GalaticHorde:
putting aside the biblical narratives I like to stick with science which postulates that all pure human aborigines are black, their level of blackness is determined by the concentrations of melanin needed for optimum chances of survival in a given climate, the genetic mutations came later, also the breeding with other sapient protohuman species like the Neanderthals in Europe and denosovians in Asia created more diversity. The north Africa climate could never have been peopled by Arabs, they would have died of skin cancers the same way Egyptians could never have been white for same reasons (climate and genetics) so Moorish black Africans with slightly pointed noses(which serves to humidify oxygen intake during a north Africans winter) were the ideal humans with the best likelihood of survival in that climate

Awesome!

Image123:


Lol, only you and your fellow deluded ones know this cockand bull story, no Russian knows this which should tell people something clear.
BTW, the Bible is about Jesus not about Hebrews. Blind man.

Of course in your brainwashed European mind. Everything about the book they gave you is about worshipping that white idol. In fact when they first came, they brought only the new testament and the white idol on a cross for y'all. They didn't tell you that?

GalaticHorde:
don't be a dullard, Berbers are black, not as black as the subsaharan Bantus but black non the less, before the Arab conquests of north Africa during the jihad the only non black people of north Africa were the hyskos invaders of Egypt, the macedonian Ptolemy's and their Macedonian ruling caste of Alexandria, and the Phoenician merchant sailors with coastal settlements around north Africa and the southern Mediterranean coast the greatest of which was the city of Carthage in modern day Tunisia, they were at loggerheads with the dessert tribes of Numidia because they weren't same people, even the Carthaginian general Hannibal savaged Italy in the first Punic war was black and depicted with wooly hair as seen on a Carthaginian coin from that era, lugard favoured the Fulanis because he considered them protoeuropeans even though they were black as bebers conquered parts of Europe during the jihad i.e spain, portugal and Sicily and ruled for hundreds of years, so yes bebers are black but asiatic black not subsaharan black

They are sometimes even darker than sub-saharan Africans. But they are genetically different. Shape of nose, hair texture etc. Even the Arabs shown to us by MSM and Hollywood today are not the aboriginal Arabs.

And thanks for that history. Lugard knew exactly who they were. The Fulani like the Berbers/Moors are ESAU/EDOM and so is Lugard. These black North Africans were the Philistines and Assyrians we read about in the bible. They are the ancestors of the white Edomites. They were the early black Romans who fathered the white Romans and many Europeans today. These black Berbers/Moors are the ancestors of those in the middle East today and transferred their genes to them.

The Bantus/negros (Israelites) have been around and as always were responsible for building the great empires and kingdoms of the world, from Egypt to Babylon (south Sudan/Ethiopia), to Rome to Europe to the U.S. etc.

We are dealing with folks who know us and our history very well but hide it from us. The purpose is to continue the slavery. And that is why our slavery continues from generation to generation.

Solosolojohquay:
If you use your brain when reading your bible you would have realized long time ago that Jesus Christ was black when king herod wanted to kill him as a baby he was smuggled to neighboring Egypt who as at then was inhabited by black Egyptian is it even possible for albino baby to be smuggled to black neighborhood and not notice talkless of a white Caucasian like Jesus reason am now

They prefer foolishness.

Solosolojohquay:
If you use your brain when reading your bible you would have realized long time ago that Jesus Christ was black when king herod wanted to kill him as a baby he was smuggled to neighboring Egypt who as at then was inhabited by black Egyptian is it even possible for albino baby to be smuggled to black neighborhood and not notice talkless of a white Caucasian like Jesus reason am now

Don't mind them... They're afraid of the truth. Their pastor has not preached it yet. CNN has not made the announcement. Folks like them don't want to be free so Caucasians keep scraping artifacts like this, breaking off their noses and lips so these ones can remain asleep.

WatchYourSix:


I want to know naaa..

.u seem to be rambling all day that the entire world is black...and the whites are just lying about everything and you are the right one.

So I want to know if all you have are just theories, statements that can’t be verified and a couple of black& white picture of people in funny old clothes

Go through my old threads. I have discussed extensively on those subjects in the past. I've met many like you who came ranting but now believe and understand the truth. When you are done, come with intelligent questions.

Image123:
Russia that doesn't care much about christianity or any religion. This one thinks they respect or venerate blacks. Ignorance is indeed bliss.

They care very much about Christianity and religion and understand perfectly how it has been used to subdue nations and kingdoms. That is why they have put religion in it's place and not allow it to become a nuisance like we have here among you white Messiah worshipping negros. Why will they place something they know is not indigenous to them higher than their own culture and ideals?

For us, it's not about religion, but about our identity as the greatest people on earth. Recognizing ourselves as the chosen ones to give light and civilization to the world. And reclaiming our culture which was stolen, whitewashed and handed to you slaves as the way to heaven.

WatchYourSix:


U tag everything western propaganda and lies
Suddenly everyone was black to you...
how does this even sound right to you...


So what happened, they lost their melanin??
evolved ?? or they were chased from everywhere they existed to Africa accross the oceans??

....then the whites went back to recapture them in slave trades expeditions..??

Your theories or so called facts are half conspiracy theory....and please, stop yelling that everything is western lies by just posting pictures of some black people....

Are you asking to know or you are arguing? I need to know, because I don't waste my time.

Razgas:
you know what...you are right. The whole world was black

Actually, you're right. There were no Caucasians before 700 BC. All indigenous populations of the earth were dark skinned, from brown to black. Know this and be free.

WatchYourSix:


It’s convenient how u dogged the fact that they explored and took Alaska and Siberia near to them just like the fulani did in africa..


I don’t get you...is it weird to you that taking territories required resources, man power, technology, including money..??

All the same, there's no concrete proof that they lacked the resources.

Fulani had small resources to invade territories close to them...if they had the financial capacity, technology and ambition they would probably cross the ocean to America before the Europeans took it from the red black indians..

I'm always careful of the poison of western media. They were just as black as any African before the raping, killing and subjugation of the indigenous people.

Razgas:
Lol olodo berbers are black? A few west Africans (mainly hausa) were slaves in North Africa and now settled. Those are not berbers. Libya is 90% berber. Are Libyans black?

Mainstream media promote the whitish race as Berbers so idiots like you possessed by the white Jesus bug may be happy. It's the same with white Egyptians, white Arabs etc.

Even the earliest Greeks, Romans, Europeans Australians, Americans, Chinese etc were dark skinned people. But I know it's all too big for buffoons to grasp.

Hausas and Berbers do not have the same DNA. I have studied the DNA haplogrous.

WatchYourSix:


They weren’t interest, yet they took Siberia and Alaska...?? their leaders ddnt have the wealth Europeans leaders had making them unambitious to take territories.....

Taking territories was common back then unless you don’t have the resources like Africa and other nations that were colonized.....even the fulani was ravaging across Africa, trying to take colonies...

Suddenly you people want to paint Russia as the good guy...u are free to follow whatever narrative you want..

Fulani must have been wealthier than broke Russia then to be taking territories. How about prioritization?

siofra:


Nowhere in history books or Google have I seen that the Soviet Union lacked resources to colonise Africa. They just weren't interested.

Western media will always attack anything Russia. They have ready answers for everything.

Razgas:
childish argument honestly. So if the white new comers in South Africa could not entirely replace the blacks how come they did it only in the middle East? I really don't argue with conspiracy theorists because they arguments isn't based on any known science

If you want to ask questions, humbly do so and learn, rather than pretend to be arguing.
You do not even posses the basic knowledge to engage me....only white supremacist brianwashing.

Have you compared the DNA of these black Berbers with your socalled middle Easterners? And you speak of "known science".

Razgas:
Lol...any time I read this type of nonsense I shake my head. The reason history is important is for educated people to make educated guesses.
We don't have a picture of all these people but we know where they lived. They lived in the middle East. How does the middle easternmost look? Do they look black? Even Sudan and Mauritania that are closest to black Africa are they pure black? Nawab for una honestly

All of the so-called middle East region was populated by black people at a time in history. The mixed (whitish) people you see there today are new comers. You can trace their genes to the black North African Berbers/Moor's who are the biblical Philistines and Assyrians (Pic below). Neither Abraham, nor the children of YAKUBI/Israel lived in the middle East because that was not the promised land.

Sub-saharan Africa is the land of promise. This is where the real people of the book settled after leaving Egypt with the Exodus but the agendists have deceived the world and our people to look to fake 1948 land and to a white MESSIAH while they rape our land.

There is more than enough proof in the form of scripture, old books, journals, artifacts etc. to prove this. So humble yourself, some have been on this road a long time.

WatchYourSix:

If you read through the Age of Exploration or the 'Age of Discovery names like Columbus, Balboa, Ferdinand Magellan, Cartier, Cabot, will come up.These were mostly European explorers.

The Russians did not take their exploration or discovery too far...it was largely due to resources limitation and ambition of the rulers of that time after conquers like Ivan the terrible.

Was it resources limitation that kept them away from the Berlin conference where they shared Africa like goat meat (which by the way is prophetic)?

Joel 3:2
[2]I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.

Bantus/negros were scattered among the nations through slave trade and their land shared.

Every nation of that time that had resources to explore during the age of exploration was part of colonizing and slave trade.. let’s not paint Russia as saints here...

Well, people don't just get up and go take another man's land or resources in the name of exploration. It was all about CONQUEST. Kingdoms rising and overthrowing kingdoms.

Such is still the case even today. We are still under the power of the Beast ROME aka EDOM aka BABYLON.

YES they all have their different agendas, but it's praiseworthy that Russia kept this history of the chosen people and did not partake in their destruction. I see them intervene on their behalf in the future (in sub-saharan Africa) even though like you argued, it could as well be for their (Russia's) own benefit.

OBALOLA55:
TOUCHED DOWN

WatchYourSix:
Crossing the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea to capture slaves required resources..... some countries had plenty money for exploring when they found Africa

Some nations ddnt have.. it’s that simple

And your point?

Ammishaddai:
They were blacks?

Yes they were

Russia is one country that knows and has kept the truth regarding early Christian artifacts. No wonder Russia never kept black slaves, nor did they take part in selling black people.

If the Vatican should open their secret archive, the things hidden there can bring this world to an end.

An interesting old thread. I'm glad I found it.

This Christian man fought to defend his idolatry and white Jesus. Did he succeed?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5ZYYBfNsTE

Sadly, their lives don't count, so all the military has been moved to the East where lives count.

RIP to the dead.

History they wish never happened. History they can never deny. You owe it to your children to tell the truth and break the yoke of slavery.

GodIsDead:

Facepalm

I'm sticking to the literal interpretations of the story as presented in all its source materials. And the conclusions I've made are perfectly reasonable and within the realms of logic and common sense

This is an easy(R) thing in the eyes of the Lord; he will also deliver Moab into your hands.

Please indulge me and tell me your understanding of this verse

Moab is a people, not a land. Just like Jacob/Yasharel/Israel is a people, not a land.. The biblical children of Israel are below the Sahara in Africa while the agendists deceive the world that the Europeans in the fake land in the negev are the people of the book.

Land is named after the people not the other way round. So do not use colonial mentality to interpret the scriptures. Where colonialists renamed lands and people in order to divide and rule and steal people's inheritance.

oliviabeem:
If this is true, then it is a nice one

Look out for the clauses in that antigrazing bill Ayade signed. I don't trust the man...he is desperate to please Buhari.

As long as you preach this white Jesus capitalist gospel, you are not preaching the Kingdom and you are not against Lucifer. This is for y'all CE fanatics who keep digging up old posts and liking them. You'll get what you bargained for, since Seun will not allow us delete or hide old posts.

Hehehe Christianity.

GreatAxeMan:
Colored photograph was extremely rare and expensive in the early 20th Century so this is likely photoshopped.

The Ainu are not and have never been black.

If anything they actually look more like Turkic People (like Mongolians, Yakuts etc) and in some cases some of them look caucasian/white people.

Secondly, the Ainu have historically been marginalised in Japan because their indiginous home which is the island of Hokkaido (the Northernmost part of Japan).

Japan itself is one of the most homogenous countries in the world and the Ainu historically has very low rates of marriage outside of their ethnicity.

You just open your mouth waaaah!

Rare but they existed. Those are military generals in that photo, and bearing in mind that the military are usually the earliest users of technology, ever before they're available to the public, this shouldn't be a surprise.

[s]As a black man, I've always been ashamed at the low self esteem of Africans who always want to claim the cultural achievements of others as their own, even while their continent remains the most backward and underdeveloped place on earth.[/s]

NONSESE

MrSamsung:


Please can you give just three examples?

1. There is evidence of Iron works in ancient Igbo land ever before such knowledge got to Europe.
2. Agricultural farming techniques were developed by the bantus and such knowledge spread as they migrated.
3. The first University in the world was in Timbuktu, West Africa.
4. Black Moors and Negros (Israelites) conquered, civilized southern Europe. They ruled Spain and Portugal for over 700 years (from the year 711 to 1492) , introducing new scientific techniques to Europe, such as in Astronomy, Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics, Geography and Philosophy flourished in Moorish Spain.
5. The blacks (Moors) taught dressing and even the concept of bathing.

LordReed:


Is there anyone disputing that modern humans arose from the African continent?

That's up to you to find out . Make your own findings, I've done mine.

MALIGNANTGuest:

Don't mind them.
Rather than studying and learning from History.
People are busy making research for them, yet you see them run down the personality with their overwhelming & conspicuous ignorance.

Thank you