DJperdurabo's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DJperdurabo's Profile › DJperdurabo's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 67 pages)
Lawd in heaven!!!! ?What a country? What a people? I don't know what to say right now...just...forget it! |
Key Takeawayshttps://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-worlds-most-and-least-liked-countries/
|
N.B: It's a lengthy read but quite informative Stanford Graduates Walking Out On The Google CEO Wasn’t A Protest. It Was A Paradigm Shift In How A Generation Exercises Power On June 14, 2026, Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet, and a Stanford alumnus, returned to his graduate alma mater to deliver the university’s 135th commencement address. He spoke about optimism, passion, and the value of not taking life too seriously. He did not speak about artificial intelligence. That last choice was deliberate. This graduation season has been marked by a wave of boos and hostile audience reactions at ceremonies across the country wherever tech executives have attempted to frame AI as the engine of graduates' futures. Pichai, it seems, read the room before he entered it. What he could not outmaneuver was the reason approximately 100 to 200 graduates, out of a class of 6,000, rose from their seats and walked out of Stanford Stadium as he spoke. Their protest was not about AI. It was about something more specific, and more damning: what Google has chosen to do with it. What the Walkout Was Actually About The students who left were organized by Stanford Students for Justice in Palestine, No Tech for Apartheid, and Tech for Liberation, all of which are that have been building toward this moment for months. Their target was Project Nimbus, the approximately $1.2 billion joint contract between Google, Amazon, and the Israeli government, signed in 2021, which provides Israeli government agencies — including, critics argue, its military and defense establishment — with cloud computing infrastructure and artificial intelligence capabilities. Google has publicly maintained that Project Nimbus covers civilian workloads including finance, healthcare, and transportation, and that he is not involved sensitive military operations. However, internal company documents reviewed by The Intercept in 2024 told a different story. According to outlet, before the contract was signed, Google’s own lawyers said that the deal was "not negotiable" on terms favorable to the Israeli government and that Israel’s defense establishment was explicitly included as a covered entity. Moreover, that Google's standard cloud terms of service — which would prohibit uses leading to harm — did not apply to Project Nimbus. The contract reportedly states that there will be "no restrictions" on what the Israeli government may migrate to the service, "including vital systems of high sensitivity level." Those concerns have found expression inside and outside Google repeatedly. In 2024, following sit-in protests at Google offices in New York and Sunnyvale, the company fired approximately 28 workers who participated in demonstrations against Project Nimbus. The number later grew to roughly 50 total employees. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has accused Google of "choosing to look the other way" on Israel's use of its services. Earlier this year, more than 800 Google employees signed a petition demanding the company disclose and terminate contracts with ICE and CBP, citing what they described as the convergence of the same technology enabling both the Israeli military and U.S. immigration enforcement. The students who walked out at Stanford’s commencement knew all of this. Their signs read "ICE SPIES WITH GOOGLE AI" and "GENOCIDE RUNS ON GOOGLE." They didn’t shout. They didn't disrupt. They stood up, walked out, and held their own ceremony — a People's Commencement in the Arboretum just outside the stadium, featuring poetry, music, and an address by Mahmoud Khalil, the Palestinian activist detained by ICE in 2025 after his protest organizing at Columbia University. It was, notably, the third consecutive year that Stanford graduates had organized a walkout at their own commencement. The Psychology of Non-Participation What distinguished the Stanford walkout, and what makes it worth examining beyond the immediate political context, is the method. The students did not attempt to silence Pichai. They did not rush the stage or shout over his remarks. They removed themselves. This is a form of protest that psychologists and organizational behaviorists have studied as a distinct category: withdrawal of participation as a form of power assertion. Rather than engaging with a system or a speaker in order to contest it, the protesters chose to make legible their refusal to participate at all. The statement being made is not "we disagree with you" but rather "your presence at our ceremony is a condition we do not accept, and we will not legitimize it with our attendance." This posture has a different psychological signature than conventional protest. It does not seek dialogue. It does not ask for a seat at the table. It declines the table entirely. For a generation that has grown up acutely aware of how institutions and corporations absorb, rebrand, and ultimately neutralize dissent, the refusal to engage may be a more sophisticated form of resistance than it first appears. You cannot co-opt a walkout. You cannot issue a statement in response to silence. Research from the CIVICUS Monitor and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace have documented at least 120 significant Gen Z-led protest movements globally over the past two years. From Nepal and Bangladesh, where youth-led demonstrations toppled national governments, to Serbia, where students have sustained organized protest for more than a year. Across these movements, researchers have noted several consistent characteristics: they are largely decentralized and leaderless by design; they rely on social media for coordination; and they are organized around a clear ethical line rather than a traditional political demand. Political scientist Erica Chenoweth's research on nonviolent resistance has found that when roughly 3.5% of a population sustains participation in a nonviolent campaign, major political change becomes possible. What is notable about the Stanford walkout is not its size — 200 out of 6,000 is a small fraction — but its precision. This was not a spontaneous reaction. It was a preannounced, organized, sustained, and repeated act. The same groups organized walkouts in 2024 and 2025. They will likely do so again. What This Means for the Institutions Being Walked Out On For corporations and institutions accustomed to managing dissent through dialogue, listening sessions, and stakeholder engagement processes, the walkout model presents a particular challenge. There is no complaint to address. There is no demand to partially meet in order to defuse momentum. There is no table at which to offer a seat. Google did not issue a statement responding to the Stanford walkout. It did not need to, in the immediate term. But the pattern of escalating institutional response — from ignoring internal protests, to firing workers who spoke out, to receiving a preannounced walkout by graduates at one of its CEO's most high-profile appearances of the year — suggests that the traditional playbook for managing employee and public dissent may be losing traction with the generation that is entering the workforce. That generation is also the one that will constitute the professional talent pipeline that companies like Google depend on. When the student activist group’s statement said that graduates "showed they could not be allured anymore with the talk of a dollar or rapidly expanding AI," they were articulating something about the terms of the implicit social contract between corporations and young workers, and what happens when those terms are perceived as broken. The institutions that would be wise to pay attention are not just the ones whose CEOs walk into hostile commencement halls. They are every organization whose workforce includes people under 30 who have been watching, for years, as their generation is told that change comes through patience and proper channels — and who have drawn their own conclusions about what happens when proper channels are used and nothing changes. The walkout is not a tantrum. It is a theory of change. And it is becoming more legible, more organized, and more globally consistent every year. https://www.forbes.com/sites/maiahoskin/2026/06/26/stanford-graduates-walking-out-on-the-google-ceo-wasnt-a-protest-it-was-a-paradigm-shift-in-how-a-generation-exercises-power/ |
CaptainJune:As "galling" as it may seem, these are words on marble. |
The French media outlet L’Équipe has apologised to the Belgian footballer Jérémy Doku after he was criticised by one of its pundits for saying he would leave the World Cup to be present at the birth of his first child. The Belgian football federation said Doku had made it back to London in time to be with his wife, Shireen, who gave birth to a boy called Praise on Monday. “Jeremy received news before yesterday’s match that the birth was imminent,” the team doctor, Brahim Hacene, said in a statement. “Everything went perfectly, and the mother, father, and baby are all doing wonderfully. Jérémy will rejoin the squad [on Tuesday] evening in Seattle.” Last week Doku had told reporters that Shireen was due to give birth in the second week of July and, should Belgium still be in the tournament by then, he was hoping to go home for the birth. “It depends on when it happens, but it’s my first child, so I would definitely want to be there,” said Doku, Belgium’s 24-year-old winger, who plays club football for Manchester City. “If you ask me what I want, my answer is that nobody wants to miss the birth of their first child … I know the federation supports its players and understands their situations. We’ll see what we can do.” France Pierron, a presenter with L’Équipe, on Friday cited the “hundreds of footballers who would kill” to be playing in Doku’s place at the World Cup. “You’re living out a childhood dream, yet you’re going to walk away from it all to attend the birth of your child – a disgusting moment, if you’ll pardon the expression, where the dad is completely useless,” she said. “He just holds your hand and takes a photo.” That followed criticism last week by one of Doku’s former youth coaches, who said the player had already made his choice by turning up at the World Cup. “It may sound harsh, but if you’ve chosen to be there, you’ve chosen to play,” Peter Janssens told the Belgian news site VRT. ”The baby will still be there afterwards.” The former Belgium international Gert Verheyen seemed to mock Doku’s decision, asking what he would do while his wife was giving birth. “The only thing you can say is: ‘You’re doing great, keep going,’” he said. But soon it was Pierron being criticised. As her remarks went viral, voices from across the world of football and beyond lined up behind Doku. “Shame on you,” wrote the content creator Caroline Salame, who played for Canada at the Under-17 World Cup in New Zealand. “As someone who has played in a World Cup and who has also given birth, let me tell you this: the hardest thing I have ever done in this lifetime – and the thing that I am most proud of – is bringing my baby earthside,” she said. “And I do not know how I would have done that without my husband beside me. Birth can be extremely complicated; anything can happen.” Pierron’s comments were also challenged by a fellow commentator for L’Équipe. The retired boxer Brahim Asloum, who won light-flyweight gold for France at the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, described the birth of a child as a singular, once in a lifetime moment. “A baby is your entire life. A World Cup is over when it is over,” he said Pierron eventually appeared on social media to apologise. “These remarks are solely my own and in no way reflect a collective position. I understand that they may have shocked, offended or hurt some of you, and I am sorry for that. My intention was never to minimise the place or role of fathers with their partners and children,” she wrote. In a statement published on Sunday, L’Équipe distanced itself from the comments made by Pierron, saying they had “shocked” many of its viewers. “L’Équipe distances itself with these remarks, which are far removed from [its] values and apologises to the footballer concerned and more broadly to its audience,” it said. It was reported that Pierron would remain off-air until the end of the current season of her show on 3 July. Jeremy Davies of the Fatherhood Institute in the UK said: “It seems ridiculous to me that we still have these big outrages, when men talk about wanting to do the most basic human thing imaginable, which is to be present when their baby is born.” He described Doku as setting a “refreshing” example. “To me, it’s like we haven’t moved on from the sort of gladiators in the Colosseum. You know, these kinds of masculine heroes who are supposed to have no softness to them, no family commitments or anything like that,” he said. “You can be a soft and loving man and hard as nails on the pitch, if you like.” Davies applauded Doku for having the “perspective” to see the broader picture. “In the end, fine – football is important, everybody loves football, everybody gets terribly excited. It’s just a job, on some level, too,” he said. “This footballer gets it, and it seems to me that’s a healthy attitude in life. And if more of us had it, maybe the world would be a better place, you know?” https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/22/lequipe-apologises-belgium-footballer-jeremy-doku-birth-child-presenter-comments Nuff said! |
There are ALL the same. ALL of them! Deep down, there's no difference between ALL of them...ruling party, opposition, contenders all cut from the same cloth! |
Winger Jeremy Doku has been criticised for saying he wants to leave Belgium's World Cup camp to be with his wife when she gives birth to their first child. Doku's wife Shireen is due to give birth during the second week of July and he intends to return home even if the Red Devils are still in the tournament, which would then be at the quarter-final stage. "It's my first child, so I would definitely want to be there," the Manchester City forward, 24, told Reuters, external. "If you ask me what I want, my answer is that nobody wants to miss the birth of their first child. But I also know that football involves many other considerations. "I know the federation supports its players and understands their situations. We'll see what we can do." However, Doku's plan to leave the USA and return home has brought fierce criticism from L'Equipe channel presenter France Pierron, who labelled a father "completely useless" at the time of their child's birth. "The World Cup is an incredible joy," she said in a message posted to the Facebook page of French sports publication L'Equipe. "There are hundreds of footballers who would kill to be in your shoes. It might never happen again in your life. "You're living out a childhood dream, yet you're going to walk away from it all to attend the birth of your child - a disgusting moment, if you'll pardon the expression, where the dad is completely useless." 'A baby is your entire life' Doku has received plenty of support online following Pierron's remarks - including from retired boxer Brahim Asloum, who won light-flyweight gold for France at the 2000 Sydney Olympics. "A baby is your entire life. A World Cup is over when it is over," he wrote. Later on Saturday, Pierron released a statement on her X page in a bid to explain her comments and apologise for any offence caused. "I was expressing a personal opinion, within the context of a contentious exchange," she said. "I understand that they may have shocked, hurt, or wounded some of you, and I am sorry for that. "My intention has never been to minimise the place or role of fathers with their partner and their child." Belgium confirmed on Saturday that Doku will miss their second World Cup group match against Iran (20:00 BST) because of illness. Rudi Garcia's side drew their opening game with Egypt 1-1. OP's Comment: I think someone has some real Daddy issues here. Her dad may have been "useless" to her biologically (at her conception) and parenting-wise (sic), but I do KNOW the overwhelming majority of fathers out there are putting in work to be the best dads/partners they can be to their kids and significant others respectively. Seeing she claimed it was her "personal" opinion in her apology, maybe she would have done better to have kept her opinion truly"personal" and not broadcast it to the world. Cc. NLFPmod |
Way to go! Finally, the push for "humanity" gets a clarion call. No more losing our brothers, sisters, kids, cousins, nephews and nieces mind to a soul-less universe where ALL is possible; evil and good, but, where unfortunately, Evil triumphs disproportionately in the battle for the minds and souls of our young. |
The United States has frozen the assets and properties of eight Nigerians accused of having links to the Islamic sect, Boko Haram, and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.https://punchng.com/us-sanctions-eight-nigerians-over-links-to-boko-haram-cybercrime/
|
nairalanda1:Sometimes just leave out the "buts" from your otherwise valid and informative comments. You don't always have to court controversy, be the "lone" voice of reason, superior thinking or whatever. After a while it gets boring, predictable and gives off an arrogant standoffish vibe (even if that's not the intent or whom you are-you can't help how people think about you right? But you sure can influence HOW they come to conclusions about your personality). And I have an idea how you may react to this comment (which may just prove the point I was trying to make). |
Lekjaa: Morocco Will No Longer Submit Bids to Host African Competitions Fouzi Lekjaa Rabat – The President of Morocco’s Football Federation (FRMF), Fouzi Lekjaa, said in an interview that Morocco will no longer submit bids to host African competitions. “Starting today, Morocco will no longer submit any bids to host African competitions, regardless of their nature. If other countries wish to organize them, we wish them the best,” Lekjaa said in his new interview with Al Jazeera 360. Lekjaa denied privileges or advantages, stating that what they describe as advantages consists of hosting competitions that no other country wants to organize. The FRMF President also addressed various topics, including the controversial AFCON final against Senegal. Morocco endured shocking events and a hate campaign during and following the AFCON final against Senegal on January 18. The event unfolded following Senegal’s walk-off, which changed the course of the tournament. The walk-off, triggered by Pape Thiaw, sparked vandalism, with Senegalese fans attempting to storm the pitch and hooliganism. Now, six months since the most successful tournament in CAF history, Morocco has decided it is no longer interested in hosting a tournament for the continent. Addressing the AFCON controversies, Lekjaa also answered questions regarding Senegal’s criticism over security during the tournament. Lekjaa said Senegal never complained about anything before the AFCON final. “On the contrary, their federation president even said the stadium was world-class, and everything was perfect,” Lekjaa said. Lekjaa said the Senegalese federation issued a communiqué in which they announced their team would arrive in Rabat at a certain time, which triggered fans to come to cheer for them. This led to fans surrounding the team, with the Senegalese federation claiming there was a lack of security to protect their team. Morocco, however, has launched a strong campaign strengthening security protection around all stadiums and host cities to ensure protection for both teams and fans. Lekjaa said Morocco’s security does not need praise, as the country already has a strong reputation among international partners who recognize the country’s strengths. He also paid tribute to Moroccan fans who showed wisdom, especially during the final against Senegal. He recalled Senegal’s complaints against their hotel, which was assigned to them by CAF. “We changed it for them. The third issue was that they refused to train with the Moroccan national team,” he added. What influence? Lekjaa firmly denied claims that suggest Morocco exerts “disproportionate influence” within the Confederation of African Football (CAF). He emphasized that Morocco has no single employee within the federation and no effective representation in its committees. “What influence are you talking about?” he continued, saying that his role as head of CAF’s finance committee was given to him due to his professional background in the sector. https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2026/06/319361/lekjaa-morocco-will-no-longer-submit-bids-to-host-african-competitions/
|
Hmmm...maybe PO should desist from "speaking" too much...just maybe. |
Richtaiwo:Extremely interesting, Walai Talia! Truly, there seem to be no redeemer for this country! Politics, politicians! What a breed!!! |
Denko2721987:Lionel Richie, Jeffrey Osborne still holding the fort. The last of a dying breed. Alas, age and death comes to us all. |
Listen to: Lost in the Night (fom Can You Stop the Rain Album) If Ever You're in My Arms Again (from Straight From The Heart Album) Absolute classics! RIP. |
@nairalanda1, while your arguments holds water, your insistence on not seeing the point of view of others with contrary view (which are quite legitimate) is a problem. You speak from an "academic" standpoint. In affairs of state & economy and even business for that matter, this view is NOT always the best given nuances ocassioned by extant conditions, developments etc. This "grey line" (you are refusing to acknowledge) is the rampart most of the opposing views take leap from. To TRULY solve a national problem (of whatever nature), it takes more than academic truth hence you see committees being set up, conferences being convened etc. I can guarantee you that even if you throw a gazillion dollars into the electricity fray, it will NOT solve the issue like you academically think it would. |
njokuuche77:Preach!!! |
njokuuche77:Preach!! |
njokuuche77:Preach! |
Gboss247:Wow..so you're crediting this development to the opening of the Hormus Strait? Oh well! (rolls eyes). |
yarimo:Oh please! shut it! It's not everything you have to take a "pro APC/BAT" stand for! Let me tell.you how true dyed-in-the-wool apologist behave. When they see an opportunity to defend or extoll their position (APC/Bola Timubu in your case) due to a positive development instigated by their espoused principle, view, principal, religion etc., they come out roaring, stomping and causing massive upheaval in the established state of things. Why? Because they have a good legitimate reason to. But, When they see a plain-as-day compromising or fumbling development from their espoused position (APC/BAT in your case), they remain MUTE. They don't say a single WORD. You know why? Defending the indefensible draws more attention to the unfortunate situation thus perpetuating the loses such a situation engenders. They only come.out fighting on positive development AND other developments that can be ARGUED. Not situations that are hopeless (as this is). Just do your research on this. In fact, don't go too far in your research as some notable APC/BAT apologists here do this a lot-remain mute on developments from the APC/BAT camp that everyone sees as being downright unpopular. Now, bringing it to this topic, you should have ignored the discussion and kept mute rather than attacking the lady as all she said is the truth never mind your position and you KNOW in your hearts of heart that she speaks the truth. Bro, you for just lock up and let the anti APC/BAT divide have a field day on her remarks. Not all battles are worth fighting. Choose your battles well. |
clearcrystal:Hear ye! Hear yee! Questions his professed greater "altruistic" motives for establishing the refinery. His rtheorics in helping poor Nigerians to access "cheap" fuel, availability etc. pales into insignificance in the light of this revelation. Why didn't you sell at N200 less before? If you can now (without taking heavy losses), you could then! So, essentially, it still boils down to the bottom-line; humongous profits! Makes one recall the whole MTN & Glo thing back in the day...MTN was cashing out MASSIVELY on per minute billing (lying to all who cared to listen (and that was everybody) that per second billing was impossible) until Glo came to upset the apple cart! All of a sudden, per second billing became "possible". Dangote can do better or he stands a great chance of losing the goodwill of the people on whose back he rode to "refinery" business stardom. One thing EVERY artiste knows is Never Take The Fans For Granted. |
dre11:. Now, that's the power and effect of "competition" in a market! |
ogododo:Wow...talk about equity and clean hands... Wow... It's a hopeless situation...liars and thieves everywhere...the redeemer himself needs redemption! The redeemer needs to be redeemed! What a country!!! ![]() |
seunmsg:Saw this coming a long time ago... Call him a coward or anything, Peter Obi knew this would happen and the man jumped ship fast...what a coalition! Game over! |
SlavaUkraini:This chap seems to be the only aspirant "bold" enough to be visiting media houses, granting interviews and making assertions. Where are the other contestants? Yes, I know it's not campaign season, but, can't they speak for themselves like Amaechi does rather than relying on so called "movements"? |
Osgilliat:Are you really serious right now?! |
Kingzjayzee:Curious Case of Benjamin Button in reverse |
pocohantas:Oops! @OP, busted!!! |
WorkTheTalk:Thanks for this! Phew! What a forum!!! ?Honestly, if Nairaland is a reflection of the so called youths that are being routed as the leaders of tomorrow or who should be given the reins of power, then the country is finished! People would read, but can't comprehend. Some will comprehend but can't relate to the issue being discussed. Some won't even read and just veer off-topic. Others stock in trade is steady vitriol...never a happy day in their lives. Honestly, it's a very tiring place to visit...near zero seminal discussions even if for just fun...quite a revealing peek at the [sorry] state of mind of the so called "future" leaders. |
OP, can you please edit the title of this post? It is misleading. |
Memphis357:Q.E.D. |
?