₦airaland Forum

Guestmale:
This is the deceit behind this sharia court being propagated by the south west Muslims,why will a Muslim sue a Christian to sharia court and the court went ahead to adjudicate on it knowing fully well the defendant is not a Muslim. This sharia is dead on arrival in south west,we don't want it in the south west no matter under any guise.

I blame those quack journalists in Arise TV for all the rubbish you guys are parroting here.

shortgun:
It's very disturbing, there's no reason a muslim Sharia Court should be operating in Abuja the nation’s capital let alone handle cases involving Christians

Why?

Are the sharia operating states not part of Nigeria and Abuja also their capital city?

FYI, there is only one Sharia Appeal Court that is also subject to the Supreme Court which also is cited in Abuja.

The Sharia Appeal Court is where cases settled in Sharia lower courts are further arbitrated on.

The Sharia Appeal Court has no jurisprudence in any matter arising in Abuja or any state which do not practice Sharia law.

Being cited in Abuja , just as the Supreme Court, is a central location where appeals from lower Sharia courts in States practising Sharia law are settled.

Ignorance.

These ARISE TV journalists are just sensational quacks.

They are only relying on the viral video by the purported shop owner to arrive at a conclusion.

Before this case would have reached the Sharia Appeal Court that has always been cited at Abuja, that means the matter would have been dragging and settled in a lower Sharia court that is sited in one of the northern states that practice sharia law.

Just like there are zonal Appeal courts sited in every zone, the Sharia court of Appeal is located in Abuja . Are the Sharia operating states not part of Nigeria and is Abuja not also their capital city?

The shop landlord was also asked to present his claims of owning the shop by same Sharia court of Appeal. Did he present enough convincing evidence that he is the owner and not the Tennant?

As per the tenant he or she is obviously a Muslim and that's why he or she was dragged to a lower sharia court by the creditor.

Did the Tennant use the property as collateral in being granted a loan by the creditor without the landlord knowledge?

Did the landlord provide compelling evidence in sharia court that the property is indeed his or did the court see an elaborate deception by the debtor to transfer ownership of the property to avoid it being auctioned off to pay his debts?

Arise TV panelists are just being sentimental and sensational and did not do due diligence .

What if in future it is established that the ibo man does not own the property but was used by the so-called tenant to avoid the shop being auctioned off to settle his debts.

This shop is in Abuja where title deeds are well documented with AGIS and I am sure the creditor and the court would have done due diligence to ascertain the real owner of that shop.

Rantingpiglets:
But as PO Propaganda has made you all look senseless, the Nnamdi Kanu matter is your fallback position as your handlers have instructed.

Such a waste of youth masquerading are sophisticated.

It was at this very moment, Kanu knew he fckedup

Rantingpiglets:
This is what Nairaland has turned into. A place where senselessness is given an opportunity to showcase itself

This is why SEUN needs to understand that putting people in sensitive positions to moderate his platform my be based on ethos of principles and NOT FOOLISHNESS.

Why are you ranting ?

The thread pain you?

Then good.

BlackViper:
I wasn't aware that "Lamidi" has now become an insulting name to call someone you don't like😂

What of Giringori ?

The ANC had a military training camp in Mozambique which Mandela was part of.

Most people don't know that the ANC under Mandela was an ultra violent Marxist militia that staged violent attacks on White settlements and committed acts of sabotage during their heydays.

Mozambique is still this day the only African country with a communist government running it.

I am sure Mandela met her back in those ''revolutionary '' days in an ANC camp in Mozambique that might have led to an affair or sort.

She was a rebel comfort woman who cashed out first, by marrying her first and late former rebel husband who ended up ruling Mozambique as a dictator and later switched to Mandela after Winnie was found to be all round no good for nothing slut.

Benzigler:
Why are the southwest people crying and gnashing their teeth over a man who said nobody should beg for fir release? nothing hate and envy can not do

Why are you demanding that a SW man who so happens to be the President free your Barrabas.

Ttalk:
He has been left to defend himself. All the people shouting the zoo will born if Supleme is arrested are now enjoying themselves at home

Even the former AGF he sacked was looking so despondent in court wondering what the hell he got himself into.

Omotosho has made it clear that lamidi must respond to the prosecution's allegations within 6 days and not the 90 days he is demanding .

The only lawyers that will be willing to take up his appeal going forward will be those wanting to cash out from IPOB slush funds or those wanting a Supreme court case.

In response to Lamidi Kanu ranting at Justice Omotosho that his court had no jurisdiction to carry on with the trial, Justice Omotosho replied thus:

The presiding judge, justice James Omotosho ruled that the defendant should open his defence as jurisdictional issues and all others can be challenged at the court of appeal or included in his final written address.

From the statement above, I am sure the Judge has already reached both a verdict and his patience .

The response by Omotosho states clearly that Lamidi should include jurisprudence or lack of in preparing his appeal.

Lamidi madness suddenly disappear.

He thought he could intimidate Justice Omotosho in his own court.

Last minute firing of his legal team who I am sure had advised him to look into entering a plea bargain after Justice Omotosho overruled the ''No case submission '' entered by the defense.

Lamidi thought he will turn the court room to a podium to air his political ideology based on hate and lies .

He thought his monologue sessions on Radio Biafra were he gets instant validation from his extremist semi illiterate followers through SM likes and accolades can be replicated in a court of law .

See as he humble for the very first time.[url][/url]

SpaceX:
Israelis as tourists visit Kenya in large numbers, showing support is the least they can do.....

Jewish tourists have been adjudged to be the worst so much so that most Swiss and European tourist sites refuse their service to them.

In Argentina, Jews are banned from visiting the very scenic Patagonian wild lands after several Jews suffering from PTSD deliberately set off wild fires. Note that Israel has an agreement with Argentina to send their PTSD ridden war criminal IDF soldiers to recoup themselves in Patagonia.

You can google all this.

Mrchippychappy:
There's genocide in Congo and Sudan also sponsored by the UAE, no one talks about that, what about the genocide against Christians in Nigeria? You hear pim from anyone? Baba rest abeg

It will come to a shock to know that every Sunni terrorist group out there is backed by Israel , the US/UK and the crypto Jews ruling the Gulf Kingdom states.

By deception , we shall wage war.

bigpicture001:
All this is what it pastor who isn't a Jew told u...

Plz remind me again, conversation btw Jesus and the woman at the well...

Let's read it again

How can a pastor be a Jew?

As per the Samaritan and Christ, Christ wanted to know her faith and she expressed her belief that Christ was indeed the messiah.

FYI, the Samaritans were descendants of the Kingdom of Israel who had broken free from the Judaic fanatical mob in Judea.

They had intermarried and so were treated worse than dogs by the Jews.

Also, note that Jesus was a Nazarene from Nazareth, a small village in northern Israel.

He too like all Israelites were heavily discriminated by the Jews who claimed the Temple priesthood against direct contravention that the priesthood must only come from the Tribe of Levi.

Christ and every other Israelite were heavily discriminated by the Jews who claimed to be of the tribe of Judah.

The Jews are not of Judah though but a Canaanite people who followed the children of Israel in the second exodus out of Babylon.

They will then muzzle their way and take over the temple rites and polluted the religion .

Even their books make reference to Babylon were it was first compiled hence : The Babylonian Talmud. Why would they name their most sacred collection of books to Babylon and not Jerusalem?

Well, Christ already warned us that you can't serve two masters.

The religion of Judaism is named so because it only applies to Jews who are not Israelites and the religion came over a thousand years after Christianity and has its origins in present day Ukraine by a people known as the khazars who historians now believe were a Canaanite people who had migrated out of the Levant .


Judaism is in every essence antithesis of Christianity and if you have studied their books as I have , you will realize that its central and only purpose is to see to the destruction of Christianity .

Arrowhead71:
God of Abraham who created the whole world said it
The same Bible also prophesied about what is happening in Gaza right now ... so you see is the truth

Genocide is what is happening in Gaza now and the God I worship will not be siding the mass murder of His own children.

Maybe you meant Satan because the Jews you so much glorify today have no business with the Torah but are a new religion formed in the early first millinuem and has no similarity in doctrine or ritual practice with Temple Hebrew religion of Moses. They are not even by blood descendants of Abraham. Only present day Palestinians share 98% DNA similarity with ancient Israelites.

So if you believe in the bloodline of Abraham and the doctrine of the Torah , you will not be supporting those who are of the synagogue of Satan murdering the only known and true descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

bigpicture001:
God did not send Jesus to earth to save the Christians... He did so to save the Jews...

So the Jews are more important to God than christians...

He made a convenant with the Jews, not the christians

Oh my.

What a very demeaning thing to say.

Christ is the salvation of all mankind.

He came to the Jews first because that was what God's covenant with Abraham had promised.

God knew they will reject His Son and when they did, the covenant came to null and now salvation is for all mankind.

Mrchippychappy:
Inspired by what the Kenyans did recently with their march for Israel, I am trying to start a million man march for this cause. We need to raise support for God's people all over Nigeria, we would start from Kaduna and then Kano and Katsina as well. Are there others who might be interested?

Kanu needed this most but you all backed out.

Funny you.

Mrfeel:
Which laws gave Fulani herdsmen the right to arm themselves attack whoever they want,then call the government for negotiation on their own terms , after the negotiating leave with the arms they came with,no arrest made ?

You are now down to whataboutism.

The SE governors formed a regional security outfit backed by law after seeing same done by the SW.

But unlike in the SW, the regional security outfit was never embraced by the people and they preferred to invite ESN instead as their community security.

This will later pitch the ESN against the regional security outfit in full blown war.

You can refer to communities in Anambra and Imo who preferred ESN to the regular security outfits and the regional one how it all turned out for them.

In Orsu, the situation became so pathetic that same ESN under another faction became a source of unmitigated terror to the people so much so that they had to send an SOS to the Federal govt to come help them to chase ESN out of their lands.

In Anambra , communities that have been abandoned since 2020 are only seeing a resurgence of life after the entire communities were abandoned for ESN.

All these are verifiable facts.

Or you rather have your own terrorists terrorise your people in the guise of fighting Fulani terrorists?

brain54:
They should pray for Kenya first...


Yeye dey smell!

What these ones don't know is that if the Jewish Territorialists had prevailed over their Zionist counterparts in the early 20th century, they would have been facing what the Palestinians are going through today.

Mrfeel:
A civil defense armed militia for self defense yes , spiral out to become a terro to the people, this is something you or anyone can not proof in court, cause as long as nnamdi kanu and the civil defense militia he created are concerned they protected the people, provide your evidence

Which law gave him the backing to form his armed militia?

That alone is a threat to Government's monopoly on violence.

We Dreamt of Africa: The Aborted Plan for a Jewish Homeland in Kenya

East Africa was one of the places that European Jews considered as a potential homeland in the early twentieth century but a proposal wrongly called the Uganda Plan, because the Uasin Gishu plateau was believed to lie in the neighbouring Uganda Protectorate, came to naught.


We Dreamt of Africa: The Aborted Plan for a Jewish Homeland in Kenya


Jewish plans in the 1900s to create a homeland in the highlands of East Africa came to nothing. If they had gone ahead, the Holocaust may never have happened. The state of Israel may never have been created. Conflict between Jews and Palestinians may never have happened either – or not on anything like on the same scale.

Far-fetched? It may not be as fanciful as it sounds. These plans, in many ways delusional and impractical, are now long forgotten, not least by most Jews. But at the time, they were not only seriously considered by some European Jews desperate to find a foreign refuge safe from antisemitic pogroms, but also encouraged by the British government. As conflict rages in Israel and Gaza, and different peoples stake historical claims to ethnic homelands, it is timely to revisit this bizarre story of what might have been.

Britain then ruled the Protectorate of British East Africa (now Kenya), although the territory did not become a colony until 1920. Jews considered settling on the Uasin Gishu plateau after British Colonial Secretary, Joseph Chamberlain, offered it to them following a visit to the Protectorate in 1902. This is the man who infamously called the lands Britain colonised in Africa an “imperial estate”. Chamberlain told the Jews that this 23,000-square-mile homeland could be self-governing. In some official papers, it is referred to as a “Jewish Colony” (see for example the correspondence between Protectorate Commissioner Sir Charles Eliot and the Foreign Office about his resignation over land concessions, published in July 1904). The promised land was later downsized to 4,950 square miles. “Samson” became the codename for East Africa in Zionist communications.

At the time, the proposal was wrongly called the Uganda Plan because the Uasin Gishu plateau was believed to lie in the neighbouring Uganda Protectorate.

Africans were not consulted, of course. There would almost certainly have been conflict between Jewish settlers and local communities. British soldier Colonel Meinertzhagen (who murdered Nandi prophet Koitalel Arap Samoei in 1905) foresaw such clashes, and fiercely opposed the plan. Though an ardent Zionist, he declared: “God knows there will be enough trouble in 50 years when the natives get educated!” Charles Eliot also feared tensions between European farmers and Africans, the Maasai in particular: “If we are once committed to the introduction of Europeans among native races, conflicts are probable, and, perhaps, inevitable.” Some British officials were particularly concerned that racist Boers from South Africa might incite conflict.

The plateau was said to be empty, free of people. That was belied by reports of Maasai warriors who allegedly threatened an exploratory expedition sent to scout the area. The “explorers” also mentioned coming across Nandi, and may have confused the two groups. What were Maasai and Nandi doing there if the plateau was unpopulated? A clue is in the name: il-uasin kishu (or il-wuasin kishu) means ‘the patchy cattle’ in the Maa language, and is also the name of a Maasai section that once lived there. The old lie of terra nullius, or uninhabited lands, has been used down the centuries to “justify” colonial conquest in many parts of the world. Sir Harry Johnston, former commissioner of the Uganda Protectorate, declared in a letter reprinted in the African Standard that the plateau “was one of the best pieces of unoccupied land which could be found … in the British Empire”. This was a turnaround; Johnston had previously been hostile to the plan.

East Africa wasn’t the only place European Jews considered as a potential homeland in the early twentieth century. (There were earlier precedents: by the spring of 1886 some 7,000 Jews had relocated to Argentina, but saw it more as a place of safety than a homeland.) Among others, Jews also investigated sites in Angola, Tasmania, Madagascar, upstate New York, Dutch Guiana (now Suriname), and the Sinai Peninsula, and sent exploratory expeditions to scout them. In a new homeland Jews sought autonomy, self-rule, and the freedom to make their own laws. But above all, they sought safety. (Ironically, the Israeli government now proposes expelling Palestinians from Gaza to the Sinai Peninsula.) American political scientist Barnett R. Rubin has recently written in the Boston Review: “Since the Jewish people had no land on which to establish a state, the Zionist movement went searching for a territory – as well as a sponsor that could assure their access to it. That was how Zionism became entangled with colonialism.”

How the plan was hatched
At the time, the proposal was wrongly called the Uganda Plan because the Uasin Gishu plateau was believed to lie in the neighbouring Uganda Protectorate. (The eastern province of Uganda was moved to British East Africa in April 1902.) The name of the Uganda Railway, built between Mombasa and Kisumu and finished in 1901, may also have contributed to the confusion. Some still refer to the plan by this name. It was first tabled for discussion at the Sixth Zionist Congress in Basel in 1903 by Dr Theodor Herzl, leader of the Zionist Organisation, who is often called the prophet of Zionism. He got a stormy reception; Jews were very divided – many said they must hold out for Palestine and not try to create a homeland anywhere else. The two rival movements were the Zionists and the so-called territorialists, who wanted to explore options beyond Palestine. Congress delegates who opposed the plan saw it as an abandonment of the Palestine dream. The Russian delegates walked out.

The Congress finally voted in favour of sending an expedition to British East Africa to investigate its potential. American scholar Adam Rovner – whose published work I have drawn upon here, together with the 1968 book African Zion by Robert Weisbord – visited all these potential homelands and retraced the steps taken by the expeditions. Rovner makes an interesting point about Jewish exploration of options outside Palestine in this period, and alternative ideologies that now appear to be forgotten: “Today Zionism remains the chief Jewish nationalist ideology, often to the point of rendering past and present alternative visions of nationhood invisible. Yet there are clear indications that at least one territorialist movement garnered more popular support on the yidishe gas – ‘the Jewish street’ – in the first decades of the twentieth century than Zionism.” This was the movement that included the “Kenya” plan.

Chamberlain’s offer followed a shocking pogrom in 1903 in Kishinev (now in Moldova, then part of the Russian empire), in which 49 Jews were killed. This and other massacres, and state-sanctioned antisemitism in general, accelerated Jewish plans to find a homeland overseas. Herzl had already sought help from Britain, both financial and political, and received a warm welcome when he visited London in 1886. Seven years later, after his 1902 visit to East Africa, Chamberlain noted in an official report to the government: “If Dr Herzl were at all inclined to transfer his efforts to East Africa there would be no difficulty in finding land suitable for Jewish settlement.” His motivation wasn’t exactly humanitarian, although in public speeches he spoke of providing “an asylum for these persecuted people”. Britain urgently needed to make the new Uganda Railway pay, aided by an influx of white settlers – preferably wealthy ones.

Exploring Uasin Gishu
A three-man expedition travelled to East Africa in 1904-05 and spent less than two months there. They were an odd party, only one of them Jewish. Major Alfred St Hill Gibbons was an English sportsman, Boer War veteran, explorer and author of travel books. He was hired to manage the expedition. Alfred Kaiser was a Swiss explorer and scientist, and a convert to Islam, who spoke Kiswahili and Arabic. Nachum Wilbusch (he shortened the name from Wilbuschewitz) was a 25-year-old Jewish civil engineer. Russian by birth, he had never been to Africa before, unlike the other two. Rovner describes Wilbusch as a double agent, who planned to sabotage the expedition. The three set off by train from Mombasa accompanied by a headman, servants and ten porters; 35 more porters joined the expedition later. The team included several Maasai warriors who, Wilbusch noted, were believed to have Jewish blood. (There is in fact no evidence that Maasai are related to Jews.) This motley crew only started walking after they reached Nakuru. Two European settlers also accompanied them at the insistence of the settler community.

Hostility soon developed between Gibbons and Wilbusch. The younger man suspected that Gibbons planned to report back favourably, irrespective of whether Uasin Gishu was suitable for settlement or not. Wilbusch accused Gibbons of poor organisation, while Gibbons accused him of being “no help … from start to finish”. Other tensions were rife: the porters refused to enter certain areas “for fear of enemy tribes”. There were arguments with the guides. Food supplies were not sufficient, and luggage and vital equipment had been left behind in Nairobi.

Gibbons, Kaiser and Wilbusch decided to separate, and explore different parts of the plateau in order to cover more ground. That nearly ended in disaster for Wilbusch, who got lost, was forced to eat locusts, and passed out near Mount Sirgoit. Rovner writes: “When he came to, he watched a vulture overhead descend in slow circles.” When the three managed to reunite, Gibbons spoke glowingly of the rich, well-watered land he had seen. The other two had come to the opposite conclusion, although Rovner speculates (after checking Wilbusch’s field notes) that he appears to have drawn conclusions that contradicted his own experience. Along the way, the three men met and consulted with a few Jews who had already moved here from South Africa, mostly to farm. They included the young Abraham Block, who rose from humble beginnings to found the famous chain of hotels.

Scared off by Maasai in war regalia, tales of man-eating lions, and fierce opposition from white settlers, the expedition returned home with mixed reports. Wilbusch’s report ended with the words: “Where nothing exists, nothing can be done.” The three men concluded that the area was “extremely unsuitable for a purely Jewish settlement” and could not support a large colony, although Gibbons remained more positive. By July 1905, at the Seventh Zionist Congress, the plan was officially shelved, although some Jews still wanted to pursue it. The Colonial Office was reportedly relieved.

Objections from settlers and clergy
European settlers and some leading clergy loudly opposed the “Kenya” plan with the aid of a sympathetic media. Their main fear was that Jewish settlement would gobble up the best land in the Protectorate, although of course they wanted to gobble it up themselves. This was a period of intense land speculation, with would-be settlers, many from South Africa, applying for large land grants all over the highlands. Groups of capitalists, notably the East Africa Syndicate, were also applying for land at this time. The Syndicate, whose members included Jewish financiers from the City of London, was granted 500 square miles of the Rift Valley. (Eliot thought the terms of the lease “too easy”, and resigned on a point of principle.) Settlers formed an Anti-Zionist Immigration Committee. Levels of public antisemitism went through the roof, with talk of “Jewganda”, “Jewdrops”, “pauper alien Jews”, and “The Land of Noses”.

Scared off by Maasai in war regalia, tales of man-eating lions, and fierce opposition from white settlers, the expedition returned home with mixed reports.

Many of these racist sentiments were aired in the editorial, news and letters pages of the African Standard. On 5 September 1903, for example, one headline read: “The Threatened Jewish Invasion”. The Standard published a letter signed “Patriot” in June 1904 that called for a boycott of the expedition – it should be refused food, shelter, transport and conversation, the writer believed, and so should any Europeans or Africans who aided it. Unsurprisingly, leading settler Lord Delamere was at the forefront of this local opposition. As early as August 1903, he had sent a telegram to The Times of London declaring: “Feeling here very strong against introduction alien Jews”.

I asked political scientist Barnett Rubin (see earlier mention of his recent article) to comment on this story, and began by asking him if, in his opinion, the plan could have been made to work. “This plan could never have worked. Settlers and natives would have united to prevent it and drive the colonists out. The settlers would have had conflict with the Maasai rather than Palestinians. Even if the Zionist movement had accepted this plan, and some Jews started to settle there, most of the Jews of Europe (95 per cent) would never have considered it. And Jews felt zero attachment to that land, it was meaningless to them.”

How do Jews look back on these events today if they even know about them? “Jews generally don’t know about this and if they do, they consider it as a very minor weird detour in the history of Zionism.”

The Uganda bar, Jerusalem
Tourists visiting downtown Jerusalem today (in dwindling numbers, because of the conflict) may stumble across what Rovner calls a “countercultural pub” called Uganda. Presumably, he means it’s a tad alternative. A framed portrait of Theodor Hertzl, one of the chief architects of the “Uganda Plan”, hangs over the bar. If the customers were asked what it all means, would they be able to answer?

The Jewish community in Kenya
There are about 1,000 Jews living in Kenya today, 300 in the Nairobi Synagogue community. Jews began arriving in 1899, and the Nairobi Congregation was founded in 1904. More Jews continued to arrive from Europe, fleeing the Nazis. Today, the community is largely made up of the children and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors. There is also an African Jewish community called the Kasuku Gathundia, living near Nyahururu.

fabolouz1:
Any country that aligns with Iseral naturally attracts blessings and any country that opposes Israel attract curses.

I bet they won't be in the streets doing this if the Territorialists in the JWC had succeeded in having the British govt grant them Kenya as a Jewish state. If the Zionist hadn't prevailed within the JWC above the Territorialists, these same Kenyans would have been in the same position as the Palestinians.

For more on this Google : Jewish Territorialism vs Zionism.

Mrfeel:
Kanu knows the reason why he included those names as compellable witnesses ,they are not going to give testimonies in his favour but there are things they said and actions they took in the past that nnamdi kanu can use to his defence

He intends to use the court as grounds to air his ideology and not his defense.

As per TY Danjuma , I know the only reason he is being listed is to have him repeat what he said about the Fulani rampage and call for self defense as justification of him forming ESN.

But what Kanu refuses to understand is that a call to self defense in the midst of real and portend danger as that posed by Fulani terrorists does not equate to forming your own armed militia which will later spiral out to become a real terror to the people they claim they are defending.

Kingpele:
This 10th National Assembly is a joke..so if Adams doesn't intervened the senate president would have allowed sen Natasha to go against the senate rules...what an assembly

Akpabio allowed her to speak but when she referred to a matter already concluded, he overruled her.

When Oshiomole stood up to caution Natasha on the rules, Akpabio said he allowed her to speak because he did not know what she wanted to say and when she was ranting on a concluded matter he overruled her.

Natasha is the one to blame here.

Irony1:
Bro bring the write up that shows that it was Ohaneze that instituted court proceeesing against Edo and Lagos.

OK I admit it. It was Edo state government .

But in the pending case in Lagos filed by the self declared Eze of Ajao estate, the case was filed BH the same Eze.

Ofunaofu:
But they can hide behind immunity to commit unimaginable crimes and get away with it.

Who made this law in the first place?

A few people came together to write something they called a law, turned around to describe it as “We the people of Nigeria.

The immunity clause is meant to shield the governor from being distracted from frivolous suits and to concentrate on governance.

If there is a case of law breaking during the tenure of a governor, the law also dictates that legislative branch be the ones to investigate any breach and then impeach the governor out of office from where he loses his immunity and can then be subjected to criminal prosecution.

At the core of this immunity clause is the caveat that the electorate elect only those who are law abiding.

A sitting governor can not be a material witness in a court of law as they are under immunity .

As much as they can't be sued , they also can't sue and so can not also be part of any suit.

The court will have to determine if any of the listed witnesses he intends to call are relevant to the ongoing case.

If he like he can summon Jubril.

Reminds me of how one PDP spokesman (forgot his name) once requested Jonathan as his witness in a case over campaign funds distributed by then NSA Dasuki.

Jonathan refused the summons and the case went on without Jonathan appearing .

Mrexcell:
So a 19yrs old adult can't know what she really wants in life someone that's already using her own car and also featured in so many movies?

Can you compare yourself now to whom you were as a 19y old?

And when has owning and driving a car made one to be fully responsible?

Go to any US High School and see the car park for students.

The way poverty has misconstrued all your brains to assume certain basic material components make one arrived in life needs to be studied.

You can't even use ordinary car to woo a girl in the US unless its a Lamborghini. That Toyota, Benz or Lexus jeep a 21yr old working in retail can qualify for credit to own.

All those Benz cars you see shipped from US are mostly repossessed vehicles from Atlanta after some Akata failed in making their monthly repayment.

You guys just give value to nonsense.

Pierocash:
this is not the problem of Nigeria. There are laws that are punishing such crimes and that is enough. Let them face the real issues affecting Nigerians. They should make laws that improves the lifestyles and standard of living for Nigerians. This is like chasing rat and ignoring the beasts

You think all those Boko terrorists who were groomed as almajiris during their early childhood did not suffer abuse both physical and sexual in the hands of their mallams?

Heard of MK-Ultra programming and how it all stems from subjecting young children to the most depraved and sadistic sexual torture?

The early stages of human development are key to shaping ones personality and character.

Most sociopaths and extreme narcissistic individuals are themselves victims of childhood trauma and exposure to obscene acts of depravity.

FYI, MK Ultra wasa CIA funded operation to create '' super killers '' who showed zero empathy or remorse to their victims.

It all began in the 50s when US Pentagon officials reviewed the kill rates of US soldiers in WW2. The Pentagon was disappointed to find out that most of the men deployed to battle deliberately refused to shoot at or deliberately miss aim their rifles on the enemy forces. The average kill rate for every deployed allied soldier was less than 0.2. With most refusing to shoot and kill the enemy. Most kills in that war were attributed to artillery, Tank fire and aerial bombings.

In the Korean war, this wasn't the case as the US forces saw the enemy as a different race and the kill rates were much higher just as in Vietnam war that was to follow. But a more severe problem arose which was having to deal with the PTSD arising after the conflict.

To both stem out empathy in the battle field and to prevent remorse afterwards , the CIA created the MK Ultra program that first experimented with mind altering drugs before settling for behavioral adjustment by exposing those unfortunate to be in the program to extreme sadistic cruelty. Since most adult participants broke down and lost their minds, the CIA then decided to use young subjects.

The MK Ultra program then began to abduct young Americans below ten to be used as subjects.

While the focus of the MK Ultra program was to see how to produce super killing soldiers, the program was then reviewed to produce super assassins for the CIA global killer network.

And they achieved all this by destroying the innocence of young children.

Mrexcell:
Regina has absolutely no one else to blame but herself she was obviously carried away by ned nwoko's wealth and political influence, she wanted to leverage and use ned's money to maintain and upgrade her already celebrity lifestyle but was later disappointed when she discovered that all the very expensive properties and cars ned was buying for her was in ned's name instead of her own name this now made her to fall into depression and intake of hard drugs for consolation. She is a typical example of a gold digger there's no way she can blame anyone for her current predicament cause she was well exposed before meeting and marrying ned nwoko.

She was barely an adult when she met Ned and had no clue on what she was getting into.

This is where her parents' counselling should have come in but they both failed .
The mother , who is now shifting blame to Regina forgot how she dismissed Regina's father's reservations against the marriage and insisted the marriage must go on without her father's consent.

The mother bears the greatest blame and the father who the mother painted as being absent in her life also shares part of that blame.