₦airaland Forum

Diademk07:
Scroll down the page and you will see the matches he played with his stats in each match.

All this boring back and forth with you is tiring!

Tiring? When i'm just starting

I'm glad you can see his statistics in each match, can you bring them here for all to see? Why is that hard for you? you have the chance to finally prove your point and make me shut up by bringing those statistics here, why you dey pass?

Diademk07:
I already told you I have no time for that shite!

His stats confirmed my suspicion that he contributed much more in the winter which I already know before that!

If you can't accept that, the floor is all yours!

His statistics only showed that he scored 14goals, it didn't show us how decisive those 14goals were, if you can't prove or show us how decisive those goals were, then the floor is all MINE

Diademk07:
Lol.

The site I posted showed Hazard contribution which happened much more in the winter than in the summer! Whether you keep banging your head or telling yourself it aint true, the stats already proved that's the truth!

I have no time to waste on useless argument!

Very good, use that same site to tell us those decisive goals hazard scored in the second half of the season that made them win the league, you've been only able to call the game he scored against us, the site is there, list other games

Key word here is "decisive"

Diademk07:
One is his lone goal against us. I can't waste my time on others!

I know for a fact that without Hazard, the title wouldn't have happened 'cos I watch them a lot.

I took my time to list out all the games chelsea played in the premier league starting from January and also citing the games hazard contributed in

When you are ready to go into a well detailed argument, mention me because I am now ready to put an end to your false claims on this thread

Wingback:
3 setpieces is now equivalent to dominant...oh, how time flies.











Chicarito scored a Perfect hattrick today...Right foot, left foot, header...Still can't fathom why Van Gaal sold him.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXBzsxK4YjU

What led to those set pieces? Was it passing the ball from defender to defender or pressing the opposition? Please pick one of the options and answer simply, as it is above

Since when does dominance not include scoring from set pieces? Please state the year and month, I didn't ask you for long stories, thanks

Diademk07:
Yeah, remembering that performance turned out to be real and not an imagination, So what's the fuss?

That Hazard wasn't able to show his super man strength in every game after he already pulled them to the title?

What kind of question is this for crying out loud!

I asked you some questions in my previous posts which you haven't answered yet, lemme make it clear, if you can prove to us that it was hazard's sheer brilliance alone that won mourinho the title by listing majority of the 38games were his 14goals and 11assists were very decisive compared to costa's 21 goals, I would surrender

Diademk07:
They still got thrashed! Did you think a Bayern or Barca team who were about to win/just won the league would get thrashed like that? LOL!

But sheer brilliance alone was in the match

Diademk07:
So?
3-0 is no more trashing because it was their 37th game? LOL!

Don't twist it, your statement, "I remember them getting thrashed 3-0 by westbrom, just to show you how poor they were"

Are you now saying they were poor in the same year you claimed hazard's sheer brilliance won them the league? The year were his goals weren't all that decisive as seen in my previous post

Note: hazard was in that match

Can I say hazard was shite in the first half of the season were it was Costa and Fabregas' sheer brilliance that won them games?

Diademk07:
I already provided the site, check that for yourself!

I watch a lot of Chelsea games with my Cousin so I don't need to review those matches again.

That you didn't know it was chelsea's 37th game of the season that they got thumped 3-0 by westbrom

I'm going to check for costa's statistics in that site, if I don't see it, you'll provide it

Thanks

BossKratos:




So much megedefegede being read on this thread today!



Lmao!!!






***Sips black label, pours dopejemi a double shot of the same***

Thank you jare

Diademk07:
He was as good as the whole team in the first half and when everything turned out shite in the second half, he was the one bailing the team out..

I remembered a Westbrom team trashing Chelsea 3-0 that year, just to show you how poor the team were!
Do you think it was coincidence they turned out shite the following year without Hazard brilliance to constantly bail them out? That Chelsea team was already there for the taking if it weren't for Hazard form in the previous season!

Abegi, People should stop arguing on what they do not know!

West brom vs chelsea, scoreline, 3-0, game 37(chelsea's second to last game of the season)

Don't argue what you don't know

Diademk07:
His 14 goals and 11 assists in which majority of it overturned their deficit or got them into winning position were instrumental. You won't even see any Chelsea fan dispute that. if you know nothing about Chelsea team that year, get yourself updated and stop asking me yeye question!

E never reach to make your temper boil

I asked you to bring the same statistics you brought out for hazard for Costa, you haven't done that yet

Can you please list the games were "Majority" of his goals and assists overturned their deficit or got them into winning positions?

Note: majority of his goals and assists is equals to majority of the 38games, so don't give me 5 games and still tell me his sheer brilliance alone won mourinho the league, unless you don't know the meaning of "sheer brilliance ALONE". His contributions must be in majority of those games, when I say contributions I mean "Decisive" ones

You have all the time in the world

Diademk07:
Point of correction, goals and assists!

Okay, goals and assists

Explain extensively

Diademk07:
In the second half of course.

I said Hazard wasn't as shite in the 1st half as Fabregas was in the 2nd half. That makes Hazard Chelsea's best player!

Alright, now let's remove Fabregas' assists and Costa's goals since it was hazard's sheer brilliance alone that won mourinho the league, hazard scored 14 goals in 38games that season, just how instrumental was it to their league triumph?

Explain extensively

UniqueGem:
Unlike sane individuals that have 38games a season, Diademk07 only has few games in his own season. Take his 2016/2017 season as a case study where he only had 3 games in that season and Hazard won the league best player, the league title and the balon d'or. He's already 2 games into his own 2018/2019 season and Hazard is fumbling because others are sh.it.

Lmao

Diademk07:
Not like he was as shite as the likes of Fab and Matic in the first half though. He was good in the summer, better in the winter. As simple as abc!

Did you just say Fabregas was shi.t in the first half of the season? Was it in the second half of the season or preseason he made all his assists.

Please elaborate

Diademk07:
As soon as Fabregas turned off his performance, Costa source of productivity were cut off as well!

Note that I'm talking about the second half of that seasons when almost everyone started serving out shite!

Okay, so was it the second half of the season that won chelsea the league? Since you said hazard's sheer brilliance alone won mourinho the league

Diademk07:
Off the top my head, I remembered his lone goal against us.. Also, almost all his goals were instrumental goals that either won the game or drew it for Chelsea..

That said, anyone could see that Hazard's best form started from late dec 2014 to april 2015. That was roughly the same time Barca fans were mocking Chelsea on their acquisition of Fabregas who tends to go off form every winter. Matic became poor as well during that time.

I would rather a Chelsea fan challenge me on this though and tell me if Hazard wasn't head and shoulder above his team mates in the second half of 14/15 season or if the likes of Fabregas and Matic didn't turn out poor in winter.

If almost all his goals were instrumental, what about the 20 to 21 goals Costa scored?

Let's settle this

Let's compare how instrumental the goals they scored were to their league triumph, lets do that

Note: you said Mourihno won the league due to hazard's sheer brilliance ALONE

Diademk07:
Yep..

His first contribution in January was against spurs, they ended up losing that game 5-3

Played two games after that, no contributions, they won 2-0 and 5-0 against Newcastle and swansea respectively

His second contribution was against Manchester city, 1 assist, they drew that game

Third contribution was against Aston Villa, 1 goal, they won 2-1

No contribution in the next game, they won 1-0 against Everton

Fourth contribution was against burnley, 1 assist, they drew that game

Fifth contribution was against Everton, scored the only goal

No contribution in the next game, they drew 1-1

Four games after that he scored 3 times and made two assists

Next games were against arsenal and Leicester, no contributions, they drew one and won one, no contribution

They played crystal palace after that, he scored the only goal, I believe around this period they had already won the league

They played 3 games after that, they drew 1, lost 1 and won 1, One contribution


With all these, i'd like for you to explain extensively how mourinho won the league due to hazard's sheer brilliance alone, I would also like for you to point out the decisive goals he scored in these games and also pull out Diego Costa's statistics that year too

Don't be angry

Chelseafan1:
Ur statement is incomplete na....

Well said to his post again.

Hahahahaha, but he said he would bin hazard.. there was "bin" in the statement and what followed was "hazard"

chrisley024:
My guy accepts any change now o!

Lmao, Chai! Na wa oh

Diademk07:
www.transfermarkt.com/eden-hazard/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/50202/saison/2014/wettbewerb/GB1/verein/631

Check that above..

After the 22nd of Dec, Hazard contributed more to every games Chelsea played than before it and if you check some of the line-ups, you would noticed the midfield packed with either 2 of Mikel, Matic, Ramires or at times, Zouma with just Fabregas above them.

People who watches Chelsea wouldn't even dispute this!

Before I go on, blue ball represents goals While green ball represents assists right?

Chelseafan1:
Well Said.

Are you sure it's well said? He said he would bin hazard oh

I'm using Diademk07 to practice "patience" cause I lack that in reality nowadays

So make una no vex

Diademk07:
When Costa and Fabregas came in as new signings, they were all vibrant until Mourinho saw a chance at winning the Epl due to the position they already attained on the log and went full out defensive by January..

On the other hand, Hazard isn't really a player that works well as a winger in a 4231 tactic to begin with. However, he's got the will and sheer brilliance to take his performance to another level and win games especially when he sees a chance of his team winning a title/cup as shown by his Lille performances. That's why most pundits say "Hazard always plays when he wants to".

Just look at his performance against Spurs for example. He said he was going to stop Spurs from winning the league and many people laughed in his face because he's been out of forms for months and lo, behold, he was something else in that game.

Another thing is he was helped by the way Mourinho packed his midfield in January because the midfield more or less became a 3-man midfield and that gave him the space and opportunity to often roam around every area of the final third and do his thing. Mourinho never knew this though because if he knew, he woulda employ the same tactic to bring out his best.

Very good

With all you posted, I still didn't see how hazard's sheer brilliance alone won mourinho the league when his contributions were less than that of Costa and Fabregas'

Can you be kind enough to bring out chelsea's statistics starting from that January to may? I'd like to see the "full out defensive" chelsea went and the decisive goals hazard scored that period too since Costa and Fabregas stopped playing then

Diademk07:
[Cquote author=dopeJemi post=49658606]

God bless you my brother

Was it only hazard that was in form? What about Fabregas that had the highest number of assists, what about Costa who finished as their top scorer? What about willian, Matic and azpil?

They all stopped playing by Jan.. Only Hazard was existing.

At some point, Mourinho even had Mikel, Matic and Ramires all on the pitch to defend games while Hazard toils and toils to get all the 3 points for them.

You mean they stopped playing by January? Did they also stop playing by February, march, april and may?

What was hazard doing in august, September, October, November and December?

Hazard had less goals and assists than Costa and Fabregas respectively, if i'm not mistaking, 60% of the goals Costa scored were decisive, but mourinho won the league due to "hazard's sheer brilliance".

Please shed more light on this

Diademk07, you are not replying me, i'm waiting

Diademk07:
Was it only Aguero and Van persie that were on form? You forgot the likes of Silva, Yaya, Komapany etc for City?

How about Carrick, Evra, Ferdinard who all looked good under Fergie in his last season?

God bless you my brother

Was it only hazard that was in form? What about Fabregas that had the highest number of assists, what about Costa who finished as their top scorer? What about willian, Matic and azpil?

Diademk07:
I stated here on many times that a 442 tactic with 2-man midfield without a Kante/Keane/Koke kind of player in there hardly work out against decent opposition. However, some coaches compensate for that by having a hardworking workhorse SS, such as Welbeck, a prime Rooney or Okazaki to constantly pressurise the opponent like Welbeck did against Madrid or Okazaki did for Leicester many time.

But yesterday, a lazy lethargic Slimani was used in the SS role..

It's tedious trying to reason with people on here. Simple things that are hardly difficult to understand, you spend hours trying to make them to..

Can you tell me the formation or tactics deployed by ranieri against liverpool?

bigkesh:
You know that movie was made by Aba boys right.....Just like the player,it was a pirated copy

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Diademk07:
Through the sheer hard work of Hazard. That Chelsea team already stopped playing by Jan 2015 and it's no surprise when they continued their horrible form in the following season.

Compared that to the likes of Martial, Rashford, Carrick, Fellaini who all looked good with little dip in their form here or there under Van gaal in his last reign.

Can I say it was due to the sheer hard work of van persie that won fergie the league?

Can I say it was due to the sheer hard work of aguero that won mancini the league?

Answer Yes/No

Can you name the club that have won the league were all the players in the team finished as highest goal scorers without a particular player being exceptionally brilliant?

If yes, please go into details

Diademk07:
Lol!

See that meme coward as usual throwing snide remark.

Apart from the fact that I mentioned that Leicester defence was poor against Liverpool in my discourse with Tess, only an ignorant man would even compare our performance to that of Liverpool!

Liverpool were tearing a Leicester city team that had Okazaki from left to right and created countless of chances compared to our goals which came through setpieces, thanks to our left back, Blind who had a fantastic performance BTW. People's football reasoning on here is quite poor! That's just the fact!

Is okazaki a defender?

When liverpool tore a Leicester team that had okazaki, was it the attack they tore to shreds or the defense?

A Leicester side with okazaki got torn to shreds by liverpool, a Leicester side without okazaki was torn to shreds by man united but it was because the likes of them okazaki did not play, Explain in not more than 50 words

Answer the above questions in that particular order