Dapsyra's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dapsyra's Profile › Dapsyra's Posts
mctfopt:It is brand new in mint condition |
Yea, it is not a regular Chinese knock-off. It is premium quality; good enough to power Japanese Robots. It is normal practice to repurpose Lithium batteries for uses other than the original design especially when the battery is of very good quality. What is important is the quality, durability and safety of the battery. The Sharp Stobe battery is of premium quality having been originally made to power robots. It is very durable with extended cycle life and also delivers the rated power. The chemistry is also very safe since it does not burst into flames when abused. Since the specifications, quality, longevity and safety exceeds those of many other Lithium batteries in use today, there is therefore nothing for buyer's to beware of. adrusa: |
Sharp Stoba EA-BA1000 Premium Lithium Battery at the price of AGM/GEL/Flooded 1Kwh, 48.1v nominal, 20.6Ah Lithium Ion Battery with Sharp Stoba addictive Extended Cycle life. Increase Capacity. Enhance Safety. Reduce Cost. High Quality BMS inbuilt Experience Lithium technology without breaking the bank N135,000.00 Contact: 080 five five 35 six 495
|
You cannot only discharge LTO batteries to 100% DoD routinely without any damage, you can also discharge them to 0v without dire consequences. Some of my cell actually arrived at 0v sealed in a packet from the manufacturer. They were in storage for 10years before I bought them. LTO batteries simply don't burst into flames no matter the abuse. It is the safest Lithium chemistry available today. It is superior to LFP. I concur with Niyi that it is poor design to max out your battery capacity and rely on BMS to cutoff. I did 100% DOD a few times just to verify the true capacity of the batteries and they over performed on every occasion. When many people do the Lithium Vs Lead Acid comparison, they leave out so many important factors. Coulombic Efficiency is one such factor. Most Lithium batteries have Coulombic efficiency greater than 99% while that of Lead acid is about 85%. This implies that every time you cycle your lead acid battery, 15% of the energy is lost to battery inefficiency as against 1% loss in Lithium. This is real energy you could have used to power your home wasted by Pb batteries. Another important factor is the charge C rate. Most lead acid batteries are rated at C10 or less. Lithium on the other hand can do 1C or higher. This become very important in Solar applications because of the limited sun hours available daily. You can easily over size your array to fully recharge the Lithium batteries in 1-2 hours. Try this with lead acid batteries and watch your battery become a heater. You can also benefit from the high charge rate of Lithium batteries even if you rely on PHCN to recharge your battery. With adequate fast charger, you can easily recharge your Lithium battery within 1-2hours window when PHCN is available in your area. No need to run expensive generator. Today's Lead Acid vs Lithium debate is similar to the Carburetor vs Injector and Automatic vs Manual transmission debate of late '80s and early '90. The new vs the old. The old had never won and it will not in this instance also. When people talk about the Lithium hype, I smile. It is not a hype; it is real! You need to experience Lithium to appreciate it. Some of the die hard Lead acid fans on this platform that eventually took the Lithium plunge can attest to this. Ignore Lithium at your detriment. NiyiOmoIyunade: |
This issue is usually caused by mismatched total resistance (battery internal resistance plus wire resistance) of each respective bank. The higher resistance bank will lag behind. That is why is it best practice to use wires same gauge and length when connecting batteries in parallel. It is also advisable to use busbar if you must parallel more than two banks. adrusa: |
Contact futurenix: |
futurenix:Impressive |
futurenix:Can you please show the nameplate specifications and datasheet? |
funshyboi:You can charge all batteries from any power source, be it Solar, Windmill, PHCN or Generator provided you have the right charger. |
12v, 24v and 48v ESS LiFePO4 Power Tank Batteries on sale These are automobile grade LiFePo4 batteries built like a tank. Comes in 24v modules but can be easily configured for 12v, 36v and 48v or higher. 3C continuous charge and 5C continuous discharge. Sold with appropriately rated Ant BMS with bluetooth monitoring. Each module of 8S4P is rated at 25.6v 160Ah for 4096Wh Price: N705,000.00 per module Contact: 080 five five 3 five 64 nine 5
|
I have some LiFePo4 batteries coming in this week. earthrealm: |
Israelicc:The jump from 100/150w panel to 300/380w panel was a technological leap (improved efficiency) which is not the case with the 810w panel. The manufacturer of the 810w panel merely fused two 380/400w panels into one large panel with equivalent increase in surface area and weight. If the 810w panel is wired for higher voltage, the VOC will be about double that of 380w panel while the ISC remain same If wired for higher current, the ISC will be about double that of 380w panel while the VOC remain same. Both scenarios can be easily achieved by installing two 400w panels instead of the 810w panel |
ceaser:BMS is required. They are bare cells. You have to build them into a pack according to your need. |
EMMAACHILE:At first glance, it look spectacular but when you do the maths, it reduces to ordinary. This 810w panel has dimensions 2.22m by 1.757m. This gives an area of 3.9m2 Now lets look at regular 380w panel. The dimensions are usually about 1.956m by 0.992m. This implies a surface area of 1.84m2 If will now scale up the 380w panel proportionally to produce 810w, the surface area will also scale up to 3.92m2 (1.84m2 x 810w/380w) Summary (note all the bold figures) The new 810w panel requires an area of 3.9m2 to install If scaled up to deliver 810w, the old 380w will require 3.92m2 to install. Since the area requirements of both panels are just the same, the new panel is just the old panel in a bigger frame. Nothing new on the technological side. Now that the physical size of the new 810w panel is over twice that of the 380w panel, handling becomes an issue especially when installing on difficult terrains. Excerpt the new 810w panel is cheaper than two 380w panel, I will not recommend buying it. |
Abigai:7pcs in series is ideal for 24v setup |
SPIM08HP LITHIUM ION 3.7V 8AH CELLS FOR SALE @ N3,600/cell I have some leftover cells for sale. These cells are rather very powerful. They are rated at 25C discharge and 10C charge rates. If you are a DIY enthusiast and you want to play with Lithium batteries without breaking the bank, these cells are for you. CHECK OUT THE SPECS BELOW. Material Li-ion Typical capacity 8AH Nominal Voltage 3.7V Weight around 300g Dimensions of cell body: 9x138X190mm Dimensions of cell with tabs 9x138X210mm Internal Resistance ≤0.8mΩ Max Charge Rate 120A Recommend Continuous Discharge Rate 200A Pulse Discharge Rate(3 seconds) 400A Fully Charged voltage 4.2V Discharge cut off voltage 2.5V Working Charge Temp 0~50°C Working Discharge Temp –20°C~50°C Storage Temperature –20°C~50°C Applications e-bikes, powerwalls, car audio, golf carts, forklifts, UPS, solar system, etc. Cycle life 2000 cycles to 80% with 100% DOD under normal temperature Advantages safety, environment-friendly, high discharge current, low capacity loss, super-long cycle life. There are a lot of videos on YouTube about them .... https://youtu.be/Gw9f68gN_s4 Contact: o8o five five 35 six four 9 five
|
futurenix:Are you suggesting that the manufacturer of the panel does not know the correct efficiency wafers they used? Or The forger of the nameplate copied wrong data from somewhere else? |
earthrealm:Both configurations have about 19,200Wh of stored energy. Please advice your pal to spend a little more money and buy Lithium battery of about 12,000wh (60% of the AGM capacity). He will get more usable energy, it will perform much better and also outlive the AGMs. |
justcallmenuel:A very simple calculation based on the nameplate data reveals that the panel is actually 320w instead of the 360w written on it. From the nameplate: The surface area of the panel is 1.956m x 0.992m = 1.940352m2 The panel efficiency is 16.5% Irradiance standard test condition is 1000w/m2 From these data, we can calculate the true capacity of the panel. capacity (w) = area x efficiency x irradiance /100 capacity = 1.940352 x 16.5 x 1000 /100=320w So, this is clearly a 320w panel being sold as 360w |
essegis:The 20Ah cells were used "as is". Just connect 2 packs in series and charge to 60v The 55Ah cell came bare. This are the ones we built into several banks of 22s and also charge to 60v The 20Ah banks and the 55Ah banks were all connected in parallel to a busbar |
ceaser:About 90% of the battery capacity is between 2.1v and 2.5v. At 30v, the battery is 90% full |
essegis:We arranged the cells into 22S to achieve 52.8v nominal |
ceaser:Each module consist of 24pcs of 2.3v 20AH cells arranged in 2 rows of 12 cells each. 1.1Kwh total, 550wh each section of 12 cells. Voltage ranges for each row of 12 cells. 32.4V Maximum 27.6V Nominal 18V Minimum Both rows can be wired in series for 20AH, 55.2V nominal OR Wired in parallel for 40AH, 27.6V nominal o8o five five 35 six four 9 five |
essegis:We bought some of those ones after mopping up all the 55Ah cells we could find. They are fully built modules made from 20Ah cells. I still have two or three leftover modules for sale. |
Trippledots:I have no idea what the current price is. They are not regular stock. We purchase them over three years ago when prices of Lithium batteries was not as affordable as it is today though we struck a very good deal because of the volume purchased. |
Trippledots:The ones Will Prowse tested are Chinese knock-offs. Mine were made in Japan by Toshiba for Honda. They were built to the highest international standards. |
mctfopt:They sure do. Standard charge/discharge rate is 10C with bursts over 50C I cannot comment on their performance under extreme charge/discharge rates since I have not been able to load them beyond 0.14C. My experience with them has been nothing but pleasant. They have lived up to their reputations |
ojeysky:High C rates are very useful in automobile and grid stability applications. It is of no use in home solar storage. I did not buy LTO for it's high C rate. I bought it for it's very long cycle life and abuse tolerance. |
NiyiOmoIyunade:Your battery bank should be designed for your need not what someone else think. I am 100% off-grid and my system is designed to meet my needs with enough redundancy to cater for 2 days of bad weather. |
essegis:From my personal experience running LTO batteries at very low "C" rates, the cycle efficiency is about 99.9%. For comparison, the cycle efficiency of Lead Acid battery is about 70% My bank is 700Ah and the highest instantaneous load it has ever seen is 100Ah. That is 0.14C on a battery that is capable of 10C |
essegis:One man's food is another man's poison. All the "PRO" points I listed cannot be faulted in any objective review. The only complaint I have seen about them that I did not list in my "CONs" list is the claim that their cycle efficiency is lower that other Lithium flavours. My personal experience with LTO is contrary to that claim maybe because I am not running them at 10C. For home solar storage, nobody need 10C. At 10C, the battery bank will be depleted in 6minutes! That will be a very poor design |
NiyiOmoIyunade:Niyi, those PylonTech batteries are quite good. I took a brief look at them back then before settling for the LTO cells. I had a client that ordered large quantity of LTO cells (>120kwh). I seized the opportunity of the bulk purchase to grab some cells for myself at a very affordable price. |
