You think we don't know both monikers are being operated by the same person? Keep fooling yourself.

You even had to descend low by nominating yourself with your alternate(?)

We are aware of how desperate you are but you don't have to do this.

Shame on you!

lolz..

Jadekitana:
Lol I haven't seen any! I believe the contest isn't just about the beauty, brains should make 60percent of the criteria.

Ah well... Iv been here since 2007 so I think I need to step aside for newbies.

Jadekitana:
I nominate Mi.mzy, crea.mish and re.finer.

If any other cute lady comes to mind i'd add her as well

Cc dy.geasy

Thanks but i'm nowhere near as cute as the other ladies mentioned.

You on the other hand, stand a better chance than I do. SOOO....

Synnzu:
Who knows more peoples that Knoweth multitudes

Dyge.asy has made it more interesting.. kachisbarbie.. wat say u jare? Let's do bizness together.. its been a long time coming!

joseph1832:
I don't need to. When it comes to you, I just like to yank your chord. Lol.

I hereby nominate creamish.

www.nairaland.com/creamish

Cc dygeasy.

Not interested.

Kachisbarbie:
N50000? ?? ?? ?
E done tey I see that kind money.

Make I nominate u? we can pally together and share da money..

I know people..who know people..who know people..

joseph1832:
Okay oh. The way your mouth take dey sharp these days ehn, na wa oh...

But still you booked a space, did it occur to you space bookers too book space for reasons best known to them?

@bolded...read the below a-g-a-i-n.

Creamish:
I have my reason for booking this space.
Stop bridging the gap between u and hell with ur lies. Iv never cared about nor replied space bookers.

joseph1832:
later you'll be yabbing somebody abi.

I have my reason for booking this space.

Stop bridging the gap between u and hell with ur lies. Iv never cared about nor replied space bookers.

I nominate:

1. Kachisbarbie
https://www.nairaland.com/kachisbarbie

2. Mimzy
https://www.nairaland.com/mimzy



cc: Dygeasy

Synzu:
Kramfonos, na so your people dey do?

DemiGoddess:
Nope.

He's a blasted son of a b!tch who deserves to die by chinese water torture.

I was writing from the wife's point of view and not the husband which is pretty much obvious.

Did I ever glorify the man's ass?

So either you have problem understanding or you just trying to spite me.


Please don't ever get sarcastic with me again 'cause it never goes down well.


Thank you fine sir!

Same way he chose to think I left her hubby free. The fact that he isn't mentioned now does not mean he is free. We are basically addressing the issue in the thread..the wife vs the mistress..

Lezzlie:
That coming from you is an endorsement of some sort

I could not agree more with your position on this..

joseph1832:
I did. I'm just bothered you seem more intent on killing the mistress than the man.

If you read my posts and understood my stand, we wont be having this conversation.


Lemme help u understand where I truly stand on this. The wife and her friends were wrong to have beaten her and disgraced her. A non-violent confrontation shuld av sufficed. A confrontation with the hubby too shuld occur.

D'u understand now?

joseph1832:
Why the focus on the mistress? The husband is now left totally in the loop.
Now, I'll ask as regard the emboldened, from which perspective are you coming from, religion, moral or logic?.

Re-read my stand above. Not sure why U think we are in different boats. The only difference btw us is I believe the mistress is as guilty as the husband..

Please quote where I said the husband is not guilty..

joseph1832:
My dear, being realistic means being reasonable. The mistress is guilty? What about the husband? Did it occur to you that may be the man might have been the one who started the whole affair? Funny you blame the mistress and accuse her of being guilty and you totally ignored the husband.

If my wife decides to cheat on me just to keep her job, I trust she would see the need to tell me that her husband is sexually assaulting her, from there, I'll handle it.

This is why I make damn sure that I'll get married to a woman who respect reason and logic, not one who is a slave to her emotion and her religion.

@bolded.. read thru my earlier post.

joseph1832:
In the court of law emotions aren't used as evidence, facts are!. That's the difference.

I'm saying its wrong of her to attack her, that if she had done that in her home, then I can be understood and it may fly in court.

The wife assaulted the lady, that's for sure, not just assault, but pre-meditated assault.

We are on the same page on the assault.

What i am trying to understand is your stand on the mistress. Is she right or wrong? Was it ok for her to date a married man?

joseph1832:
So? Of course emotion will always take over reason when women are involved. One would have expected her to know who initiated the whole thing, the mistress or the husband.

Or did it bother anyone that may be husband coerced the mistress into having an affair with him, like sleep with me, or loose your job. I'm sure you've heard of such tales?

And I intend to keep my guts intact, it means very much to me, thank you very much.

Whatever happened, the mistress is guilty. Once she decided to sleep with the hubby, she became guilty. She must av known that she wont be celebrated when caught but she still decided to fvck on nwayz.. So if ur wife decides to sleep with her boss cos she was threatened of her job, u will approve cos it's not her fault?

Let's be realistic here pls..

joseph1832:
I meant if she had caught them in her matrimonial bed/home.

Whatz the difference? Hearing a confession and actually catching them...does one make the heart ache less than the other?

Are you saying that it is ok to beat her up when shez caught red-handed?

joseph1832:
Still, that doesn't give the wife and her friends that right to assault the mistress.

The wife should have taken this ish up with her husband. If she had caught them defiling her matrimonial home, then I'll understand, but to assault her like this, is not it.

If she had the balls, why didn't she beat her husband with her friends? You wouldn't be surprised that her husband might be the one chasing the mistress up and down.

Explain the bolded better cos the mistress confessed to having an affair with the husband for a year..

Lezzlie:
A married woman who finds her husband greasing the carnals of another should first seek to warn off the supplanting whøre. But it is a difficult asking.

The cognitive abilities of women aren't built for such rendering of logicality in a heated circumstance like that. She will strike, and she'll choose the most disposable of the them, and it has to be the whøre.

Once a woman finds out about her husband's secret squeeze, every odd behaviour of the husband, every unexplained financial denial, every night of cold response, every lack of complement of her looks will suddenly have an answer:

It's in the warm thighs of the LovePeddler: Her reactions shouldn't always be reasonable.

Exactly!!

joseph1832:
Out of respect for you, I'll refrain from saying what I have to say.

Therez a lil devil in everyone Joe. Ur free to spill ur guts. This mistress was having an affair with the husband of a woman who helped her get a job.. she had the affair for a year. The wife got a job for this ingrate.

Abeg.

@Mimzy and Misspicy..

I just read the story.. the mistress knew the man is married. She was even assisted by the man's wife.. habaaa... The mistress deserves the beating jor!

On a serious note.. she shulda just been chased out of the house sha.

Why am I smiling at the pixs?

its inhuman...Yes.. Brutal...Yes... Uncalled for...YES...


...but i'm still smiling ... dat wifey musta been thru a lot..so tey dem cut hair..chai..

pinceprinz:
This one has been to hell before. Pun intended oh!

I don't think it's a first time offence from dear hubby..

Mistresses sef... If u know the man is married, keep off!! U don't know what he is married to!!!

misspicy2:
She wouldn't even dare

You are quick to forget many are in prison for killing their husbands... Cases have been reported of women who chopped of their hubby's d1cks..

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned..

misspicy2:
My dear , going psychotic because of a randy husband has never been know to solve anything.

my point is the wife,will obviously end up escalating the problem,probably to the point you described above or even killing herself too,now what happens to the children when she goes to jail or dies?

because some do it,does not make it acceptable.
[/b]

Beating up or killing the mistress cannot be justified except the mistress came for the wife's or kid's life (Self-defense). Not everyone wants to know the repercussion of their act once their minds are made up. Its not everyone who thinks rationally like you would want them to.

misspicy2:


and I still emphasize that,before any married woman go ballistic on the mistress,she should at least carry out some investigations,[b]most mistresses are not even aware that their man is married[/b]

This was my point in my first post. Its not all mistresses who know the actual status of the man. I will still prefer a call or non-violent confrontation with the mistress where need be and a confrontation with the hubby as well. If u leave the mistress out of it, she will continue her biz with ur hubby so she needs to be told off.

mimzy:
The woman and her friends got wind of the affair long enough to plan the attack. It wasn't the same day she got informed bout it that she attacked the babe na. So what stopped her from brutally assaulting her hubby too or confronting him at least?

The fact that we have not read about it does not mean nothing happened. So for now, we cant say what may or may not have happened at home.

cassieblake:
Yes or she can cut part of his dick.

Some men dont bother studying or really getting to know the woman they are about marrying. They think cos they are men, they are allowed to wander upandan. hahahaha... I juss dey pity dem.

mimzy:
The husband was in a business meeting at the time of the report . He was unscathed.

He was unscathed cos he was in a business meeting. Did the reporter bother to tell us what happened upon his return home?

misspicy2:
Assaulting her does not even solve half the problem

it only escalates it,now tell me,how many mistresses will she have to kill to curb her husbands roaming third leg?

If you visit the female section of a prison, ul be amazed at the number of women who decided to kill their hubbyz for issues like this. Don't underestimate any woman. They can go to the extent of eliminating all threats to their marriage. The fact that you see it as inhuman does not mean the next woman thinks like you do.

Watch the Crime & investigation channel sometimes..u might learn a thing or two about Women who kill.

Always best to keep off other people's property.