₦airaland Forum

gidgiddy:
As much as I think that Ihedioha was robbed, this Bayelsa case has shown that the supreme court does not reverse its self, they cant afford to. If the supreme starts reversing its judgment, everyone whoever lost at the supreme will come for judgment review.

The Supreme court never reverses its self, the only thing they can do is correct a clerical error in the judgment

Ihedioha and Lyon never stood a chance

PopsiAde:
I don't think I understand what you mean by the process of Ihedioha coming back to power. can you please explain?

Leo3333:
Wrong.

The Justices also said that the "...applicants failed to point out errors"

The keyword here is "errors".

The SC can upturn its earlier ruling should there be a proven case of clerical errors, which could render the judgment unsuitable as a precedent for similar future cases..

“There must be an end to litigation even if we review this judgment, every disaffected litigant will bring similar applications and the finality of Supreme Court judgments will be lost.”

ChristianNorth:
Exactly what I said. Reversing its judgement in Bayelsa will make the court lose what makes it final.

In IMO, we are not asking the court to set aside itself but to enforce its earlier judgment that declared Nwosu as the rightful candidate of APC.

This automatically will return Ihedioha.

PDP is coming

The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for review of the judgment which sacked the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Bayelsa state, David Lyon and his deputy, Senator Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo.

According to Justice Amina Augie who read the judgment, the application lacks merit, adding that the decisions of the court are final.

She added that the applicants failed to point out errors, stating that the judgment is final for all ages.

The apex court judge said the judgment is final in the ‘real sense’ and no court on earth can review the judgment.

“There must be an end to litigation even if we review this judgment, every disaffected litigant will bring similar applications and the finality of Supreme Court judgments will be lost.”

She added that the applications are frivolous and vexatious, and awarded the cost of N10 million against the applicants to be personally paid by their counsel.

Details later…

Dansuqi:
Can she convince the other panel members or not

Iamgrey5:
Was forgery proven in this case?

Dansuqi:
Mary wont want to lose bayelsa Justin's rivers.she headed that panel,it is not for nothing

Dansuqi:
Once election concludes,all pre election cases are overtaken by election tribunal.being sworn in does not give them immunity from electoral cases.going by records,it is time the supreme court rescinds its decisions.that time is here.the pressure is much