₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,509 members, 8,512,233 topics. Date: Tuesday, 03 November 2026 at 06:15 AM

Toggle theme

DoctorAlien's Posts

Nairaland Forum › DoctorAlien's Profile › DoctorAlien's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (of 137 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:34pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
There are no moral absolutes.
So rape is not really bad?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:31pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
Humans can create moral.absolute laws. A few men ended slavery and criminalized slavery. Same with genocide. A few men criminalized it.
I seriously don't want to believe that you're dull. Do you even know what a moral absolute is? That something is enforced by a group of humans does not mean it is a moral absolute.

Please, make meaningful contributions, not ignorant comments. Go and first check the meaning of moral absolute, then come back.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:25pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
can there be good or bad without a god?

who made rape wrong in China?

until you tell me the god that gave the Chinese their morals I think I'm done here
LOL grin grin GOD is the Author of the universal moral code.

Don't tell me you're running. Whether rape is wrong in China or Gambia is not the issue. You might want to go and read the thread again from the beginning. The issue is: if I decide that rape is good, it is good for me. Assuming that 200 more people share the same view, rape is good for us. Now, is rape really good?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:21pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
Yes. In Saudi Arabia the views of a few men have turnew something like driving for women into a crime.
That women should desist from driving is not a moral absolute.

Don't prove to us that you're not intelligent.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:16pm On Jan 10, 2017
felixomor:
Guy, u r dodging so many questions.
Why will u be scared of yes or no question?
He's clutching on to an obvious moral absolute so as not to appear bad, and yet he is denying the Author of that moral value grin A simple yes or no would have been enough for me.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:13pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
this is red herring

seems you're now clutching at straws now that I've shown you don't need any god to tell you what's right and wrong with a good example
LOL grin grin grin Felixomor really predicted that you'll never answer the question.

But this has been my question all this while: if there are absolute moral values(like desisting from rape), who made them absolute?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:09pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
Who else apart from humans.
Can the views of a group of persons turn something that could be a relative(desisting from rape) into an absolute?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:08pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
the things they decided as good is good for them! that's why there's no such thing as "objective morality" it varies from place to place

every society needs to make their own rules in order to maintain order as much as possible

China shows you don't need any god to tell you what's right and wrong

back to "Charity"

how did the Chinese see "Charity" as good when there's no god instructing them to? since all their religion is technically atheistic in nature
If I see rape as good, it is good for me. Assuming 5 more persons, or 100 more persons are of the same view, rape is good for us. Is rape really good?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:04pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
DoctorAilen

I'm still waiting for your definition of "Murder"
Peurile, I must say. I have no definition of murder. Instead, the dictionary has one.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:02pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
What you are saying has also been addressed by other threads so I will stay and I won't back down. Why is rape and murder bad when your God whom you claim is the source of morality, is all over the place in the bile commanding people to carry out genocide and rape?
Is rape absolutely bad? If yes, who declared it absolutely bad?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 8:01pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
nope you've not

morality comes from a god, that's what this thread is about

Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism does not involve any god and they're able to decide on what's right and wrong; how did they do that without any god telling them?

I would love to see you twist out of this
The things they decided are good: are they really good? If they decide rape is good, is it good? Who declared their decisions which they call "good" absolutely good?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:55pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
Rape was so good to your God that he watched as his chosen men happily shared virgins as war booty. He even asked rapist to marry their victims.

The bible is filled with genocide and murder as commanded by your God yet you are still talking about murder as a bad thing?
There are a thousand and one threads on this issue. Kindly go to those ones. Don't derail this thread.

Thank you.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:52pm On Jan 10, 2017
felixomor:
They are only trying to hang on some shreds of morality so they wont be despised like the atheists of old
LOL. It's hypocrisy/inconsistency to hang on to some absolute moral values when you cannot say who made them absolute. Almost all the "atheists" in the house can agree that rape is absolutely bad, but they can't say who pronounced it absolutely bad.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:43pm On Jan 10, 2017
No "atheist" has been able to give us the reason why rape or murder is bad absolutely. Could it be that they are not really moral subjectivists as they claim?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:33pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary:
Yes u can. But do u know the futurehuh No. Does ur said God know the future? Yes. So if God knows that his purpose would fall through, yet he goes ahead to give someone a purpose which he knows would eventually fail. I don't know how u still don't see the inconsistencies here man. [/i]
How can GOD tamper with what you want to do just because He knows the future? That GOD knows that mr. A would end up in hell: does it mean GOD is the reason why mr. A will enter hell? especially when GOD made available chances for mr. A to avoid hell, and that people go to hell based on what they do?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:24pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary, please don't derail this thread by bringing in talks about evolution. Please, refute the OP or go to another thread.

Thank you.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:21pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary:
Did u even read what I wrote? I said we choose our purpose. They are not integrated into us.
Life, then, is utimately purposeless. We are on earth for no reason. That's what you mean. Life is meaningless. We only struggle to give it meaning. Nice and healthy view.


God gave man freewill yet he has a purpose for ushuh You still don't see the inconsistencies right?
I can have a purpose for my son: to make him a medical doctor. But then he can choose to be a lawyer. You now see what freewill is?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:13pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
okay, so is there any manmade law against that?
Is giving to charity good?

If yes, who pronounced it absolutely good?

It cannot be a group of persons because each of them is just of the opinion that charity is good. That the opinions of 5 or 10 or 1 millon persons are coincidentally the same does not turn what could be a relative(giving charity) into a moral absolute.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:04pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
give me examples of those things universally agreed on as "good"
Come on. Don't be dodgy. Are you saying that there is nothing universally agreed upon as good?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 7:02pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
the law is binding so long you're living in the environment of that law, you're subjected to it
Who made it binding? Who said killing is bad?

people gave the lawmakers the authority

we vote the president, senators, house of reps, Governors, house of assembly, local govt chairmen, councillors etc WE all combined to give them that power; a functioning society needs laws to checkmate things
If nothing is universally agreed upon as good, why will the belief of probably 10 million people make a relative absolute and binding? Can it not be seen that "killing is bad" is just the opinion of one random person, and which happens to coincidentally be the opinion of the next person? What authority has a group of persons to declare a moral absolute?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:56pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
and saying absolute morality comes from a god puts you in a position that you can't possibly criticise Al Qaeda, boko Haram for the destructions they're doing since they also are working with absolute morality which comes from their version of god; you also can't possibly criticise the killing of twins, Apostasy laws, Honour killings etc
I have not pointed out any absolute moral value. Moreover, this indicates that you don't really know what I'm talking about when I say absolute moral values. It is simply something that is universally agreed upon as moral/good.

So, are you saying that there is nothing universally agreed upon as good?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:47pm On Jan 10, 2017
hopefulLandlord:
He's outraged because violent murder goes against the laws of the land he's in; its a felony
Who made the laws binding? Who gave him/her/them the authority? Who said killing is bad? Does the belief of a million human beings turn a relative into an absolute?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:43pm On Jan 10, 2017
dalaman:
What is the purpose of humans? The universal purpose of humans that is acceptable by all humans on earth is what?
If life has no purpose and meaning, and you exist today by chance, why do you go on living?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:36pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary:
Not all atheist believe in absolute morality. Morality is obviously subjective to individuals based on their exposure and knowledge.
DoctorAlien:
Now, some atheists might respond, “That’s right! Morality is subjective. We each have the right to create our own moral code. And therefore, you cannot impose your personal morality on other people!” But of course, this statement is self-refuting, because when they say, “you cannot impose your personal morality on other people” they are imposing their personal moral code on other people. When push comes to shove, no one really believes that morality is merely a subjective, personal choice.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:34pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary,

I'm not impressed that you're throwing non-sequitors and red herrings all over the place. Address the content of the OP. This is not a thread about evolution. Address the inconsistencies pointed out.

Or just pass.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:27pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary:
We have come a long way in civilization and it is undeniably that survival of the fittest got us here to select the best suited to survive.
How did the fittest arrive?

But in this case, our morality are guided by secular laws which has to a great extent helped in ensuring our survival.
What secular laws are guiding our morality? The presence of a law necessitates a lawgiver. Who gave the secular laws?

So u wondering why atheist should bother just keeps me thinking.
Huh
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:24pm On Jan 10, 2017
ValentineMary:
Humans have no predefined purpose, we choose our purpose. As conscious beings, we can choose what we want. If we have a predefined purpose by a good God, then he/she/it is responsible for all the people who became serial killers, rapist and terrorist. Since he gave them an already defined purpose.
Then that would be incompatible with an all loving being. Purpose are attributes of conscious organisms built in by evolution to ensure survival no matter how complex or primitive it might be.
In other words you say that life is meaningless.

GOD gave man freewill. As such, man can do whatever he wants. But he is not free from the consequences of his actions. Any action has a consequence.

Are you confused? How can you say we have no purpose and then say that evolution programmed purpose into us? What is the purpose of man from the evolution POV?
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:06pm On Jan 10, 2017
How could there be laws at all without a lawgiver? The atheist cannot account for

(1) the existence of laws of logic,

(2) why they are immaterial,

(3) why they are universal,

(4) why they do not change with time, and

(5) how human beings can possibly know about them or their properties.

But of course, all these things make perfect sense on the Christian system. Laws of logic owe their existence to the biblical God. Yet they are required to reason rationally, to prove things. So the biblical God must exist in order for reasoning to be possible. Therefore, the best proof of God’s existence is that without Him we couldn’t prove anything at all! The existence of the biblical God is the prerequisite for knowledge and rationality. This is called the “transcendental argument for God” or TAG for short. It is a devastating and conclusive argument, one that only a few people have even attempted to refute (and none of them successfully).
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 6:03pm On Jan 10, 2017
No one is denying that atheists are able to reason and use laws of logic. The point is that if atheism were true, the atheist would not be able to reason or use laws of logic because such things would not be meaningful. The fact that the atheist is able to reason demonstrates that he is wrong. By using that which makes no sense given his worldview, the atheist is being horribly inconsistent. He is using God’s laws of logic, while denying the biblical God that makes such laws possible.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 5:52pm On Jan 10, 2017
However, the atheist cannot account for laws of logic. He cannot make sense of them within his own worldview. How could there be immaterial, universal, invariant, abstract laws in a chance universe formed by a big bang? Why should there be an absolute standard of reasoning if everything is simply “molecules in motion”? Most atheists have a materialistic outlook—meaning they believe that everything that exists is material, or explained by material processes. But laws of logic are not material! You cannot pull a law of logic out of the refrigerator! If atheistic materialism is true, then there could be no laws of logic, since they are immaterial. Thus, logical reasoning would be impossible!
Christianity Etc › Re: Was Peter A Pope? by DoctorAlien(op): 5:41pm On Jan 10, 2017
LEGENDS AND TRADITIONS

When I was in school, I was taught that, as a boy, George Washington chopped down a cherry tree and confessed his transgression to his father saying, "I cannot tell a lie".

Parson Weems' biography of George Washington is the source of that story. According to modern historians, the cherry tree event never happened.I was quite surprised to hear that because I had never questioned the story.

Articles on the Internet say that Parson Weems deliberately created the cherry tree legend some time between 1800 and 1809. But perhaps Parson Weems wasn't deliberately deceiving people. Perhaps he was simply passing on a story that he believed to be true. Either way, modern biographers of George Washington say that the cherry tree episode never really happened.
Christianity Etc › Re: Exposing The Inconsistencies In Atheism by DoctorAlien(op): 5:36pm On Jan 10, 2017
Laws of logic stem from God’s sovereign nature; they are a reflection of the way He thinks. They are immaterial, universal, invariant, abstract entities, because God is an immaterial (Spirit), omnipresent, unchanging God who has all knowledge (Colossians 2:3). Thus, all true statements will be governed by God’s thinking—they will be logical. The law of non-contradiction, for example, stems from the fact that God does not deny Himself (2 Timothy 2:13). The Christian can account for laws of logic; they are the correct standard for reasoning because God is sovereign over all truth. We can know some of God’s thoughts because God has revealed Himself to us through the words of Scripture and the person of Jesus Christ.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (of 137 pages)